ECOLOGICAL STANDARDS OF MARINE ENVIRONMENT QUALITY DEVELOPED BY: Research Organization “Ukrainian Scientific Centre of the Ecology of Sea” (RO UkrSCES)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
Advertisements

Mediterranean Sea Basin Checkpoint a user of EMODnet Chemistry N. Pinardi E. Clementi C. Panaroni INGV EMODnet Chemistry Data Products – Experts Workshop.
Wastewater Characteristics CE Importance of Characteristics The degree of treatment depends on: The degree of treatment depends on: Influent characteristics.
How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.
SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Tanja Popovicki Department for International Co-operation Ministry for the Protection of Natural Resources and Environment of the.
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
Criteria for water quality assessment between countries: how to proceed in the next few years ? F. László Water Resources Research Centre Budapest, Hungary.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EU AQ LEGISLATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC J. FIALA Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Danube River Basin Joachim Bendow, ICPDR Executive Secretary 1.
Introduction: We will start with an overview of treatment processes 1) Why do we treat water and wastewater? The main objectives of the conventional wastewater.
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
AUTHORS: THE STUDENTS IX-a E - MARTIN ADRIAN, X-a A – RADU IOANA, PASCU FLORINA, ZINCĂ CRISTINA, MAZILU COSMIN, XI-a H – GHIŢĂ LILIANA This project has.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT of RIVER WATER QUALITY.
Case Studies from Egypt
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MARINE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ”GRIGORE ANTIPA” CONSTANTA, ROMANIA PROJECT TITLE Improvement of the scientific background for assuring.
CHEMICAL-PHYSICO MONITORING SUPPORTING ECOLOGICAL STATUS FOR THE EU WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE BY MICHAEL JACKMAN CHEMISTRY EXPERT.
NATIONAL RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY Safety Inspectorate Inspection Ecology September 2011 Waste management in National Railway Infrastructure Company.
VI International Symposium on Trasboundary Waters Management, Thessaloniki, October 2008 The European Union’s Marine Strategy Directive Dr. Angeliki.
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water Norman Green, NIVA Nov 2006, Belgrade.
1 Relations between PM and persistent toxic substances Alexey Ryaboshapko, Meteorological Synthesizing Center “East” EG on Particulate Matter, Berlin,
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009 S.I. No. 272 of 2009 Pat Duggan.
South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
Alexander KORSHENKO STATE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE (SOI) Kropotkinsky Lane 6, Moscow BLACK and AZOV Hydrochemistry.
WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION A.I. ZOUBOULIS Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Chemistry, Div. Of Chem. Technol. Main aspects: Introduction Dangerous substances in.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan
1 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 1 ENPI/SEIS Consultation Meeting European Commission, Brussels, 11 November 2010 Current Situation and.
Comparison of Environmental Quality Objectives, Threshold Values or Water Quality Targets set for the Demands of European Water Framework Directive Ulrich.
Mussel watch programme in support of the WFD monitoring : the RINBIO and MYTILOS project Louis A. ROMAÑA Ifremer - France Workshop on ‘In-situ trialing.
Approaches to decrease nutrient pollution in agriculture of Ukraine: reality and perspectives WORKSHOP “AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION CONTROL – GOOD PRACTICES”
A Practical Approach: The General Physico-Chemical Quality Elements and the Classification of Ecological Status.
BUG SURVEYS : An Initiation of Transboundary Co- operation Małgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship Inspectorate of Environmental Protection in Szczecin.
Integrated initial Assessment of pressures and state of the Mediterranean marine environment in the framework of the application of Ecosystem Approach.
Proposal for estimation of surface water bodies background levels for selected metals Slovak Republic.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
1 Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-1 Lecture -4 & 5.
Dedicated maps on contaminants
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
Alexander Petrovich Dalimayev,
SERBIAN NATIONAL ACTION PLAN [DRAFT]
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
METREAU part II Analysis Division March 10,
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Dedicated maps on contaminants
WG C Groundwater Threshold Values
Data collection and dedicated maps on contaminants
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Summing up and next steps
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
Preparation of the Heavy Metals Protocol Ratification by Ukraine
Juhani Gustafsson, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
Finalisation of study report
Interaction of humic acids with heavy metals - a theoretical study
WGGW Bratislava – 26 October 2016
Analysis.
Presentation transcript:

