D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tutor Role in Problem Based Learning
Advertisements

1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Performance Assessment
C ENTRE FOR E XCELLENCE IN T EACHING & L EARNING A SSESSMENT FOR L EARNING Group work assessment: key considerations in developing good practice. Dr Tony.
The following sides have been taken from a presentation on Assessment Centres by the Suncorp Graduate Recruitment Team 1 Leadership, Culture & Talent HR.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Exploring teaching and learning in first year architecture; bridging the gaps. Introduction to Architectural Design I Architecture BA (Hons) 1 st Year.
Professor Stanley Marshall Makuza Dean, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
1 Arts Faculty, Macquarie University Foundations in e Learning & Teaching, 9 September 2009 Team/Group Work & Assessment Assessment is ‘the senior partner.
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
Models of work-based learning. Dr. Lesley Moore Director of work-based learning and Shell Awards.
Problem-based Learning An Introduction. What is PBL? –“the most significant innovation in education for the professions in many years” –now very common.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
1 Small Group Teaching Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
H YBRID -PBL: G ETTING TO G RIPS Workshop Friday 15 th March 2013 University of Gloucestershire.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Autonomy in language learning Members: Cheung Lai Ling, Echo Choy Wai Yan, Vivien Tsang Man Yin, Angel.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Problem-Based Learning in Professional Education Doris R. Brodeur Massachusetts Institute of Technology AAHE - April 2004.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING An approach to curriculum, learning and teaching c. N Haigh, EdQuest.
Focussed teaching in reading Maldon PS Dec, 2009.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.
Transforming Learning with Technology a Portfolio by Jeanette Gorzelitz Created in EdL 325 Instructional Technology Fall 2009 As a teacher it is critical.
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Assessing to Support New Learning Outcomes: Assessing for Graduate Capability Acquisition Evaluations & Assessment 2003 Sally Kift, Assistant Dean QUT.
H YBRID -PBL: G ETTING TO G RIPS Monday 15 th July 2013 London South Bank University.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
ALYSSA HOLZHAUSEN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP 325 SPRING 2013 IT Portfolio.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
Charlotte Hespe January 2011 PBL Phase 2 Training for Tutors.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
FLIBS Dec Biology Category 1 Session 2: Learning Biology within the IB Philosophy.
Problem-based Learning Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 1PBL.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Leadership Academy. Objectives  Leadership Academy Mission: To provide students with opportunities to develop effective leadership, clear objectives,
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
ISTE Standards for Teachers Anja Whitehead IDT 3600 Fall 2015.
Using Problem Based Learning: from classroom to clinical practice Dr Dawn Goodwin, January 2015.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
Candidate Support. Working Agreements Attend cohort meetings you have agreed upon. Start and end on time; come on time and stay for the whole time. Contribute.
Knowledge is fixed and need only to transfer from teacher to students is based on constructive and transformation process through learning process Learning.
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
Good teaching for diverse learners
Faculty of Engineering, UoS
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
‘There is somebody wiser than any of us, and that is everybody.’
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Workshop Overview 1. Why assess process?
Presentation transcript:

D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for Sustainability Keele University

PBL: G ETTING TO G RIPS Bland Tomkinson: Manchester University Sophie Bessant: Keele University

G ETTING S TARTED Potential Issues with Problem-Based Group Working?

G ETTING S TARTED Potential Issues with Problem-Based Group Working Students not taking group work as seriously Group members failing to turn up Lack of preparation Dominating students “Passenger” students Conflicts within the group Tutors carry on teaching Tutors fail to manage group problems Tutors fail to make learning objectives clear Groups having difficulty getting started Disciplinary and Cultural differences Pre-conceptions of the PBL process PBL Training for facilitators and students Coverage: knowledge v skills Expert v non-expert facilitators Some students find group work daunting

G ETTING THEM INTO GROUPS Size of groups: Is there an “Ideal” group size? Is group size different for online? Does the group size depend on the number of facilitators? Choosing group membership: Does the tutor or do students lead the choice of groups? Do you constrain the groups to balance cultures/disciplines? Do you look for a balance of males and females in the group? Is it simpler just to use a random or systematic approach? Do you expect to change the groups or stay with same ones all the way through?

