UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CHEVRON ANNEX ROBERT MROSKEY | CONSTRUCTION OPTION ADVISOR: DR. CHIMAY ANUMBA PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Government Building Maryland Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Andrew R. Pino | Construction Management Option Advisor | Dr. John Messner.
Advertisements

| Michael Gallagher | Construction Management AE Faculty Consultant: Dr. Riley The Pennsylvania State University AE Senior Thesis Project.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
3711 Market Street 3711 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Zachary Yarnall l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Professor.
The Edward St. John Student Center Zachary Haupt Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 11 April 2011.
The Warrenton Aquatics and Recreation Facility Warrenton, Virginia Derek DiPiazza Construction Management.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
Daniel Suter Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Presentation The Pennsylvania State University Unknown Data Center Somewhere, USA
Christopher Havens Spring 2012 Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor Construction Management Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project The Northeastern Pennsylvania.
LOCKWOOD PLACE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Monica Steckroth- Structural Option.
1 Abdulwahab Hasan Construction Management Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor April 11 th, 2011.
Fisk Corporate Headquarters Houston, Texas Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Stephen Blanchard – Construction Management Option Advisor: Dr. John Messner.
UNC Imaging Research Building UNC Imaging Research Building Chapel Hill, NC Daniel R. Hesington, LEED AP l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
Charles Miller Construction Option Spring Dr. Riley WestEnd25.
Army National Guard Readiness Center Arlington, VA Arne Kvinnesland Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Final Presentation, Spring 2010 The Pennsylvania.
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
1 PLACE HOLDER FOR IMAGE Center for Sustainable Landscapes Pittsburgh, PA Daniel Zartman | Construction Advisor : Dr. Robert Leicht Daniel Zartman | Construction.
Gateway Plaza Wilmington, DE Elizabeth Hostutler Structural Option.
The Health Care Center Dauphin County, PA Ken Lorenz Penn State University Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 17, 2007.
Wilsdorf Hall Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Construction Management Option Senior Thesis.
Mathew Nirenberg AE Senior Thesis Structural Option.
1.  S.T.E.P.S.: Science, Technology, Environment, and Policy Building  Education, laboratory, and research  Owner: Lehigh University  Location: Bethlehem,
Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) Global Headquarters Natasha Beck Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Heather Sustersic Images courtesy of Gensler & Tom.
Waynesburg Central High School Waynesburg, Pennsylvania Robert Owen Brennan The Pennsylvania State University Construction Management.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S. Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Alexander Ward | Construction Management James Faust | CM Advisor.
UPMC Passavant Pavilion & Addition Pittsburgh, Pa Jeremy McGrath Construction Management Senior Thesis Presentation 2009 The Pennsylvania State University.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Craig Owsiany Architectural Engineering – Construction Management STEM Building Hagerstown Community College Hagerstown, Maryland Science Technology.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
The Mary J. Drexel Home Assisted Living Addition Bala Cynwyd, PA Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Gjon Tomaj – Construction Management Option Advisor:
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
Arts & Humanities Instructional Building Noah J. Ashbaugh Construction Management 2006.
200 Minuteman Drive New Design for Additional Floors and Vibration Sensitive Equipment Brent Ellmann Structural Option Dr. Linda Hanagan - Consultant.
Malory J. Faust ∙ Mechanical Option ∙ Senior Thesis 2007.
Brandon mckee ae senior thesis 2007 construction management penn state university ambridge area high school Ambridge Area High School ambridge, pennsylvania.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT Adam Lasher │Construction Management Dr. Robert Leicht Susquehanna Health Patient Tower Expansion Williamsport, PA.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
CBD Chemical Production Building Virginia, USA Christina DiPaolo │ Structural Option.
Taylor Hall George Mason University Fairfax, VA Advisor: Ed Gannon Introduction Prevention through Design Façade Re-design for PtD Stick-Built vs. Infinity.
Manoa Elementary School Amanda Cronauer Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 14 April 2010.
North Hall | American University| Washington D.C.
Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield Headquarters
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
The Stuckeman Family Building
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Redifer Commons Addition & Renovation Project
Graduate Circle Housing Proposal for the Pennsylvania State University
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel, EIT Germantown, Maryland
Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA
JAKE POLLACK NEW YORK POLICE ACADEMY STRUCTURAL OPTION
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
Presentation transcript:

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CHEVRON ANNEX ROBERT MROSKEY | CONSTRUCTION OPTION ADVISOR: DR. CHIMAY ANUMBA PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CHEVRON ANNEX I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE ROBERT MROSKEY | CONSTRUCTION OPTION ADVISOR: DR. CHIMAY ANUMBA PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT

OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO PRESENTATION OUTLINE OWNER | THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ARCHITECT | WILSON ARCHITECTS GENERAL CONTRACTOR | BURCHICK CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAL ENGINEER | BARBER & HOFFMAN, INC. MEP/FP | AFFILIATED ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS | THE GATEWAY ENGINEERS, INC. I.PROJECT BACKGROUND I.OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO II.SITE PLAN II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS PROJECT PARTICIPANTS PROJECT COST | $25 M SIZE | 35,000 SF BUILDING LOCATION | PITTSBURGH, PA DURATION | NOV – SEPT PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD | DESIGN-BID-BUILD PROJECT PARAMETERS

OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND I.OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO II.SITE PLAN II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS CONSTRUCTION LOGISTICS 2 PHASE PROJECT – RENOVATION & VERT ADDITION ARCITECTURE  2 CHEMICAL RESEARCH FLOORS  1 MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE  FAÇADE SYSTEMS  TERRA COTTA  METAL PANELS  LOUVERS  GLAZING  LEED GOLD BUILDING LAYOUT

OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND I.OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO II.SITE PLAN II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS BUILDING SYSTEMS MEP SYSTEMS  ADDITION SERVICE BY 3 NEW AHU’S  (3) LABORATORY EXHAUST FANS  (1) 1500 kW EMERGENCY GENERATOR  300 kVA TRANSFORMER  1600 A MAIN SWITCHBOARD STRUCTURAL SYSTEM  STRUCTURAL STEEL  STILT-LIKE STRUCTURE SUPPORTED BY PILE CAPS  BRACED FRAMES TO RESIST SHEAR AND LATERAL LOADS

SITE PLAN PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND I.OWNER & BACKGROUND INFO II.SITE PLAN II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS RED: Project Site BLUE: Field Offices & Limited Parking GREEN: Lay-down/Storage Areas

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.CASE STUDIES III.IMPLEMENTATION III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO CONTRACTOR REWORK RED: Project Site BLUE: Field Offices & Limited Parking GREEN: Lay-down/Storage Areas

CASE STUDIES PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.CASE STUDIES III.IMPLEMENTATION III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS BALFOUR BEATTY SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION BOND BROTHERS VELA SYSTEMS  VELA WEB  ISSUES & PUNCHLISTS  QA/QC  SAFETY  COMMISSIONING  VELA MOBILE  IPAD OR SMART PHONE  DOCUMENTS, CHECKLISTS, ETC.  VELA REPORTS  FIELD BIM

CASE STUDIES PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.CASE STUDIES III.IMPLEMENTATION III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS BALFOUR BEATTY  VELA SYSTEMS & iPADS COMPANY-WIDE  PROTECTIVE CASE  LOW COST  LONG BATTERY LIFE  EASE-OF USE  REDUCTION IN GENERAL CONDITIONS  INCREASED EFFICIENCY  REDUCED RISK

CASE STUDIES PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.CASE STUDIES III.IMPLEMENTATION III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION  WASTED TIME COMMUNICATING  MEETING MINUTES  INCREASE IN:  PERSONAL PRODUCTIVITY  PROJECT ACCELERATION  RISK REDUCTION  COST OF QUALITY

CASE STUDIES PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.CASE STUDIES III.IMPLEMENTATION III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS BOND BROTHERS  COMMISSIONING OF HARVARD LAB  ELIMINATED NEED FOR PAPER  TABLET PC’S:  VIEW DRAWINGS  MARK UP DRAWINGS  PUNCHLIST  HANDOVER DOCUMENT SET

