Recursive methods
Recursion A recursive method is a method that contains a call to itself Often used as an alternative to iteration when iteration is awkward or “inelegant” Each recursive call is given a smaller portion of the original problem Last recursive call solves diminished problem without recursion
Example // method writes digits of a non-negative number, stacked vertically public void write_vertical(int n) { n = Math.abs(n); if (n < 10) System.out.println(“” + n); else { write_vertical(n / 10); System.out.println(“” + n % 10); }
Tracing recursive method write_vertical 1. write_vertical(52406); n=52406 n/10= write_vertical(n/10) ; n=5240 n/10= write_vertical(n/10); n=524 n/10=52 4. write_vertical(n/10); n=52 n/10=5 5. write_vertical(n/10); n=5 Stop recursion! Output: 6. System.out.println(“” + n); System.out.println (“” + n%10); 8. System.out.println (“” + n%10); 9. System.out.println(n%10); 10. System.out.println (“” + n%10);
Elements of recursive method Base caseBase case: problem is simplified to the point where recursion becomes unnecessary: n < 10 Variant expressionVariant expression: the part of the problem that changes, making the problem smaller: n Recursive callRecursive call: method calls itself: write_vertical (n / 10);
How recursion works Activation record: memory block that stores all the information a method needs to work: –values of local variables & parameters –where method should return to (so calling method can resume execution)
How recursion works When a method call is encountered, execution of current method ceases Information for newly called method is stored in an activation record Method executes
How recursion works If new method contains another method call, the process just described repeats Each recursive call generates its own activation record –as each recursive call is encountered, previous activation record is stored on run- time stack –when last call fails to generate a new activation record, stacked calls are removed (in reverse of the order they were stored), and each process continues in succession
Remember, for a recursive method to be successful... Must be a problem with one or more cases in which some subtasks are simpler versions of the original problem - use recursion for these Must also have one or more cases in which entire computation is accomplished without recursion (base case)
Another example: the powers method Suppose you wanted to find the value of X n For most values of n, we can solve this iteratively using a simple loop: int answer = 1; for (int c = 1; c <= n; c++) answer *= X; We can take care of the cases of n=1 or n=0 with simple if statements; but what about a negative value of n?
Finding a recursive solution We can observe that for any value of n, X n is equal to X * X (n-1) Armed with this information, we can easily develop a recursive solution that covers all values of X and n
Recursive power method double rpower (double X, int n) { if (X == 0) return 0; else if (n == 0) return 1; else if (n > 0) return X * rpower(X, n-1); else // n < 0 return 1 / rpower(X, -n); }
Another example: Factorial The factorial of N is the product of the first N positive integers: N * (N – 1) * (N – 2 ) *... * 2 * 1 The factorial of N can be defined recursively as 1 if N = 1 factorial( N ) = N * factorial( N-1 ) otherwise
Recursive Method An recursive method is a method that contains a statement (or statements) that makes a call to itself. Implementing the factorial of N recursively will result in the following method. public int factorial( int N ) { if ( N == 1 ) { return 1; } else { return N * factorial( N-1 ); } } Test to stop or continue. Recursive case: recursion continues. End case: recursion stops.
Another example: Anagram Anagram: A word or phrase formed by rearranging the letters of another word or phrase. For example, Elvis to Lives. We can use a recursive method to derive all anagrams of a given word. When we find the end case (an anagram), we will print it out.
Anagram List all anagrams of a given word. Word C A T C T A A T C A C T T C A T A C Anagrams
Anagram Solution The basic idea is to make recursive calls on a sub- word after every rotation. Here’s how: C C A A T T Recursion A A T T C C T T C C A A Rotate Left C A T C T A A T C A C T T C A T A C
4-letter word example
Anagram Algorithm We find the anagrams by rotating the positions of the letters. The trick is, when the method is called recursively, we pass a word with the first letter cut off. So the words being passed to successive calls are getting shorter and shorter. However, we must access all letters of the word in order to print it out.
Anagram Algorithm We solve this problem by passing two parameters: the prefix and the suffix of a word. In each successive call, the prefix increases by one letter and the suffix decreases by one letter. When the suffix becomes one letter only, the recursion stops.