S UPPORTING THE PROCESS Do you provide exercises to help the group dynamics? eg: Ground rules Team roles Resolving conflict/negotiation Decision making Problem solving Do you put all this (and other things) in a Handbook?

C OPING WITH DIVERSITY What are the differences within the group? Diverse cultures Diverse disciplines Differences in learning style Differences in language skill Differences in expectations of groupwork What are the differences in approach with PBL? Differences in approach to learning Differences in assessment Dealing with expectations of ‘being taught’

A SSESSMENT How do you assess students now? What is different with PBL? What is different online? The need for Constructive Alignment What are the intended learning outcomes? The need for Authentic Assessment How do we make the assessment reflect the ‘real’ world? How do we balance individual and group marks?

A SSESSMENT How do you assess students now? What is different with PBL? What is different online? The need for Constructive Alignment What are the intended learning outcomes? The need for Authentic Assessment How do we make the assessment reflect the ‘real’ world? How do we balance individual and group marks?

A SSESSMENT How do you assess students now? What is different with PBL? What is different online? The need for Constructive Alignment What are the intended learning outcomes? The need for Authentic Assessment How do we make the assessment reflect the ‘real’ world? How do we balance individual and group marks?

A SSESSMENT Group Individual Assessment Oral presentation Video clip Reflective report/log/portfolio Student newspaper article Peer assessment Workbook Intervention action plan Formal/technical report Information leaflet Poster

A SSESSMENT Modified Essay Questions Facilitator observation Groupwork Reflective essays/logs Peer assessment

P EER ASSESSMENT What to assess? How to assess it?

P EER ASSESSMENT What to assess? Authentic assessment Constructive alignment How does the assessment relate to the learning outcomes? How to assess it? Does a different mode of learning need a different mode of assessment?

P EER ASSESSMENT Attended regularly and on time Contributed actively to the group discussions Gathered appropriate ideas and information Helped to shape ideas and analyse information to develop an appropriate solution Helped the group to reach decisions by summarising ideas and information Contributed to the structure and design of the report Contributed to the writing of the report Helped to keep the group focussed on the task Made sure the views of everyone were included Helped to identify and resolve potential conflicts in the group.

P EER ASSESSMENT - LEARNING OUTCOMES Transferable skills and personal qualities D1 Apply reflective practice to enable continuing self- improvement in a professional context. D2 Work collaboratively as a member of a multidisciplinary team, contributing to the development of effective team processes and effective team dynamics. D3 Develop strategies to work more effectively with those from different disciplinary, national or cultural backgrounds. D4 Demonstrate the ability to practise self-directed learning including: defining a problem, formulating questions to be explored, identifying relevant sources of information, critically appraising information, applying new knowledge and understanding, referencing accurately, justifying approaches and decisions, reflecting on their application and analysing what has been learned through the experience. D5 Develop, debate, structure and communicate ideas and proposals in writing, verbally in meetings and in presentation format.

R EFLECTIVE PRACTICE All 3 universities require some form of reflective diary or reflective report. How often is this to be assessed? Weekly/twice a semester/end of semester? How much ‘scaffolding’ do we give? None/weekly prompts/detailed questions? What do we assess? Group skills/subject knowledge/capacity to cope with change/capacity to continue to learn?

R EFLECTIVE PRACTICE What do we assess? Group skills/subject knowledge/capacity to cope with change/capacity to continue to learn? In Manchester, The five reflective report assessment criteria are: Completeness and presentation of report and quality of reflective practice Demonstrating comprehension of underlying learning points Demonstrating development of self-directed learning skills (analysing problems, researching literature, evaluating sources, critical appraisal of information, accurate referencing) Awareness of and contribution to development of the team dynamics Awareness and development of effective team processes

PBL: G ETTING TO G RIPS Thank You Are there any questions?