ECOLOGICAL STANDARDS OF MARINE ENVIRONMENT QUALITY DEVELOPED BY: Research Organization “Ukrainian Scientific Centre of the Ecology of Sea” (RO UkrSCES) of the Ministry of Environment of Ukraine, 2009 SUBMITTED BY: State Ecological Inspection of Ukraine DEVELOPERS: (Borulko V.I., scientific supervisor; Denga Yu.M., executive developer; Pavlenko M.Yu., Zhuravel G.Ya., Khapchenko L.M. – developers)

General Characteristics and Provisions of the ES The proposed system of ecological standards of marine environment components’ quality (water and bottom sediments) is based on joint harmonized massif of maximum permissible concentrations (MPCs) adopted in Ukraine and in the EU (see Annex 1), as well as on the information about background levels and real ranges of fluctuations of water and sediments’ quality quantitative values in the Black Sea according to the data from environmental monitoring of the Black and Azov Seas carried out by the Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of Sea (UkrSCES) for many years. Lists of informative parameters used in schemes of water and sediments quality ecological classifications contain main hydrochemical parameters, nutrients and priority pollutants (see Annex 2). At that requirements of the EU Directives, maritime conventions and National Legislation were taken into consideration (see Annex 3). The proposed system of ecological standards of marine environment components’ quality (water and bottom sediments) is based on joint harmonized massif of maximum permissible concentrations (MPCs) adopted in Ukraine and in the EU (see Annex 1), as well as on the information about background levels and real ranges of fluctuations of water and sediments’ quality quantitative values in the Black Sea according to the data from environmental monitoring of the Black and Azov Seas carried out by the Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of Sea (UkrSCES) for many years. Lists of informative parameters used in schemes of water and sediments quality ecological classifications contain main hydrochemical parameters, nutrients and priority pollutants (see Annex 2). At that requirements of the EU Directives, maritime conventions and National Legislation were taken into consideration (see Annex 3). System of ecological quality standards does not substitute National fishery standards for MPCs currently used in Ukraine for the purposes of ecological control. System of ecological quality standards does not substitute National fishery standards for MPCs currently used in Ukraine for the purposes of ecological control. Ecological quality standards of marine environment are harmonized with the European standards and enable us to assess marine environment quality according to current international requirements, which is caused by requirements of both National and international programmes. Ecological quality standards of marine environment are harmonized with the European standards and enable us to assess marine environment quality according to current international requirements, which is caused by requirements of both National and international programmes. Methodology of integrated assessment of marine water and bottom sediments quality was developed based on results of marine environmental monitoring. Recommendations on the use of the methodology were issued. Methodology of integrated assessment of marine water and bottom sediments quality was developed based on results of marine environmental monitoring. Recommendations on the use of the methodology were issued.

Levels of priority of parameters of marine environment quality For estimation of marine environment quality (water and bottom sediments) the set of parameters is defined and distributed on two levels of priority (Level 1 - the basic and Level 2 - additional). This or that level of priority is appropriated to parameters depending on their importance for estimation of marine environment quality and management of its condition. For estimation of marine environment quality (water and bottom sediments) the set of parameters is defined and distributed on two levels of priority (Level 1 - the basic and Level 2 - additional). This or that level of priority is appropriated to parameters depending on their importance for estimation of marine environment quality and management of its condition. Monitoring of parameters of Level 1 is necessary for check of their conformity to ecological standards for sea waters and bottom sediments. Monitoring of parameters of Level 1 is necessary for check of their conformity to ecological standards for sea waters and bottom sediments. Parameters of level 2 can be included in level 1 at monitoring of those sea areas in which there is a danger of occurrence of these substances or their presence in essential concentration is established. Parameters of level 2 can be included in level 1 at monitoring of those sea areas in which there is a danger of occurrence of these substances or their presence in essential concentration is established.

Parameters of Level 1 for marine waters General Parameters (Dissolve oxygen, pH, BOD, TSS, Ammonium nitrogen); General Parameters (Dissolve oxygen, pH, BOD, TSS, Ammonium nitrogen); Nutrients (Nitrite, Nitrates, Phosphates, Total N and P); Nutrients (Nitrite, Nitrates, Phosphates, Total N and P); Trace metals (V, Cd, Co, Cu, As, Mo, Ni, Hg, Pb, Cr, Zn); Trace metals (V, Cd, Co, Cu, As, Mo, Ni, Hg, Pb, Cr, Zn); Benz(a)pyrene (as indicator of PAHs); Benz(a)pyrene (as indicator of PAHs); Total PHs; Total PHs; Organochlorine pesticides (Lindane and its isomers, DDT and its metabolites); Organochlorine pesticides (Lindane and its isomers, DDT and its metabolites); Total PCBs. Total PCBs.

