Tim Wigley President Western Energy Alliance. Bringing discipline to our advocacy and offering political cover to our friends and allies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What’s the Matter With Kansas? Part III. Capital, Wealth, and Values Last lecture we discussed the role of wealth, party politics, and factions. This.
Advertisements

Battleground Survey 2010 #12676 September 7-9, 2010.
2008 Latino Voter Survey in Key Battleground States Produced by The NALEO Educational Fund and Latino Decisions, Sponsored by AARP October 23, 2008.
March, 2010 Public Support for Energy Reform in Colorado Survey Results.
January 6-8, 2002 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. Battleground 2002 (XXI)
Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.
Advocacy Toolkit for Caregiving Coalitions. Advocacy- Why Now? State Budgets State Budgets Federal Budgets Federal Budgets 65.7 Million Family Caregivers.
Chapter 12 Section 2 Roosevelt and the New Deal
October 27-31, 2013/ N=1,000 Registered “likely” voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL A national survey of 1,000 Registered “Likely”
What should voters know? Information and its importance to the electoral process.
EMC Research, Inc th Street, Suite 820 Oakland, CA (510) EMC # Telephone Survey of Cambrian Elementary School District Voters.
st Street, NW, Suite 401  Washington, DC   The Graduate School of Political Management POLITICS FROM A NEW.
A N I NTRODUCTION TO A DVOCACY : T RAINING G UIDE Ritu R. Sharma Women Thrive Worldwide Ritu R. Sharma Women Thrive Worldwide.
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
1 You as a Caregiver Advocate: How Coalitions Can Impact Federal and State Legislation Today Amy Friedrich-Karnik, Legislative Consultant, NAC 7 th Annual.
I.Why? – Neccessity of Party Programmes II.How? – Elaboration of Party Programmes III. Idendity – The Political Spectrum IV. Examples – Different Political.
NCC Asheville Meeting July 20, 2004 UPDATE: Quota Phase-out & Textile Safeguard.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
1 Howard Learner Executive Director, Environmental Law & Policy Center ABA Webinar on Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges & Solutions for the Green Economy.
Government and Economy Terms Review. What is a Chief of State?
NATIONAL POLL April 24-27, 2014 N=1,960 Likely Voters #
April 22-24, 2001 / N=1,000 Registered Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of Voter Attitudes Nationwide for the #8633.
From Recruitment to Evaluation: How to Build and Maintain an Exceptional Board Matt Kouri | President and Executive Director TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY.
Survey of 49 Swing Congressional Districts Regarding Environmental Issues August 26 - September 2, 2007 Ayres, McHenry & Associates, Inc. 112 North Alfred.
UNIT THREE Political Parties and Interest Groups.
BATTLEGROUND XXV. June 20-23, 2004/ N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. If the election for President were held today, and you had to make.
America’s Voice: Immigration 2008 Presented by Benenson Strategy Group and Lake Research Partners November 13, 2008.
C.9 Political Parties. Third Parties These parties are referred to as third parties because throughout history they have challenged the two major parties.
Virginia Transit Association APTA’s Advocacy and Outreach Campaign to Increase Funding for Public Transportation June 9,
A Worksheet About How to Win the Presidency
What Determines Elections? Linkage Institutions #4.
June 11-13, 2000 / N=1000 “Likely” Voters Nationwide / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes for the #8296.
Consumer Feedback Gathered Through a Telephone Survey N=1,013 April 2013 An Evaluation of Consumer Awareness & Attitudes Regarding Marcellus Shale Drilling.
What Determines Elections? Linkage Institutions #4.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
July 30 - August 3, 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes for the Republican National Convention.
NW Communications & Energy Innovation Conference Presented by John Horvick, Vice President & Political Director September 2015.
Nonprofit VOTE VOTER REGISTRATION BASICS FOR NONPROFITS July 22, 2010.
Successful Practices Network Do Now ! 1.Identify 2 things you think you have done to advocate for CTE. 2.Identify one thing you think.
Headline Here, Times, Bold, 24pt Text here, times, 16pt, double spaced Text here, times, 16pt, double spaced Text here, times, 16pt, double spaced Text.
Marketing Resource Group for The Michigan Chamber of Commerce A survey of 600 likely voters was conducted by live interview April 2-6, A random sample.
FIRST STAGE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PROCESS – CAUCUSES AND PRIMARIES
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
August , 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A rolling sample of N=1,000 Margin of Error +3.1% A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes.
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
13 Groups and Interests. The Pull and Push of Groups and Interests There is a “pull” and a “push” organizing political activity in the United States –There.
March 13-19, 2012 N=500 Hispanic Likely Voters Nationwide.
THE POLL Lake Snell Perry A s s o c i a t e s, I n c March 12-13, 2000 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of Voter Attitudes for.
THE POLL Lake Snell Perry A s s o c i a t e s, I n c May 1-3, 2000 / N=1000 “Likely”Voters nationwide / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes.
& Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide.
March 28-31, 2004/N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. BATTLEGROUND XXIV.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
From Change to Change: Obama and the Tea Party in 2010 Presented by Terry Nelson November 30, 2010 International Democrat Union.
APUSH: Great Depression and New Deal (no images)
July 30 - August 3, 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes for the Democratic National Convention.
Community Mobilization to Improve Population Health Elaine J. Alpert, MD, MPH Adjunct Professor College of Health Disciplines HESO 449 January 2011.
THE POLL May 1-3, 2000 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. #8263 THE POLL.
Warm-Up: How do you think U.S. citizens make informed decisions in elections??? Explain your answer. How do you think U.S. citizens make informed decisions.
Florita Montgomery West Virginia University Extension Allison Nichols West Virginia University Extension Teresa McCoy University of Maryland Extension.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Using Library Perception Information and Impact Data.
Interest Groups Linkage Institutions. Interest Groups  Organized group of individuals seeking to influence the government and policies *they operate.
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Presentation by Donna Brazile Brazile and Associates, LLC March 17, 2011 “ Keys to Successful Campaigns, Tools and Techniques.
Rubio For Senate A Communications Perspective. Where The Campaign Began Marco announces his campaign via YouTube on May 9, 2009 The first poll with Crist.
BATTLEGROUND XXVII.
Voter Engagement Research and Strategy
A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes for the
Parties, Interest Groups, and Public Policy
Chapter 17 Political Parties
Warm Up – March What is an executive order?
Presentation transcript:

Tim Wigley President Western Energy Alliance

Bringing discipline to our advocacy and offering political cover to our friends and allies

 Political “marketing” is different  Unlike typical corporate marketing – with substantial financial resources and time – in an effort to get 3, 5, or 7% of the market share (if lucky) – the “marketing / advocacy” of the Alliance offers little resources, little time, with a requirement to attain 50% PLUS ONE of the “market share”  Laser beam focus is required

 Issue Management Campaigns  Healthy Forests  ESA  ANWR  Gray Wolf Management

Survey conducted March 19-22, 2012 Conducted by The Tarrance Group 1,000 high-performing voters in Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Montana, New Mexico and North Dakota

69% of voters feel the country is on the “wrong track” 59% feel strongly this way Only 26% feel “right track” 10 point gender gap (more men feel wrong track)

42% approve / 54% disapprove 48% strongly disapprove Nationally: 53% approve / 45% disapprove/ 39% strongly disapprove

54% disapprove of his handling of energy issues 37% approve Many voters question whether or not the President truly has an energy policy

55% approve of his efforts to develop alternatives 39% strong approve “peel the onion”

Jobs & Economy: 35% Government Spending: 28% The Environment: 3%

“oil & gas” industry: 48% favorable “natural gas” industry: 69% favorable

72% support increased production 56% strongly support

37% say too many regulations 25% say too few 28% say about right The 28% would be our advocacy target – like an un-decided voter

66% agree that a moratorium on any new rules and regulations is needed This was a major theme in the “ Blueprint ”

High level of awareness 38% very concerned 30% somewhat concerned 30% no concern

28% would support a ban 58% would oppose a ban 38% oppose strongly

82% have seen, read or heard 69% favor development / 55% strongly Only 23% oppose development

What’s the game plan? What do we do with this information?

 More than any previous election, ENERGY issues ARE and WILL CONTINUE to play a major role in the 2012 election cycle  When the economy is strong and the 401(k) is growing – people can afford to be “green”  Issues of the environment have not been in the top 10 issues of concern in ANY survey work I’ve done in the past two years.  Jobs and the economy have been #1 in EVERY survey

 We will conduct “dial test” focus groups to further test specific messages from this survey  We will create a “language dictionary”  Speeches, newsletters, interviews, etc. We try and speak from the same page, of the same book, at the same time  Give elected officials a “backbone of courage” or a “cushion of comfort” as these issues take center stage in the public domain

 I remember the days when….  2000 election brought false hopes  Our grassroots were burned out! We “assumed” things would change and problems solved / reversed from the previous 8 years  Our collective sigh of relief ended up biting us  New Administration shows up in 2009 with a plan, agenda and a determination to get it done

 Part of the blame goes directly to industry who stopped funding grassroots  We’ve already begun the process of re-igniting this old coalition with new techniques and technologies  In May we met with leading sportsmen and conservations groups  We met with Cattlemen last week / larger meeting to follow  On deck: Farm Bureau; Mining; Forestry; recreation communities

Several states will be key “swing” states: Colorado, New Mexico and Montana Not a ton of electoral votes – but difference makers in a close campaign season! Key Senate races in New Mexico, Montana and North Dakota

If there is a change due to the election – this Administration is already looking at what they can do in the “lame duck” period: use of Antiquities Act to create more monuments (de-facto wilderness) And more…via Executive Orders We must be ready!

Please go to our website: Download the document and you can see our strategies for informing the public about the importance of Western energy

Tim Wigley, President Western Energy Alliance