Hilton Head Island, South Carolina Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Traffic Management
Advertisements

© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
1 Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited Atmospheric Impacts Routing (AIR) Web Service Support to the Tactical Airspace Integration System.
Ohio University Russ College of Engineering and Technology School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Avionics Engineering Center Ranjeet Shetty.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
Development of Guidance and Control System for Parafoil-Payload System VVR Subbarao, Sc ‘C’ Flight Mechanics & Control Engineering ADE.
Cargo Airdrop Overview Parachute Industry Association Meeting
High altitude airborne developments have presented huge advantages in the US military’s arsenal through: environmental monitoring precision navigation.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Antenna Baseline Measurement System 29 January 2010 Mark Phillips, Research Assistant Ohio University, Athens OH Research Intern Naval Research Laboratory.
METEOR BACKGROUND This is a foundation project in an ambitious endeavor to provide the RIT research community with a means to conduct near space.
Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
CP1610: Introduction to Computer Components
Data Processing Equipment
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
1 © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Cisco Technical Support Presentation Using the Cisco Technical Support.
1 SAIC V22 Simulation Support Manned Flight Simulator By Roger A. Burton Head, Air Vehicle Branch Simulation and Research Division Science Applications.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos, Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior,
Pg 1 of 12 AGI GPS Signal Simulation & Visualization Oct 11, 2005 Curtis Hay Spirent Federal Systems.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
“Real-Time Path Planning Guidance (RT-PPG)” By Manuel Soto & Luis E. Alvarado, UNITECH Corp Project Description Develop an RT-PPG API to safely generate.
INFO425: Systems Design INFORMATION X Finalizing Scope (functions/level of automation)  Finalizing scope in terms of functions and level of.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
1 Chapter 11 Implementation. 2 System implementation issues Acquisition techniques Site implementation tools Content management and updating System changeover.
RUDAK DSP Experimentation June & July 2002 Contributions to this presentation by: KK7P, WD0E, 4X1KX.
Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Vanderbilt Aerospace Club Rocket Launched Reconnaissance UAV Design Team William Runge (ME) Kyser Miree (ME) Thomas Carroll (ME) Thomas Bowden.
Episode 3 EP3 WP6 - Excom - December 15th, Brussels 1 WP6 - Technology EP3 Final Report Technology results December 2009.
Product Manager Clothing Individual Equipment Personnel Airdrop Systems Team PROGRAM STATUS UPDATE TO PIA February 2008 The Soldier: America’s Most Deployed.
1 Civil Air Patrol United States Air Force Auxiliary …performing Missions for America.
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
Pre-Genesis Monitoring of the 3-D Atmospheric and Oceanic Environment Via High Altitude Aircraft Observations Jeff Hawkins 1, Peter Black 2, Pat Harr 3,
Mesoscale Predictability Experiment MPEX National Center for Atmospheric Research Research Aviation Facility.
Projectile Kinetic Energy Reduction System (PKERS)
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Prediction of Tropical Cyclones Chapter 9. Tropical weather data from traditional sources (surface and radiosonde) is scarce, so remote sensing via other.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
AIR & SPACE TRAVEL CONTINENTAL US FLIGHT OPERATIONS PROVIDE GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES PROVIDE FLIGHT PLANNING SUPPORT Request Flight Plan Request User.
Part II: Turbulence Signature and Platform Limitations Dan Weber, Frank W. Gallagher, Ken Howard ©2000 Frank W. Gallagher III.
111/27/2015 User Education & Training End-to-End Cycle for NOAA's Satellite Program Anthony Mostek NOAA - NWS – OCWWS - Training Division Anthony Mostek.
Multi-Mission Earth Entry Vehicle: Aerodynamic and Aerothermal Analysis of Trajectory Environments Kerry Trumble, NASA Ames Research Center Artem Dyakonov,
Lecture 4: Global Positioning System (GPS)
1 SOARS Matt Edwards Arseny Dolgov John Shelton Johnny Jannetto Galina Dvorkina Nick Driver Eric Kohut Kevin Eberhart Self Organizing Aerial Reconnaissance.
Communications Plan: Ji Young Kim, Chul Han Song, Saewung Kim, and Jim Crawford.
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
Redesigning Air Traffic Control: An Exercise in Software Design Daniel Jackson and John Chapin, MIT Lab for Computer Science Presented by: Jingming Zhang.
LAPS Applications: High Resolution LAPS is used to initialize WRF model runs and other systems around the globe LAPS RSA (Range Standardization And Automation.
Mid Semester 2 Presentation: February 27, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002
End of Semester 1 Presentation: November 28, 2007.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
General Avionics Software Specification Paper by: C. Douglass Locke, David R. Vogel, Lee Lucas, John B. Goodenough Presented by: Jeremy Erickson August.
TAMDAR Status FPAW Forum November 11, The patented TAMDAR sensor Measures and derives: Ice presence Median and peak turbulence Winds aloft Indicated.
1 © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Cisco Technical Support Seminar Using the Cisco Technical Support Website.
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland X-pilot flight testing X-pilot groundstation demonstrating waypoint navigation.
Younis H. Karim, AbidYahya School of Computer University Malaysia Perlis 1.
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
IOT – Firefighting Example
RGS: Recovery Guidance System
Mission Aircrew Course High Altitude and Terrain Considerations
Force Packaging.
MiG-29 aircraft upgrade.
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Hilton Head Island, South Carolina Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA The Precision Airdrop System (PADS) Airborne Mission Planner: A System Now Enabling Precision High Altitude Airdrop Presented at the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee Meeting Hilton Head Island, South Carolina by Phil Hattis Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA October 21, 2005

