US R&D activities and plans in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits SRF performance has been rising every decade SRF installations for HEP (and other.
Advertisements

HOM Damper Hardware Considerations for Future Energy Frontier Circular Colliders S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY ,
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
FCC RF Overview FCC Week 2015, Washington DC March 2015
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
1.0 MW / 175 MHz Source for IFMIF: a study of alternatives
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
RF scenarios and challenges for FCC-ee A. Butterworth, O. Brunner, CERN with input from R. Calaga, E. Jensen, S. Aull, E. Montesinos, U. Wienands.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
5 th CLIC X-band collaboration meetingWalter Wuensch16 May 2011 CLIC rf structure program.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Rong-Li Geng Jefferson Lab High Efficiency High Gradient Cavities - Toward Cutting Down ILC Dynamic Heat Load by Factor of Four R.L. Geng, ALCW2015,
Highly HOM-damped cavities S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University March Washington, DC FCC Week 2015.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
MEIC Collaboration Meeting, March 30-31, 2015 (Topics: Ion Beam Formation and Cooling) MEIC Collaboration Meeting, March 30-31, 2015 (Topics: Ion Beam.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Neutrino Factory Workshop, IOP, 28th October 2003 RF Systems David M Wilcox.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
I. Syratchev, April 2015, EuCARD2, Barcelona. Review of Efficient RF Sources I. Syratchev, CERN.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
Topical workshop on The Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Oct 2007 RF Systems for a Neutrino Factory Rebecca Seviour Cockcroft Institute Lancaster University.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
The RF system for FCC- ee A. Butterworth, CERN Thanks to: O. Brunner, R. Calaga, E. Jensen, E. Montesinos, F. Zimmermann (CERN), U. Wienands (SLAC)
I. Ben-Zvi Update Ilan Ben-Zvi for the Stony Brook, BNL and AES SPL teams Presented by Rama Calaga.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
Advances in Development of Diffused Nb3Sn Cavities at Cornell
CEPC 1.3GHz & 650MHz SC cavity high Q R&D Z.C. LIU #, P. Sha, H.J. Zheng, J.Y. Zhai, M.Y. Wang, G.W. Wang, Y. Sun, J. Gao
Ingot Niobium Workshop RF Sources Andrew Kimber 4 th December 2015 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is managed by Jefferson Science Associates,
Status of the 1.2 MW MB-IOT for ESS Morten Jensen CLIC Workshop 2016, January, CERN.
Project X: Accelerators Sergei Nagaitsev September 2, 2011.
The Beauty of an ERL for LHeC … and the interest to collaborate Erk Jensen, Ed. Ciapala (with lots of material provided by Rama Calaga, Joachim Tückmantel.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
WP5 Elliptical cavities
LCLS-II Cavity Production and Vertical Testing
Development of high-power IOTs as an efficient alternative to klystrons Morten Jensen Energy for Sustainable Science 24 October 2013, CERN.
Update on the US decadal roadmap on SRF technology for HEP accelerators Sergey Belomestnykh FCC Week 2017 in Berlin 30 May 2017.
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
Tuner system Zhenghui MI 2017/01/17
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Report of WG 5: Superconducting RF
Summary, Working Group 4 Superconducting RF
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
Tuner system for CEPC MI Zhenghui 2016/09/14
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
ERL2015 WG4: RF & superconducting RF for ERL
Matthias Liepe Zachary Conway CLASSE, Cornell University June 1, 2009
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
DQW HOM Update and Recent Developments
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
Presentation transcript:

US R&D activities and plans in SCRF and RF power source efficiency S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University FCC Week 2015 March 23-27 Washington, DC

