Detection of weak earthquakes by small seismic array using DP/EP in the Czech Republic Jaroslav Strunc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Detection and Identification of Near Seismic Events by SeisComP3 limited by a sparse distributed Seismic Network Thomas Burghardt, Friedrich-Schiller-
Advertisements

THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.
Rethinking Array Seismology in Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Monitoring Steven J. Gibbons Workshop on Arrays in Global Seismology, Raleigh, North Carolina, May.
New Mexico Seismic Networks 1. New Mexico Tech Seismic Network Rick Aster, Sue Bilek (NMT EES Dept Contacts)
Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino RESEARCH CENTRE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS.
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Monday 10 June 2013
Reverse Drift Bursts in the GHz Band and their Relation to X-Rays František Fárník and Marian Karlický Astronomical Institute Academy of Sciences.
1 2 Outlines Earthquakes in the Manhattan area “Big” ones Small ones Earthquakes and earthquake hazard Causes of earthquakes Why Manhattan had earthquakes.
Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague Origin of earthquake swarms in West Bohemia inferred from observations of non-doble-couple components in.
Double-difference earthquake relocation of Charlevoix Seismicity, Eastern Canada implication for regional geological structures Meng Pang.
Seismicity around Lhasa Tsoja Wangmo 1), Norsang Gelsor 1) and Jens Havskov 2) 1) Jiangsu Road No 36 Lhasa, Tibet, PRC 2) University of Bergen, Department.
Global Broadband Arrays – a View from NORSAR Johannes Schweitzer and NORSAR’s Array Seismology Group Workshop on Arrays in Global Seismology May 15 – 16,
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Vibration measurements on the final doublets and the Shintake Monitor Benoît BOLZON7th ATF2 project meeting, 16/12/08.
Introduction to the Broadband Array in Taiwan for Seismology (BATS) Wen-Tzong Liang* Chun-Chi Liu Bor-Shouh Huang Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia.
Array Response Functions with ArrayGUI
1 Fault Dynamics of the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Sequence Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University Luca Malagnini INGV, Roma.
March 2010 Reasonable expectations for what a particular seismic network can accomplish (regardless of the software used) Antelope configuration suggestions.
Some issues of mining-induced seismicity in Khibiny and Lovozero mountain massifs Asming V.E., Kola Regional Seismological Centre GS RAS Kozyrev A.A.,
Automatic detection and location of microseismic events
1 Automated Processing of Earthquake Swarm Records at Very Short Epicentral Distances José M. Cepeda Universidad Centroamericana, (UCA) San Salvador, El.
Crust and upper mantle structure of Tien Shan Orogen and its surroundings by ambient noise tomography and earthquake tomography Yong Zheng a, Yingjie Yang.
Induced Seismicity at Lake Aswan Reservoir, Egypt Awad Hassoup Head of the National Seismic Network Laboratory.
Bill Ellsworth U.S. Geological Survey Near-Source Observations of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Rupture and Fault Mechanics JAMSTEC International.
IRIS workshop on “Managing Waveform Data and Related Metadata from Seismic Networks” Hotel Windsor Suites, Bangkok, Thailand 08-13, January, 2012 Ashvin.
Cross-over Seismology : Blurring the line between passive and active source experiments Diego Quiros Cornell University.
Seismic Networks Operated by Central Weather Bureau in Taiwan Ta-Yi Chen Central Weather Bureau.
Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
8-13 January 2012, Bangkok, Thailand Institute of Seismology, National Academy of Sciences, Kyrgyz Republic.
Tuesday Nov 10, 13:30 November 8-17, 2009Data Management Workshop Cairo, Egypt.
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
