Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Designing ESI Planner: The Participatory Design of a Sound and Image Enhanced Planner for People.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methodology and Explanation XX50125 Lecture 1: Part I. Introduction to Evaluation Methods Part 2. Experiments Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Advertisements

Create an interactive Science PowerPoint for classroom instruction
1 Slipping and Drifting: Using Older Users to Uncover Pen-based Target Acquisition Difficulties Karyn Moffatt and Joanna McGrenere Department of Computer.
CCE GUIDELINES FOR CLASSES 6 TO 8
Audio, Visual, and Digital Technologies in Teaching
What is Camp?Methods and Observations Measuring EnvironmentMeasuring Physical EngagementMeasuring Social Engagement MelissaNaomiJulieMari Interaction between.
Assistive Technology AT services provided through Oklahoma ABLE Tech, a contractor for the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Communication after a Stroke
Saul Greenberg User Centered Design Why User Centered Design is important Approaches to User Centered Design.
1 of 622 April 2006Melissa Dawe, CHI 2006 Workshop Designing a Remote Communication System with and for Individuals with Cognitive Disabilities and their.
Department of Computer Science
Saul Greenberg CPSC 481 Foundations and Principles of Human Computer Interaction James Tam.
Evaluation of A PDA Based Clinical Handover System Dr Marilyn R McGee-Lennon University of Glasgow SIHI, Portsmouth, Sept 2007 HECTOR.
1 User Centered Design and Evaluation. 2 Overview Why involve users at all? What is a user-centered approach? Evaluation strategies Examples from “Snap-Together.
Evaluation Methodologies
Analytical methods for IS professionals ISYS3015 Some qualitative methods of data collection.
Design and Evaluation of Iterative Systems n For most interactive systems, the ‘design it right first’ approach is not useful. n The 3 basic steps in the.
Picture Planner Tom Keating Eugene Research Institute CHI 2006 Project funded in part by National Institute on Disability Research and Rehabilitation and.
Gender Issues in Systems Design and User Satisfaction for e- testing software Prepared by Sahel AL-Habashneh. Department of Business information systems.
Course Wrap-Up IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher. 2 C.J. Minard ( )
1 User Centered Design and Evaluation. 2 Overview My evaluation experience Why involve users at all? What is a user-centered approach? Evaluation strategies.
IEEM Human-Computer Systems Dr. Vincent Duffy - IEEM Week 9 - Approaches to Human- Computer Interaction Mar. 30, 1999
Part 2: Requirements Days 7, 9, 11, 13 Chapter 2: How to Gather Requirements: Some Techniques to Use Chapter 3: Finding Out about the Users and the Domain.
The Aphasia Project 1 Generalizability in Research with Cognitively Impaired Individuals Karyn Moffatt, Leah Findlater, Meghan Allen University of British.
Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental.
Introduction Introduction. Problem. Literature. Data. Quantitative. Qualitative. Presentation. Cases. Analytical methods for Information Systems Professionals.
Prototyping and Designing New Assistive Technologies for People with Disabilities Shaun Kane Human-Centered UMBC
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Students with Communication Disorders Chapter 7.
Communication Disorders
Personalized Medicine Research at the University of Rochester Henry Kautz Department of Computer Science.
Intern: Nathalie Kaing Supervisor: Regina Bernhaupt Tutor: Marco Winckler 1.
WORLD LANGUAGES : A Year of Transition. Today’s Outcomes  Celebrate the start of the school year  Greet new teachers  Explore areas of focus.
Using ADDIE to. ADDIE Model systematic instructional design model consisting of five phases:  Analysis Phase  Design Phase  Development Phase  Implementation.
Case History #4 Esther. Background 72 year old female suffered a left CVA July 5 th, year old female suffered a left CVA July 5 th, 1999 Received.
Evaluation Framework Prevention vs. Intervention CHONG POH WAN 21 JUNE 2011.
User-Centered Development Methodology A user interface comprises “ those aspects of the system that the user comes in contact with.” ● Moran [1981]
The Effect of Cognitive Fatigue on Language in Multiple Sclerosis Leena Maria Heikkola, Päivi Hämäläinen and Juhani Ruutiainen Åbo Akademi University,
Language and Learning Disabilities. IDEA definition Disorder in one or more basic psychological processes involved in understanding or using language.
Sharing and Building Ideas Fayette Long Walden University Sherry Lambertson Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology, EDUC-6714 D-2 November.
Customizing the IMDI metadata schema for endangered languages Heidi Johnson (AILLA) Arienne Dwyer (DOBES)
Will using a Nintendo Wii have an affect on the fitness, social skills and behaviour of Autistic Spectrum Disorder Children? Kath Dickinson Supervisor.
 range in severity and may interfere with the progress and use of one or more of the following: Oral language (listening, speaking, understanding) Reading.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Two Major Types  Language disorders include formulating and comprehending spoken messages. ▪ Categories:
Tiffany Harrell “The goal for every student is to learn, but not every child learns in the same way.” (Firchow, 2011)
K-3 Formative Assessment Process: The Five Domains of Learning Welcome! This webinar will begin at 3:30. While you are waiting, please: Locate the question.
PhD CONCEPT Exploring Digital Maps as Communication Tools for eParticipation - On an example of Urban Planning PhD concept, Beate Weninger,
Schools and Curriculum Development Stuart McQuaker Education Support Officer (ICT)
Chapter 3 Managing Design Processes. 3.1 Introduction Design should be based on: –User observation Analysis of task frequency and sequences –Prototypes,
Today Next time  Interaction Reading: ID – Ch 2 Interaction  Introduction to HCI & Interaction Design Reading: ID – Ch. 1 CS 321 Human-Computer Interaction.
Psychological Testing
Effectiveness of using technology in teaching and learning language Submitted by: Md. Ziaul Islam
Tara Wagg and Miranda Barry YRDSB Student Services.
Emily Kesler LEARNING DISABILITIES AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY.
Utah School of Computing CS5540 Human Computer Interfaces Rich Riesenfeld (w Margaret Jelinek Lewis, PhD in Psychology) Fall 2009 CS5540 Human Computer.
By : Haley Boyd January 7, 2012 Parenting Child Development.
Susan Craig Walden University Instructor: Dr. Jacqueline Derby EDUC 6714: Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology July 24, 2011 Universal.
Summer Institutes 2013 Changing Teacher Practice Changing Student Outcomes.
The Process of Developing a Mobile Device for Communication in a Safety-Critical Domain Jesper Kjeldskov and Jan Stage Mobile HCI Research Group Department.
Foreign Language Learning Disability BY: GETINA COLEMAN Foreign Language Learning Disability.
Ricardo T. Caicedo B. Bachelor of English and Spanish Royal institute of English.
Shannon O’Reilly EDU 673 Universal Design for Learning, and Differentiation.
Teaching as Inquiry 2012 Cluster Share presentation Focus: Digital Reading.
Interventions for Cognitive Dysfunction OT 460A
Augmentative and Alternative Communication Assessment and Intervention
Exploring and Using the new foundations of Education (3rd edition) Connection Chapters to promote Literacy Instruction Dr. Dawn Anderson from Western Michigan.
Acquired language Disorders
Human computer interaction-com 402
Dr. Said Fathy El Said Assistant Professor, English Department
CSM18 Usability Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Designing ESI Planner: The Participatory Design of a Sound and Image Enhanced Planner for People with Aphasia Karyn Moffatt, Joanna McGrenere, Barbara Purves, Maria Klawe Department of Computer Science University of British Columbia Canada 1

