NanChang, April 19, 20101 Tsallis Interperation in Heavy-ion (HI) Physics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li, Zhangbu Xu CPPT/USTC Introduction & Motivation Why.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
Advertisements

First Alice Physics Week, Erice, Dec 4  9, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity at RHIC and LHC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese,
ISMD’05, Kromeriz, Aug 09  15, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity – Light  Flavor (u,d,s) Thermalization at RHIC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg.
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,
11/23/ Examine the species and beam-energy dependence of particle spectra using Tsallis Statistics Zebo Tang, Ming Shao, Zhangbu Xu Li Yi Introduction.
Bingchu Huang, USTC/BNL 1 Bingchu Huang (for STAR Collaboration) University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
1 Baryonic Resonance Why resonances and why  * ? How do we search for them ? What did we learn so far? What else can we do in the.
Statistical Models A. ) Chemical equilibration B
1 相对论重离子碰撞中  介子的产生 陈金辉 中国科学院上海应用物理研究所 QCD 相变与重离子碰撞物理国际暨 2008 年 7 月 10 号 -12 号 Many thanks to: X. Cai, S. Blyth, F. Jin, H. Huang, G. Ma,
Luan Cheng (Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University) I. Introduction II. Interaction Potential with Flow III. Flow Effects on Light Quark.
Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March , 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.
STAR-MTD Workshop, USTC, Mar 30 - Apr 1, Tsallis Fit to RHIC Data Ming Shao CPST/USTC with Zhangbu Xu, Zebo Tang, Li Yi, Lijuan ruan, and more Introduction.
XXXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, September 7, 2003 Kraków, Poland Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez STAR Collaboration Review.
11/05/2009 唐泽波 (USTC), 第十三届全国中高能核物理大会, 合肥 1 Radial flow and non-equilibrium in heavy-ion collisions (from Tsallis-based Blast-Wave) Li Yi, Ming Shao, Zhangbu.
Charmonium Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions Loïc Grandchamp Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Texas A&M, Dec. 10 th 2004 w/ R. Rapp.
Sept WPCF-2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on: Yu.S., I. Karpenko,
Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
Rashmi Raniwala Hot & Dense Matter in RHIC-LHC Era, February 12-14, 2008, TIFR, Mumbai 1 Rashmi Raniwala Department of Physics University of Rajasthan.
May, 20, 2010Exotics from Heavy Ion Collisions KE T and Quark Number Scaling of v 2 Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba Collaborated with Yoshimasa Ikeda,
Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.
Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:
Partonic Collectivity at RHIC ShuSu Shi for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Central China Normal University.
Quarkonium Workshop, BNL, June 6-18, Zebo USTC Zebo Tang (for the STAR Collaboration) University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)
Matter System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.
20 Nov 2006, Quark Matter, Shanghai, ChinaShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Rapporteur 3 Bulk Properties and Collective Phenomena ShinIchi Esumi Univ.
Jaipur February 2008 Quark Matter 2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev (with participation.
Xi’an 2006 STAR 1 STAR Particle Ratios and Spectra: Energy and  B dependence International Workshop On Hadron Physics and Property of High Baryon Density.
R. BELLWIED Lecture 2, Part 1: Yields. R. BELLWIED Chemical freeze-out (yields & ratios)  inelastic interactions cease  particle abundances fixed (except.
J/Ψ PRODUCTION IN A+A COLLISIONS AT STAR Ota Kukral for the STAR Collaboration Czech Technical University in Prague RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting 17.
Characterizing non-equilibrium and radial flow at RHIC with Tsallis statistics What physics can spectra address? Why do we need a new BlastWave model and.
Energy Dependence of ϕ -meson Production and Elliptic Flow in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Md. Nasim (for the STAR collaboration) NISER, Bhubaneswar, India.
Helen Caines Yale University Soft Physics at the LHC - Catania - Sept Questions for the LHC resulting from RHIC Strangeness Outline Chemistry Yields.
Steffen A. BassDynamics of Hadronization #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The baryon puzzle at RHIC Recombination + Fragmentation.
System size dependence of freeze-out properties at RHIC Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai-China Nov System size dependence of freeze-out properties.
Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.
CCAST, Beijing, China, 2004 Nu Xu //Talk/2004/07USTC04/NXU_USTC_8July04// 1 / 26 Collective Expansion in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions -- Search for.
Helen Caines Yale University 1 st Meeting of the Group on Hadronic Physics, Fermi Lab. – Oct Bulk matter properties in RHIC collisions.
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Round Table Workshop on NICA Physics Dubna,September 9-12,20091 J/Ψ Production in Heavy Ion Collisions J/Ψ Production in Heavy Ion Collisions Pengfei ZHUANG.
HIRSCHEGG, January , 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 1 / 24 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Collisions Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Peter Kolb, CIPANP03, May 22, 2003what we learn from hydro1 What did we learn, and what will we learn from Hydro CIPANP 2003 New York City, May 22, 2003.
9 th June 2008 Seminar at UC Riverside Probing the QCD Phase Diagram Aneta Iordanova.
04/14/2010Workshop on Critical Examination of of RHIC Paradigms1 Review of particle spectrum data Outline: What have we learnt from published data bulk.
Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM
School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.
High-p T Particles and RHIC Paradigm of Jet Quenching Ahmed M. Hamed NN2012 The 11 th International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions 1.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.
Strange Probes of QCD Matter Huan Zhong Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California Los Angeles, CA Oct 6-10, 2008; SQM2008.
PhD student at the International PhD Studies Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Department of Theory of Structure of Matter.
Systematic Study of Elliptic Flow at RHIC Maya SHIMOMURA University of Tsukuba ATHIC 2008 University of Tsukuba, Japan October 13-15, 2008.
JET Collaboration Meeting June 17-18, 2014, UC-Davis1/25 Flow and “Temperature” of the Parton Phase from AMPT Zi-Wei Lin Department of Physics East Carolina.
Bulk properties at RHIC Olga Barannikova (Purdue University) Motivation Freeze-out properties at RHIC STAR perspective STAR  PHENIX, PHOBOS Time-span.
QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo Saturation of E T /N ch and Freeze-out Criteria in Heavy Ion Collisions Raghunath Sahoo Institute of.
24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.
Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.
Nu Xu“Hot and Dense Matter in the RHIC-LHC Era”, Mumbai, India, February 12-14, 20081/27 Many Thanks to the Conference Organizers Partonic EoS at RHIC.
Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.
Strange hadrons and resonances at LHC energies with the ALICE detector INPC 2013 Firenze, Italy 2 -7 June 2013 A. Badalà (INFN Sezione di Catania) for.
Heavy quarks and charmonium at RHIC and LHC within a partonic transport model Jan Uphoff with O. Fochler, Z. Xu and C. Greiner XLIX International Winter.
STAR and RHIC; past, present and future.
Experimental Studies of Quark Gluon Plasma at RHIC
Outline First of all, there’s too much data!! BRAHMS PHOBOS PHENIX
System Size and Energy Dependence of -meson Production at RHIC
用重味探测夸克胶子等离子体 Heavy Flavor as a Probe of Quark-Gluon Plasma
Presentation transcript:

NanChang, April 19, Tsallis Interperation in Heavy-ion (HI) Physics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li, Zhangbu Xu CPPT/USTC Introduction & Motivation Why and how to implement Tsallis statistics in Blast-Wave framework Results − strange hadrons vs. light hadrons − beam energy dependence − J/  radial flow Conclusion

NanChang, April 19, /14/20102 Thermalization and Radial flow in HI Matter flows in heavy-ion collisions – all particles have the same collective velocity Multi-strange decouple earlier than light hadrons

NanChang, April 19, /14/20103 Hydrodynamics evolution π, K, p Multi-strange  Multi-strange particle spectra can be well described by the same hydrodynamics parameters as light hadrons  in contrast to the Blast-wave results Ulrich Heinz, arXiv: Hydro parameters:  0 = 0.6 fm/c s 0 = 110 fm -3 s 0 /n 0 = 250 T crit =T chem =165 MeV T dec =100 MeV

NanChang, April 19, /14/20104 Blast-Wave Model Assumptions: –Local thermal equilibrium  Boltzmann distribution –Longitudinal and transverse expansions (1+2) –Temperature and  T  are global quantities random boosted E.Schnedermann, J.Sollfrank, and U.Heinz, Phys. Rev. C48, 2462(1993) Extract thermal temperature T fo and velocity parameter  T  BGBW: Boltzmann-Gibbs Blast-Wave

