Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Advertisements

Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
1/14/05M. Shochet/NSF Site Visit1 Recent Work and Future Plans Faculty: Mel Shochet Postdocs:Taka Maruyama (now Tsukuba faculty) Erik Brubaker Grad Students:Jahred.
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Dijet Mass Sherpa vs Pythia Multi-Threshold e.t.c. for H/Abb->4b’s Kohei Yorita University of Chicago FTK Meeting 12/19/2006.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
Early Electroweak Measurements in CMS and ATLAS J. Alcaraz (CIEMAT - Madrid) XLII Rencontres de Moriond (EW), La Thuile 11 March 2007.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
September 30, 2004FTK meeting1 Making the FTK Physics Case M. Shochet 9/30/04.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 A.Nomerotski SUSY Benchmarking Analyses with SiD Yiming Li, Tomas Lastovicka, Andrei Nomerotski (University of Oxford) TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009.
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Improving b-jet energy resolution b-resolution mtg Sept. 26, 2007 P. Grannis Improving b-jet energy resolution and raising the di-b jet tag efficiency.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 TOP2006 Workshop Coimbra, Portugal Jan,2006 Top quark reconstruction in ATLAS V. Kostyukhin INFN Genova on behalf of ATLAS collaboration.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Moriond EW 2013BSM Higgs Searches at the Tevatron 1 Beyond the SM scalar boson searches in TeVatron Elemér Nagy CPPM on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Summary of Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal, University of Udine Top Working Group, CERN October 29 th, 2003.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
More technical description:
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
VBF H(->bb)+photon
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005

Physics Case for the FTK Fast Track Finder I.Introduction The general argument: unknown new physics  best toolbox Importance of the 3 rd generation to new physics: EWK symmetry breaking, SUSY, … Challenge of efficiency, rapid identification of b and  jets in the trigger because of large backgrounds oEarly access to high quality tracks can give rapid rejection in L2  lower deadtime  can reduce the L1 threshold to increase physics efficiency Rapid tracking can be useful for many purposes including calibration: ex, single isolated track trigger for calorimeter calibration (low P T & W→  ) Here we focus on 3 rd generation partons Remaining sections:

–b-jet ID –  -jet ID (1 & 3 prong) –Z→bb –bbH/A→ 4 b’s (& 2 b’s 2  ’s ?) –VBF production of H→  –H→hh→4b’s –B s →  –(generic l  triggers ?) –Summary & conclusions * As we go, we have to keep tabs on the total requested additional L1 jet trigger rate (use common thresholds when possible).

II.The CDF Experience ex: early predicted trigger rates vs. reality; SVT success – B physics expectation before run I vs. what was done (SVT needed for unanticipated physics); Z  bb – bb purity after trigger III.Overview of FTK (technical details elsewhere) IV.Rapid selection of b-jets Simulation samples used Optimization procedure b-jet efficiency vs light quark & gluon rejection factor Comparison with planned trigger and offline algorithms IV.Rapid selection of  jets Same bullets as in III with addition of –Triggering on 3-prong  decay (for polarization information) V.Z→bb Measure b-jet response of ATLAS calorimeter, check the shift when b semileptonic decay is identified, additional check of overall ATLAS jet energy scale Problem: maintaining low enough L1 rate and having low M JJ turn- on to get background shape

Solution: high P T Z’s (3-jet trigger) Background & signal after trigger Z mass uncertainty & width vs. integrated luminosity VI.bbH/A→4 b’s pick a few points in parameter space (just) outside ATLAS sensitivity region Signal & background samples used (describe use of ATLFast and use of transfer functions) Background rate & signal efficiency vs selection criteria Observation significance vs integrated luminosity & comparison to ATLAS baseline result VII.VBF production of H  Same as above, with discussion of forward jets &/or rapidity gaps.