Reading and Newbury VTS 2014 Dr K Emerson Health Education Thames Valley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The e portfolio Based on e portfolio pearls. Whats it for? 2 main purposes: Enable ARCP panel to decide whether you should continue to progress through.
Advertisements

With thanks to Dr J Foulkes Wessex Deanery. Headline Changes Updated look and feel New functionality Educational Supervisors Review(ESR) Revalidation.
Securing the Foundation Programme Stuart Carney Deputy National Director, UKFPO.
Performing an educational supervisor report. Step by Step guide By Dr Kim Emerson January 2013.
Introduction to the eportfolio and the nMRCGP HEKSS, KSS Deanery GP Specialty School 2013 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean for Assessment.
General Practice Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP KSS Deanery 2014 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean for Assessment KSS Deanery.
Ian Whitehead TPD ARCP.  Structured postgraduate medical training is dependent on :  having curricula which clearly set out the standards and competences.
ARCP - A nnual R eview of C ompetence P rogression Once a year in June Assessment is key to progression (or not) The curriculum defines: –Competences –Knowledge.
ARCP Panels What’s is all about?. What is ES doing when deciding on the outcome of an educational review?  Making a recommendation to the ARCP panel.
GRAND ROUND Secondary Care 4 Primary Care Dr. Amjad Khan Associate Dean (Black Country) Dr. S. Sikka, Dr. R MacRorie, Dr. S. Saini Training Programme Directors.
6 Month ES Reviews Yer What???
The e-portfolio - how it will work and how it will improve training James Barrett JRCPTB Clinical lead for e-portfolio.
ST4 Induction 2015 An introduction to competency based training and the ARCP.
MMC – workplace based assessments Dr Lisa Joels Postgraduate Organiser Singleton Hospital 6 th August 08.
Bob Woodwards SAC Chair, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Revalidation Implementation for doctors in training Dr Lorna Burrows, National Revalidation Fellow, NHS South of England.
Modernising Medical Careers for GPs Education Supervision and Review of Progression.
Flexible Training Dr Helen Goodyear Associate Postgraduate Dean for flexible training.
ARCP PANELS: WHAT HAPPENS? KATE WISHART SEPTEMBER 2015.
Out of Hours Nov Definition: OOH GMS contract “ and all day weekends and on public holidays” “ and all day weekends and on.
OUT OF HOURS INTENDING TRAINERS COURSE. DO WE CARE? WE DO NOW!
Update - ATSM Recent changes. Regulations for the Advanced Training Skills Modules Generic: The applicant must be working in the UK for the duration of.
Sarah Taaffe GPST3. Overview First year: GP placement and 2 hospital posts Settle in. Second year: GP + innovate, and 2 hospital posts AKT Third year:
Guide to the ESR By Carol and Barry. Why is the ESR important? An Educational Supervisors Review (ESR) is conducted every six calendar months for all.
Dr. Sarbjit Saini TPD – Sandwell VTS. What we will be covering When to complete ESR Creating a review period What is contained in an ESR Collecting.
NMRCGP Work-Place Based Assessment = e-portfolio Work-Place Based Assessment = e-portfolio CSA CSA AKT AKT.
Welcome to GP Specialty Training in Bolton Nick Pendleton & Julian Page.
GP Specialty Training in the East of England Professor John Howard Postgraduate GP Dean Induction.
The educational supervisor’s interview Preparing the ground for the educational supervisors report.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
General Practice Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP HEKSS 2015 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean for Assessment, HEKSS.
Work Place Based Assessment: A deeper understanding of competency assessment John Kedward, Associate Dean.
Flexible Training Dr Helen Goodyear Associate Postgraduate Dean for flexible training.
TAA2 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
E-portfolio By Carol, Sally and Barry. Where does my e-portfolio fit in? Knows (AKT) Can (CSA) Does (e-portfolio) It’s the ‘doing’ that is the most.
 An overview of how to help your trainee  Learning needs assessment  CSA  Role of educational supervisor  Half day release  Employment  Important.
DR NICK PENDLETON ST2 Teaching Programme
Planning your three years Dr Morooj Mohammad GP/ Commissioning Fellow.
Roles and Responsibilities Use of e-portfolio Use of the newOOH Training Workbook 2 nd December 2010.
Saunton Sands What is a DID A doctor in training who, for whatever reason, is struggling to complete satisfactorily what is required of them.
The ARCP An Overview. A Trained ARCP Panel? Purpose of the ARCP Normally at least annually A review and record of the trainee’s progress Allows judgement.
E-Portfolio, ARCP and decision aids. Dr Derek Harrington, Consultant Cardiologist Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust Cardiology TPD HEKSS.
Planning the next 3 years Dr Nisha Ehamparanathan GP / Clinical Skills Lecturer.
The ARCP Annual Review of Competence Progression Intending Trainers’ Course.
ARCP of foundation trainees – an operational guide Dr Ajay Bedi Dean Director Northern Deanery Foundation School.
TRAINING UPDATE- CSAC Brindha Dhandapani. Aim to cover  Guidance on SLEs for CCH level 3 training  General paediatric competencies for CCH level 3 
ARCP SCENARIOS. SCENARIO 1 An ST3 trainee has had 4 months whole time equivalent extension to training, and has failed the CSA for the fourth time. WPBA.
Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP HEEKSS 2015 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean of Assessment, HEEKSS.
Speciality Training Aims To outline the changes to Speciality Training described in the “Gold Guide” Define trainees/trainer responsibilities New.
Supporting Trainees in Difficulty. The Professional Support Unit Professional Support Unit Manager Laura Meaney Case Managers Laura Abbott and Stephanie.
Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP On behalf of HEE KSS GP School.
Dr Becky Gove CT1 Psychiatry - HEKSS
Out of Hours - OOH Module 2.
5th March 2015 The role and effectiveness of Quality Control Audit: improving the ARCP process across Foundation Schools. Dr B T Langham Director of Foundation.
Preparing for ARCP.
13th National Multi-specialty Meeting – 20th January 2015
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
2018 ARCP briefing slides.
By Claire, Sally and Barry
The ePortfolio – who cares?
PDPs ...a bit of a muddle.
ARCP Panel What happens, who's who How to pass without complications
School of Paediatrics Day
E-portfolio By Carol and Barry.
GMC – the road to “recognition” of Educational Supervisors
The ARCP This podcast has been developed for use by members and prospective members of ARCP panels in the East of England. The podcast itself is part.
Trainee ePortfolio Revision 2013
PDPs ...a bit of a muddle.
Making ARCPs work for trainees
PDPs for everyone Trainees Trainers Educational Supervisors Everyone!
Presentation transcript:

Reading and Newbury VTS 2014 Dr K Emerson Health Education Thames Valley

Audit of completion of satisfactory OOHs sessions in ST1/2 Reading and Newbury VTS 2014 Are we policing our ST1/2 OOHs? Are our ST1/2 fulfilling their contractual obligation to do and record OOHs session? What should we do with Trainees that we know are not fulfilling this?

Introduction: ST1/2 are contractually required to complete 36 hours in ST1 or 6 sessions in ST 2 of out of hours (OOHs). This is a contractual obligation not educational. To ensure coverage of curriculum areas such as acute medicine. Educational supervisors asked to confirm satisfactory completion of OOHs at the end of ST3 No such requirement within the portfolio for ST 1/2. Accepted that as long as completed ie 18 months worth by the end of ST 3 ok. Recently disputed with the recommendation that insufficient is a reason for referral to panel.

Criteria ST1/2 should have completed and have recorded in their logs the correct amount of OOHs either 36 hours for ST1 or 6 sessions for ST2. If they have insufficient the trainee should be discussed with PDs (educational team). Consideration should be made re referral to panel. Those with insufficient should be referred to panel. If insufficient with no referral there should be an educator note to explain this.

Standards: 100 % of trainees should have satisfactory OOHs recorded within their portfolio or If they have not 100% of the trainees should: Have been brought to the attention of the PDs by the ES Be referred to panel. Have reasons for not referring to panel recorded in their educator notes.

Method: After completion of the ESR in the first 6 months checked eportfolio to see what OOHs had been recorded and if these were sufficient. If these were not sufficient we checked to see if: We had been made aware of this by the ES, There was an explanatory note within the Educator notes, either stating why or if future sessions booked, or sessions done but not yet recorded. The trainee had been referred to panel.

Results: Of the 4 ST1s in general practice only one had recorded sufficient OOHs hours. The range of hours recorded was Of the 7 ST2s in general practice 1 excluded as yet to complete the 6 month equivalent of time. Only 4 out of 6 had recorded sufficient OOHs sessions Range from 1-10 sessions. Overall only 5 out of % had recorded sufficient. For these one ES had recorded within the ESR that numbers were short. No other ES had commented None had recorded an educator note. Only one ST had been reported to us and that was not for lack of OOHs. None had been referred to panel for OOHs.

Conclusion: We are not checking for satisfactory completion of OOHs for ST 1 and 2 s. Is this a reflection of our lack of policing or a belief that it is acceptable to leave to make up in ST3? Do panel really wish all those that are short to be referred? What outcome will they get? Should there be clear deanery or national guidelines on how to manage this? Discussed with the panel chairs, the Dean, posted a discussion on the DALS noodle site and asked Dr Jonathan Foulkes FRCGP Medical Director Quality Management & Training Standards RCGP for guidance his response was: “ I think most deaneries do give either an OC 5 (if there is still chance for then trainee to make up the deficit somehow) or an OC1 with dire warnings added to the additional comments box in the ARCP Panel report. As you say, all other OCs are inappropriate. However at the end of the day, so much depends on each individual deanery/LETB. Every deanery/LETB seems to have its own set of rules. The college is as you know concerned with overall competence in OOH care at the end of ST3. Exactly how many hours/sessions are done is up to the deanery just so long as the trainee follows COGPED guidance (which is very non-specific anyway). As a result, to date, there has been no national consensus on how to approach the problem of the ST1 or ST2 who has not fulfilled their OOHs requirement in a GP Post. The responses from the DALS Moodle site 3 saying they would refer to panel but give an outcome 1 with strict notes to make up the time in ST3. One deanery was giving outcome 5s In summary at present there is not clear guidance on this area.

Out of hours requirements: Guidance; ST1- 36 hours ST2- 6 sessions after which -36 hours ST3- 72 hours unless starting ST3 year before Aug 13 If ST1/2 have completed less than their full OOHs at the end of their GP placement they should be referred to panel at their 6 month review or at their end of year/ gateway review which ever is the first review after the GP placement. If ST3 has completed less than their full OOHs (unless up to 2 sessions booked, recorded in educators notes), at their end of year/ final review they should be referred to panel. All above apply even if trainee is otherwise making satisfactory progress.

Plan: Advise all ES of this guidance. Advise trainees of the importance of OOHs and meeting contractual obligation. Re-audit June 2014.