Parameters of Level 1 for marine bottom sediments More toxic metals (Cd, Co, Cu, As, Mo, Ni, Sn, Hg, Pb, Cr, Zn); More toxic metals (Cd, Co, Cu, As, Mo, Ni, Sn, Hg, Pb, Cr, Zn); Individual PAHs; Individual PAHs; Total Phenols; Total Phenols; More toxic OPs ( Lindane and its isomers, DDT and its metabolites, Dieldrin, Endrin); More toxic OPs ( Lindane and its isomers, DDT and its metabolites, Dieldrin, Endrin); PCBs total. PCBs total.

SYSTEM OF MARINE WATERS QUALITY ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION The system of marine water quality ecological classification states the correspondence between physical and chemical water quality indices as related to ecological standards required to support optimal functioning of marine ecosystems. The quality system is divided into the following classes: The system of marine water quality ecological classification states the correspondence between physical and chemical water quality indices as related to ecological standards required to support optimal functioning of marine ecosystems. The quality system is divided into the following classes: I. “High” quality I. “High” quality 2. “Good” quality* 2. “Good” quality* 3. “Satisfactory” quality 3. “Satisfactory” quality 4. “Poor” quality 4. “Poor” quality 5. “Bad” quality 5. “Bad” quality 6. ”Critical level” of quality 6. ”Critical level” of quality * hereinafter called ecological standard (ES) * hereinafter called ecological standard (ES) Ecological standard answers the standards of MPC, which provides for satisfactory functioning of marine ecosystems. Ecological standard answers the standards of MPC, which provides for satisfactory functioning of marine ecosystems.

The ranges of marine waters quality compared to the ES Quality class Determination I. “High” quality < ES x “Good” quality (ES) > ES x 0.5 ES x 0.5 < ES x 1 3. “Satisfactory” quality > ES x 1 ES x 1 < ES x “Poor” quality > ES x 2.5 ES x 2.5 < ES x 5 5. “Bad” quality > ES x 5 ES x 5 < ES x “Critical level” of quality > ES x 10

The above classification is used to assess hydrochemical parameters except for dissolved oxygen and pH, for which coefficient between quality classes is not used, other criteria are used instead: ES for dissolved oxygen should be interpreted on the contrary to the comparison with all other parameters (i.e. the higher is concentration, the better is water quality). ES for dissolved oxygen should be interpreted on the contrary to the comparison with all other parameters (i.e. the higher is concentration, the better is water quality). As the pH values from 6,5 to 8,5 are usually mandatory requirement for the majority of water organisms irrespective of their relative tolerance of other physical and chemical parameters, those values should be taken for both “high” and “good” quality. That is why all the values outside the above limits could be considered as “inconsistent”. As the pH values from 6,5 to 8,5 are usually mandatory requirement for the majority of water organisms irrespective of their relative tolerance of other physical and chemical parameters, those values should be taken for both “high” and “good” quality. That is why all the values outside the above limits could be considered as “inconsistent”.

Ecological classification of marine waters quality

SYSTEM OF MARINE BOTTOM SEDIMENTS’ QUALITY ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION Ecological classification of the Black Sea bottom sediments quality determines a range of values for each parameter to be checked for correspondence to the ecological standards. Ecological classification of the Black Sea bottom sediments quality determines a range of values for each parameter to be checked for correspondence to the ecological standards. The difference between groups of parameters for bottom sediments and those for sea water differ in the following way: for two groups of chemicals (metals and organic matter) in sediments the coefficients 5 and 50, respectively, are used The difference between groups of parameters for bottom sediments and those for sea water differ in the following way: for two groups of chemicals (metals and organic matter) in sediments the coefficients 5 and 50, respectively, are used ES (Quality class 2) for marine bottom sediments used in the EU countries (in particular, in the Netherlands) P. O. Box 30945, 2515 XP, The Hague, The Netherlands ES (Quality class 2) for marine bottom sediments used in the EU countries (in particular, in the Netherlands) P. O. Box 30945, 2515 XP, The Hague, The Netherlands

Ranges of bottom sediments’ quality classes for trace metals Quality class Determination I. “High” quality < ES x “Good” quality (ES) > ES x 0.5 ES x 0.5 < ES x 1 3. “Satisfactory” quality > ES x 1 ES x 1 < ES x “Poor” quality > ES x 1.25 ES x 1.25 < ES x “Bad” quality > ES x 2.5 ES x 2.5 < ES x 5 6. “Critical level” of quality > ES x 5

