1 Contextual Value Added and Data For Dummies The mystery explained.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIRMINGHAM CATHOLIC PRIMARY PARTNERSHIP HEADTEACHER BRIEFING MEETING 12 TH JANUARY 2007 JOHN HILL CHIEF RESEARCH AND STATISTICS MANAGER.
Advertisements

Aldwych Primary School – case study Information for presenters; Script is contained on the notes page Handouts required: Context Context extract Internet.
Sue Rogers Director of Education KGA Presentation GCSE and Post 16 plus Closing the Gap.
Progression at Pupil, School and National Levels Workshop 14 DCSF Conference: The Use of Evidence in Policy Development and Delivery 9th February 2010.
Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
Exploring the impact of involvement in NCSL activity on school improvement Pam Sammons and Qing Gu University of Nottingham School of Education University.
The Performance of Vulnerable Learners Somerset Schools Forum 20 May 2014 Agenda Item 5b Nicola Turner.
Philippa Wilding and Pat Webb How to demonstrate the impact of pupil premium funding with SIMS.
Compact Termly Primary Headteacher Briefing November 2012 Headline Performance Data 2012.
School Improvement in East Sussex New ways of working…
Data – a focus on vulnerable groups and how governors can use data to positively challenge Directorate Support Team (Data & Statistics) Cornwall Council.
Summary Education Performance for Herefordshire Overview February 2015.
Kent Governors’ Association County Briefing 20 October 2014 Patrick Leeson Corporate Director Education and Young People’s Services.
Inter-Board Governor Support Programme
Labelling and anti-school subcultures LOs: I can describe what labelling is. I can explain how labelling can affect a student’s educational achievement.
Curriculum and Performance Measures ….an update.  Changes to content and assessment at every Key Stage  Key changes coming up  Possible considerations:
SASH Conference The Ofsted perspective on Somerset secondary schools 15 May 2015 Tom Winskill, Senior HMI, Ofsted South West 15 May 2015.
FFT Data Analysis Project – Supporting Self Evaluation  Fischer Family Trust / Fischer Education Project Extracts may be reproduced for non commercial.
“ I often say that what gets measured, gets done. Margaret Spellings ” Knowing every student, Knowing their.
School: Boundary Primary Headteacher: Dayle Harrison 2009 Target for English and Maths combined =65% SchoolSchoolNational Average Number of.
Reporting levels Parents Evening. SO WHAT LEVELS DO YOU EXPECT YOUR CHILD TO BE WORKING AT? National Curriculum Levels range from level 1 to level 8,
Feyisa Demie Adviser for school self-evaluation and
Summary and analysis of school data on pupil achievement 2012 ‘How are we doing?’
STATISTICS IN SCHOOLS Vinay Bhardwaj Kim Jackson Catherine Rich Amy Zaffarese.
Salford: How well are we doing?. Early Years Foundation Stage.
Educational Standards Cabinet January Early Years Performance  The percentage of pupils achieving the target expectations in the Early Years Foundation.
Saltburn Primary School.  Saltburn-by-the-Sea is a small Victorian seaside town on the North East coast with a mixed catchment area. (Professional families.
Key Stage Analysis and Trends Education and Performance Analysis Team Data source: Statistical First Release: GCSE and equivalent attainment by.
1 New Performance Tables: 2011 and Beyond… Cathy Christieson Head of School Performance Data Unit 13 th May 2011.
Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
Mike Treadaway Director of Research Fischer Family Trust Using FFT Live Secondary Schools.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-05 Workshop 3S (Secondary) Analysing progress data.
