SpatialAnalyzer Advanced Uncertainty Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
It is very difficult to measure the small change in volume of the mercury. If the mercury had the shape of a sphere, the change in diameter would be very.
Advertisements

Software Error Compensation of Rapid Prototyping (RP) Kun Tong, Sanjay Joshi, Amine Lehtihet Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering The.
Design of Experiments Lecture I
Isoparametric Elements Element Stiffness Matrices
July 2004 Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference Integrated CAD-Metrology and Alignment of Key Features of A380.
© University of Strathclyde Assessing Aesthetic Quality Martin Fitchie University of Strathclyde.
Approaches to Data Acquisition The LCA depends upon data acquisition Qualitative vs. Quantitative –While some quantitative analysis is appropriate, inappropriate.
The Comparison of API T3 and Leica AT401 in the Test and Survey CAI.Guozhu MAN. Kaidi Institute of Modern Physcis,CAS The 13 th international Workshops.
Integrating a Short Range Laser Probe with a 6-DOF Vertical Robot Arm and a Rotary Table Theodor Borangiu Anamaria Dogar
Optimizing Laser Scanner Locations using Viewshed Analysis MEA 592 Final Project November 20,2009 Jeff Smith.
MARLAP Measurement Uncertainty
Uncertainty Representation. Gaussian Distribution variance Standard deviation.
International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY, Hamburg Germany Graphical and Numeric Measurement Station Uncertainty Characterization Scott Sandwith.
Attitude Determination - Using GPS. 20/ (MJ)Danish GPS Center2 Table of Contents Definition of Attitude Attitude and GPS Attitude Representations.
GD&T Inspection in SpatialAnalyzer
IMA Tutorial, Instantaneous Motions - Applications to Problems in Reverse Engineering and 3D Inspection H. Pottmann.
3D Measurements by PIV  PIV is 2D measurement 2 velocity components: out-of-plane velocity is lost; 2D plane: unable to get velocity in a 3D volume. 
A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison Michael Levitt Mark Gerstein.
The Calibration Process
Stockman MSU/CSE Math models 3D to 2D Affine transformations in 3D; Projections 3D to 2D; Derivation of camera matrix form.
SCC & Leica  Import total station survey, GPS, traverse, levelling and GIS data direct from all Leica instruments.  In built Grid Inquest for GPS reduction.
TRYPHINE DUDZAYI.  Surveying instrumentation has undergone a major transformation over the past years transit to the modern instruments.  The theodolite,
Dimensional Metrology Dimensional Metrology Program Steve Phillips Program Manager MEL Metrology Support for Laser Trackers and Scanners Supports Industrial.
Metrology for NCSX Steve Raftopoulos and the NCSX Metrology Team.
Month 200X Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference Large Jig Verification Project LVMC 06 Geraint W Jones Engineering.
University of Florida Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 1 Useful Tips for Presenting Data and Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Ben Smarslok.
Computer Aided Design, Manufacturing & Measurement Integration August Coordinate Measurement System Committee Albuquerque, New Mexico Richey-McIvor-Sandwith.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Project Report Unscented kalman Filter Information.
Application Solution 3D Inspection Automation with SA.
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
Overview of SpatialAnalyzer
Chapter 5 Engineering Tools for Electrical and Computer Engineers.
Basic Principles of Coordinate Measuring machines
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
A Comparison of Nature Inspired Intelligent Optimization Methods in Aerial Spray Deposition Management Lei Wu Master’s Thesis Artificial Intelligence Center.
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Quality Assessment for LIDAR Point Cloud Registration using In-Situ Conjugate Features Jen-Yu Han 1, Hui-Ping Tserng 1, Chih-Ting Lin 2 1 Department of.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
3 Drafting Skills What is the difference between sketching and technical drawing? Is it necessary to use CAD to create drawings for a design project?
Objective Read World Uncertainty Analysis CMSC 2003 July Tim Nielsen Scott Sandwith.
Best-Fit, Bundle, & USMN Using SA to understand measurement uncertainty Zach Rogers NRK, EMEAR Application Engineer.
Multilevel Distributed
SP5 - Neuroinformatics SynapsesSA Tutorial Computational Intelligence Group Technical University of Madrid.
1 Using Multiple Surrogates for Metamodeling Raphael T. Haftka (and Felipe A. C. Viana University of Florida.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group Interface Workshops for ESS Warm-Linac: ISrc - LEBT.
421/521 Lab 5 Total Station, Laser Tracker and Coordinate Measuring Machine CMM.
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
WELCOME TO Alignment Techniques – Traditional, Optical, Digital Warren Wagstaff – Digital Precision Metrology Inc. October 2014.
1 Stellarator Core Metrology issues NCSX WBS-1 Meeting April 2, 2003 What are we measuring? When? How do we take the measurements? How do we correlate.
Network Least Squares Adjustments Demystified
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 13th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment October 13-17, 2014, IHEP, Beijing, China Smoothing Based on Best-fit.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
aIFMIF/EVEDA Project Team, Japan / bF4E / cJAEA
Danfoss Visual Inspection System
The Comparison Of API T3 And Leica AT401 in the Test and Survey
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T)
How SCADA Systems Work?.
Application Solution: 3D Inspection Automation with SA
The Storage Ring Control Network of NSLS-II
CSc4730/6730 Scientific Visualization
Scanners – Robots – Measurement Plans Synergy in Motion
Presented By: Darlene Banta
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement
Integrated CAD-Metrology and Alignment of Key Features of A380 Wings
TOS Control – main idea and scheme
Presentation transcript:

