Institutional Review Board And how it affects you.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

All you always wanted to know about Assurances Office of Research Protections (ORP) U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) Fort Detrick,
Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Cooperative Research IRB Brownbag, 3/4/08. ISU Policy Cooperative research projects are those projects which involve more than one institution. The official.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE: Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.
 About SP ERC  Role of SP ERC  SP ERC Members  ERC Operations  Definition of Research  Definition of Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, Collaborator.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
Research and AWC Faculty Seminar, February 19, 2009, Mary Schaal, M.Ed.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Laura M. Argys Associate Dean for Research and Creative Activities College of Liberal Arts and Sciences University of Colorado Denver.
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Human Subjects Research Nellie Quezada-Aragon, Director Office of Compliance Dr. Luis A. Vazquez, Chair NMSU Institutional Review Board
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
University Committee on Human Subjects (UCHS) Our contract with the Federal government is our “Federalwide Assurance” (FWA), and our FWA number is FWA
Institutional Review Board
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
University of Charleston’s
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Introduction to IRB (Institutional Review Board)
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
SOU Institutional Review Board
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
What are the Role & Purview of the IRB?
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Review Board And how it affects you.

 To ensure the institution is in compliance with the HHS Protection of Human Subjects (Federal Regulation 45 CFR part 46).  To be eligible for a Federalwide Assurance (FWA), a commitment that we will comply with this regulation.  To be eligible for grant money.

 A review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.  Research is a systematic investigation designed to contribute to generalizable knowledge.  Human subjects are those about whom an investigator obtains data, or from whom identifiable private information is obtained.

Approve / disapprove research Modify research Hold continuing reviews Observe / verify changes Suspend / terminate approval Observe the consent process and research procedure Require collaborating outside agencies to have an FWA

Five members minimum Both sexes must be included Varied Professions: 1 non-science, 1 science, 1 not affiliated with the institution. Additionally, the board must be culturally diverse, be sensitive to community issues, and have members that understand the research being done.

 Juliana Serafin, Chair  Brad Deel  Debra Mullins  Stephen Cook  Dean Reardon  Jennifer Pack  Lynn Gunnoe *  Diana Long * Nonvoting Members:  Marea Dodd, Assistant to the Board and Recordkeeper  Dennis Flaherty, ad hoc * Denotes an outside representative who is not affiliated with UC

 The IRB meets quarterly to complete full reviews:  August  November  February  May Check with Marea Dodd for specific dates.  The IRB may hold additional, Special Meetings, based on need.

Application for initial reviewApplication for Annual Renewal/Progress ReportAmendments or modificationsReports as indicated by the IRBClosure ReportReports to other agencies may also be required.

Forms and instructions are on the UC website (Faculty and Staff) The primary investigator for research involving human subjects must submit an IRB application. The investigators must have the appropriate NIH training or their application will not be reviewed.

Investigators must have current Training in Protecting Human Research Participants or applications will not be reviewed. Training is found at: phrp.nihtraining.com PI is responsible for submitting a copy of their current certificate with EACH application. Training is good for 3 years from the date of certification. Plan to renew your training before it expires, to avoid delays with your project. PI Certification Expires before project is complete, the project is suspended until: The PI renews training certification, or An application for change in PI to another PI who has training certification, is approved.

NOTE: Our process has changed for issuing application numbers. You will NOT be issued an application numbers, until the project has been approved. Submit (Choose a Method) Signed & Scanned Electronic to: OR Signed Paper Copy to: Marea Dodd, SOP-304 Save Electronic Copy of All Completed Forms Complete Forms(All appropriate) Choose Forms(All appropriate) Review InstructionsForms

Full Committee ReviewExpedited ReviewExempt ReviewAnnual Review

IRB will go over the application at a formal meeting. Modifications may be requested by the IRB before approval is given There must be a quorum present for the IRB to vote and each member will vote to approve or disapprove the project.

Risk Level Minimal Falls into one of nine specific categories (Refer to Instructions for detail): Noninvasive Sample Collection Blood Samples Studies with approved drugs/devices Data that has already been collected or will be collected for non- research purposes Review Two IRB Members are chosen to review.

Risk Level No Risk Minimal Risk Falls into one of six categories: Educational Research Educational Tests Educational Research involving public officials or candidates for office De-identified existing records Research conducted by heads of government department Taste and Food Quality Evaluations Review IRB selects one IRB Member to review

Prisoners Surveying or Interviewing Children Observations of public behavior when investigator participates

CAMC’s IRB actions will be accepted in lieu of UC’s IRB Other Institutions involved in a study must have a FWA and obtain approval from UC’s IRB

Select Application Type: Save a Copy of All Completed Forms: Print Copy & Obtain All Required Signatures: Submit Signed Application: See You will need this for the next two steps. You will also want a copy for your records. Primary Investigator Other Investigator School/Division Chair Electronically to: (Scan entire application and attachments as one inclusive OR Mail Hard Copy to: Marea Dodd, SOP-304, Charleston Campus

If there are changes to the project, such as, PI, PI’s NIH Certification Expires, or Circumstances or situations arise that were not previously know. You MUST notify the IRB. You may NOT begin your project, until you receive written approval from the IRB. Once approved, it is good for one year from date of approval. If you wish to continue beyond one year, you must seek approval through the Renewal Process.

A project must stop at the end of the approved year; unless you have applied for and received approval. Apply at least 60 days before the expiration of your approval. NIH Training Certification must remain current.

At Project Termination Project Completed Funding Ended PI Left University At end of Approved Year Unless completing a Renewal Application

Four Weeks Exempt Six Weeks Expedited Eight Weeks Full Review Submit 60 days prior to expiration of the approved year. Annual Renewal / Progress Report No approval required, due upon the completion or termination of project or suspension of approved year; unless, applying for renewal. Closure

For Additional Assistance, Please Contact: Dr. Juliana Serafin, IRB Chair OR Ms. Marea Dodd, IRB Asst./Recorder Charleston Campus, CTB-716 Charleston Campus, SOP