Steve Krebs and Jed Peters– DTSD-Bureau of Technical Services July 29, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B/C Ratio Engr. Faisal-ur-Rehman CED N-W.F.P UET P.
Advertisements

AD/AB - LCCA 2 nd Session Wednesday, January 29th.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
1 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014.
1 Northeast Corridor Cost Benefit Assessment Status Mark Kipperman SAIC July 14, 2003.
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
Pat Gardiner Bureau Of Maintenance And Operations 1.
Fargo-Moorhead Metro COG Wade E. Kline, AICP.  Depict existing freeway operations: I-94 & 1-29 Metro Area  Model existing conditions (2008), 2015, and.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
A Urban Highway Infrastructure: Design For Long, Long Life Michael I. Darter, Ph.D, PE Principle Engineer, ARA, Inc. Director, Pavement Research Institute,
Alternate Bidding in Missouri Transportation Estimators Association Annual Conference November 2-4, 2005 – Daytona Beach, FL Interstate 44 … South-Central.
FHWA Life Cycle Costs Analysis and Pavement Type Selection Guidance Maryland Concrete 2014 Conference March 18, 2014.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
Steve Krebs, Bob Arndorfer, and Jed Peters – DTSD-Bureau of Technical Services April 29, 2013.
Corrected for Discount Rate.
MIT Research: Effects of Inflation and Volatility on Construction Alternatives.
MIT Research: Effects of Inflation and Volatility on Construction Alternatives.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - In Search of Better Investment Decisions - Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Executive.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
PRIORITIZATION.
Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Methods and Preliminary Results January 10, 2011 John Harvey Nick Santero Lev Khazanovich.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Value Engineering. Definition Value Engineering (VE) is defined as a systematic process of review and analysis of a project, during the concept and design.
Benjamin Krom, PE Michigan Department of Transportation.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Introduction to Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Agency Energy ManagerLife-Cycle Cost Methodology Mike Mills, CPA, BEP.
Transportation Asset Management Presented by: Eric Gabler Economist, Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.
Hcm 2010: work zones.
FINANCING THE EU TRANSPORT POLICY AND TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS. Hugh Rees. BELGRADE APRIL 2012.
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
TRB Planning Applications Identifying the Long-Range Transportation Improvement and Funding Needs for Urban Areas in Texas By Kevin M. Hall, Texas Transportation.
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Highway Costs Spring Highway Transportation Costs Type of CostExamples Highway investment costEngineering design, ROW, grading, drainage, pavement.
Georgia’s Regional Traffic Operations Program Christopher Barrow, E.I.T. Traffic Engineer II.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
2014 Freeway Congestion Monitoring Program MOITS Technical Subcommittee December 9, 2014.
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Street Maintenance Program Update City Council Work Session February 5, 2013 Department of Public Works & Transportation.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
1 Update on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Related Data Activities Wenjing Pu COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee Meeting May 26,
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Presentation to the Washington Transportation Commission March 16, 2010 Washington State Association of County Engineers.
Asphalt Pavement Association of Indiana Annual Winter Conference Michael B. Cline Commissioner, INDOT December 14, 2010.
John Donahue, P.E. Missouri DOT 5 th Annual Building Green with Concrete Workshop June 21, 2012.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Evergreen Highway Corridor Update Planning Commission Workshop March 22, 2016 Jennifer Campos, Senior Planner.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Operations and Service Concept
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Program Plan Development Roundtable December 13, 2016.
Overview Project Limits Improvements Cost Anticipated Schedule
Project Feasibility Analysis
Overview Project Limits Improvements Cost Anticipated Schedule
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Introduction and Applications
Presented by Joy Davis, ITRE TRB Planning Applications Conference
Presentation transcript:

Steve Krebs and Jed Peters– DTSD-Bureau of Technical Services July 29, 2013

 Non-Conservative Costs  4 Policy Options with Implementation Costs  FDM Work Zone Delay Restricted Corridors  High Volume Arterials (color coded peak hour volume map)  TOIP  Freight Network 2