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Aphasia is a loss of words – not intelligence Acquired language disorder Acquired language disorder Caused by brain damage (e.g. stroke, trauma, etc.) Caused by brain damage (e.g. stroke, trauma, etc.) Impairment of communication abilities Impairment of communication abilities Relative sparing of other cognitive abilities Relative sparing of other cognitive abilities What is Aphasia? A hp a a i s i Y a l Q n ssxo f o w r d T o y i t l g iir e nc e - 2

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Skip has Aphasia Video and name used with permission. 3

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Key Design Problems mismatch of individual abilities and skills required to use the technology mismatch of individual abilities and skills required to use the technology failure to address the spectrum of communication contexts failure to address the spectrum of communication contexts Sports Work Doctor SpotFamilyHi/Bye Hi, I have an appointment with Dr Smith New Back Home More 4

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Research Goals Understand the strategies used by individuals with aphasia to communicate and to carry out language-based tasks. Understand the strategies used by individuals with aphasia to communicate and to carry out language-based tasks. Seek opportunities where technology can support individuals in those activities. Seek opportunities where technology can support individuals in those activities. 5

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI ESI Planner The Enhanced with Sound and Images Planner PDA application (iPaq from HP) PDA application (iPaq from HP) A computerized daily planner designed for people with aphasia A computerized daily planner designed for people with aphasia Uses images, sound, and text to represent people and places in appointments Uses images, sound, and text to represent people and places in appointments 6

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Design Approach Two phase design: Two phase design: Phase One: Participatory Design Phase One: Participatory Design Phase Two: Experimental Evaluation Phase Two: Experimental Evaluation 7

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase One: Participatory Design Four sub-phases: 8

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase One: Participatory Design Four sub-phases: 1. Idea brainstorming Interviews Interviews Identified needs: Identified needs: Daily planner Daily planner Recipe book Recipe book Word dictionary Word dictionary Personal history recorder Personal history recorder Conversation primer – to help preplan conversations Conversation primer – to help preplan conversations Photo used with permission 9

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase One: Participatory Design 1 - Drawn by hand2 - Using computer tools June: 9/6/03 7:00 am - 9:30 am Marilyn MonroeEiffel Tower 11 : : Starts Ends Four sub-phases: 1. Idea brainstorming 2. Low-fidelity paper prototyping 10

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase One: Participatory Design Four sub-phases: 1. Idea brainstorming 2. Low-fidelity paper prototyping 3. Medium-fidelity software prototyping 11

