SPP.org 11. SPP Delivery Point Addition (DPA) Process Effective May 1, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FPLs Request for Recovery of the Costs Associated with the Seabrook Transmission Substations Pool Transmission Facilities NEPOOL Participants Committee.
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
GEORGIA POWERS SMALL POWER PRODUCERS FUNDAMENTALS.
Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
Open Season MT to Idaho Calendar of Events Posted on NWE OASIS September 30, 2004 (Slide 8 updated 2/28/05)
Presentation to Montana Public Service Commission October 27, 2004.
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
CLECO TRANSMISSION RATE CASE. AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Purpose of Meeting Transmission System Update Formula Rate Overview Formula Rate Protocols.
Deficit District Roles & Responsibilities. MCL A district or intermediate district receiving money under this act shall not adopt or operate.
October 30, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Grant of Regulatory Approval for execution of Inter-State Transmission Scheme to Central Transmission Utility)
What’s New in Southern Companies’ OATT Southern Company Transmission 2008 Customer Forum.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
GENFLEX TARIFF AND INCOPORATION OF THE MEC INTO THE NMD RULES
Work Plan Development Steve Robinson Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
PG&E’s General Market Virtual Net Metering Schedule NEMV
June 6, 2007 TAC Meeting NERC Registration Issues Andrew Gallo, Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Business Operations ERCOT Legal Dept.
Topics to Cover Interconnection Process Overview
SPP.org 1. 2 Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS)
ERCOT Compliance Audits Robert Potts Sr. Reliability Analyst March 23, 2005.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Work Plan Development Aschalew Aberra Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT November 20, 2013.
2013 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
Small Generation Interconnection Standards - IOU Dennis Reed Westar Energy Topeka, KS September 26, 2007.
Transfer Service Meeting, October 19, 2005 Bonneville Power Administration Long-Term Transfer Service (GTA and OATT) Customer Kick-Off Meeting Garry Thompson.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
2014 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results. Background Open for comment February 12, 2015 through March 31, 2015 for evaluation of prior year – 21 close.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
1 Interconnection Update Jay Zimmerman Manager, Transmission Policy Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
1 MANDATORY OUTPATIENT TREATMENT Jane D. Hickey Office of the Attorney General June 5, 2008.
Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform 2 nd Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2009.
March 30, 2012 Wholesale Generation Interconnection Process Photovoltaic Program Power Purchase Agreements Request for Offers.
Transmission Issues & Renewables Perspectives of a Wind Developer.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
2013 Wind Conference. Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy.
2006 SPP RTO Expansion Plan Carl A. Monroe July 30, 2006.
Transmission Customer Forum Operating Agreement Update Cheryl Johnson 9/21/06.
Service Quality Innovation Trust Safety The Samet Way “Managing the Company Cash Position” Accounts Payable (AP) should always be less than Accounts Receivable.
ATSS New Aggregate Facilities Study Process Customer Workshop September 18, 2015.
SPP.org Transmission Expansion and Cost Allocations for FERC SPP-Entergy CBA 1.
Transmission Studies for New Long Term Network Resources Doug Powell Manager Technical System Planning Entergy Services, Inc. September 11, 2006.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
RiversidePublicUtilities.com Arts & Innovation RiversidePublicUtilities.com MOD GENERATOR TESTING REQUIREMENTS RESOURCE PLANNERS LeeAnne Uhler, Regulatory.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting March 9, 2005 Houston, TX.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Summary Overview: Maryland Straw Man Interconnection Rule Prepared by Brad Johnson* January 11, 2007 ACN Energy Ventures *National.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
Generation Interconnection Overview 2007 Transmission Summit July 31, 2007 New Orleans, Louisiana.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Duke Energy Independent Entity Update
Modifications to Planning Charter
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
ICT System Impact Study Process
Pseudo-tie business procedure
T.O. Highway/Byway Recommendations
IID Generating Facility Interconnection Process
Westar Formula Rate and your bill
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

SPP.org 11

SPP Delivery Point Addition (DPA) Process Effective May 1, 2010

SPP.org SPP Delivery Point Addition Procedure What is OATT Attachment AQ? Why Attachment AQ? When does Attachment AQ apply? How to submit a request Study Process Website 3

SPP.org WHAT is OATT Attachment AQ? Process by which Transmission Customers can have SPP & TO assess additions, modifications, or abandonments of local physical delivery point facilities under the SPP Tariff Approved by DPATF, RTWG, MOPC, SPP BOD, and FERC 4

