TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Meaningful Use Stage I Class III Menu Objectives
Meaningful Use Basics.  Demographics  Active Medication List  Active Allergy List  Vitals  Smoking Status  Problem List  Computerized Physician/Provider.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
TWS July 2011 Stimulation. TWS July 2011 The ARRA Stimulus Reimbursement from an ifa Customer Perspective.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Presented by: Dianne Paulk, CNO Jim O’Connor, CIO The content and/or presentation of the information with which Irwin County Hospital (ICH) is involved.
Meaningful Use Monitoring Methodology © 1 Meaningful Use Monitor (MUM) Initial Gap Assessment (IGA) Phase Kit 4/6/2010 Meaningful Use Monitor Indiana Radiology.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
The Standards Rule and the NPRM for Meaningful Use John D. Halamka MD.
HealthBridge – Healthcare Transformation Conference Scott Callahan, MD FAAP Medical Director Children’s Health Care Batesville, Indiana.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use: Roadmap for Successful Attestations Presented by: Darlene Creech, MPH Assistant Program Manager Health Information Technology NC Division.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
Peter Muir MD Springfield Center for Family Medicine Collaborating Communities Health Information Exchange HealthBridge Tri-State Regional Extension Center.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
TWS July 2011 New Crop eRx Comprehensive Electronic Prescribing System.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Meaningful Use Core and Menu Objectives.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Syndromic Surveillance Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission EHR & MU for HIM Professionals Resource Patient Management System.
Patient Electronic Access Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Maine Health Information Technology (HIT)Status Report for MaineCare and Office of the State Coordinator for HIT Project Team: Andy Coburn Cathy McGuire.
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Meaningful Use Measures Series – Session 3 Objectives related to interoperability and exchanging data to outside entity 1.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
CDSS, queries and statistics FLL July 2011 Claudia Wente-Waedlich.
Electronic Access to Health Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
MediSYS EHR About Meaningful Use
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Presentation transcript:

TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2

TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access to at least one internal or external formulary for the entire EHR reporting period. Exclusion: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 prescriptions during the EHR reporting period. Menu Requirement 1: Drug Formulary Checks

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements YES / NO / EXCLUSION Eligible professionals (EPs) must attest YES to having enabled this functionality and having had access to at least one internal or external formulary for the entire EHR reporting period to meet this measure. An EP who writes fewer than 100 prescriptions during the EHR reporting period can be excluded from this objective and associated measure. EPs must enter ‘0’ in the Exclusion box to attest to exclusion from this requirement. Menu Requirement 1: Drug Formulary Checks

TWS July 2011 Objective: Incorporate clinical lab test results into EHR as structured data. Measure: More than 40 percent of all clinical lab test results ordered by the EP during the EHR reporting period whose results are either in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in certified EHR technology as structured data. Exclusion: An EP who orders no lab tests whose results are either in a positive/negative or numeric format during the EHR reporting period. Menu Requirement 2: Lab Tests

TWS July 2011 The criteria for tracking this requirement is met by recording lab tests in ifa. Compliance can be tracked by monitoring item 9 in the Stimulus Dashboard. Menu Requirement 2: Lab Tests

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements NUMERATOR / DENOMINATOR / EXCLUSION DENOMINATOR: Number of lab tests ordered during the EHR reporting period by the EP whose results are expressed in a positive or negative affirmation or as a number. NUMERATOR: Number of lab test results whose results are expressed in a positive or negative affirmation or as a number which are incorporated as structured data. EXCLUSION: If an EP orders no lab tests whose results are either in a positive/negative or numeric format during the EHR reporting period they would be excluded from this requirement. EPs must select NO next to the appropriate exclusion, then click the APPLY button in order to attest to the exclusion. The resulting percentage (Numerator ÷ Denominator) must be more than 40 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. Menu Requirement 2: Lab Tests

TWS July 2011 Objective: Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research, or outreach. Measure: Generate at least one report listing patients of the EP with a specific condition. Exclusion: No exclusion. Menu Requirement 3: Patient Lists

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements YES / NO Eligible professionals (EPs) must attest YES to having generated at least one report listing patients of the EP with a specific condition to meet this measure. Menu Requirement 3: Patient Lists

TWS July 2011 Objective: Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow-up care. Measure: More than 20 percent of all patients 65 years or older or 5 years old or younger were sent an appropriate reminder during the EHR reporting period. Exclusion: An EP who has no patients 65 years old or older or 5 years old or younger with records maintained using certified EHR technology. Menu Requirement 4: Patient Reminders

TWS July 2011 Menu Requirement 4: Patient Reminders The criteria for tracking this requirement is met by recording lab tests in ifa. Compliance can be tracked by monitoring item 9 in the Stimulus Dashboard.

