STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIE Annual Conference| September 24, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson,
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
STAAR 3D Data We just got a bunch of data What do we do with it
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Peaster Elementary. STAAR – What is it? State’s student testing program for Mathematics, Reading, Writing, and Science Emphasizes “readiness” standards,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
Parent Meeting February STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Emphasis on college and career readiness standards Began school.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
Information provided by LISD Assessment Office.  STAAR stands for: › State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness  Implemented in for school year.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Accountability: Current Issues Friday, April Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
STAAR Overview Parent Information January 23, 2014.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Accountability Update Ty
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness January 2012.
Every Student Matters Understanding the Indexes, the Tests, and Targeted Goal for STAAR 2016.
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness
Texas State Accountability
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2014 State Accountability Ratings
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night

 All 3 rd Grade students will take the Reading and Mathematics STAAR tests  Test dates are April 21 st -Math & April 22-Reading  Student Raw Scores are reported in May  Campus Results are reported in August What Tests Will My Child Take?

 Reading test is 40 multiple choice questions based off of five to six short stories, articles, poems, or excerpts from larger works  Sample Questions Sample Questions  Math test is 46 multiple choice & gridable questions  Sample Questions Sample Questions What Does The STAAR Test Look Like?

 Each student’s score is reported in three different ways: Raw Score; Scale Score; and Percent Score  Each student can score in three different levels: Level 1-Unsatisfactory; Level 2-Satisfactory; Level 3-Advanced  Raw Score Conversion Chart-Math Raw Score Conversion Chart-Math  Raw Score Conversion Chart-Reading Raw Score Conversion Chart-Reading What Does My Child’s Score Mean?

≈ 55 % ≈ 70 % ≈ 75 % ≈ 85 % ≈ 65 %

STAAR Performance Standards Well Prepared Inadequately Prepared Sufficiently Prepared Likely to need significant, ongoing academic intervention Likely to need short- term, targeted academic intervention Likely to succeed with enrichment and extension Phase 1: 11-12, 12-13, Phase II: TBD Level I Unsatisfactory Academic Performance Level II Satisfactory Academic Performance Level III Advanced Academic Performance SatisfactoryAdvanced Final: TBD PHASE IN The Phase-in affects the rigor of the cutpoint for Level II Level III is NOT phased-in Level II Satisfactory Academic Performance Phase III: TBD

 Scores are measured for growth between their 3 rd and 4 th grade test results  Scores that fall within the final readiness and advanced ranges are identified for campus reporting  Scores from students who are identified as economically disadvantaged and/or belong to racial/ethnic groups are identified for campus reporting Additional Information on Student Scores

 Campuses score either Met Standard or Improvement Required based on four index scores (Student Achievement, Student Progress, Closing Performance Gaps, Post-Secondary Readiness)  If campuses score Met Standard there is an opportunity to earn distinctions in Reading/Language Arts, Mathematics, Student Progress, Closing Performance Gaps, & Post- Secondary Readiness How is Spring Valley Elementary Graded?

Spring Valley Index Comparisons

 All students  Combined over all subject areas  Credit given for meeting phase-in Level II performance standard on:  STAAR Grades 3-8 English and Spanish from Spring  STAAR Grades 3-8 & EOC Modified and Alternate  STAAR-L included through ELL Progress Measure Index 1 = Student Achievement Tests Passed/Tested Taken

Spring Valley Index 1 Comparison

 10 Student Groups (all students, ethnicity, students with disabilities, and ELLs)  By subject area (reading & math)  Credit based on weighted performance:  1 point credit for each percentage of tests at the Met growth expectations level  2 point credit for percentage of tests at the Exceeded growth expectations level  STAAR–M and STAAR–Alt, and ELL Progress Measure are added to the assessment list Index 2 = Student Progress Student Progress to Satisfactory or Advanced Performance Level

 Determined by formula created by TEA  Formula Flowchart Formula Flowchart  Example Student Scores 80% as a 3 rd Grader As a 4 th Grader State expectation is to score the same or better If student scores 80% as a 4 th Grader then student Met Progress If student scores 90% as a 4 th Grader then student Exceeds Progress If Student scores 70% as a 4 th Grader then student Did Not Meet Progress How Does My Child Meet/Exceed Progress

Spring Valley Index 2 Comparison

 All economically disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing Racial/Ethnic groups based on Index 1 student achievement indicator reported in the prior year  By subject area (reading/ELA, math, writing)  Credit based on weighted performance:  1 point credit for each percentage of tests meeting the phase-in Level II performance standard  Credit based on weighted performance:  2 point credit for each percentage of tests meeting the final Level III Advanced performance standard  Calculations from year to year should not statistically be compared due to the performance of qualifying ethnic groups Index 3 = Closing Performance Gap Achievement Gaps Measured for Satisfactory and Advanced Levels

Spring Valley Index 3 Comparison 28

 STAAR Postsecondary Readiness  8 student groups evaluated (all students and each ethnicity)  Combined over all subject areas  Credit given for meeting postsecondary readiness standard (final Level II) Index 4 = Postsecondary Readiness

Spring Valley Index 4 Comparison 12

 STAAR Parent Information Night-Late September  Whole group morning tutorials-Skills-Early October  Small group afternoon tutorials-Student and Objective specific-Early October  Tracking of student progress toward student goals and mastery of objectives for all students to ensure progress and growth Spring Valley Plan of Action

 Goal setting for all STAAR students including self- monitoring of objective mastery (folders)  Campus intervention time moves to student objective specific intervention  Continue to develop teacher instruction to improve effectiveness and rigor of instruction  Utilize website and social media for teachers to communicate skill strategies Spring Valley Plan of Action

 Incorporate 4 Math Camp days throughout the year (2 Fall, 2 Spring)  Host 2 Family Math Nights (1 Fall, 1 Spring)- October 23rd  Professional Development- Utilize partnership with Baylor and the MISD C&I Department to increase the use of high yield strategies to improve instruction Spring Valley Plan of Action