April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Fecal Coliform “Hot Spots” Monitoring Stacie Greco Senior Environmental Specialist Alachua County Environmental Protection Department.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Pathogen and Turbidity TMDLs and OKR04 Richard Smith, INCOG Oklahoma MS4 Conference Oklahoma City Zoo Education Center November 7-8, 2012.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Public Workshop: RIPDES Draft Phase II Storm Water Regulations RI Department of Environmental Management RIPDES Storm Water Program July 25, 2001 Contacts:
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Regulatory Requirements Background
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Pollution.
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Control Program Timothy Stevens, TMDL Project Manager

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Overview What is a TMDL? Chester Creek impairment Sources of pollution in Chester Creek TMDL process applied to Chester Creek Implementation – current and future Discussion

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Chester Creek Watershed

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL TMDLs 101 What is a Total Maximum Daily Load?

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL TMDL Definition A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards. A TMDL is a designed to help guide the restoration of a waterbody to support all of its designated uses. Basically, a TMDL is a “pollution budget” designed to restore the health of a waterbody.

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL The Ultimate Goal: Attainment of Water Quality Standards and Removal from the Section 303(d) List The process for de-listing requires documentation that the waterbody is attaining (such as implementing a TMDL) or has attained Alaska WQS.

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL TMDL Development Stakeholders were consulted on the best method to use to develop the TMDL SWMM was chosen as the preferred method because of the quantity and quality of available data. –Water quality – Anchorage Municipality –Stream discharge – USGS stream gaging –Land use - Anchorage Municipality –Precipitation- NOAA

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Major Elements of a TMDL Identify pollutant(s) of concern Identify uses that are impacted Identify sources of pollutant(s) Calculate current pollutant loading and the projected capacity of the stream Calculate reduction necessary to meet WQS Suggest ways to reduce/eliminate pollutants

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Pollutant of Concern Currently, Chester Creek, University Lake and Westchester Lagoon are 303(d) listed as not meeting state water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria pollution. They first appeared on the State’s list in 1990

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Designated Uses All waters of the State are required to meet all designated uses unless reclassified. Historical and current water quality data indicate Chester Creek, University Lake and Westchester Lagoon consistently do not meet water quality standards for Water Supply including drinking, culinary and food processing, and occasionally exceed standards for Contact Recreation.

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Background on TMDL Program The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program is required by Section 303(d) of the 1972 Clean Water Act The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is the lead national regulatory agency for TMDL oversight DEC is the State’s regulatory agency for TMDL development, implementation and oversight

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Sources of Pollution Potential sources of fecal coliform pollution Domestic animal waste – pets Wildlife – moose, foxes, rabbits and waterfowl Leaking sewer lines Failing septic systems Indigent people

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Loading capacity – maximum amount of a pollutant a waterbody can receive and still meet WQS Wasteload Allocation – amount of pollutant a waterbody receives from point source pollution Load Allocation – amount of pollutant a waterbody receives from non-point sources Margin of Safety – a safety net TMDL = Σ WLAs + Σ LAs + MOS TMDLs: Calculating a “Pollution Budget”

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Identifying Pollution Sources Point Sources: direct discharge to waterbodies – permitted Nonpoint Sources: indirect discharge (runoff) due to development, construction, forestry, urban areas, etc. – not permitted Background Sources: naturally occurring sources, not due to human activity Sources of pollution are identified and actions are developed to reduce pollutants so that a water can meet WQS

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL TMDL for Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Chester Creek Loading Capacity = 6.46 x 10E11 to 4.15 x 10E12FC/year Wasteload Allocation: (point source) = 100% 5.18 x 10E11 to 3.73 x 10E12FC/year Load Allocation: (nonpoint source) = Zero (0 ) Reduction needed = 54 to 98 percent Margin of Safety = 10%

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Ways to Reduce Fecal Coliform Loading Continue water quality monitoring to determine major sources Implement Best Management Practices Non structural – educational Scoop the poop campaigns Better handling of waste at homes Structural – controls Low impact development Frequent street sweeping Maintaining and increasing greenbelts

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Monitoring Monitoring goals include getting an over all picture of current fecal coliform levels and trying to determine contributions from potential sources It is important to conduct follow-up monitoring to determine if structural and non structural BMPS are reducing fecal coliform levels in Chester Creek DEC is working with the University of Alaska to gather current fecal coliform data for the Chester Creek watershed

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL After a final TMDL is developed... EPA must approve or disapprove State submissions, and if disapproved, to act in lieu of the State.

Chester Creek TMDL at a Glance TMDL is for: Chester Creek, University Lake and Westchester Lagoon Water Quality-limited? Yes Hydrologic Unit Code: Criteria of Concern: Fecal coliform Designated Uses Affected: Water supply and water recreation Major Source(s): Urban runoff Loading Capacity: 6.46 x 10E11 to 4.15 x 10E12FC/year Wasteload Allocation: 5.18 x 10E11 to 3.73 x 10E12FC/year Load Allocation: 0 FC/year Margin of Safety: 10 percent Necessary Annual Reduction: 54 to 98 percent

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Submit Public Comments Comments on draft TMDL can be submitted: – –Fax (907) –TMDL can be found on the DEC website _TMDL_Chester%20Creek%20watershed_April06_05. pdf