Outline PADS objectives and architecture Current Precision Airdrop Planning System (PAPS) capabilities PADS features used by PAPS Demonstrated performance Deployment status and next development steps Summary

PADS Objectives and Architecture System Objectives Overarching Goals Enable precision cargo delivery from high altitude Combat re-supply Humanitarian relief Reduce surface weapon threats to carrier aircraft Enable delivery aircraft to remain near their upper altitude limit for airdrop Specific PADS Goals Provide a common platform for ground-based and in-flight airdrop Mission Planning (MP) Enable application to ballistic and guided airdrop systems Support both cargo and personnel drops Include advanced wind modeling Make the planning system easy to use and its outputs easy to understand

Some Mandated PADS Features PADS Objectives and Architecture Some Mandated PADS Features Compatibility with C-130 and C-17 carrier aircraft Computed Air Release Point (CARP) determination on board carrier aircraft Generation of expected delivery footprints (for nominal airdrops and major failure scenarios) PADS “snap-on/snap-off” capability on the carrier aircraft Means to receive wind and mission updates while in transit to the Drop Zone (DZ) Wireless updates of guided airdrop system mission plans while in transit to the DZ The look and feel of the Portable Flight Planning System (PFPS) Easy to understand MP outputs, including data displays over maps or images

PADS Software Components PADS Objectives and Architecture PADS Software Components A laptop personal computer (PC) with the following features The “WindPADS” atmosphere modeling tool provided by Planning Systems, Inc. (PSI) A PAPS that accounts for: Payload weight, aircraft load station, decelerator type Altitude, heading, and airspeed at release Roll-out and decelerator opening models (for ballistic parachutes) 6 degree of freedom (6 DOF) cargo/decelerator descent models A tool to predict the expected payload delivery footprints Means to acquire real-time aircraft state data An easy-to-use PFPS-like Graphical User Interface (GUI) A image/map overly display using FalconView including: Desired CARP, and feasible release envelopes for guided airdrops Expected landing footprints (for ballistic parachutes) and expected impact footprints for failed airdrop systems

PSI-Supplied PADS Block 2 Flight Hardware Components PADS Objectives and Architecture PSI-Supplied PADS Block 2 Flight Hardware Components Key Components (clockwise from upper-left) Panasonic CF-29 data processor with 802.11g wireless interface 4-channel UHF radio transmitter Cables and connectors to aircraft interface GPS hand-launched dropsonde (expendable) Total weight with portable case: 75 pounds This page extracted from AIAA paper CP-2005-7070, “On-Board Atmospheric Modeling System to Support Precision Airdrop,” by R. Wright, R. Benney, and J. McHugh, presented at the Infotech@Aerospace Conference, Arlington, Virginia, September 26-29, 2005

