1. Of your institution’s Student Learning Outcomes, which are – or could be considered – employment related generalizable skills? 2. What is the difference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Excellence in Service and Programming Writing Group: Kim Arrendell, Lisa Blazer, Eric Cooper, Andrew Haring, Anne Jimenez, Jennifer Lilly, Bob Miller,
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.
A DAY IN PRE-K CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Clarke County School District’s Vision Our vision is for all students to graduate as life-long learners.
Designing and Assessing an Integrated Educational Experience: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes across Curricular and Co-Curricular Units at Georgia.
Our Commitment to Student Completion & Success Elizabeth L. Bringsjord Interim Provost and Vice Chancellor University Faculty Senate October 25, 2013.
Integrating Ethics Into Your Compliance Program John A. Gallagher, Ph.D Center for Ethics in Health Care Atlanta, GA.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Understanding your District’s Plan Colleen Miller, Director of Leadership Development.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Lily Hwang, Director, Institutional Research Juliana Lancaster, Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
System Office Performance Management
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
Leadership and Strategic Planning
System Office Performance Management
Vision UniSA will be a leading contributor to Australia having the best higher education system in the world, supporting the world’s best educated and.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Multidisplinary Approach.. What are your expectations Write on board.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Portland State University Division of Student Affairs.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
1 Outcomes-Driven Program Assessment as a Component of Sustainable Development at an Innovative College ABET Best Assessment Practices Symposium April.
College of Alameda Institutional Effectiveness Committee Retreat August 11, Jannett N. Jackson, Ph.D., Interim President.
Stas Preczewski Vice President, Academic & Student Affairs Juliana LancasterDirector, Institutional Effectiveness Lily HwangDirector, Institutional Research.
Student Learning Outcomes: Institution to Course Candace Timpte Juliana Lancaster Georgia Gwinnett College.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Student Learning Outcomes: Institution to Course Candace Timpte Juliana Lancaster Georgia Gwinnett College.
Introduction to Security
International Strategic Enrolment Management at the University of Victoria 2015 BCCIE Summer Seminar Carolyn Russell, Director, Student Recruitment and.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Co-Curricular Learning Assessment Academy for Student Centered Learning Fall 2013.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
A Focus on Health and Wellbeing Wendy Halliday Learning and Teaching Scotland.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Taking Stock 2004 University of Hawaii - Windward Community College Presented by Chancellor Angela Meixell March 10, 2004.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Speed Round Rethinking Job Descriptions: How to Manage Expectations Up Front Rethinking Job Descriptions: How to Manage Expectations Up Front.
Performance Evaluation
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
We are a North Carolina public education institution in Davidson County. With the support of the community and our staff we provide access to opportunities.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
JOINT MEETING OF THE EAST BRANCH AND STUDENT CHAPTER OF THE ASCE AT THE YEH CENTER Tuesday, March 27, :30 p.m.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
Part 2—Skills for Success Chapter 10 Leadership and Group Dynamics.
Student Affairs Division Meeting September 19, 2012.
Vision, Mission and Values Presented by Sam Davis & Nicola Blake.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
21st Century Skills in the Classroom
Juliana S Lancaster Georgia Gwinnett College
Assessing Student Learning in Student Workers
Designing Assessment and Institutional Research for a New Institution
Student Learning Outcomes: Institution to Course
Presentation transcript:

1. Of your institution’s Student Learning Outcomes, which are – or could be considered – employment related generalizable skills? 2. What is the difference between a student worker and a temporary part-time employee? 3. Of the employment related generalizable skills in your outcomes, which might student workers be expected to demonstrate or master?

Jim Fatzinger, Associate Vice President, Student Affairs Juliana Lancaster, Director, Institutional Effectiveness

 4-year, State College in the University System of Georgia  Authorized by GA Legislature in May 2005  President hired in September 2005  Campus opened with 118 students and 10 faculty in August 2006  Home of the Grizzlies!

 Student:  Fall 2008 Enrollment: Headcount 1563 Full-time equivalent 1374  Fall 2009 Enrollment: Headcount approximately 3000  Faculty:  Instructional full-time faculty: 125 Instructional part-time faculty: 30  Facilities Information:  6 Buildings: A, B, C, D (Student Services Center), E, F (Fitness Center)  Library, Student Center, Dormitory (1200 beds) under construction  Total acreage: 200  Degree Programs  Currently offered: BBA Business; BS Biology; BS Information Technology; BS Psychology  Beginning in January 2009 (pending SACS approval): BA English; BA History; BA Political Science; BS Mathematics; BS Criminal Justice/Criminology; BS Exercise Science; BSEd Early Childhood Education; BSEd Special Education

 Commitment at every level to student learning and effectiveness  Institutional focus on interdisciplinary/ integrated education  Openness to going “outside the box” – provided there is a plan for assessment  Created the opportunity for a ground-up design of an INSTITUTIONAL assessment plan and framework  Allowed focus on collaboration across boundaries to articulate and assess what is important

As a charter 21 st Century Institution GGC will: 1. Produce graduates who can anticipate and respond effectively to the changing world 2. Inspire graduates to be contributing citizens and community leaders 3. Achieve significant levels of student success in retention, progression and graduation 4. Innovatively design and deliver educational programs and support services 5. Engage with Gwinnett and surrounding communities to support student development and community needs 6. Create a culture devoted to the holistic development of students 7. Acquire the resource base needed to accomplish its mission and vision 8. Serve as a resource for innovation for the broader educational community