Ranges of bottom sediments’ quality classes for organic’s pollutants Quality class Determination I. “High” quality < ES x “Good” quality (ES) > ES x 0.2 ES x 0.2 < ES x 1 3. “Satisfactory” quality > ES x 1 ES x 1 < ES x 5 4. “Poor” quality > ES x 5 ES x 5 < ES x “Bad” quality > ES x 25 ES x 25 < ES x “Critical level” of quality > ES x 50

Ecological Classification of Marine Bottom Sediments’ Quality

Dredged Materials’ Quality Assessment for Issuing Permits for Their Dumping into the Sea Quality Class (Parameters of Level 1)* Use 1. „High” quality Naturally clean sediments (no restriction on dump- sites determined by environmental authorities) 2. “Good” quality No restriction for damping of dredged materials into marine environment or use on the coast in the areas determined by the environmental authorities 3. “Satisfactory” quality Damping is permitted only within the areas specified. Use on the coast is restricted to low quality construction materials 4. “Poor” quality Damping only within the areas specified or use on the coast as additives to low quality construction materials – permitted only after preliminary treatment. 5. “Bad” quality Damping into marine environment is prohibited. Disposal on the coast is required

METHODOLOGY OF INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF MARINE WATERS AND BOTTOM SEDIMENTS QUALITY Integrated assessment of marine waters or bottom sediments is done according to results of marine ecological monitoring. The procedure of integrated class setting envisages determination of general quality classes for certain set of parameters according to the results of monitoring, carrying out of calculations to determine limits for each quality class and state the integrated quality class for the studied region of the sea Integrated assessment of marine waters or bottom sediments is done according to results of marine ecological monitoring. The procedure of integrated class setting envisages determination of general quality classes for certain set of parameters according to the results of monitoring, carrying out of calculations to determine limits for each quality class and state the integrated quality class for the studied region of the sea An example of integrated assessment of marine water quality is presented below : An example of integrated assessment of marine water quality is presented below : STAGE 1 – Data Collecting STAGE 1 – Data Collecting According to results of marine environmental monitoring a quality class is stated for each parameter in accordance with the system of ecological classification. For example, according to the data from marine environmental monitoring a set of data was received comprising 25 parameters of (P) Level 1: According to results of marine environmental monitoring a quality class is stated for each parameter in accordance with the system of ecological classification. For example, according to the data from marine environmental monitoring a set of data was received comprising 25 parameters of (P) Level 1:

STAGE 2 – Determination of general (total) value of quality class for the present set of parameters This stage consists in simple summing up of a number of parameters in each quality class according to ecological classification. This stage consists in simple summing up of a number of parameters in each quality class according to ecological classification. Table I.1 shows the process of summing up values of separate parameters in each class for this data set in accordance with the scheme of marine waters ecological classification. Table I.1 shows the process of summing up values of separate parameters in each class for this data set in accordance with the scheme of marine waters ecological classification.

Procedure of Determination of Quality Classes’ Limits and Integrated Assessment of Marine Waters Quality in the Studied Area

Graphic presentation of marine water integrated quality  Integrated quality class 3 (Satisfactory), at that, average quality class of marine water on copper, molybdenum and lindane content are estimated as bad (5), on vanadium and benz(a)pyrene content – as poor (4), on ammonium nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, BOD, total nitrogen and phosphorus, mercury and lead content – as good, on pH, nitrite, cadmium, cobalt, nickel, lead and chromium – as high (1).  Similarly integrated assessment of marine bottom sediments’ quality for certain areas is calculated according to the data from environmental monitoring.

Main conclusions Use of ecological standards of water and sediments’ quality enables us to introduce differentiated approach in management of marine environment state, which takes into account real state of marine environment, current level of anthropogenic pressure, requirements of water- users as to the quality of marine water, as well as capacities of State monitoring system to control parameters of marine environment situation. Use of ecological standards of water and sediments’ quality enables us to introduce differentiated approach in management of marine environment state, which takes into account real state of marine environment, current level of anthropogenic pressure, requirements of water- users as to the quality of marine water, as well as capacities of State monitoring system to control parameters of marine environment situation. The sphere of implementation of ES is assessment of marine environment quality according to results of marine environment monitoring, as well as development of measures to protect and stage-by-stage improve marine water areas’ suffering different levels of anthropogenic pressure. The sphere of implementation of ES is assessment of marine environment quality according to results of marine environment monitoring, as well as development of measures to protect and stage-by-stage improve marine water areas’ suffering different levels of anthropogenic pressure.