PADS System Features and Interfaces PADS Objectives and Architecture PADS System Features and Interfaces Wind Data Sources Satellite-Derived TACMET Radiosonde Theater Pilot Reports Com Satellite Air Force Weather Agency Atmospheric Forecast Model - High-Resolution Nested Grid Surrounding Drop Zone(s) 5-KM Grid Domain within 15-KM Grid Domain Combat Track II Radio Receiver Aircraft Top Antenna INTERNET/SIPRNET Secure Interface Laptop Computer Guided/SmartAirdrop Systems Mesoscale 4D Field Assimilation Processor PIP GPS Dropsonde Dropsonde Processor 3D Field - Wind, Density, Pressure for Drop Time Airdrop DynamicsSimulation Via 802.11G Wireless Radio Receiver PADS-Derived Upload Data Aircraft Bottom Antenna Computed Air Release Point (CARP) Navigator or Navigation System Aircraft 1553 Data Bus

Ballistic Parachute Support Current PAPS Capabilities Ballistic Parachute Support MP support for an expandable set of systems, currently including: G-12 and 26 ft ring-slot hemispherical canopy airdrop systems Enables delivery of payloads in the 2,000 lb class (+/- 25%) Includes treatment of stick releases (multiple load drops on a single pass) Targets the stick’s CARP for any one designated load in a stick Determines expected delivery footprints for each load in a stick Footprint determination for the Tri-wall Aerial Delivery System (TRIADS) Enables airdrop of Meals Ready to Eat (MREs) MP parachute trajectory determination accounts for: Aircraft release and roll-out dynamics Canopy opening and deceleration Descent response to 3D wind and density fields Statistical variation in all the above effects TRIADS trajectory determination accounts for: Carrier box release and deceleration dynamics Dispersed MRE statistical response to 3D wind and density fields

Airdrop Trajectory Factors Treated by PAPS Current PAPS Capabilities Airdrop Trajectory Factors Treated by PAPS

Guided Airdrop Support Current PAPS Capabilities Guided Airdrop Support Supports an expandable set of cargo airdrop systems, with L/D values ranging from 0.5 to over 4, currently including: Sherpa, Screamer, and the Affordable Guided Airdrop System (AGAS) in the 2,000 lb payload class Screamer and Dragonfly in the 10,000 lb payload class Seeing initial application to personnel airdrops MJN-1, MC-4/5 and variants, as well as a generic canopy capability Derives feasible release zones and preferred CARPS, including for sticks with varied landing targets MP trajectory determination accounts for: System-specific L/D and velocity vs. payload mass characteristics Descent response to 3D wind and density fields Dispersion footprints generated for the following scenarios: Failed canopies Failed guidance and/or control after successful canopy deployment

Feasible Release Cone Determination: Single Load Current PAPS Capabilities Feasible Release Cone Determination: Single Load Feasible Release Code Without Wind Correction Release Cone Correction Due to Wind Effects

Feasible Release Cone Determination: Stick Loads Current PAPS Capabilities Feasible Release Cone Determination: Stick Loads Illustrated for two loads without wind effects MP can handle multiple load sticks Wind and density effects on all cones assessed before identifying feasible release envelope

Interface Functionality PADS Features Used by PAPS Interface Functionality Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) Modeled after PFPS Combat Airdrop Planning Software (CAPS) GUIs Accommodates user inputs of payload data before flight Carrier aircraft type; payload mass; cargo bay location; airdrop system type; DZ target; planned release altitude and airspeed; expected weather data source file; etc. Provides resulting CARP and engineering data displays FalconView Overlay Displays Provides visual user cues regarding: CARP locations; landing footprints; feasible release zones; etc. 1553 Bus Interface Provides aircraft navigation data and at-altitude wind estimate Enables monitoring designated bus data Combat Track II CTII Interface Provides secure UHF-link access to flight plan and wind updates during transit to the DZ File Upload Capability Provides an in-transit wireless interface for upload of updated descent mission plans for guided airdrop systems