SpatialAnalyzer Advanced Uncertainty Analysis USMN SpatialAnalyzer Advanced Uncertainty Analysis

Agenda Review of USMN Open Questions New USMN Features/Additions

Presentation Outline Background and Motivation Instrument Uncertainty Characterization Discrete Point Cloud Uncertainty Fields Combining CASs – Traditional Approach Unified Spatial Metrology Network (USMN) Case Studies

Open Question What is Ranking … how does it relate to measurement confidence? Statistics Review… Predicting local fit error on a daily basis (point RMS, uncertainty) Instrument uncertainty why should we use average explain usmn with nominal point groups when we can use it can I get summary stats out after I have shut down USMN some questions on instrument uncertainty

Measurement Tools Portable CMMs Theodolites & Total Stations Digital Photogrammetry Laser Trackers Digital Levels Laser Scanners

Background ? Need: General Software Common User Interface Unify Metrology Processes Many instrument types and models in use. Each manufacturer has individual, incompatible, software applications. Users need to apply several devices to a single measurement task. Operators need to re-train on each software package. ? Combined Results Software A Software B Software C

Motivation Uncertainty statements must accompany measurements. (NIST TN/1297, ISO Guide, ANSI GUM, NCSL RP-12) Coordinate measurements used to make important (and expensive) decisions Multiple systems are often used to perform a single measurement job. Current industry practice is to make guesses at (or ignore) overall combined uncertainty based on instrument manufacturer specifications. Needed: Instrument performance in the “real-world” Geometric representation of uncertainty Combination of measurements and uncertainty Task-Specific Uncertainty (geometrical fits, etc.)

Questions… Questions… Questions… What is the uncertainty of my instruments in the “real-world”? What is the effect of uncertainty propagation on the quality of my measurements? How can I make optimal use of my measurements to minimize uncertainty? Ok, its nice to know the uncertainty of a point, but I’m fitting a cylinder. What is the uncertainty of my fit? What about my hidden point bar?

Unified Spatial Metrology Network Answers… Answers… Answers… Combine measurement systems Characterize instrument uncertainty Verify instrument performance Determine uncertainty fields Take advantage of the relative uncertainty of the measurement components. Geometric fitting uncertainty (sphere, line, plane, cylinder, etc)

Coordinate Acquisition System (CAS) Uncertainty Characterization Measure the performance of the entire system under the conditions of interest. Include instrument, operator, environment, etc. Determine uncertainty of compensated instrument output values. Determine effect of these uncertainties on the measured coordinates.

Instrument Example: Laser Tracker

Measurement Process Establish a field of unknown fixed points. 56 feet

Measurement Process Measure the points from the first instrument location.

Measurement Process Measure the points from the second instrument location.

Measurement Process Measure the points from the third instrument location.

Measurement Process Measure the points from the fourth instrument location.

