Operator Performance Appraisal Byron Tilly RS Unit Manager, SEPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Protection Legislation Stephen McCallum
Advertisements

Managing the Health and Safety of Contractors
Accident and Incident Investigation
ADR company checks in Romania
Objectives Terminal Objective
Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
Auditing Computer-Based Information Systems
Audit file reviews ordered by ACCA Audit file review orders Key features Basis of ACCA’s audit file assessment Guidance for firms (and “hot” reviewers)
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Reporting Results for Pesticide Programs Robin Powell, EM Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Environmental Department.
DWA CORPORATE IDENTITY Presented by: Johan Maree Deputy Director: Media Production 12 December 2012 Compliance Monitoring Strategy Presented by: Anet Muir.
Fire Safety Jonathan Harrison Fire Protection Inspector West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Authority.
Health and Safety.
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Energy Division’s Proposed Policy on Targeting and Prioritisation WIG Conference 18 September 2013.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION Food Safety legislation is designed to protect consumers from illness and harm.
NACMPI November 15-16, 2005 Risk-Based Inspection Dr. Barbara Masters Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator,
BRC Food Safety Quality Management System Training Guide
We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. The Environment.
Joint European Commission – IMPEL Seminar on Environmental Inspections Wednesday 17 November 2010 Hotel Le Meredien, Brussels.
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
National Radioactive Waste Disposal Institute Bill Presentation to the NCOP Select Committee on Economic and Foreign Affairs October 2008.
Health and Safety Policy
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
SEPA Compliance Assessment Scheme. Aims and Benefits 1.Proportionate 2.Consistent, fair and legally correct 3.Transparent and accountable 4.Targeted,
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part III.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
How ACCA assesses compliance with auditing standards.
Webinar FSSC audit report 7th september 2015
IS 630 : Accounting Information Systems Auditing Computer-based Information Systems Lecture 10.
Authorization Part III. Content of a license Structure of a license General elements General and specific conditions Annexes Documents attached (e.g.
International Atomic Energy Agency School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096 Vienna, 3 May, 2010 Adriana Nicic, Regulatory Activities.
A New Standard for Disposal Mark Crookston Senior Advisor Appraisal Government Recordkeeping Group.
Checking and Corrective Action EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
Monitoring, review and audit.
ISO RECORDS. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to:  Describe.
Managing Fire Safety In Common Parts of Flats and Mixed Use Buildings Simon Gibbins Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service.
Chapter 3-Auditing Computer-based Information Systems.
WEEE Producer Responsibility in the UK – Best Practice.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
Slide n° 1 EU railway legislation - Safety regulatory framework NAB/RB training workshop in Valenciennes, April 2016 NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Health & Safety Management “and a few other things for your consideration”
1.9. Safety assessment “School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety, IAEA - Module 1 Regulatory framework for safety, authorization and inspection.

National Sensory Impairment Partnership/Learning Event
Project Quality Management
ISO/IEC
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Health and Safety Policy
United Kingdom arrangements for national registers of radioactive sources Ian Streatfield IAEA International Workshop on National Registers of Radiation.
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
National Radioactive Waste Management Agency Bill
PROVINCIAL WORKSHOPS November 2018.
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
OSU Controlled Substances Training Module for Researchers
Presentation transcript:

Operator Performance Appraisal Byron Tilly RS Unit Manager, SEPA

Purpose & Scope of OPA  SEPA is required to direct resources to where they are most needed  SEPA has adopted a risk-based assessment methodology to determine inspection frequencies  System used for RSA premises is the Operator Performance Assessment - OPA  OPA assesses and scores the performance of operators in managing the hazards to the environment from licensed activities

Purpose & Scope of OPA Methodology for undertaking OPAs is intended to:  Be objective whilst recognising need for professional judgement of officers  Provide a numerical indicator to enable SEPA to prioritise its inspections and focus its resources  Note – The OPA is not intended to be used as a substitute for production of inspection reports or taking appropriate enforcement action

Purpose & Scope of OPA Objective of the OPA scoring scheme:  To identify sites which are poor performers  To allow regulatory effort to be targeted appropriately  The RSA OPA scheme is an internal guide for SEPA to focus its inspections and target resources

Attributes to be assessed 1.Radioactive Substance Security  Physical security of the radioactive substances with regard to inadvertent loss or theft from the premises  Physical means by which the operator is able to restrict access to radioactive substances by authorised persons only

Attributes to be assessed 2.Knowledge & Implementation of Licence Requirements  Operators fundamental understanding of the certificates, the regulations and relevant duties to apply BPM  Effectiveness of implementing the certificates’ and regulatory requirements

Attributes to be assessed 3.Recording and Use of Information  Operator would be expected to keep accurate records of the types, volumes and activities of all wastes accumulated and disposed of from the premises  Records should be kept upto date and utilised to demonstrate compliance

Attributes to be assessed 4.Facility Management  Physical state of the facility and the management of maintenance activities  Reactive approach to maintenance?  Proactive work undertaken to predict and prevent future breakdowns or remediate deteriorating facilities?  The operator should have a rationalised and documented approach to determining maintenance strategy

Attributes to be assessed 5.Radioactive Substance Management  Effectiveness of the radioactive substance management system, including written procedures  Effectiveness and extent of implementation of operating procedures  Control of RS operations

Attributes to be assessed 6.Incidents, Complaints & Non-Compliance Events  Overall compliance with licence requirements  Incidents & complaints  Non-compliances  SEPA’s improvement requirements and the operator’s response to such requirements

Scoring of Attributes Each of the 6 attributes is given a score out of 5 Scoring System  1 - Very few or no features within an attribute complied with  2 – Minority of features complied with or a significant failure observed  3 – Majority of the features complied with and no significant failures observed  4 – Nearly all features complied with and no significant failures observed  5 – All features complied with and no significant failures observed

Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory Criteria A score of 3 is considered to be satisfactory and indicates that the operator is compliant with all relevant licence conditions relating to that attribute  If the operator scores one level 2 on any attribute, the OPA shall be considered satisfactory provided all other attributes are scored at level 3 or above  If two or more attributes are scored at level 2 or below, then the assessment is considered unsatisfactory  A score of 1 against any attribute means the overall assessment is unsatisfactory

Pass/Fail Mark Once the total score has been calculated, it is necessary to determine if the operator has passed (satisfactory performance) or failed (unsatisfactory performance) the assessment A score of 17 or above indicates a pass mark, with the following caveats:  A score of 1 on any attribute  Two or more attributes which have scored 2