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements DENOMINATOR: Number of unique patients 65 years old or older or 5 years older or younger. NUMERATOR: Number of patients in the denominator who were sent the appropriate reminder. EXCLUSION: If an EP has no patients 65 years old or older or 5 years old or younger with records maintained using certified EHR technology that EP is excluded from this requirement. EPs must select NO next to the appropriate exclusion, then click the APPLY button in order to attest to the exclusion. The resulting percentage (Numerator ÷ Denominator) must be more than 20 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. Menu Requirement 4: Patient Reminders

TWS July 2011 Objective: Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information (including lab results, problem list, medication lists, and allergies) within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP. Measure: At least 10 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP are provided timely (available to the patient within four business days of being updated in the certified EHR technology) electronic access to their health information subject to the EP’s discretion to withhold certain information. Exclusion: Any EP that neither orders nor creates lab tests or information that would be contained in the problem list, medication list, medication allergy list (or other information as listed at 45 CFR (g)) during the EHR reporting period. Menu Requirement 5: Timely Access

TWS July 2011 The criteria for tracking this requirement is met by using the Eye Care Patient Portal. Compliance can be tracked by monitoring item 13 in the Stimulus Dashboard. Menu Requirement 5: Timely Access

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements DENOMINATOR: Number of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period. NUMERATOR: Number of patients in the denominator who have timely (available to the patient within four business days of being updated in the certified EHR technology) electronic access to their health information online. EXCLUSION: If an EP neither orders nor creates lab tests or information that would be contained in the problem list, medication list, medication allergy list (or other information as listed at 45 CFR (g)) during the EHR reporting period, they would be excluded from this requirement. EPs must select NO next to the appropriate exclusion, then click the APPLY button in order to attest to the exclusion. The resulting percentage (Numerator ÷ Denominator) must be at least 10 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. Menu Requirement 5: Timely Access

TWS July 2011 Objective: Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient if appropriate. Measure: More than 10 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP are provided patient- specific education resources. Exclusion: No exclusion. Menu Requirement 6: Patient Ed.

TWS July 2011 Add “PE*.DOC” to patient record, OR Use the CDS Button “Patient Education (Text)” OR “Print Leaflet” in eRx, OR Enter manually Menu Requirement 6: Patient Ed. Compliance can be tracked by monitoring item 13 in the Stimulus Dashboard.

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements DENOMINATOR: Number of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period. NUMERATOR: Number of patients in the denominator who are provided patient-specific education resources. The resulting percentage (Numerator ÷ Denominator) must be more than 10 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. Menu Requirement 6: Patient Ed.

TWS July 2011 Objective: The EP who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation. Measure: The EP performs medication reconciliation for more than 50 percent of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP. Exclusion: An EP who was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the EHR reporting period. Menu Requirement 7: Medication Reconciliation

TWS July 2011 The criteria for tracking this requirement is met by using the “Medication Reconciliation” button. Menu Requirement 7: Medication Reconciliation Compliance can be tracked by monitoring item 11 in the Stimulus Dashboard.

TWS July 2011 Attestation Requirements DENOMINATOR: Number of transitions of care during the EHR reporting period for which the EP was the receiving party of the transition. NUMERATOR: Number of transitions of care in the denominator where medication reconciliation was performed. EXCLUSION: If an EP was not on the receiving end of any transition of care during the EHR reporting period they would be excluded from this requirement. EPs must select NO next to the appropriate exclusion, then click the Apply button in order to attest to this exclusion. The resulting percentage (Numerator ÷ Denominator) must be more than 50 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. Menu Requirement 7: Medication Reconciliation

TWS July 2011 Objective : The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral. Measure: The EP who transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals. Exclusion: An EP who neither transfers a patient to another setting nor refers a patient to another provider during the EHR reporting period. Menu Requirement 8: Clinical Summaries

TWS July 2011 Objective The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral. Measure The EP who transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals. Exclusion An EP who neither transfers a patient to another setting nor refers a patient to another provider during the EHR reporting period. Menu Requirement 8: Clinical Summaries

TWS July 2011 Objective Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries or immunization information systems and actual submission according to applicable law and practice. Measure Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology’s capacity to submit electronic data to immunization registries and follow up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the immunization registries to which the EP submits such information has the capacity to receive the information electronically). Exclusion An EP who administers no immunizations during the EHR reporting period or where no immunization registry has the capacity to receive the information electronically. Menu Requirement 9: Immunization

TWS July 2011 Objective Capability to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and actual submission according to applicable law and practice. Measure Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology’s capacity to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and follow-up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the public health agencies to which an EP submits such information has the capacity to receive the information electronically). Exclusion An EP who does not collect any reportable syndromic information on their patients during the EHR reporting period or does not submit such information to any public health agency that has the capacity to receive the information electronically. Menu Requirement 10: Syndromic Surveillance