Maj. Brad Carver Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Phone: 404-954-6967.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Law and Institutions – rights and binding agreements U.S. water rights traditionally based on common law: Riparian doctrine in East – land owners.
Advertisements

Chapter 4 The Federal System.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
The Model Interstate Water Compact 1.Model Interstate Water Compact 2.The Utton Center 3.University of New Mexico School of Law 4.August 4, John.
Georgia Environmental Conference Water Supply – Reservoirs in Georgia Dargan Scott Cole, Sr. Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. 191 Peachtree Street, Suite.
Governor’s State Water Law Review Committee Recommendations 1982: Implementation Update David G. Baize Bureau of Water.
Coosa North Georgia Regional Water Plan: Goals, Major Resource Issues, Recommendations, and Lessons Learned Doug Baughman.
EVOLUTION OF SPACING AND POOLING IN COLORADO Denver Association of Division Order Analysts July 21, 2014 Denver, Colorado Steve Sullivan Welborn Sullivan.
The Compact  Legally enforceable contract among the Great Lakes States  Provided for in the U.S. Constitution  Ratification by State legislatures 
The NC Water Allocation Study : a report for city and county attorneys.
Water Resources In the United States: Perspectives and Challenges by Dr. Jerome Delli Priscoli Institute for Water Resources US Army Corps of Engineers.
Tennessee Valley Authority
1 Concurrent powers are shared between the federal government and state governments. Concurrent powers include, but are not limited to: Setting up courts.
Marbury v. Madison (Appointed fed. Judge by Pres. Adams night before Adams left office) (Sec. of State for Jefferson) (1803) Background –“Midnight Judge”
ADWR’S JUNE 2009 SUBFLOW ZONE REPORT ADWR’S JUNE 2009 SUBFLOW ZONE REPORT by Rich Burtell Arizona Department of Water Resources October 2, 2009.
Do Now: Take out your Venn Diagram and complete it on the board. Delegated Powers Reserved Powers Concurrent Powers.
 “We know what we want-now, how do we do it?”  Republic  Republicanism (based on the consent of the people)  Needed a government based on virtue –
Maj. Brad Carver Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C.
What Congress may and may not do.
John Marshall, Chief Justice
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) By Phil St Jacques & Eric Mott.
Introduction to Water Law & the Central Arizona Project (CAP)
8.1 Articles of Confederation OBJECTIVE: to understand why the Articles proved too weak to handle the new nation’s problems HW 8.2.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
7-2 Nationalism at center stage
7.2 Nationalism at Center Stage Mr. Manelski CPUSH.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
Jason King, P.E. State Engineer WSWC/NARF Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Right Claims August 25-27, 2015 Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe’s.
Regional Water Council Planning Update Dargan “Scott” Cole Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. 191 Peachtree Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia
U1, C4: Federalism. National defense Gambling laws Public education Voter registration Foreign affairs Disaster relief Real Estate property Environmental.
John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 
Colorado Water Law By Travis Hoesli. Colorado Water Law Unit Objectives 1. Understand who makes water laws in Colorado. 2. Recognize the general laws.
Property Rights Along the Watershed Sarah Kendall Gault, Nathaniel Zev Goldman, and Amy Michelle Russ Oglethorpe University Atlanta, GA Honors 201: Ecology.
Article III The Judicial Power. Section 1 The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as.
FEDERALISM Why so much more power today for the National Government?
“To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution.
The Federal System: National and State Powers. The Division of Powers The Constitution divided government authority by giving the national government.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Understanding Sedimentation and Land Use Cover Relationships in the Lake Sidney Lanier Watershed Russell A.
Too Little Water. Georgia Rivers Watershed Chattahoochee Watershed.
Interbasin Transfers of Water Alabama Water Resources Conference 2012 Dargan “Scott” Cole, Sr. Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. 191 Peachtree Street, Suite.
FEDERALISM. Questions to consider: In our federal system of government, what is the relationship between federal and state laws? Are there ever conflicts.
13. National and State Powers 13. National and State Powers.
Jeopardy Section1: Federalism: The Division of Powers Section 2: The National Gov’t and the 50 States Section 3: Interstate Relations PowerThe Constitution.
NID Data Model based on HUC CE394K.3 Term Project by Seungwon Won December 7, 2000.
Chapter 19 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Kevin Colvett, P.E. Nashville Corrective Action Plan and Engineering Report, Phase III for Metro Water Services and the City of Brentwood, TN Presentation.
F EDERALISM. T HREE TYPES OF GOVERNMENT Unitary – A centralized system of government in which all power is vested in a central government. Most nations.
3 Old Dominion University Lake Gaston Project Field Trip November 1, 2014 Thomas M. Leahy, P.E. Director of Public Utilities.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
Southeastern Region of the USA
How does this happen?. How does this happen? Why water?
Urban Water Institute- August 2015
Manifest Destiny=War with Mexico!!!
Concurrent powers include, but are not limited to: Setting up courts
Water Supply Context: Alabama, Florida and Georgia
Federalism Scenarios.
Department of Environmental Quality
Redundancy and Emergency Interconnectivity (REI) Plan
For the Coosa North Georgia Region
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
2018 Kern County Water Summit
Document #1 James Madison, Federalist #45
Westward Expansion of Georgia
Constitution Articles
The American Civil War Prelude.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Restoring Liberty and Justice, Once and For All
Drought Contingency Planning Efforts
Presentation transcript:

Maj. Brad Carver Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia Phone: Water for Georgia: Briefing for 2011 Groundwater Protection Council Annual Forum Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C.

Water Supply Issues Droughts in GeorgiaDroughts in Georgia – – – – – Georgia PopulationGeorgia Population –2,900,000 –3,695,000 –5,970,000 –8,185,000 –9,700,000

MNGWPD Projections 2030 Population 4 M to 8 M

What’s Beyond 2020 or 2030? Options in Consideration: –Other IBTs like Savannah River (Local opposition) –Desal. in Savannah, Pump to Atlanta Sea Level to EL 1000, 200+ miles? –Streamline Reservoir Implementation A Major Additional Source –Tennessee River at Nickajack Reservoir Pool EL 634+/-, <100 miles

NW GA to Double in 20 Years

NW GA in Four River Basins Water Supply Watersheds –Tennessee (7% of Upper Tn River in GA) 1.7 BGD -Coosa -Tallapoosa -Chattahoochee

Tennessee River at Nickajack

TVA Environmental Impact Statement Appendix D-9, Final Reservoir Operations EIS (Feb, 2004): –1 Billion Gallons of Excess Capacity per 2004 Reservoir Operations Study –Sensitivity analysis assumed 264 mgd (<1 % of flow) for Metro Atlanta, concluded “IBTs not likely to substantially affect future reservoir elevations…” “no effects on mainstream reservoirs…”

GA Duty to Augment Equitable apportionment doctrine imposes “affirmative duty to take reasonable steps to conserve and augment the water supply of an interstate stream." Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 US 176, 183, 185 (1982) (emphasis supplied).

Solution to Tri-State Water Wars with Alabama and Florida Solves the ACT/ACF Litigation because Alabama and Florida will know Georgia has enough water sources to meet minimum flows during extreme drought situations.

Prior Voluntary Access Attempts Unsuccessful ARC approached TAWC Chattanooga to purchase water from TN River in 1999 Tennessee responded with Inter-Basin Water Transfer Act of 2000 –Prohibited IBT w/o TDEC Permit –Expressly in direct opposition to Metro Atlanta growth

Originally Riparian to the Tennessee River – North Border “35 th Parallel” Jedediah Morse Map o

1835 Map of AL and MS Territory 35 o

Cession of Western Land April 24, th Parallel Clearly Indicated Border Expressly Intersects Tennessee River –“then in a direct line to Nickajack on the Tennessee River, then crossing the said last- mentioned river, and thence running up the said Tennessee River and along the Western bank thereof to the southern boundary of the State of Tennessee…” GA Ceded Mississippi Territory to the United States in 1802

Faulty Survey of 1818 Border Commission est. by TN and GA Mistakenly located 35 th Parallel Georgia has never accepted current border – still refer to 35 th Parallel Multiple attempts since by GA to resolve refused or ignored by TN including 2008

State of Tennessee established after GA U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3 –New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress. No such Consent ever granted Current Border Unconstitutional

GA Has Original Sovereign Riparian Rights and/or Federal Reserved Rights in TN River Sovereign Riparian rights not lost by nonuse nor subject to regulation by adjacent states (VA vs. MD, US Supreme Court, 2003) TVA has duty to implement federal promise to GA in Cession Agreement, using its own riparian rights if needed, analogous to federal reserved water rights doctrine FRWR supersede prior appropriation, riparian, and other rights (Laitos, 1985)

FERC Order Granted GA Authority 1981 FERC decision confirmed 1974 agreement with TN that GA has sole jurisdiction over gas utility in the disputed strip TN PSC expressly stated GA border still in dispute In Re Atlanta Gas Light Company, Docket No. CP71-221, 15 FERC P

35 th Parallel Intersects TN River US Army COE Navigation Chart No. 63

Aerial Photo 1999 USGS TN GA Current Borders Approximate AL Cole City Creek

Topographical Map 1982 USGS 35 o Approx. 1 mile

TVA Marginal Strip TVA System Map Current Marked Border

View of Nickajack from Dade Co

Questions / Discussion