Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PORTFOLIO.
Advertisements

Regional Implementation Grant: 5 Districts in ESD 189 Cooperating.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
8 Teacher Evaluation Criteria 8 Principal Evaluation Criteria 4-Tiered Rating System E2SSB 6696 (2010) 3 Criteria must include student growth Up to 3.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Looking into the relationship between teacher and principal evaluation
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
New Legislation In March of 2010, the Washington State legislature passed Engrossed Second Senate Bill 6696 (E2SSB 6696), a law requiring the following:
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Stakeholder Forum D300 Strategic Plan Overview Fred Heid, Superintendent.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Materials  Wiki 
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot – Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Visit our blog & resource site: – Follow.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
20 What is our plan? Bold, comprehensive, approach to transformation – focused on students and student achievement High achieving, engaged students Effective.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
Entry Task As you enter, please take a moment to place a blue dot on the continuum on the wall that represents your perception of the following: Consider.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Advanced Classroom Technology State funding for implementing technology Professional development for 21 st Century Classrooms One-to-One Mobile Devices.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Using data for instructional decision-making
Presentation transcript:

Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each other.

Principal: Keep order Hire teachers Evaluate teacher behavior Supervise athletics Balance the budget In the end, hand out diplomas to kids who made it.

Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each other. Principal: Keep order Hire teachers Evaluate teacher behavior Supervise athletics Balance the budget In the end, hand out diplomas to kids who made it.

Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each other. Principal: Keep order Hire teachers Evaluate teacher behavior Supervise athletics Balance the budget In the end, hand out diplomas to kids who made it.

TEACHER EVALUATION CRITERIA

PRINCIPAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

Teachers: “fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.” “collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.” Principals: “creating a school culture that promotes the ongoing improvement of learning and teaching for students and staff.” “providing for school safety.”

Teachers: “using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.” Principals: “development, implementation, and evaluation of a data-driven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements.”

Teachers: “providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.” Principals: “assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment with state and local district learning goals.”

Teachers: Implementing the instructional framework Principals: “monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices.”

Teachers: “communicating and collaborating with parents and school community.” Principals: “partnering with the school community to promote learning.”

Wary/Welcome Activity Why might teachers and principals be wary of a 4-tier evaluation system? Why might they welcome it?

? ?

Satisfactory, That is not enough as to say one is average, or adequate or moderate. I want to be loved for who I am.

Teacher Evaluation Criteria

Principal Evaluation Criteria

E2SSB 6696 When available, student growth data that is referenced in the evaluation process must be based on multiple measures that can include classroom-based, school-based, district-based, and state- based tools. As used in this subsection, “student growth” means the change in student achievement between two points in time. SIG (MERIT) Implement rigorous, transparent and equitable evaluation systems for teachers and principals which are developed with staff and use student growth as significant factor. Identify and reward school leaders and teachers who have increased student achievement and graduation rates; identify and remove those who, after ample opportunities to improve professional practice, have not done so. Implement such strategies as financial incentives and career ladders for recruiting, placing and retaining effective teachers

Many Present Teacher-Evaluation ModelsMany Present Teacher-Evaluation Models

Gallupstudentpoll.com Track your students’ engagement, hope and well being

Success at the Core Videos and facilitators’ guides designed to develop schools’ leadership teams and individual teachers’ skills in the classroom.

PRINCIPAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

At Stewart Elementary School, we want students to begin thinking about college early, so we display the college entrance requirements in our hallway. This helps to set the tone that this is a place to learn, and if students work hard, they will all be prepared for learning after high school.