 10 Projects Analyzed  8 Concrete Mainline  2 HMA Mainline  As-built and Estimated FDS Costs 3

 Concrete Mainline Projects  As-built average (avg) cost: $182,920/mile  FDS HMA avg cost: $346,430/mile  FDS concrete avg cost: $265,000/mile  HMA Mainline Projects  As-built avg cost: $123,320/mile  FDS HMA avg cost: $171,600/mile 4

 Concrete Mainline Projects  As-built avg net present value (NPV) life-cycle 50 year cost: $354,120/mile (Original Value: $276,720)  FDS HMA avg NPV life-cycle 50 year cost : $428,310/mile  FDS concrete avg NPV life-cycle 50 year cost : $345,140/mile  HMA Mainline Projects  As-built avg NPV life-cycle 50 year cost : $250,230/mile (orig: $198,050)  FDS HMA avg NPV life-cycle 50 year cost : $243,210/mile * NPV calculated with 3.5% discount rate 5

Conventional DesignFDS HMAFDS Concrete Real Discounted Cost Real Discounted Cost Real Discounted Cost Cost Initial Construction $ 182, $ 346, $ 264, Total NPV of LCCA minus initial construction cost $ 171, $ 81, $ 80, Total NPV of LCCA $ 354,119 $ 428,311 $ 345,137 User Delay Costs - (Scheduled Maintenance, Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, & Unplanned Events) $ 134,056 $ - Cost NPV (Initial Construction + LCCA NPV+ User Delay NPV) $ 488,175 $ 428,311 $ 345,137 Benefits - Initial Cost (NPV) ($182,912) ($123,048) ($39,874) Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

 Estimated As-Built Construction Cost/Mile  Estimated 10” FDS Construction Cost/Mile  Life Cycle Adjusted to Reflect True Life-To-Date  Minimal/Negligible maintenance costs  2012 Project (Year 28 of life cycle)- 8” Shoulders Let Cost/Mile  $333,850/mile  Adjusted LCCA Costs  As-built NPV = $519,200/mile  FDS NPV = $483,850/mile 7

 Selective Application of FDS  High-Volume Arterial Corridors  Mass Evacuation Routes  Incorporate FDS (Existing and Future) into Emergency Planning 8

 Selective Application of FDS  FDM Delay Corridors  High Volume Arterials  TOIP  Freight 9

Miles

11 Volumes Estimated For Highest Direction in 30 th Highest Hour in 2013 : 850 Miles : 1070 Miles : 1180 Miles :1270 Miles :1580 Miles

12 Priority Corridors: 1190 Miles

13 Not Investigated as Stand-Alone

14 ~Equivalent to Backbone System

 High Volume Arterials ($0.89 – $1.3 Billion)  $350 - $518 Million More than Conventional HMA  $89 - $98 Million Less than Minimum Concrete  TOIP Priority Corridors ($985 Million)  $390 Million More than Conventional HMA  $99 Million Less than Minimum Concrete  FDM Delay Restricted Routes ($1.4 Billion)  $548 Million More than Conventional HMA  $139 Million Less than Minimum Concrete  Freight Routes = Backbone System ($1.3 Billion)  $518 Million More than Conventional HMA  $131 Million Less than Minimum Concrete 15

16

 Factor of All (High Volume Arterials, TOIP, Freight, and FDM Delay Corridors)  Driving Need: Traffic Demand  1000 VPH (2013 data) 17

Miles

 Total Cost  FDS: $977 Million  HMA Conventional: $590 Million  Minimum Concrete: $1.1 Billion  FDS Average Annual Cost (Average of 30 Reconstruct or Pavement Replacement projects with 18 Miles/Year)  FDS: $14.9 Million  HMA Conventional: $9 Million  Minimum Concrete: $16.4 Million  Nearly 150 Miles ($119 Million) Completed or Planned  N-S Freeway, Zoo Freeway, IH-39, USH 41 19

20