Some PADS GUIs Used by PAPS PADS Features Used by PAPS Some PADS GUIs Used by PAPS CARP Solution Data Cargo Bay Coordinates CARP Solution Status Indicator Payload Locations In Cargo Bay Top-Level PADS GUI Page Provides Tabbed Data Summaries and Access to all MP functionality Load & Chute GUI Enables User Input of Payload Data and Displays Resulting Payload Layout in the Cargo Bay

Example PAPS FalconView Image and Map Overlay Displays PADS Features Used by PAPS Example PAPS FalconView Image and Map Overlay Displays Guidance Failure Footprints Planned Impact Points Run In Nominal Descent Dispersion Footprints CARP CARP Failed Canopy Dispersion Footprints Individual Release Envelopes Ballistic Parachute Nominal and Failure Footprint Displays Guided Airdrop System Release Envelopes and Failure Footprints

Ballistic Parachute Operational Utility Evaluation (OUE) Results Demonstrated Performance Ballistic Parachute Operational Utility Evaluation (OUE) Results C-130 Results C-17 Results Carrier Aircraft Mission Computer Expected Results Using Pre-Flight Wind Data C-130: 595 m C:17: 1036 m Carrier Aircraft Mission Computer Expected Results Using PADS-Derived Wind Data C-130: 492 m C-17: 486 m PADS MP Directed Airdrop Results C-130: 260 m C-17: 308 m OUEs involved dozens of 4-payload stick drops using 26 ft ring-slot parachutes accomplished over 2 weeks Missions were executed by regular Air Force flight crews given 1 day of PADS training Drops were a mix of releases from 18,000 and 25,000 ft Accuracy scoring was based on the designated CARP payload in each stick

Guided Airdrop System Demonstration Status Demonstrated Performance Guided Airdrop System Demonstration Status Numerous guided airdrop system flight tests have been accomplished using PADS-generated mission update files uploaded in transit to the DZ Sherpa, AGAS and Screamer 2,000-lb class systems Dragonfly 10,000-lb class systems All the 2,000-lb class systems have achieved mean accuracies better than 100 m to their targets, including stick releases with scattered targets Despite the still early developmental status of its guidance and control system, the Dragonfly has achieved mean accuracies of about 200 m using PADS generated mission files

Deployment Status and Next Development Steps PADS is now in initial field use Some military free fall operations now apply PADS to assure personnel jumps from carrier aircraft are within reach of the DZ 2,000 pound-class guided airdrop systems are currently being fielded with PADS MP support capability enabled PADS-enabled precision ballistic parachute and guided airdrop system delivery capabilities to be used to limit the need for hazardous ground convoys in many scenarios Initial PADS MP support capabilities for 10,000 and 30,000 pound class guided and ballistic parachute airdrop systems will be available for field use by the end of the calendar year An open architecture Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C) software package for steerable parafoil applications to be hosted on PADS laptops is under development Will be available for upload to compatible guided airdrop systems Designed to provide GN&C for a wide variety of parafoil airdrop systems

Summary A Precision Airdrop System (PADS) in-flight Mission Planner (MP) has completed initial development and is now being used in the field Applies high fidelity wind estimates based on data gathered from forecast, in situ measurements, and securely transmitted data Supports ballistic parachute and guided system airdrops of cargo and personnel Has interfaces compatible with the Portable Flight Planning System to assure ease of use by carrier aircraft crew in the field Operation Utility Evaluation from C-130 and C-17 aircraft was completed for ballistic parachute airdrops Major accuracy improvement was demonstrated in comparison to prior high altitude airdrop methods The fielded PADS MP supports a variety of 2,000 pound class airdrop systems Provides mission plan upload capability for guided airdrop systems An extension of the PADS MP to 10,000 and 30,000 pound class airdrops systems is currently in work