IMPLEMENTATION PRESENTATION OUTLINE BENEFITS & SAVINGS I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.CASE STUDIESS III.IMPLEMENTATION III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS Worker Rate UnitHours/Day Project Days Total HoursTotal Cost Superintendent $ $/hr , $ 100, Foreman $ $/hr $ 23, Accountant $ $/hr $ 12, Project Manager $ $/hr $ 24, , $ 160, COSTS ASSOCIATED WITHOUT TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD Technology Type Cost QuantityTotal Cost iPad w/ warranty & camera $ $ 2, OtterBox Case $ $ Vela Systems $ 11, $ 11, Vela Training $ 2, $ 2, Total $ 16, Potential Savings Associated with Technology in the Field Costs without Technology $ 160, Technology Costs $ 16, Potential Savings $ 144, POTENTIAL SAVINGS ESTIMATED TECHNOLOGY COSTS TECHNOLOGY SHOULD HAVE BEEN USED ON THE CHEVRON ANNEX AND FUTURE PROJECTS

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION PRESENTATION OUTLINE  SEPARATE PRIME CONTRACTORS I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION III.SWING LOCATIONS IV.PHASING V.SUMMARY IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  INTERDEPENDANCY OF FAÇADE SYSTEMS  LIMITED NUMBER OF SCAFFOLDING SYSTEMS  ARHICTECTURAL EYEBROW  MINIMUM SCOPE MEETINGS & PLANNING SESSIONS

LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION PRESENTATION OUTLINE CONCEPT I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION III.SWING LOCATIONS IV.PHASING V.SUMMARY IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS KEY PRACTICES OF THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM: FLOW CHART COURTESY OF ENNOVA  MINIMIZING WORK VARIABILITY BETWEEN TASKS  CREATING LOOK-AHEAD PLANS  PLANNING WORK ON WEEKLY BASIS  MEASURING PROGRESS AND USING WEEKLY LEARNING TO IMPROVE WORK PRACTICES

SWING LOCATIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION III.SWING LOCATIONS IV.PHASING V.SUMMARY IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS

PHASING PRESENTATION OUTLINE SOUTH ELEVATION I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION III.SWING LOCATIONS IV.PHASING V.SUMMARY IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS EAST ELEVATION

PHASING PRESENTATION OUTLINE NORTH ELEVATION I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION III.SWING LOCATIONS IV.PHASING V.SUMMARY IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS WEST ELEVATION

SUMMARY PRESENTATION OUTLINE  ON-SITE KNOWLEDGE TO DETERMINE ACTIVITY DURATIONS I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER INTRODUCTION III.SWING LOCATIONS IV.PHASING V.SUMMARY IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  KNOW HOW A SYSTEM IS INSTALLED BEFORE PROJECT BEGINS  SEPARATE PRIMES ADD ADDITIONAL COORDINATION CONCERNS  MULTIPLE COORDINATION AND SCOPE REVIEW MEETINGS  GET ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN CREATING THE SCHEDULE  THOROUGH SCOPE  PROPER PLANNING IS ESSENTIAL

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION PRESENTATION OUTLINE  COMMISSIONING AGENT WAS CONTRACTED DIRECTLY WITH THE OWNER I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER & NEW SCHEDULE III.KEY DIFFERENCES IV.POSSIBLE SOLUTIIONS V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  CHEVRON TOWER WAS IN NEGATIVE AIR CONDITION, SUCKING DIRT FROM THE PROJECT INTO THE EXISTING BUILDING  LABS HAD TO BE “DUST-FREE” BEFORE TAB COULD BEGIN

LAST PLANNER & NEW SCHEDULE PRESENTATION OUTLINE KEY MILESTONES I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER & NEW SCHEDULE III.KEY DIFFERENCES IV.POSSIBLE SOLUTIIONS V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  AHU DELIVERY DATE  STROBIC FAN START-UP  L&I INSPECTIONS  ABOVE CEILING WORK  TESTING AND BALANCING

KEY DIFFERENCES PRESENTATION OUTLINE  LABORATORY CASEWORK I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER & NEW SCHEDULE III.KEY DIFFERENCES IV.POSSIBLE SOLUTIIONS V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  ABOVE CEILING WORK  ARCHITECTURAL MILLWORK & DUST-FREE ACTIVITIES  STROBIC FAN START-UP  NIPPLE PLENUMS  FOOTBALL SHROUDS AT FUME HOODS  AHU DELIVERY LATER THAN EXPECTED