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase One: Participatory Design Four sub-phases: 1. Idea brainstorming 2. Low-fidelity paper prototyping 3. Medium-fidelity software prototyping 4. High-fidelity software prototyping and formal evaluation > Demo! 12

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI ESI Planner Demo 13

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Evaluation Hypothesis: A planner using triplets of images text and sound would be more usable than a text-only planner. Hypothesis: A planner using triplets of images text and sound would be more usable than a text-only planner. vs. Text-Only: NESI Planner (The Not Enhanced with Sound and Images Planner) Images, Sound, and Text: ESI Planner 14

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology 8 Participants: 8 Participants: 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 All at least one year post onset All at least one year post onset Participants mild moderate severe SpeechAuditionReadingWriting 15

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology 8 Participants: 8 Participants: 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 All at least one year post onset All at least one year post onset Participants mild moderate severe SpeechAuditionReadingWriting 15

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology 8 Participants: 8 Participants: 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 All at least one year post onset All at least one year post onset Participants mild moderate severe SpeechAuditionReadingWriting 15

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology 8 Participants: 8 Participants: 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 1 female, 7 male; ages: 47 to 86 All at least one year post onset All at least one year post onset Participants mild moderate severe SpeechAuditionReadingWriting 15

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology Two Sessions: Two Sessions: 16

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology Two Sessions: Two Sessions: Session 1: Planner Evaluation Session 1: Planner Evaluation 30 min with each planner 30 min with each planner 10 tasks per planner 10 tasks per planner retrieval, creation, modification retrieval, creation, modification presentation format: text and oral presentation format: text and oral Quantitative performance measures: Quantitative performance measures: Number of tasks completed correctly Number of tasks completed correctly Number of tasks completed Number of tasks completed Qualitative self-reported preferences Qualitative self-reported preferences 5:15pm End Time: 4:00pm Start Time: September 14, 2003 Date: When? Eiffel Tower Place:At Marilyn Monroe Person:With4A Create an appointment Example Task 16

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Methodology Two Sessions: Two Sessions: Session 1: Planner Evaluation Session 1: Planner Evaluation Session 2: Western Aphasia Battery Session 2: Western Aphasia Battery Standardized battery used to assess: Standardized battery used to assess: speech, auditory comprehension, reading, and writing speech, auditory comprehension, reading, and writing Used to describe abilities in terms of severity: Used to describe abilities in terms of severity: mild, moderate, or severe mild, moderate, or severe 16

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Qualitative Self Reported Measures Qualitative Self Reported Measures Preference varied with severity of impairment Preference varied with severity of impairment Participants mild moderate severe preference ESINESINESINESIESIESIESIESI SpeechAuditionReadingWriting More severely impaired More mildly impaired 17

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Qualitative Self Reported Measures Qualitative Self Reported Measures Preference varied with severity of impairment Preference varied with severity of impairment Participants mild moderate severe preference ESINESINESINESIESIESIESIESI SpeechAuditionReadingWriting More severely impaired More mildly impaired 17

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Qualitative Self Reported Measures Qualitative Self Reported Measures Preference varied with severity of impairment Preference varied with severity of impairment Participants mild moderate severe preference ESINESINESINESIESIESIESIESI SpeechAuditionReadingWriting More severely impaired More mildly impaired 17

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Significantly more tasks correct with ESI Planner Significantly more tasks correct with ESI Planner (F(1,7) = 27.00, p<.01) Averages: ESI Planner: 7.9 NESI Planner: Participants Total Tasks Correct ESINESI 18

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Significant interaction between tasks correct and interface order (F(1,7) = 8.33, p<.05) Significant interaction between tasks correct and interface order (F(1,7) = 8.33, p<.05) ESI NESI NESI ESI Trial 1 Trial 2 ESI-NESI NESI-ESI Average Tasks Correct 19

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Significant interaction between tasks correct and interface order (F(1,7) = 8.33, p<.05) Significant interaction between tasks correct and interface order (F(1,7) = 8.33, p<.05) ESI NESI NESI ESI Trial 1 Trial 2 ESI-NESI NESI-ESI Average Tasks Correct 19

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Phase Two: Results Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Quantitative Performance Measures: Tasks Correct Significant interaction between tasks correct and interface order (F(1,7) = 8.33, p<.05) Significant interaction between tasks correct and interface order (F(1,7) = 8.33, p<.05) ESI NESI NESI ESI Trial 1 Trial 2 ESI-NESI NESI-ESI Average Tasks Correct 19

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Ongoing Research Additional Analysis Additional Analysis Patterns of Behavior Patterns of Behavior Longitudinal Field Study Longitudinal Field Study Adoptability vs. Usability Adoptability vs. Usability Explore Customization Explore Customization 20

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Research Outcomes ESI Planner: An application to support a specific daily living activity ESI Planner: An application to support a specific daily living activity Guidelines Guidelines For working with special populations For working with special populations For improving the accessibility of handheld technology For improving the accessibility of handheld technology 21

Imager Laboratory for Graphics, Visualization, and HCI Questions? Contact: Karyn Moffatt 22