Anagram Method End case Test Recursive case public void anagram( String prefix, String suffix ) { String newPrefix, newSuffix; int numOfChars = suffix.length(); if (numOfChars == 1) { //End case: print out one anagram System.out.println( prefix + suffix ); } else { for (int i = 1; i <= numOfChars; i++ ) { newSuffix = suffix.substring(1, numOfChars); newPrefix = prefix + suffix.charAt(0); anagram( newPrefix, newSuffix ); //recursive call //rotate left to create a rearranged suffix suffix = newSuffix + suffix.charAt(0); }
A classic: the Towers of Hanoi Initial situation: a stack of donut-shaped disks stacked in in order of decreasing size from bottom to top on a wooden peg Object: move all the disks to a second peg, one at a time –third peg available as temporary holding area –at no time may a larger disk be placed on top of a smaller disk
Solving towers of Hanoi Simplest case: tower of one disk -- move disk to destination peg With stack of two disks: –Move top disk to third peg –Move next disk to destination –Move disk from third peg to destination
Solving towers of Hanoi Simplest case: tower of one disk -- move disk to destination peg With stack of two disks: –Move top disk to third peg –Move next disk to destination –Move disk from third peg to destination
Solving towers of Hanoi Simplest case: tower of one disk -- move disk to destination peg With stack of two disks: –Move top disk to third peg –Move next disk to destination –Move disk from third peg to destination
Solving towers of Hanoi Simplest case: tower of one disk -- move disk to destination peg With stack of two disks: –Move top disk to third peg –Move next disk to destination –Move disk from third peg to destination
Solving towers of Hanoi Simplest case: tower of one disk -- move disk to destination peg With stack of two disks: –Move top disk to third peg –Move next disk to destination –Move disk from third peg to destination
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi Stack of 3: –Move 2 disks from 1st peg to 3rd peg, using method already described –Move 1 disk from 1st to 2nd –Move 2 disks from 3rd to 2nd
Solving towers of Hanoi When there are two or more disks to move, always use third peg With more than two disks, we can solve the problem recursively by recognizing that the pegs are interchangeable -- that is, any peg can be used as source, destination, or “spare”
Solving towers of Hanoi In general, for a stack of n disks: –Move n-1 disks from peg 1 to peg 3 –Move 1 disk from peg 1 to peg 2 –Move n-1 disks from peg 3 to peg 2
15.4 Towers of Hanoi The goal of the Towers of Hanoi puzzle is to move N disks from peg 1 to peg 3: –You must move one disk at a time. –You must never place a larger disk on top of a smaller disk.
15.4 Towers of Hanoi This puzzle can be solved effectively using recursion. The top N-1 disks must be moved to peg 2, allowing you to then move the largest disk from peg 1 to peg 3. You can then move the N-1 disks from peg 2 to peg 3.
15.4 Towers of Hanoi public void towersOfHanoi (int N, int from, int to, int spare) { if (N == 1) { moveOne(from, to); } else { towersOfHanoi(N-1, from, spare, to); moveOne (from, to); towersOfHanoi(N-1, spare, to, from); } private void moveOne(int from, int to) { System.out.println(from + “--->” + to); }
When Not to Use Recursion When recursive algorithms are designed carelessly, it can lead to very inefficient and unacceptable solutions. For example, consider the following: public int fibonacci( int N ) { if (N == 0 || N == 1) { return 1; } else { return fibonacci(N-1) + fibonacci(N-2); }
Excessive Repetition Recursive Fibonacci ends up repeating the same computation numerous times.
Nonrecursive Fibonacci public int fibonacci( int N ) { int fibN, fibN1, fibN2, cnt; if (N == 0 || N == 1 ) { return 1; } else { fibN1 = fibN2 = 1; cnt = 2; while ( cnt <= N ) { fibN = fibN1 + fibN2; //get the next fib no. fibN1 = fibN2; fibN2 = fibN; cnt ++; } return fibN; }
When Not to Use Recursion In general, use recursion if –A recursive solution is natural and easy to understand. –A recursive solution does not result in excessive duplicate computation. –The equivalent iterative solution is too complex.
Preventing infinite recursion One-level recursion: every case is either a stopping case or makes a recursive call to a stopping case Since most recursive functions are, or have the potential to be, recursive beyond just one level, need more general method for determining whether or not recursion will stop
Preventing infinite recursion variant expressionDefine a variant expression –numeric quantity that decreases by a fixed amount on each recursive call –in towers of Hanoi, variant expression was height -- each recursive call used height -1 as parameter threshold valueBase case is when variant expression is less than or equal to its threshold value
Proving correctness of a recursive function Show that there is no infinite recursion: –define the variant expression –ensure that it reaches its threshold value In other words, show that the function always terminates eventually