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Introduction This talk is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of the SRF/RF R&D activities in the U.S., but rather a selection of the activities I deem relevant to future energy frontier circular colliders. This means CW operation of large-scale SRF systems to support high beam currents. I will review: High Q R&D Nb3Sn research Development of HOM-damped SRF cavities Efforts to improve RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency High Q0 R&D March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Recent breakthrough results Capital and operational cost of cryogenic systems is one of the main contributors (along with SRF/RF system) to the total cost of large machines based on SRF technology. For CW accelerators, the dynamic heat load is dominant, hence improving Q0 at operating gradients (15 – 20 MV/m) can bring significant cost savings. Recent R&D efforts at Fermilab led to the following breakthroughs: Nitrogen doping treatment results in record low BCS surface resistance, reduced non-flux residual resistance; Tuning Meissner effect via fast cooldown leads to no/low contribution from trapped magnetic flux and to the record low residual resistance. Thanks to LCLS-II at SLAC, nitrogen doping has received a strong technological push to make it production-ready at 1.3 GHz 9-cell cavities. This was accomplished by collaborative efforts at Fermilab, Cornell and JLab. Initial results from applying nitrogen doping to lower frequency (650 MHz) cavities are very promising for future colliders, which plan to utilize RF frequencies as low as 400 MHz. More details in Alexander Romanenko’s talk. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Nitrogen doping of 650 MHz cavities – first results Applying N doping to 650 MHz (b = 0.9) leads to double Q compared to 120°C bake (standard surface treatment ILC/XFEL), ~7×1010 at 2 K – world record at this frequency Courtesy of A. Grasselino (Fermilab) March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency 650 MHz cooldown studies Cooling details have been shown to play an important role in Q retention. Slow cooling through Tc shown to severely deteriorate Q for 1.3 GHz cavities. At 650 MHz we find a weaker effect, likely due to smaller impact of trapped flux at lower frequency. Very promising for Q retention in cryomodule. A. Romanenko, A. Grassellino, O. Melnychuk, D. A. Sergatskov, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 184903 (2014) A. Romanenko, A. Grassellino, A.Crawford, D. A. Sergatskov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 234103 (2014) Courtesy of A. Grasselino (Fermilab) March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Minimizing residual resistance (maximize Q) by avoiding the ambient magnetic flux to be trapped Same cavity, just cooled differently through 9.2K Flux expelled efficiently Flux mostly trapped Courtesy of A. Romanenko (Fermilab) March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Utilizing new physics for record high Qs Combination of nitrogen doping and efficient flux expulsion: record high Q > 1011 up to 28 MV/m in SRF cavities Courtesy of A. Romanenko (Fermilab) A. Romanenko, A. Grassellino, A. C. Crawford, D. A. Sergatskov, and O. Melnychuk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 234103 (2014) March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

R&D plans on low frequency cavities More studies at Fermilab on 650 MHz cavities for PIP-II to fine-tune the recipe. Initiating a BNL/JLab collaboration on a 400 MHz single cell cavity studies. Courtesy of R. Rimmer (JLab) March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

New results for Nb3Sn cavities March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Recent advances in Nb3Sn cavities Nb3Sn, having critical temperature ~2 times higher than Nb, promises to deliver higher Q and gradients. The Q should be >1010 even at 4.2 K. However, the material is challenging (brittle), difficult to deal with. Cornell recently renewed efforts to advance Nb3Sn studies and received very promising results on 1.3 GHz single cell cavities. The first accelerator cavity made with an alternative superconductor that outperforms Nb at usable gradients. More details in Matthias Liepe’s talk. Standard Nb cavity Nb3Sn-Coated March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Development of HOM-damped cavities March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Development of HOM-damped cavities at BNL and JLab BNL and JLab are actively designing future electron ion colliders, eRHIC and MEIC. Both machines will require HOM-damped SRF cavities operating at frequencies relevant to FCC and CEPC. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

R&D at Jefferson Lab: MEIC ion ring design concept 0.5 A beam current, 7.5-7.8 MV/m, up to 110 kW per cavity March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Five-cell cavity with strong HOM damping for eRHIC at BNL HOM coupler ports FPC port A five-cell 704 MHz SRF cavity (BNL3) has been developed at BNL for high current linacs before the eRHIC RF frequency was changed to 422 MHz. A prototype cavity reached 19.7 MV/m. Six antenna-type couplers will be attached to the large diameter beam pipes and will provide strong HOM damping while maintaining good fill factor for the linac. Two HOM filters are currently under consideration: a high pass filter made of lumped elements and a dual-ridge waveguide filter. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

2-stage filter HOM coupler and dual-ridge WG HOM coupler 50 Ω transmission line to room temperature D = 72 mm More compact than rectangular waveguide. A very broadband coax-to-waveguide transition was developed. Better transmission than that of the 2-stage coaxial coupler. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency 422 MHz HOM-damped cavity R&D on the 422 MHz BNL4 cavity is in progress. The RF design is completed with the cavity shape re-optimized from the scaled 704-MHz BNL3 cavity model: The first HOM of the BNL4 cavity is 15 MHz further away from the fundamental mode. The BNL4 cavity’s has higher transverse and longitudinal BBU threshold than the scaled BNL3 cavity. The HOM power for BNL4 is 10% lower than for the scaled BNL3 cavity. The 3-cell prototype cavity will be ordered in the near future. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Efforts to improve RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