Solve for Instrument Transformations Instrument Transform Computation: Point Computation: Find Minimize Find Minimize

Extract Uncertainty from Residual Errors Group residuals by component “Type A” uncertainty evaluation Result:

Coordinate Acquisition System Output with Realistic Uncertainty Statement Uncertainties including all measurable effects: operator, environment, target, mechanical backlash, etc. Coordinate Acquisition System

Instrument Performance Comparison

Uncertainty Characterization as an Operational Check Component 1 Sigma Uncertainty Before Compensation After Compensation Typical Performance (from Table 4.2) Horizontal Angle 3.47 arcseconds 0.91 arcseconds 1.3 arcseconds Vertical Angle 11.45 arcseconds 1.18 arcseconds Distance 0.0087 inches 0.000598 inches 0.0006 inches Total measurements 32

Coordinate Uncertainty Fields

Uncertainty Field Density

Field Density: How many field points are needed?

Combining 2 CASs – Traditional Approach Match common points by minimizing residuals. Apply transformation to all points and the instrument.

Chain of CASs - Traditional Best-Fit Transform tracker to CAD Transform Arm to Tracker Transform Scanner to Arm All transformations based on XYZ coordinate residuals Usually performed using multiple software packages

Unified Spatial Metrology Network: A Method for CAS Combination Simultaneous combination of CASs Relative uncertainty weighting for measurements Determine uncertainty fields based on CAS combination. Task-Specific: Apply uncertainty fields to downstream analysis.

Relative Uncertainty Weighting in Point Computation Different instrument types Different uncertainty characteristics Weight measurement components based on relative uncertainty.

Weighting Example U m D W e

Weighting Example: 4 Measurements

USMN Uncertainty Analysis 2 Instruments Before Combination

USMN Uncertainty Field Analysis Network Solution with Actual Measured Values Inject U into all measurements Network Solution with Measured + U Values Composite Coordinate Set + Uncertainty Field

USMN Uncertainty Propagation Fixed Reference 2 Instruments After Combination

USMN Uncertainty Propagation Add a 3rd Instrument to the Measurement Chain

USMN Uncertainty Propagation Fixed Reference Add a 3rd Instrument to the Measurement Chain

USMN Uncertainty Propagation Fixed Reference Close the Measurement Loop to Reduce Uncertainty

Task-Specific Measurement Uncertainty Given point uncertainties, how is my actual measurement job result affected? What is the uncertainty of a sphere fit? Hidden Point Bar? Go/No Go Decision? How certain are you it’s a GO?

USMN Task-Specific Uncertainty Given coordinate uncertainty fields…. What is the uncertainty of the sphere fit in part coordinates?

USMN Task-Specific Uncertainty What is the uncertainty of the measured cylinder axis and diameter?

Analysis: Hidden Point Bar Uncertainty Uncertainty Fields Interact End-Point is extrapolated… And so is the uncertainty! Yikes!

USMN Software Integration

USMN Advanced Settings

Case Studies Aircraft Carrier Catapult Alignment (CVN-76) Disney Concert Hall Panel Positioning Submarine Fabrication (SSN 774) Nuclear Power: Steam Generator Replacement

Aircraft Carrier Catapult Alignment (CVN-76) Long narrow structure 350’ x 6’ trough 4 laser trackers chained together

Catapult 1,797 Measured Points 300 field samples 15 minute run time P-4 1.8 gigahertz

Disney Concert Hall (LA) 285 measured points 300 field points 11 minute run time P-4 1.8 gigahertz

Submarine Fabrication (SSN-774)

296 points 1.6 sec. for single solution 300 field points 28 minutes run time P-4 1.3 gigahertz

Steam Generator Replacement

Uncertainty Chain 106 points 300 field points 9 minute run time P-4 1.8 gigahertz

Uncertainty Reduced by Closing the Measurement Chain

Future Applications Wrap optimization around USMN to determine instrument type and placement. Expand instrument models to include the multitude of internal parameters. Extend Task-Specific analysis to point to surface fitting and other analyses. Extend Uncertainty to entire GD&T & FD&T analysis process – decision uncertainty.

Conclusions It is now possible to obtain realistic geometrical uncertainty statements for combined measurement systems. It is also possible to obtain these results on the shop floor at the technician level. Realistic uncertainty statements provide ISO / ANSI compliant measurements. Replaces uncertain uncertainty guesses. This information will help to educate measurement technicians and designers so they may reduce measurement uncertainty in the future.

Questions?

Mersenne Twister Random Number Generator

Attempts at Mapping Numerical Uncertainty Instrument reference frame Ux = ± 1 Uy = ± 2 Part reference frame Point in Part frame: X = -3, Y = 6 Ux = ?, Uy = ? Point in Instrument frame: X = 2.5, Y = 4 Ux = ± 1, Uy = ± 2