SPP.org WHY Attachment AQ? Previously, delivery point additions:  Processed through SPP’s Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS) procedure  Could be significantly delayed due to length of time required to complete an aggregate study 5

SPP.org WHY Attachment AQ? (continued) New Attachment AQ process will:  Simplify and expedite delivery point addition studies  Allow SPP to accommodate load growth more efficiently and uniformly 6

SPP.org WHEN Does Attachment AQ Apply? New delivery points Abandoned delivery points Modified delivery points  Specifically, physical changes to the delivery point facilities 7

SPP.org WHEN Does Attachment AQ Apply? Will delivery point be served by existing Designated Network Resource?  YES – New Attachment AQ Process  NO – Existing Aggregate Transmission Service Studies All Delivery Point Transfers will be handled through OATT Attachment AR 8

SPP.org HOW to Submit a Request FORM – “DPA Request Form” available on OASIS dies.cfm dies.cfm Notify SPP and relevant Transmission Owner  Provide information set forth in DPA Request Form  Provide any additional useful information  to and Host Transmission SPP will respond within 3 business days to Customer and Host Transmission Owner 9

SPP.org SPP Response: Preliminary Assessment SPP will make sure all necessary information has been provided. SPP shall perform preliminary assessment of request:  Is load 10% or greater of nearest looped 60kV+ facility’s emergency rating? –OR—  Are connecting 60kV+ radial facilities exceeding their normal limits? 10

SPP.org Preliminary Assessment Results (continued) SPP will post findings of preliminary assessments by the 20 th day of the following month. If there is NO significant impact on the Transmission System, that result will be reported and posted.  Host Transmission Owner will coordinate completion of the facility upgrades. 11

SPP.org Preliminary Assessment Results (continued) If YES, a study will be required, SPP will initiate the Delivery Point Network Study (DPNS) process. By the 5 th business day after posting preliminary assessment results, SPP shall send a DPNS Agreement form to the customer. 12

SPP.org Delivery Point Network Study (DPNS) Within 30 days, customer shall submit to SPP:  Signed DPNS Agreement  Deposit for estimated cost of study or $25,000, whichever is less. Otherwise, SPP and Host TO shall deem request to be withdrawn. 13

SPP.org Delivery Point Network Study (DPNS) SPP shall assess the impacts on the Transmission System  Use power flow analysis and any other analysis that may be appropriate. Study report shall be generated and posted within 60 days of receipt of study agreement. After study has been completed, the actual cost is summed.  SPP will bill customer for remaining balance, or shall send a refund for any overpayment. 14

SPP.org Coordination of Facilities Changes If DPNS IS conducted, SPP shall coordinate facility upgrades with each affected Transmission Owner. If DPNS IS NOT conducted, Host TO shall coordinate facility upgrades with customer. In either case, Host TO shall inform SPP when official agreement has been reached between customer and TO regarding load connection facility upgrades. 15

SPP.org Host TO Response OATT Attachment AQ Sections 3.0, 3.1 Host TO shall respond to customer within 10 days of request:  TO shall indicate whether or not a study is required.  If a study is necessary, TO shall provide Load Connection Study (LCS) Agreement.  TO may request any additional information required to complete study. 16

SPP.org Host TO Response (continued) Customer shall return the following to Host TO within 30 days:  Signed LCS Agreement  Deposit for study, unless otherwise agreed  Any additional info that may have been requested by TO Otherwise, SPP and TO shall deem request to be withdrawn. 17

SPP.org Load Connection Study (LCS) Upon receipt of LCS materials from customer, TO shall conduct LCS:  Study shall assess feasibility of request, using power flow analysis, etc.  Study shall determine:  Required load connection facility upgrades  Estimated cost  Implementation schedule of upgrades  TO shall conclude study and issue report within 60 days. 18

SPP.org Conclusion of AQ Process Delivery point and necessary transmission facilities shall migrate into SPP planning models.  Host TO shall be responsible for coordinating and ensuring these changes are submitted into Model On Demand (MOD) Delivery point changes will be incorporated in the annual Attachment O reliability planning processes. 19

SPP.org Website Studies, request forms, and process guidelines are available at mission/studies.cfm mission/studies.cfm OATT with Attachment AQ can be found at ageID=27 ageID=27 20

SPP.org 21 William MauldinJosh Ross Planning Planning