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE COMMISSIONING AGENT I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES I.PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION II.LAST PLANNER & NEW SCHEDULE III.KEY DIFFERENCES IV.POSSIBLE SOLUTIIONS V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  GET INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT DURING THE DESIGN PHASE  REQUIRE TO MAKE VISITS TO THE PROJECT SITE ROUTINELY  SAME CX AGENT PERFORMING:  SUBMITTAL & RFI REVIEWS  TESTING & BALANCING  TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD  ADEQUATE SCOPE INFORMATION  PREFABRICATION  LETTER TO THE OWNER

GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION I.GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS II.STRUCTURAL BREADTH VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS EXTENSIVE - LIGHTER & LESS EXPENSIVE NOT FOR HUMAN USE INTENSIVE - HUMAN USE INTENSIVE GREEN ROOF SECTION

ADDITIONAL LOADS PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION I.GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS II.STRUCTURAL BREADTH I.ADDITIONAL LOADS II.CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS III.CONCLUSIONS VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS STRUCTURAL BREADTH REQUIREMENTS ADDITIONAL LOADINGS COLUMN LOAD CHECKS BEAM LOAD CHECKS GIRDER LOAD CHECKS ORIGINAL LOADINGS ROOF DEAD LOAD – 30 PSF ROOF LIVE LOAD – 30 PSF MEMBERS REQUIRING RESIZING  COLUMNS  E  GIRDERS ,  W18X46  W24X62 ,  W18X35  W21X44 NEW LOADINGS ROOF DEAD LOAD – 90 PSF ROOF LIVE LOAD – 100 PSF

CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION I.GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS II.STRUCTURAL BREADTH I.ADDITIONAL LOADS II.CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS III.CONCLUSIONS VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS 6 COLUMNS TESTED 1 REQUIRED RE-SIZING  E  ORIGINAL SIZE: W10 x 60  ADJUSTED SIZE: W10 x 88

CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION I.GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS II.STRUCTURAL BREADTH I.ADDITIONAL LOADS II.CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS III.CONCLUSIONS VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS 3 TYPICAL BAYS NO BEAM RE-SIZING NECESSARY BAY 1 BAY 2 BAY 3

CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS PRESENTATION OUTLINE I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION I.GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS II.STRUCTURAL BREADTH I.ADDITIONAL LOADS II.CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS III.CONCLUSIONS VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS 3 GIRDERS TESTED 2 REQUIRED RE-SIZING ,  ORIGINAL SIZE: W18 x 46  ADJUSTED SIZE: W24x 62 ,  ORIGINAL SIZE: W18 x 35  ADJUSTED SIZE: W21 x 44

CONCLUSIONS OF STRUCTURAL BREADTH PRESENTATION OUTLINE  GREEN ROOFS REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION I.GREEN ROOF TYPES & COMPONENTS II.STRUCTURAL BREADTH I.ADDITIONAL LOADS II.CALCS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS III.CONCLUSIONS VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS  GREEN ROOFS ADD A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF LOAD TO THE STRUCTURE

SUMMARY PRESENTATION OUTLINE ANALYSIS 1 I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS ANALYSIS 3 ANALYSIS 4 ANALYSIS 2  TECHNOLOGY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED ON THE CHEVRON ANNEX AND FUTURE PROJECTS  PROPER PLANNING CAN LEAD TO AN EFFICIENT INSTALLATION PROCESS  COMMISSIONING IS AFFECTED BY ALL TRADES  ADDING A GREEN ROOF SHOULD BE A DECISION MADE BY THE OWNER

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PRESENTATION OUTLINE BURCHICK CONSTRUCTION I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS SPECIAL THANKS ACADEMIC BURCHICK CONSTRUCTION FAMILY & FRIENDS DR. CHIMAY ANUMBA: ADVISOR PENN STATE FACULTY & STAFF DAVE MEUSCHKE JOE SCARAMUZZO AMANDA MYERS

PRESENTATION OUTLINE QUESTIONS? I.PROJECT BACKGROUND II.ANALYSIS #1: TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD III.ANALYSIS #2: FAÇADE RE-SEQUENCE IV.ANALYSIS #3: COMMISSIONING LAB SPACES V.ANALYSIS #4: GREEN ROOF ADDITION VI.SUMMARY VII.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII.QUESTIONS