AJ Heroux with Teresa Montaruli. Playing in the Snow!! Outline –What is IceCube? History Deployment DOMS IceTop –Shadow of the moon Motivation Methods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

ICECUBE & Limits on neutrino emission from gamma-ray bursts IceCube collaboration Journal Club talk Alex Fry.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
ANTARES aims, status and prospects Susan Cartwright University of Sheffield.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
The Milagro Gamma-Ray Observatory Milagro is a water Cherenkov extensive air shower (EAS) detector located near Los Alamos, NM at 2630m above sea level,
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
Special Issues on Neutrino Telescopy Apostolos G. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University School of Science & Technology Particle and Astroparticle Physics.
IAU Sydney Per Olof Hulth Particle Astronomy from Antarctica Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
Atmospheric Variations as observed by IceCube HE Serap Tilav 1, Paolo Desiati 2, Takao Kuwabara 1, Dominick Rocco 2, Florian Rothmaier 3, Matt.
IceCube 40Point Source AnalysisResultsConclusions Search for neutrino point sources with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory Menlo Park, California TeVPA.
Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.
Cosmic Rays: Ever Present and Useful Anthony Gillespie Denbigh High School Mentor: Dr. Douglas Higinbotham Cosmic Rays Using the Cosmic Rays Current Research.
CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.
Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.
The next generation of Neutrino telescopes -ICECUBE Design and Performance, Science Potential Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin-Madison
A. Karle UW Madison 1. 2 Why neutrino astronomy? Astrophysical Accelerators Neutrinos allow for observation of ‘hidden regions’ of cosmic accelerators.
4. Einstein Angle and Magnification The angular deflection for a relativistic neutrino with mass m ʋ that passes by a compact lens of mass M with impact.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
CIPANP 2006K. Filimonov, UC Berkeley From AMANDA to IceCube: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov University of California, Berkeley.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
SEARCHING FOR A DIFFUSE FLUX OF ULTRA HIGH-ENERGY EXTRATERRESTRIAL NEUTRINOS WITH ICECUBE Henrik Johansson, for the IceCube collaboration LLWI H.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
radio lobe sound disk  t p ~ km  optical light cone The Vision *) see e.g. A. Ringwald,ARENA 2005 Build ~100 km 3 hybrid detector to: Confirm GZK cutoff.
Cosmic Rays GNEP Teacher Workshop Steve Shropshire, July 2007.
Neutrino Point Sources (Looking for) (with Underground Detectors) THE HIGTE ST ENERGY COSMIC RAYS AND THEIR SOURCES: Moscow May 21-23, 2004 S.P. Mikheyev.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
AMANDA. Latest Results of AMANDA Wolfgang Rhode Universität Dortmund Universität Wuppertal for the AMANDA Collaboration.
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector at the geographic South Pole. We give an overview of searches for time-variable neutrino.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Muon Vertical Depth Intensity Distribution at the South Pole with AMANDA-II Kimberly Moody 1 August 2003.
Atmospheric Variations as observed by IceCube HE Serap Tilav 1, Paolo Desiati 2, Takao Kuwabara 1, Dominick Rocco 2, Florian Rothmaier 3, Matt.
APRIM Chiang Mai July 28, 2011 Heliospheric Physics with IceTop Paul Evenson University of Delaware Department of Physics and Astronomy.
HAWC Science  Survey of 2  sr (half the sky) up to 100 TeV energies Probe knee in cosmic ray spectrum Identify sources of Galactic cosmic rays  Extended.
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
Alexander Kappes Extra-Galactic sources workshop Jan. 2009, Heidelberg Gamma ray burst detection with IceCube.
5 June 2002DAQ System Engineering Requirements 1 DAQ System Requirements DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review David Nygren.
Combining Gamma and Neutrino Observations Christian Spiering, DESY.
Alexander Kappes (E. Strahler, P. Roth) ECAP, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for the IceCube Collaboration 2009 Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Łódź,
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
STATUS AND PHYSICS GOALS OF KM3NET Paolo Piattelli P. Piattelli, ICHEP14 Valencia INFN – LNS, Catania (Italy)
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
CHANDLER Detector Neutronics Modeling Alireza Haghighat William Walters Nuclear Science and Engineering Lab (NSEL) Nuclear Engineering Program, Mechanical.
E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.
Strategies in the search for astrophysical neutrinos Yolanda Sestayo, MPI-k Heidelberg for the IceCube collaboration VLVνT 09, Athens.
First All-Sky Measurement of Muon Flux with IceCube IceCube REU Summer 2008 Kristin Rosenau Advisor: Teresa Montaruli.
KM3NeT Neutrino conference 2-7 June 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino telescope in.
Downgoing Muons in the IceCube experiment: Final presentation for Phys 735, Particle, Prof. Sridhara Dasu L.Gladstone 2008 Dec 3.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector currently under construction at the geographic South Pole. We will give an overview of searches.
Imaging the Neutrino Universe with AMANDA and IceCube
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
The Antares Neutrino Telescope
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Results on the Spectrum and Composition of Cosmic Rays
J. Braun, A. Karle, T. Montaruli
J. Braun, A. Karle, T. Montaruli
MC studies of the KM3NeT physics performance Rezo Shanidze
Title A.J. Carver University of Wisconsin – Madison
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
P. Sapienza, R. Coniglione and C. Distefano
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