Efforts to improve efficiency of RF power systems for accelerators With several new projects relying on large-scale RF installations, there is a renewed interest worldwide to improve efficiency of RF power generation. There were two talks during RF session on Tuesday: one on high efficiency klystrons and the other on MB-IOTs. There are also recent results on using magnetrons. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency High-power MB-IOTs State of the art IOTs are limited to an output RF power of ~100 kW. To fully realize their advantages – no saturation, efficiency drops slowly at reduced output power – ESS (in collaboration with CERN) has initiated an industrial study to design two Multi-Beam IOTs with a pulsed power of 1.2 MW (3.5 ms, 5% duty factor, 65% efficiency). Two U.S. companies are involved: CPI as a partner in Thales/CPI Consortium and L3.The contracts were signed in September 2014. 24-month duration, long term testing at CERN. More details in M. Jensen’s talk. BNL is initiating R&D on a 844 MHz MB-IOT with an output power of 500 kW CW for eRHIC. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Magnetrons There is a renewed interest to using magnetrons as RF power amplifiers. Magnetrons are inherently efficient devices (~90%), but they are oscillators. However, there is a way to “injection-lock” them. R&D is underway at JLab, Muons, Inc. and Fermilab. A concept for a high-power 650 MHz CW magnetron transmitter was developed by Muons, Inc. and Fermilab. The phase/amplitude stability might be adequate for high intensity frontier SRF linacs (PIP-II), but probably not good enough for storage rings/colliders. Also, magnetron-type amplifiers (CFAs: Amplitron, Platinotron, Stabilotron) are available at high frequencies, but I am not aware of any devices operating at low frequencies relevant to SRF accelerators. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Courtesy of H. Wang (JLab) Why? Space-charge effect in electron bunch forming process in linear motion dominates the efficiency in klystrons. Spent energy deposits in the collector. Magnetron forms bunches in spoke-on-hub process in circular motion. Beam-to-RF cavity interaction in multiple passes. Much less wasted energy. circular devices linear devices L3 20-80 kW magnetrons Original CEBAF 13 kW upgrade Oven 1.2 kW magnetron March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

JLab R&D on magnetron RF source Courtesy of H. Wang (JLab) The potential impact for CEBAF Capital and operation cost saving for CEBAF SRF Accelerator in RF power: Low cost of magnetron device; DC-to-RF efficiency from klystron to magnetron improves from ~35% to ~90%; 3.22 MW of DC power saving; $1.74 million saving in power bill, if 41 weeks/year of CEBAF in 6-12 GeV operation. Technology demonstration for all SRF accelerators in NP/HEP/BES in DOE complexes. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

JLab R&D on magnetron RF source Courtesy of H. Wang (JLab) “First Demonstration and Performance of an Injection Locked CW Magnetron to Phase Control a Superconducting Cavity” was done at JLab in conjunction with Lancaster University, UK, in 2010 [1] with accuracy of 0.95o rms 2012-2013 SBIR Phase I with Muons, Inc. to design system for CEBAF and validate costs. 2015-2016 SBIR Phase I with Muons, Inc. to design optimized 1497 MHz 13 kW magnetron. References: [1] A. C. Dexter, G. Burt, R. G. Carter, I. Tahir, H. Wang, K. Davis and R. Rimmer, PRST-AB, 14, 032001 (2011). [2] M. Nuebauer, A.Dudas, R. Rimmer, H. Wang, An Efficient RF Source for JLab, PAC 2013, Pasadena, CA, USA. [3] H. Wang, T. Plawski, R. Rimmer, A. Dexter, I. Tahir, M. Neubauer, A. Dudas, System Study Using Injection Phase Locked Magnetron as an Alternative Source for Superconducting Radio Frequency Accelerator, IVEC 2014, Monterey, CA. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Experiments with a S-band CW magnetron. Emulated a wideband feedback system of a dynamic control. Measured a high frequency phase noise of less than 1° rms. Also performed experiments with a 2.5 MW pulsed magnetron. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Performed an experiment on a single cell 2.45 GHz SRF cavity on loan from JLab. Achieved an amplitude dynamic range of 30 dB, amplitude stability of 0.3% rms and phase stability of 0.26° rms. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Summary There is an active SRF/RF R&D program in the U.S. relevant to future energy frontier circular colliders: High Q R&D at Fermilab and other laboratories resulted in record quality factors at accelerating gradients used for CW machines. This promises big cost savings in cryogenics, both capital and operating. This treatment will be applied to LSLS-II cavities. Recent results from single cell Nb3Sn cavities at Cornell promise even bigger savings as Nb3Sn cavities cavities have very high Q even at 4.2 K. However, further R&D is needed to prove robustness of the coating and to develop coating for multi-cell cavities. Development of HOM-damped SRF cavities is in progress for future EICs at BNL and JLab. Renewed efforts to improve RF power source efficiency are concentrated in three areas: new concepts of high-efficiency klystrons, MB-IOTs and study of using magnetrons. March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency

US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency Thank you! March 26, 2015 US R&D in SCRF and RF power source efficiency