 Advantages of starting from scratch  Strong executive level support for and understanding of IE  Limited number of programs and offices at start-up  Absence of legacy or standing processes and structures  Disadvantages to starting from scratch  Absence of legacy or standing processes and structures  Each individual brings a different set of assumptions and expectations  Rapid growth and hiring leads to continuous need for explanation/education

 In order to get “…ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research- based planning and evaluation processes…[SACS]” for we needed:  Structure and resources  Broad buy-in, consensus and agreement  Working “ground rules”  Institution-wide and pervasive  Integrated with institution’s mission & strategic plan  Faculty/staff participation and basic control  Interdisciplinary and developmental assessment of student learning

 Program level student learning outcomes and assessment plans  General Education curriculum designed around student learning outcomes  Agreement to develop and assess for institutional student learning outcomes  Leading to: Integrated Educational Experience (IEE) Student Learning Outcome Goals for GG  Agreement to integrate curricular and co-curricular student learning efforts  This triggered substantial and productive discussions with Student Affairs, Educational Technology, and other areas of the College

 GGC graduates will: 1) Clearly communicate ideas in written and oral form. 2) Demonstrate creativity and critical thinking in inter- and multidisciplinary contexts. 3) Demonstrate effective use of information technology. 4) Demonstrate an ability to collaborate in diverse and global contexts. 5) Demonstrate an understanding of human and institutional decision making from multiple perspectives. 6) Demonstrate an understanding of moral and ethical principles. 7) Demonstrate and apply leadership principles.

 Student Affairs Vision & Mission  Focus on Holistic Student Development  Six dimensions of wellness  PhysicalSpiritual  EmotionalIntellectual  OccupationalSocial  Role of Student Employment in Development/ Learning  Occupational Wellness = becoming a competent employee  communication, team work, time management, leadership

 Initial employer of student workers  Student Learning Outcomes : Student staff at the GGC Fitness Center will:  Demonstrate leadership skills in an ever-changing environment  Demonstrate teamwork skills in an ever-changing environment  Demonstrate good communication skills with a variety of people  Utilize good time management and planning skills

 Definitions of terms in SLOs  Leadership: the ability to motivate people to work together to reach a common goal; to lead by example and with authority and respect  Teamwork: the ability to work together and compromise to reach a solution; being able to count on others to be responsible  Communication: the ability to convey your intentions and ideas effectively; being able to respectfully listen to others problems

FC 1: Leadership FC 2: Teamwork FC 3: Communication FC 4: Time Management IEE 1: Communication √√√ IEE 2: Critical & Creative Thinking √√√ IEE 3: Information Technology IEE 4: Collaboration√ IEE 5: Decision Making √√ IEE 6: Moral & Ethical Principles IEE 7: Leadership Principles √√

Attitude Does this person enjoy their job, have fun, and work hard? Do people enjoy working with this person? Are they optimistic and happy? Do they gossip and create problems among co-workers? Punctuality Is this person on time for shifts, meetings, and other events? Attire Does this person wear the proper staff uniform? Concern for Cleanliness Does this person maintain a clean environment and complete the cleaning duties as assigned? Is every piece cleaned as well as it needs to be? Interaction with Participants Does this person make an effort to meet new people? Is customer service important to this employee? Does this person get along well with participants, while still enforcing rules?

Work Schedule Does this person work their shifts, or continually seek subs? Are they available to pick up shifts? Do they balance work, school, and personal life? Responsibility Do they do what they say they are going to do, when they say they are going to do it? Can you count on this person? Professionalism Are they respectful? Are they able to separate work and personal life? Do they behave in a mature and professional manner? Do they avoid profanity at work? Do they take pride in all they do? Are they accountable? How are his/her communication skills? Shift Presence Is this person aware of what is going on? Do they fulfill all work duties, and get the job done well? Do they make routine rounds of their assigned area? Do they avoid watching TV? Does their mind seem elsewhere?

Fitness Center Facility Rules Does this person abide by and enforce all Fitness Center rules, especially those concerning entrance requirements (IDs), attire, slamming dumbbells, towels, chewing gum, and power lifts? Concern for Safety (Fitness Attendant Specific) Does this person “spot” participants, correct participant’s form, pick-up idle weights, ensure proper spacing of benches, check equipment for malfunctions, settle disputes and care for any injuries? Exercise Knowledge (Fitness Attendant Specific) Does this person offer correct advice to participants? Does he/ she understand how to use all of the equipment/ machines? Does this person seek continuing education opportunities? Do they workout?

 Outcome 1: Leadership  Concern for Cleanliness, Responsibility, FC Rules  Outcome 2: Teamwork  Concern for Cleanliness, Work Schedule, Professionalism, FC Rules, Concern for Safety  Outcome 3: Communication  Attitude, Interaction with Participants, FC Rules, Concern for Safety  Outcome 4: Time Management  Punctuality, Work Schedule, Shift Presence

 Target performance level: 75% of student employees meet expected criterion.  For 3 of 4 outcomes, this target was met.  For the remaining outcome (communication), 73% of student employees met the expected criterion  Response:  Initiated monthly student staff meetings with communication-focused professional development component.  Currently conducting evaluations for current year.

 Developing core set of outcomes for workers  Discussing common evaluation across areas  Discussing student’s path to & through employment to enhance occupational development / wellness  Committee Membership:  Institutional EffectivenessEducational Technology  Human ResourcesLibrary  Financial AidStudent Affairs