sg-whitespace-09/0023r01 Submission February2009 Alex Reznik, InterDigitalSlide 1 Security Straw Poll Results Date: Authors:

sg-whitespace-09/0023r01 Submission February 2009 Slide 2Alex Reznik, InterDigital Abstract This presentations summarizes the results of the straw poll distributed as part of the security ad-hoc.

sg-whitespace-09/0023r01 Submission Straw PollYesNoAbs.% yes Should the SG propose support of techniques which identify/classify valid incumbents, malicious impersonators and non-incumbent technologies for White Space technologies? Should the SG develop a list of specific techniques to identify/classify valid incumbents, malicious impersonators and non-incumbent technologies that 802 should consider? Should the SG recommend that the WGs coordinate their efforts on low-layer security Should the SG propose support of techniques that secure and attest the sensing and location measurements Should the SG develop a list of specific techniques that secure and attest the sensing and location measurements? Should the SG recommend that the WGs coordinate their efforts on sending and location measurements? Should the SG propose support of techniques that protect database information? Should the SG propose that 802 investigate the need to provide support for techniques that attest to regulatory and standards compliance of TVBD devices? Straw Poll Results February 2009 Slide 3Alex Reznik, InterDigital