HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 20,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.

Advertisements

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.

Strategy and Innovation Workgroup October 21, 2014 David Lansky, chair Jennifer Covich, co-chair.

DRAFT Stage 3 Update Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup August 16, 2013.

VISION FOR MEANINGFUL USE. 2 Meaningful Use Workgroup Co-Chairs: Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Farzad Mostashari, New York City Health Department.

HITSC: Health Information Technology “Summer Camp” Doug Fridsma

Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University December 15, 2009.

Accountable Care Quality Measures Subgroup October 28, 2013.

Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co-Chair.

Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations for Response to Stage 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making on EHR Incentive Program Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation,

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

Privacy and Security Workgroup October 14, 2014 Deven McGraw, chair Stan Crosley, co-chair.

CMS NPRM proposes requirements for Stage 3 of EHR Incentive Programs (in FR March 30, 2015) In conjunction with.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation Paul Tang, Chair Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak. Co-Chair Columbia University.

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting July 17, 2013 Jodi Daniel Director, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC 0.

Meaningful Use The Catalyst for Connected Health Sameer Bade Strategic Product Planner.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair December 13,

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University August 14, 2009.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Policy Committee Meeting July 9, 2013 Jodi Daniel Director, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC 0.

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

HIT Policy Committee Strategic Plan Workgroup Paul Tang, Chair Palo Alto Medical Foundation Jodi Daniel, Co-Chair ONC December 15, 2009.

HIT Policy Committee Nationwide Health Information Network Governance Workgroup Recommendations Accepted by the HITPC on 12/13/10 Nationwide Health Information.

HIT Policy Committee Strategic Plan Workgroup Strategic Framework Paul Tang, Chair Palo Alto Medical Foundation Jodi Daniel, Co-Chair ONC March 17, 2010.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Proposed Recommendations on MU Notice of Proposed Rule Making Paul Tang, Chair Palo Alto Medical Foundation.

HIT Policy Committee Governance Workgroup Update John Lumpkin, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Chair September 14, 2010.

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of Commerce,

HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,

Clinical Documentation Hearing Recommendations Meaningful Use and Certification and Adoption Workgroups Paul Tang, MU Workgroup Chair Larry Wolf, C&A Workgroup.

Policy Direction and Implications of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Marty Fattig, CEO Nemaha County Hospital August 2, 2011.

Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.

Stage 3 Draft Recommendations Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup March 18, 2014.

Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.

Certification and Adoption Workgroup – Policy Committee Update on the ONC Standards and Certification NPRM Marc Probst, workgroup co-chair Larry Wolf,

Information Exchange WG HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi, MA eHealth Collaborative CHAIR 04/04/2012 Office of the National.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Patient Matching Recommendations February 2,

HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.

Recommendations to the HIT Policy Committee on ONC Standards and Certification NPRM May 2, 2012 Certification and Adoption Workgroup Marc Probst, Intermountain.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair June 25, 2010.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Standards Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

Stage 3 Update Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup January 28, 2014.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair December 13,

Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.

HIT Standards Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee on July 16, 2009 As Presented by:Paul Tang, Chair Palo Alto Medical.

Quality Measures Workgroup David Lansky, PhD 1. Quality Measures Workgroup 2012 Stage 2 Quality Measure Development Stage 2 NPRM Review Alignment with.

Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair December 1, 2015 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University January 13, 2010.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Standards Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

What Lies Ahead for ONC Meaningful Use and Beyond Farzad Mostashari, MD ScM National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.

HIT Standards Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair.

Privacy and Security Tiger Team Potential Questions for Request for Comment Meaningful Use Stage 3 October 3, 2012.

Draft – discussion only Consumer Workgroup Christine Bechtel, chair Neil Calman, co-chair December 8, 2014.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 27,

Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.

Workgroup Introduction & Trust Mark Briefing Transport & Security Standards Workgroup September 22, 2014.

Quality Measures Workgroup Recommendations QUALITY MEASURE WORKGROUP RECOMMENDATIONS Mar 2, 2011.

0 HIT Policy Committee Governance Workgroup May 11, 2012.

Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup February 17, 2015 Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.

QMWG Measures Framework Quality Measure Workgroup Report David Lansky Aug. 3, 2011.

HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,

Health IT Policy Committee Workgroup Evolution

Presentation transcript:

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 20, 2010

Workgroup Membership Co-Chairs: Paul TangPalo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University Members: David BatesBrigham & Women’s Hospital Michael BarrAmerican College of Physicians Christine BechtelNational Partnership/Women & Families Neil CalmanInstitute/Family Health Art DavidsonDenver Public Health James FiggeNY State Dept. of Health Linda FischettiDepartment of Veterans Affairs David LanskyPacific Business Group/Health Deven McGrawCenter/Democracy & Technology Latanya SweeneyCarnegie Mellon University Charlene UnderwoodSiemens

Agenda Recap of stage 1 recommendation process Process for development of stage 2 recommendations Directional strategies for discussion

Recap of Stage 1 Recommendation Process Apr 29, 2009: NCVHS Meaningful Use hearing May 11, 2009: First HIT Policy committee meeting May 28, 2009: First Meaningful Use (MU) workgroup meeting Jun 16, 2009: First Draft “Meaningful Use matrix” presented at HITPC for feedback Draft released for public comment Jul 16, 2009: HITPC approved MU recommendations Jan 13, 2010: MU NPRM Jul 13, 2010: MU Final Rule

Developing Recommendations for Stage 2 (and 3) Deliberative Process Hearings over past year: –Specialists; smaller practices and hospitals –State issues –Health care disparities –Patient and family engagement –Population and public health –Care coordination CMS Final Rule on Meaningful Use ONC Final Rule on EHR certification MU WG deliberations on stage 2/3 criteria

Discussion of Philosophical Approaches to Stages 2 and 3 Recommendations Positioning of stage 2 –Incremental change over stage 1 –Stepping stone to stage 3 Migration to outcomes –Stage 3 outcomes based –Stage 2 introduction of outcomes orientation Patient engagement information sharing –Access vs. copy vs. “clinical summaries” Deeming of external criteria –Accrediting groups –Professional accrediting boards –Other CMS programs

Positioning of Stage 2 Discussion Incremental change over stage 1 –Pro: Extends current implementation plans –Con: Continues uncertainty for market for stage 3 Stepping stone to stage 3 –Pro: Establishes a roadmap (and timeline) –Con:

Migration to Outcomes Discussion Set Stage 3 outcomes-based measures –Setting performance thresholds Direct measure of benefits of HIT Deem satisfaction of process measures by achieving threshold performance measure Supports value-based purchasing –Reduce dependence on process measures Reduce emphasis on “how” (in favor of “what”); allows for innovation Reduce burden of measuring structure and process Introduce outcomes orientation in Stage 2 (merely examples) –Apply clinical decision support to achieve outcome (vs. use specific type of CDS) –Reduce prescribed major drug interactions (for prescribed drug categories) by x% –Reduce 30-day readmission rate by 10%

Patient Engagement Information Sharing Discussion Move towards innovative patient use of data Re: “access” vs. “copy” vs. “clinical summaries” vs. “discharge instructions” Setting differences and information purposes –Ambulatory care [ongoing care] –Hospitals [episodic major event] Types of information sharing –“Access”: real-time, on-demand availability of shared EHR content [could replace “copy” in the future] –“Copy” / “Download”: point-in-time copy of existing electronically available information [transitional stage from paper] –Specific-use documents (examples) Hospital: discharge instructions Ambulatory care: visit summaries

Explore Deeming of External Certification Discussion Use external certification to deem satisfaction of specific MU criteria (hypothetical examples) –E.g., Does satisfaction of MU care-coordination criteria satisfy HIT component of PCMH OR does PCMH accreditation  deemed to satisfy care coordination criteria? –E.g., Does satisfaction of MU category 1 criteria (quality, safety, efficiency) satisfy HIT component of professional maintenance of certification (MOC) for medical boards OR does MOC  deemed to satisfy a subset of MU criteria? MU deeming of HIT infrastructure for ACO qualification?

MU Work Plan Timeline Oct 20, 2010: directional guidance from HITPC Nov 19, 2010: present draft MU stages 2/3 criteria Dec, 2010: refine draft MU criteria, prepare for RFC Jan, 2011: release draft MU criteria RFC Feb, 2011: analyze RFC submissions and revise MU draft criteria Mar, 2011: present revised draft MU criteria to HITPC 2Q11: CMS report on initial MU submissions 3Q11: Final HITPC recommendations on stage 2 MU ~4Q11: CMS MU NPRM