Common risk factors for children, young people and families at risk of poor outcomes Heather Eyre – Research and Information Manager, Education Leeds John.
Hartlepool Education Commission Conference Tom Grieveson Senior HMI Ofsted North East, Yorkshire and Humber Region – May 2014.
Mike Treadaway Director of Research Fischer Family Trust.
Joining the dots FFT aspire: an overview Anne Pepper FFT Associate 1 Essex LA – Schools Hands On June 2015.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
Achievement Attainment and Progress What evidence will you need?
End of Key Stage Assessment March Children are formally assessed at the end of each Key Stage –End of reception –KS 1 –KS 2 –KS 3.
Updates Changes to the accountability measures for 2016 Pupil premium features in East Sussex secondary schools in 2013 Changes to RAISE for 2014 FFT developments.
RAISEonline 2011 The same broad approach to the new reports is used for both primary and secondary analyses.
SEF Describing good or better achievement and standards What is laid down, ordered, factual is never enough to embrace the whole truth: life spills over.
‘There can be no more important subject than English in the school curriculum. English is a pre-eminent world language; it is at the heart of our culture.
What is CVA? ….Contextual Value Added. Attainment Eg. 62% 5+ A*- C…the headline figure Attainment – where we are now (eg 62%) Achievement – the progress.
Empowering Informed Decisions Using RAISEonline data to improve governor effectiveness Dave Thomson Head of Data Analysis, RM Education.
A Guide to Raiseonline KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prior Attainment Informs the Journey KS1 Teacher Assessments KS4 ExamsKS2 TestsPost 16 Expectation to.
Data update Autumn Overview About the new targets progress attainment Raise On Line (ROL) data reports and analyses historic results future estimates.
7 th June 2012 Is it better to fail than to succeed? A quantitative analysis of ‘just’ failing an English school inspection Rebecca Allen, Institute of.
Towards Good Achievement for All Chris Snudden June 2013.
Good Morning and welcome. Thank you for attending this meeting to discuss assessment of learning, pupil progress and end of year school reports.
Monitoring Attainment and Progress from September 2016 John Crowley Senior Achievement Adviser.
Governor Data Training. Secondary National Standards National Floor Standards 5 A*-C including English and maths above 40% rising to 50% in Progress.
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
‘A Flying Start’ Achievement Update November 2014 Chris Snudden Head of Education Achievement Service Head of Virtual School for Children in Care John.
Pupil Premium Chris Snudden. Pupil Premium 2014 – 2015 Indicative Allocations Total Pupil Premium for Norfolk £29,752,000 Primary = £18,032,000 Secondary.
FFT Data Analysis Project Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
Analysing the Primary RAISE
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
This checklist is designed to help governors assess how well they know their school, and to identify areas where they could improve their knowledge. It.
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
Supporting School Improvement Partners (SIPs) working with Schools Causing Concern, including Hard to Shift 1.
Workshop 2S (Secondary)
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Progress 8: an explanation
Life beyond levels Analysing school performance using scaled scores
Presentation transcript:

1 Contextual Value Added and Data For Dummies The mystery explained

2 Objectives – to understand Contextual Value added – how it is calculated and factors which affect it. Contextual Value added – how it is calculated and factors which affect it. Performance descriptors “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”. Performance descriptors “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”. How Ofsted form judgements on performance data. How Ofsted form judgements on performance data.

3 Objectives – to understand Key Lessons from data analysis – self evaluation Key Lessons from data analysis – self evaluation What are we going to do about it? What are we going to do about it? Links with Performance Management and improvement plans (school and subject) Links with Performance Management and improvement plans (school and subject)

4 School Context

5

6

7

8

9

10 School Context “bulge” of average students

11 School Context “top slicing” of most able students

12 Value Added Value added is a prediction based on prior attainment (in SATs (standard assessment tests) at the end of primary school (key stage 2 or KS2) Value added is a prediction based on prior attainment (in SATs (standard assessment tests) at the end of primary school (key stage 2 or KS2) How does progress compare with the average progress made by students with the same prior attainment How does progress compare with the average progress made by students with the same prior attainment

13 Value Added - Definitions Attainment, progress and achievement Attainment, progress and achievement Attainment – outcomes at KS4 (age 16) compared with the national averages Attainment – outcomes at KS4 (age 16) compared with the national averages Achievement – how well a student does compared with his or her starting point Achievement – how well a student does compared with his or her starting point Progress – complicated but is a mix of achievement and attainment – a student can achieve well but make limited progress towards national attainment levels ( Ofsted are more interested in progress) Progress – complicated but is a mix of achievement and attainment – a student can achieve well but make limited progress towards national attainment levels ( Ofsted are more interested in progress)

14 Contextual Value Added Student Outcomes at Age 16 (end of KS4) Student Characteristics School Characteristics Prior attainment

15 Socioeconomic and Demographic – some factors included in CVA Ethnicity – Gender – Age within year group Ethnicity – Gender – Age within year group Special Educational Needs – in care – mobility Special Educational Needs – in care – mobility Deprivation indicator – free school meals Deprivation indicator – free school meals English as second language English as second language Prior attainment (in English and Mathematics) Prior attainment (in English and Mathematics)

16 Expected Progress - Satisfactory

17 Progress – Value Added

18 Progress – Value Added “measure of value added”

19 Progress – Less than Predicted “measure of under performance”

20 Progress – Broadly Average Range

21 Progress

22 Progress Seriously underachieving students

23 Progress Above line is positive value

24 Progress – Broadly Average Range The middle 50% of children nationally fall into this range

25 Progress – “Good” Value Added

26 Progress – “Good” Value Added Progress made by children in top 25% nationally

27 Progress – “Unsatisfactory” Value Added Poor progress made by children in bottom 25% nationally

28 Secondary Schools – relative performance

29 Secondary Schools – relative performance Each 1% strip contains about 33 schools

30 Secondary Schools – relative performance “ Median” position – comparing all schools by progress and achievement

31 Secondary Schools – relative performance 50% (percentile) is given a CVA score of 1000

32 Secondary Schools – middle 50% of all schools is “broadly average performance”

33 Secondary Schools – middle 50% of all schools is “broadly average performance” Moving towards the “good” schools

34 Secondary Schools – middle 50% of all schools is “broadly average performance” Moving towards the “unsatisfactory” schools

35 Secondary Schools – relative performance Above 25% are the “good” schools

36 Secondary Schools – relative performance Top end – the “outstanding” schools

37 Secondary Schools – relative performance Below 25% are the “unsatisfactory” schools

38 Secondary Schools – relative performance Bottom “very weak” schools – possible “special measures”

39 Secondary Schools – relative performance

40 Conversion of Grades to Points for Calculations GCSE Grades GCSE Points GCSE Grades GCSE Points A*58D34 A52E28 B46F22 C40G16

41 Subject Performance at GCSE in 2009

42 Subject Performance at GCSE in % predicted to get A-C, 76% achieved = significant value added = “good” 8% more students got A-A* than expected – value added but not significant (top end of satisfactory)

43 Subject Performance at GCSE in 2009

44 CVA – Individual Students This student is predicted to get 8 GCSEs at grade C This student is predicted to get 8 GCSEs at grade C Total points score = 320 Total points score = 320 This is the FFT B (median) predictions This is the FFT B (median) predictions He gets 320 points He gets 320 points This student achieves 0 value added points. This student achieves 0 value added points.

45 CVA – Individual Students This student is predicted to get 8 GCSEs at grade B from prior attainment. This student is predicted to get 8 GCSEs at grade B from prior attainment. Total points score = 384 Total points score = 384 This is the FFT B (median) predictions This is the FFT B (median) predictions She gets 394 points She gets 394 points What is her value added score? What is her value added score?

46 CVA – Individual Students She is a girl and she gets free school meals (FSM) She is a girl and she gets free school meals (FSM) Prediction from prior attainment = 384 points Prediction from prior attainment = 384 points Add 14 points (female) = 398 Add 14 points (female) = 398 Subtract 22 points for FSM Subtract 22 points for FSM Total prediction = 376 Total prediction = 376 Value added = 18 points Value added = 18 points