MICRO-SEISMICITY AND FOCAL MECHANISMS IN THE MALÉ KARPATY MTS., SLOVAKIA Lucia Fojtíková, Václav Vavryčuk, Andrej Cipciar, Ján Madarás.
Three BB and SM seismic stations in the Corinth Gulf jointly operated by the universities in Prague and Patras Jiri Zahradnik Charles University, Prague.
Facilitate – Collaborate – Educate Tuesday, January 10, 11:05am Data Management Workshop Bangkok Thailand, January 2011.
DPC High-resolution multi-disciplinary monitoring of active fault test-site areas in Italy S5S5S5S5 Roma 24/03/ 2010 S5 Project High-resolution.
The existing and upgrading national seismological network in vietnam Le Tu Son Le Tu Son Institute of Geophysics, VAST Vietnam.
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
Anomalies of Recordings of Spitsbergen Earthquakes A.V. Fedorov, V.E. Asming, S.V. Baranov Kola Branch of Geophysical Survey of RAS
A NON-TRADITIONAL HIGH PERFORMANCE BROAD-BAND SEISMOMETER PMD/eentec, USA
Rick Benson Saturday, Aug 14, 14:00 August 13-19, 2010Data Management Workshop Foz do Iguassu- Brazil.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Usage of joint rating functions for seismic phase association and event location Asming V.E., Prokudina A.V., Nakhshina L.P. Kola Regional Seismological.
Institute of Geophysical Research of the National Nuclear Center of RK Kazakhstan National monitoring system of nuclear explosions and earthquakes Mikhailova.
Passive seismic reflection imaging, on the earth and on the moon Kees Wapenaar Delft University of Technology.
High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.
Changes in the Performance of the IMS Infrasound Network due to Seasonal Propagation Effects David Norris and Robert Gibson BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17.
Vibration Stability Studies of a Superconducting XFEL/ILC Accelerating Module at Room Temperature and at 4.5K R. Amirikas, A. Bertolini, W. Bialowons.
Systems Check. Milton Garces and Claus Hetzer Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Manoa PMCC analyses of signals from the North American and.
Václav Vavryčuk Rosalia Daví Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha Seismic network calibration for retrieving accurate.
Seismic Monitoring Capabilities of Pakistan By Nasir Mahmood, Pakistan.
An overview of Uganda Seismological Network and current activities
Seismograph Networks in Japan
Global and Local Arrays. Topics covered:  Types of seismic arrays  How arrays are used  Example global networks.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
Seismicity of Norway Seismo group, Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Norway Location of stations in the Norwegian National Seismic.
Focal mechanisms and moment tensors of micro-earthquakes in the Malé Karpaty (Little Carpathians) Mts., Slovakia Lucia Fojtíková 1, Václav Vavryčuk 2,
Small-aperture seismic arrays: instruments and detectability Jiří Málek, Milan Brož and Jaroslav Štrunc Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics AS CR,
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Václav Vavryčuk, Fateh Bouchaala, Tomáš Fischer Institute of Geophysics, Prague High-resolution fault tomography from accurate locations and focal mechanisms.
José Faustino Blanco Chía National University of Colombia Geosciences Department.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Monitoring of the tidal variations in the seismic and hydrogeological data collected at the East European Platform Besedina A.N., Kabychenko N.V., Gorbunova.
DUEO, Department of Geology, University of Dhaka SHA DUEO, Department of Geology, University of Dhaka SHA Earthquake Studies And Earthquake Monitoring.
Search for solar normal modes in ambient seismic noise
- an example of the Jan Mayen Mw 6.8 of August 30, 2012 earthquake
Broadband Array in Taiwan for Seismology (BATS) Current Status
DIGITAL SEISMIC NETWORK OF UZBEKISTAN
THE SEISMOLOGICAL NETWORK AND EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY IN VIETNAM
Presentation transcript:

Detection of weak earthquakes by small seismic array using DP/EP in the Czech Republic Jaroslav Strunc

November 4, 2009NORSAR2 Outline Shortly about Academy of Sciences Areas of interest Experimental arrays Detections – classic & correlation Implementation model for WEBNET

November 4, 2009NORSAR3 Academy of Sciences Institute of Rock Structure & Mechanics −dept. of Seismology Czech Technical University −PhD student – measurement tech. What should be done −evaluation of experimental data −implementation in the Czech Rep.

November 4, 2009NORSAR4 maps.google.com Areas of Interest (1)

November 4, 2009NORSAR5 Areas of Interest (Natural Seismicity) Western Part −swarm area −Eger Rift & Marianske Lazne Fault −M Lmax = 5 Eastern Part −rare events but „strong“ −Hronov-Porici Fault −M Lmax = 3.5

November 4, 2009NORSAR6 East Bohemia Mount Ostas, 2005 Aperture 40m 1 broadband Guralp (30s) 3-D geophones SM6 (4.5Hz) 10 km NE far from Hronov-Porici Fault Near-surface events

November 4, 2009NORSAR7 West Bohemia WEBNET (West Bohemia Network) 13 permanent stations −Guralp (30s) & SM3 (1s) −Lennartz, Nanometrics 2 experimental arrays – NKCA, KVCA −triangular shape −aperture 90m −SM6 geophones (4.5Hz)

November 4, 2009NORSAR8 NKCA & KVCA Novy Kostel (2007), Kvetna (2008) Aperture 90m 3-D geophones SM6 (4.5Hz) Hypocentre b. Novy Kostel (5~15 km) KVCA placed about 5 km SE

November 4, 2009NORSAR9 KVCA (Kvetna)

November 4, 2009NORSAR KVCA NKCA

November 4, 2009NORSAR11 Swarm Activities (1) Last Swarm Activity : October/November 2008

November 4, 2009NORSAR12 Swarm Activities (2)

November 4, 2009NORSAR13 What with the data? 3 arrays −several years of continuous data No software for data processing −go through data manually? lack of time Is the shape and place of array suitable?  That‘s the purpose of my visit.

November 4, 2009NORSAR14 Objectives (1) Get familiar with array processing tech. Evaluate −array shape −array location −used type of sensors Find out the optimal method of detection for current configuration

November 4, 2009NORSAR15 Objectives (2) Select on array −KVCA (West Bohemia) Perform all experiments with the data −detections −locations Prepare automated process for the other arrays

November 4, 2009NORSAR16 Array Equipment Sensors −geophones – velocity (SM6b, Sensor Netherland) −theoretical flat resp. in range 4.5~1000Hz −sensitivity 2600 V/(m/s) Digitizers −RUP2004 (our product) −21-bit A/D Converter −sampling 100 Hz

November 4, 2009NORSAR17 But...?

November 4, 2009NORSAR18 Period of Study, KVCA April 17 ~ August 12, 2008 −117 days 131 local detections by WEBNET −M Lmin = -1 Array sensors „best“ features at −freq. band 8 ~ 16 Hz −spurious resonances present

November 4, 2009NORSAR19 Array Transfer Function

November 4, 2009NORSAR20 Classic DP 4 freq. bands (8-10, 10-12, 12-14, 14-16) used 227 beams (horizontal, vertical) threshold 12.5 ~ 6.5 lower SNR −increased false detections rapidly caused by spurious resonances of geophones −many „visible“ events stayed undetected

November 4, 2009NORSAR21 Event Example - Resonances

November 4, 2009NORSAR22 Event Example - Detail !

November 4, 2009NORSAR23 DP Results Best Results for −vertical SNR ≥ 6.5 −horizontal SNR ≥ 10 −backazimuth 270° ~ 360° April 19, 2008 −Σ 135 events 54 false at least 15 missed (visible without beamforming)  Data are too bad for classic DP

November 4, 2009NORSAR24 What about Cross-Correlation? 131 detected events by WEBNET −from 22 near locations 11 suitable templates −distinct phases −„weak“ enough (M L < 0) −only 7 of 9 array traces used (malfunction)  Finally: it takes time bud it works!

November 4, 2009NORSAR25 CC Results – Unique Detections April 19, 2008 −Σ 103 events (including template) for CC_SNR ≥ 9.5 −9 false −2 missing? −Σ 90 events (including template) for CC_SNR ≥ 10.5 −3 false −7 (+2?) missing!

November 4, 2009NORSAR26 Whole Period of Time (117 days)

November 4, 2009NORSAR

November 4, 2009NORSAR28 Detections per Day

November 4, 2009NORSAR29 Templates & Detections

November 4, 2009NORSAR30 Conclusions Geometry −suitable for detections in Fault Zone −but: none redundancy Features of the Sensors disable to use DP −they should be replaced CC-DP increases no. of detections −template necessary −cannot fish out new events

November 4, 2009NORSAR31 Future Work Implementation of on-line DP/EP in Academy of Science −at the beginning as template based CC-DP Process data from the other arrays Prepare a short paper

November 4, 2009NORSAR32 Thank you for attention Many thank to Johannes & Steven and to everybody for the nice atmosphere at Norsar