Decoupling laser beams with the minimal number of optical elements Julio Serna December 14, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE WELL ORDERING PROPERTY Definition: Let B be a set of integers. An integer m is called a least element of B if m is an element of B, and for every x.
Advertisements

Overview of ERL R&D Towards Coherent X-ray Source, March 6, 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL 1 Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS.
Class question: Why do we use Gaussian beams? One clue: there was no Gaussian beam before Answer 1: It is the simplest fundamental solution that.
Principal Component Analysis Based on L1-Norm Maximization Nojun Kwak IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2008.
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 2. The Propagation of Rays and Beams 2.0 Introduction Propagation of Ray through optical element : Ray (transfer)
 Light can take the form of beams that comes as close
VARISPOT FS BEHAVIOR IN COLLIMATED AND DIVERGING BEAMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS Liviu Neagu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
An Optical Setup for Crackle Noise Detection Carell Hamil Mentor: Gabriele Vajente 1.
Course outline Maxwell Eqs., EM waves, wave-packets
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Scale invariance Object of which a detail when enlarged becomes (approximately) identical to the object itself. Condition.
1 Electromagnetic waves Hecht, Chapter 2 Monday October 21, 2002.
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
3. Image motion due to optical element motion
Error Analysis for Material Point Method and a case study from Gas Dynamics Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins Thanks to DOE for funding from
1 Algorithms for Large Data Sets Ziv Bar-Yossef Lecture 12 June 18, 2006
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Introduction to Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 10 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR VARIABLE RESIZING OF ROUND FLAT-TOP DISTRIBUTIONS George Nemeş, Astigmat, Santa Clara, CA, USA John A. Hoffnagle,
Light Propagation in Photorefractive Polymers
Camera Geometry and Calibration Thanks to Martial Hebert.
Focusing Properties of a Solenoid Magnet
MATH4248 Weeks Topics: review of rigid body motion, Legendre transformations, derivation of Hamilton’s equations of motion, phase space and Liouville’s.
Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry Zahra Shaterzadeh Yazdi Institute for Quantum Information Science, University of Calgary with Peter S. Turner.
Boolean Minimizer FC-Min: Coverage Finding Process Petr Fišer, Hana Kubátová Czech Technical University Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
1 Departament of Bioengineering, University of California 2 Harvard Medical School Department of Genetics Metabolic Flux Balance Analysis and the in Silico.
Proximity Effect in EBL by: Abhay Kotnala January 2013
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
1 Electromagnetic waves Hecht, Chapter 2 Wednesday October 23, 2002.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Dynamics of modulated beams Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department.
Fall 1999 Copyright © R. H. Taylor Given a linear systemAx -b = e, Linear Least Squares (sometimes written Ax  b) We want to minimize the sum.
MASS MOMENT OF INERTIA (Section 17.1) Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to Determine the mass moment of inertia of a rigid body or a system of.
Today’s Lecture Interference Diffraction Gratings Electron Diffraction
Space-time analogy True for all pulse/beam shapes
Stability Diagram and Stability Criterions As described in textbooks for instance LASERS of A. E. Siegman, the stability diagram initially has been de-
Gaussian pulses Bandwidth limited: Pulse duration FWHM Fourier transform Bandwidth duration product Chirped Gaussian Fourier Transform.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Appendix A: A digression on mathematical methods in beam optics Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
High power fibered optical components for gravitational waves detector Matthieu Gosselin, PhD Student at EGO ELiTES : 3 rd general meeting February 10.
1.7: Adding Like Terms TERM: A number, a variable, or the product of the two.Ex: a, 3x, 2x, 5, CONSTANT: a term with no variable (number) Ex: 4, -1, 6,
Sect. 4.5: Cayley-Klein Parameters 3 independent quantities are needed to specify a rigid body orientation. Most often, we choose them to be the Euler.
Announcements Exam 3 starts Thur noon, and continues through Mon close, in the Testing Center. It will include both conceptual questions and homework style.
Families of Solutions, Geometric Interpretation
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 15)
Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins
Radar Micro-Doppler Analysis and Rotation Parameter Estimation for Rigid Targets with Complicated Micro-Motions Peng Lei, Jun Wang, Jinping Sun Beijing.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17)
Chapter 1 Systems of Linear Equations and Matrices
Fast Computation of Symmetries in Boolean Functions Alan Mishchenko
Quadratic Forms and Objective functions with two or more variables
Algebraic Property Testing
Modeling in the Time Domain
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 13)
The Fractional Fourier Transform and Its Applications
Light Fields in Ray and Wave Optics
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 13)
The M2 parameter in space ---beam quality factor
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 14)
Scalar theory of diffraction
William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter
Concepts of stress and strain
5.4 T-joins and Postman Problems
Scalar theory of diffraction
Scalar theory of diffraction
Dust Flow in Disks in the presence of Embedded Planets
MATHO Fill in your board with scrambled answers. Should have one answer left over because of free space. Show all work and if you win – Your Team Wins!!
Chapter 3 Modeling in the Time Domain
EXAMPLE 4 Solve proportions Solve the proportion. ALGEBRA a x 16
Presentation transcript:

Decoupling laser beams with the minimal number of optical elements Julio Serna December 14, 2000

George Nemeş In collaboration with: Decoupling laser beams with the minimal number of optical elements

Outline Introduction The problem The proof Consequences and conclusions

Laser beam characterization Wigner distribution function (WDF)

Second order characterization Beam matrix P ( + )

Second order characterization Gauss Schell model (GSM) beams ( + )

First order optical systems ABCD matrix: S symplectic,

Propagation

The problem (ST beam)

The problem (ASA beam)

The problem (GA beam)

The problem (PST beam?)

Cylindrical lens fx=184 mm Cylindrical lens fx=184 mm PST beam & cyl. lens

The problem

Decoupled beam: (trivial or) no crossed terms

The problem Question: Which is the minimum number of optical systems F, L needed to decouple a (any) laser beam? Answer: F L F L

Why the question? Laser beam properties can be changed using optical systems Nice mathematical properties. Further insight into P/GSM, S I like it

What do we know Any optical system can be synthesized using a finite number of F and L –Shudarshan et al. (2D/3D) OA85 –Nemes (constructive method) LBOC93 Optical systems

What do we know Any beam can be decoupled using ABCD systems –Shudarshan et al. (general proof, no method) PR85 –Nemes (constructive method) LBOC93 –Anan’ev el al. (constructive method) OSp94 –Williamson (pure math) AJM36 Decoupling

What do we know? Beam classification * * IS beams:  P d rotationally symmetric IA beams:  P d rotationally symmetric rounded beams/non-rotating beams/ blade like beams/angular momentum... * to decouple

The proof: beam conditions Decoupled beam conditions  P: M symmetrical, W, M, U same axes  GSM:  I,  g, R same axes,  = 0

The proof: optical systems Free space RSA thin lens

1. F (free space) Impossible: F does not change ST, ASA or RSA property Consequences: –no use alone –no point in having F at the end

2. L (single lens) GSM  L / beam is decoupled lens  R  does not affect conditions:

2. L (single lens) P matrix  L / beam is decoupled

2. L (single lens) $L / beam is decoupled Note:   last element L: end in waist possible  L covers all IS beams, and more

3. F L Propagate conditions  1,  2 in free space

3. F L Beams not decoupled via F, FL: 1.PST, PASA, PRSA   (z) = 0 constant   1 (z)  0  go to LFL 2.What if  1 (z) =  = 0 but  2 (z)  0?  go to LFL? Not enough  1 (z) =  = 0 invariant under L  go to FLFL (at least!)

4. L F L Left beams:  (z)  0 Aproach: find a particular solution a.NRGA (pseudo-symmetrical, twisted phase) beams b.RGA (twisted irradiance) +  (z)  0

4a. L F L, NRGA beams 1.L 1 to have tr M = 0 (waist) 2.Use a “de”twisting system –Simon et al. (matrix) JOSAA93 –Beijersbergen et al. OC93 –Friberg et al. josaa94 –Zawadzki (general case) SPIE95  L F L L 1 L 2 F L = L F L

4b. L F L, RGA with  (z)  0 1.GA  PST, PASA, PRSA: L is enough, since  (z)  0 2.Go to 4a L’ L F L = L” F L

5. F L F L Leftovers from F L: beams with  1 (0) =  (z) = 0  2  0 Solution: free space F (  is not invariant under F)  then go to L F L

YES NO YES NO P/GSM Use L Use LFL Use FL NO (z L >0) P  PRSA Use F Use L Converts into PRSAModifies  1 / 

Consequences and conclusions ® To decouple any beam we need FLFL or less ® The output beam can be at its waist ® We can use the result to “move around” P  P’ solved via P  P d  P’ ® Engineering: starting point to handle GA (rotating or non rotating beams)