NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oasys SIREN.
Advertisements

One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis
Chapter 7 Waves in the Ocean ©2003 Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Passive Vibration Control
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Educational Resource Library
The Study of Flows in the Deep Convection Zone ( Mm depth) Tom Duvall Shravan Hanasoge “ASH team”
Calculation of Heave of Deep Pier Foundations By John D. Nelson, Ph.D., P.E., Hon. M. SEAGS, F. ASCE, Kuo-Chieh (Geoff) Chao, Ph.D., P.E., M. SEAGS, M.
A Wavelet Analysis of Ground Motion Characteristics R. Z. Sarica M. S. Rahman.
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Ground Motion Scaling Based on 1-D Rock Simulations N. Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Geology for Engineers The San Andreas Fault: The Geological and Civil Engineering Implications.
DELAMINATION DETECTION OF HMA AIRPORT PAVEMENTS WITH NDT DEVICES
“LIQUEFACTION” Prepared By: Husni M. Awwad Talal Z. Zammar
Science Modules using the Mini Wave Tank (working document)
February 15, 2005 Benchmarking of Nonlinear Geotechnical Ground Response Analysis Procedures PEER Lifelines Project 2G02
Local Site Effects Seismic Site Response Analysis CEE 531/ESS 465.
Seismic Refraction. Some uses of seismic refraction Mapping bedrock topography Determining the depth of gravel, sand or clay deposits Delineating perched.
Seismic Wave Propagation
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
SURFACE WAVE SURVEYS LIMITED
Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking. Earthquake Origins and Seismic Waves –Focus point where earthquake rupture occurs Shallow focus - 70 km or less (80%
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
Inelastic Displacement Surface Method Tom Shantz CALTRANS- Division of Research and Innovation.
Developer Scope Ground Motion Model (median, standard dev) –Ground Motion Parameters: Horizontal components (Ave Horiz, FN, and FP) PGA, PGV, PGD Pseudo.
Earthquake Hazard Assessment in the Pacific Northwest: Site Response Thomas L. Pratt U. S. Geological Survey School of Oceanography University of Washington.
1 Workshop on GMSM for Nonlinear Analysis, Berkeley CA, October 26, 2006 ATC-63 Selection and Scaling Method Charles Kircher Curt B. Haselton Gregory G.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
The primary “tool” for investigating the physical properties of the Earth’s interior is seismology. Seismology.
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.
Project Review and Summary of NGA Supporting Research Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #6 July, 2004.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
Seismic LRFD for Pile Foundation Design
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Youssef Hashash In collaboration with Duhee Park
The primary “ tool ” for investigating the physical properties of the Earth ’ s interior is seismology. Seismology.
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
University of Missouri - Columbia
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
FORUM FOR THE PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA H.R.WASON, Emeritus Fellow, IIT Roorkee & President, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology 21 December,
Predicting Site Response
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Predicting characteristic loads for jackets and jack-ups Shallow water location – quasi-static approach Problem.
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2
Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.
Hashash et al. (2005)1 Youssef Hashash Associate Professor Duhee Park Chi-chin Tsai Post Doctoral Research Associate Graduate Research Assistant University.
Predicting Site Response. Based on theoretical calculations –1-D equivalent linear, non-linear –2-D and 3-D non-linear Needs geotechnical site properties.
SASW – an in situ method for determining shear modulus
PEER 2G02 – Code Usage Exercise: OpenSees Zhaohui Yang UCSD 2/15/2005.
Joseph Wartman and Patrick Strenk
NERIES JRA4 Meeting Rome 4 and 5 December 2006 TASK A: SITE SELECTION Monography of the station CATANIA Station code CAT__ Servizio Sismico Nazionale.
1& 2. Pattern of earthquake, volcano, and mountain range on the Earth Matches the location of the plate boundaries. Most earthquakes, volcanoes and mountain.
C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,
Jennie Watson-Lamprey COSMOS Annual Meeting Technical Session November 9, PEER GMSM Program: Recommendations for Selection and Scaling of Ground.
Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Generation of Uniform Hazard Accelerogram Representing from “Dominant.
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
Designing a Ground Penetrating Radar Experiment You need to determine: 1.Amount of time to record the signal 2.Antenna frequency 3.Line spacing While thinking.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Modulus and Damping Curves of Ottawa sand from Centrifuge and Full Scale Tests Inthuorn Sasanakul Prompat Kasantikul.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Derivative Examples 2 Example 3
1 CENA H and V SITE AMPLIFICATION Walter Silva Pacific Engineering and Analysis October 1, 2009.
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
1 March 22, 2002Singapore, Elgamal Response Spectrum Ahmed Elgamal.
Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Faults and Earthquakes
Presentation transcript:

NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang

Project Objectives Compare RVT based site response response calculation versus time history approach Compare RVT based amp factors (RASCALS) with time history based (SHAKE) amp factors Compare amp factor differences between equivalent-linear procedure (RASCALS and SHAKE) and non-linear procedures (D-MOD2 and SUMDES)

Basis of Comparison: Two shaking levels (M w 15 km and M w 5 km) Three profile depths (100, 300, and 500 ft) 30 spectrum compatible ground motions were used for each shaking level. Results from one RVT run from RASCALS is compared with the average of 30 SHAKE run Non-linear analysis scope reduced to two M w 7.5 time histories analysis for two depths to demonstrate differences in difference non-linear programs

Target Spectrum (A&S strike-slip, rock) M w =6.5 r=15 kmM w =7.5 r=5 km

Shear Wave Velocity Profile La Clenega Site – Simplified CJR Model

Sand Clay Sand & Clay Non-Linear Properties Based on SHAKE91 Extend to 10% strain 2 Curves only – simple Decoupled modulus and damping Non-linear models should base on matching modulus reduction curves. Damping may be different

Deep Profile – 500 ft M7.5 Ground Surface Response

Deep Profile – 500 ft M6.5 Ground Surface Response

Deep Profile – 500 ft Ground Surface Response

Med. Deep Profile – 300 ft Ground Surface Response

Shallow Profile – 100 ft Ground Surface Response

Deep Profile – 500 ft Average Spectral Ratio

Med. Deep Profile – 300 ft Average Spectral Ratio

Shallow Profile – 100 ft Average Spectral Ratio