NanChang, April 19, /14/20105 Limitation of the Blast-wave Strong assumption on local thermal equilibrium Arbitrary choice of p T range of the spectra Non-zero flow velocity =0.2 in p+p Lack of non-extensive quantities to describe the evolution from p+p to central A+A collisions –m T spectra in p+p collisions Levy function or m T power-law –m T spectra in A+A collisions Boltzmann or m T exponential minbias STAR PRC71 (2005) STAR PRL99

NanChang, April 19, /14/2010 Non-extensive Tsallis statistics C. Tsallis, H. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988) Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, PRL84, 2770 (2000) Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, EPJ40, 299 (2009) Particle p T spectra: Exponential  Power law

NanChang, April 19, /14/2010 Tsallis statistics in Blast-wave model BGBW: With Tsallis distribution: Tsallis Blast-wave (TBW) equation is:

NanChang, April 19, /14/20108 Fit results in Au+Au collisions ZBT,Yichun Xu, Lijuan Ruan, Gene van Buren, Fuqiang Wang and Zhangbu Xu, Phys. Rev. C 79, (R) (2009)

NanChang, April 19, /14/20109 Fit strange hadrons only Strangeness, Au+Au 0-10%: = T = q = chi^2/nDof = 51/99 T strange >T light-hadrons Strangness decouple from the system earlier All available species

NanChang, April 19, /14/ Centrality dependence for T and <    Multi-strange hadrons decouple earlier Hadron rescattering at hadronic phase doesn’t produce a collective radial flow, instead, it drives the system off equilibrium Partons achieve thermal equilibrium in central collisions

NanChang, April 19, Beam energy dependence 1/14/ The radial flow velocity at SPS is smaller than that at RHIC. 2.Freeze-out temperatures are similar at RHIC and SPS. 3.The non-equilibrium parameter (q-1) is small in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC and SPS except a larger (q -1) value for non-strange hadrons at RHIC energy

NanChang, April 19, /14/ How about heavy hadrons?

NanChang, April 19, /14/ J/  suppression at RHIC and SPS Grandchamp, Rapp, Brown PRL 92, (2004) nucl-ex/ Regeneration? Test with J/  flow. quarkonium – gloden probe of QGP deconfinement (color screening) thermometer J/  suppression at RHIC ≈ J/  suppression at SPS (energy differs by ~10 times) Puzzle!

NanChang, April 19, /14/ J/  Elliptic flow Heavy Flavor decay electron Too early to compare with models Won’t have enough statistics before 2011 J/  Ermias T. Atomssa, QM2009 Alan Dion, QM2009 PHENIX Beam Use Request

NanChang, April 19, /14/ How about radial flow? Yifei Zhang, QM2008, STAR, arXiv: (submitted to PRL) Sizeable radial flow for heavy flavor decay electrons

NanChang, April 19, /14/ J/  radial flow = T = q =  2 /nDof = / 26 J/  radial flow consistent with 0 Inconsistent with regeneration

NanChang, April 19, /14/ Summary Identified particle spectra from SPS to RHIC have been analyzed with Tsallis statistics in Blast-wave description (light hadrons, multi-strange hadrons, charmonium) Partonic phase –Partons achieve thermal equilibrium in central heavy-ion collisions –J/  is not thermalized and disfavors regeneration Multi-strange hadrons decouple earlier Hadronic phase –Hadronic rescattering doesn’t produce collective radial flow –It drives the system off equilibrium –Radial flow reflects that when the multi-strange decouples Thank you!

NanChang, April 19, Back up 1/14/201018

NanChang, April 19, Check— Parameter Correlation 1/14/ = T = q =  2 /nDof = / 13 = T = q =  2 /nDof = / 37

NanChang, April 19, Check—Strangeness and light hadrons 1/14/201020

NanChang, April 19, Results in p+p collisions 1/14/2010

NanChang, April 19, /14/ Temperature fluctuation Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, EPJ40, 299 (2009) Wilk and Wlodarzcyk, PRL84, 2770 (2000) Reverse legend