AJ Heroux with Teresa Montaruli

Playing in the Snow!! Outline –What is IceCube? History Deployment DOMS IceTop –Shadow of the moon Motivation Methods Results –Future Work –Work done with DOMs

AMANDA was the precursor to IceCube Roughly 600 PMTs Buried at depths from m Pioneered the hot water drilling used in IceCube Still functional, will be able to work with IceCube

IceCube – The Next Generation 4800 PMT Buried at depths from 1500 to 2500 m Much greater sensitivity and accuracy over AMANDA Coincidences and veto by IceTop will help streamline analysis

Cherenkov Radiation and Neutrino Detection Created by ultra- relativistic particles This light is what the AMANDA/IceCube DOMs detect Similar to sonic boom or shockwave, but EM based For AMANDA/IceCube, produced by muons from muon neutrinos When DOMS are triggered in a row, there is a chance for a signal

Shadow of the Moon Motivations Calibration Absolute Pointing Accuracy Angular resolution

Methods for Calibration Known neutrino sources – AGN, Supernovae, Accreting Black Holes…. or not Moon/Sun Shadow with Atmospheric Muons from Cosmic Rays

How to find the Shadow? Need to know where it is –Albrecht Karle’s code –My code: SLALIB –NASA JPL Ephemerides Accuracy –10’ longitude, 3” latitude Result: My code will be implemented in IceCube software Sun Moon Declination in Degrees Sun and Moon Declination in Degrees

Calculating the Muon Deficit Need to know several key values –Atmospheric Muon Flux –Effective Area of IceCube –Radius of the Moon disc and Search Bin From there we calculate –Expected Muon Events –Blocked Muon Events –Significance of the Deficit

Cosmic Ray Muon Flux Images from Paolo Desiati, AMANDA Collaboration

Calculations for the Moon Based on 2005 Data Cosmic Muon Flux Search Bin Size of Moon Effective Area of IceCube Expected Background Blocked Events Significance of Deficit

AMANDA vs IceCube 31.39σ in 64 days1.88σ in 64 days38.92 in 98 days2.34σ in 98 days Significance Events Absorbed Events Expected 0.18 or 64 days 0.27 or 98 days Moon above 20۫۫ 10 6 m²3·10 4 m²10 6 m² 3·10 4 m² Effective Area 1°3°1°3° Angular Resolution 8.5·10 -9 cm -2 sec -1 sr -1 Cosmic Ray Flux IceCubeAMANDAIceCubeAMANDA-II SunMoon

Future Work It will now be possible to calibrate IceCube every month using this method. Starting in 2014, the moon will not reach the 20 degree cutoff until around 2017

STF Work: My Program Sorts through any test results generated by ReadSTFTest.pl from Hagar Landsman. Sorts data based on temperature of test, date of test, or on separate value from test. Multiple output options, and changing code from test to test is contained within first few lines of code.

Results good bad good

Acknowledgements Teresa Montaruli – IceCube Collaboration Hagar Landsman – IceCube Collaboration Ed Mierkiewicz – UW Astronomy Dept Bob Benjamin – UWW Physics Dept The whole IceCube group especially JuanCarlos Diaz-Valez, Jonathan Dumm, Alessio Tamburro, Albrecht Karle The other REU Students