Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Advertisements

PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
PCT Supplementary International Search Service (PCT Rule 45bis applicable from January 1, 2009)
Trademark Portfolio Management
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations MPU Review of International Application.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
MODEL IMPLEMENTING IDERA REGULATION SUMMARY POWERPOINT FIRST EDITION NOVEMBER 2014.
Seminar and Roundtable on the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Tel Aviv February 8 and 9, Eric FONTAINE Assistant Team Coordinator.
Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and.
The Madrid Trade Mark System Dr Simon Goodman Partner, Reddie & Grose London and Cambridge.
1 Presented By: MP Bhatnagar New Delhi, India. 2 TRIPS Obligation and India (1) TRIPS Obligations & India’s Response Copyright: Article – 9,10,11,12,13,14.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Proposed Rules to Implement Title I of the Patent Law Treaty The Hague Agreement.
Madrid – A System for Businesses Madrid Seminar Washington 23 October 2013 Rodrigo Garcia-Conde Examiner.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations After International Registration.
ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΒΙΟΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑΣ DRAFTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PATENT OR UMC DRAFTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PATENT OR UMC.
THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS André Ntamack Tel Aviv, July 4-5, 2007.
India and the Madrid Protocol An update on the Madrid system AIPPI, Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
The Madrid system for the International Registration of Marks Basic and General Principles when Filing an International Application Podgorica June 6, 2011.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
Jerusalem July 2010 André Ntamack
Trade Marks & Branding for Not-for- Profit Organisations Presented by: Jason Watson, Partner Saioa Echevarria Idianez, Trade Marks Attorney FAL MARKS &
Madrid – A System for businesses Handling the Madrid Portfolio Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
Overview of the Madrid System USPTO GIPA 23 October 2013 Alan Datri Senior Counsellor  Slide updated 10/25/13.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Energy Regulatory Partnership Program of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners of the USA and National Commission for Energy State Regulation.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Utilizing The Madrid Protocol Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward LLP Christian Larsen Cooley Godward LLP Legal Texts regarding the Madrid System:
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
World Intellectual Property Organization The 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs WIPO National.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
Madrid Trademark Application Filing in Canada: Overview of the Madrid System Darlene H. Carreau Chairperson, Trademark Opposition Board Canadian Intellectual.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Options for protecting your trademarks in the European Union A Presentation by Mark Kennedy – OHIM External Relations KIPO Seminar on The Community Trade.
Customs Rulings and Protests Tips and Best Practices Atlanta International Forwarders and Brokers Association March 8,
1 Giulio C. Zanetti, WIPO Alicante, April Giulio C. Zanetti, WIPO Alicante, April 2000 Recent developments in the Madrid system for the International.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
Registering your brand
Geographical Indications
Content of Tender Dossier - Instructions to Tenderers - Tenders
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
Deputy Registrar of Trademarks & GI
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
EGYPO Organisational structure
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
Gordon HUMPHREYS Chairperson of the 5th Board of Appeal
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector

Table of Contents International Application Examination of the International Application in the International Bureau Date of the International Registration Effects of the International Registration Examination in the Office of the Designated Contracting Party Communications from the Designated Contracting Party Provisional Refusal Irregular Provisional Refusal Interim Status of a Mark in a Designated Contracting Party Final Disposition on Status of the Mark Invalidation

International Application

International Application: 3 Main Actors International Application Office of origin International Bureau Applicant

Filing Basis Under the Madrid System Madrid Agreement and Madrid Protocol Applicant Establishment Domicile Nationality Basic Registration Basic Application

The Madrid system is a closed system The applicant (natural person or legal entity) must be entitled to use the Madrid system through Real and effective industrial or commercial establishment Domicile; or Nationality The Office of the Contracting Party through which the applicant is entitled to use the Madrid system, is considered his Office of origin Filing Basis: Entitlement

Filing Basis: The Basic Mark When the entitlement with a Contracting Party is established, the applicant needs to have a trademark registered or deposited for registration with the Office of that Contracting Party (the basic mark) The international application must concern the same applicant/holder, the same mark and the goods and services in the international application must be covered by the list of goods and services in the basic mark

International Application: Forms 3 international application forms Form MM1: Governed exclusively by the Agreement (Rule 1(viii)) Form MM2: Governed exclusively by the Protocol (Rule 1(ix)) Form MM3: Governed by the Agreement and the Protocol (Rule 1(x)) Official forms available at:

International Application: Requirements The international application must be presented to the International Bureau via the Office of origin Official form: MM1, MM2 or MM3 Mandatory contents Optional contents Certification by the Office of origin

Mandatory Contents (1) The international application shall contain or indicate Name and address of the applicant Name and address of the representative, if appointed Entitlement of the applicant Any claim of priority, if applicable Reproduction of the mark Indications of the mark (color claim, kind of mark, etc.) Description of the mark, if required

Mandatory Contents (2) Transliteration of the mark, if applicable List of goods and services (Nice Classification) Special requirements requested by some designated Contracting Parties The amount of fees being paid and the method of payment

Optional Contents The international application may also contain Nationality of the applicant / nature of the legal entity Translation of the mark, if possible An indication by words of the principal parts of the mark which are in color, where color is claim Disclaimer

Certification by the Office of Origin The international application shall contain a declaration by the Office of origin certifying The date of receipt of the international application That the applicant is the same as the applicant/holder of the basic mark That the mark is the same as the basic mark; and That the goods and services are covered by the list of goods and services in the basic mark

Special Requirements for Certain Designated Contracting Parties European Union Indication of a second working language Possibility of claiming seniority (MM17) United States of America Declaration of intention to use the mark (MM18) India, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, and the United Kingdom The designation is a declaration of intention to use Cuba, Ghana and Japan Individual fees payable in 2 parts

International Application: Fees Basic fee (653 or 903 CHF) plus Standard fee regime Complementary fee(s) per designated Contracting Party (100 CHF), and Supplementary fee(s) per class of goods and services beyond 3 (100 CHF); or Individual fee(s), if the designated Contracting Parties have made such declaration Cuba, Ghana and Japan: individual fees payable in 2 parts Fee calculator available at:

International Application: Presentation The international application must be presented to the International Bureau by the Office of origin through Electronic transmission Postal delivery Fax transmission Where the application is communicated by fax, the original of the reproduction of the mark must follow by mail within a given time limit

Role of the Office of Origin APPLICATION RECEPTION FORMALITIES EXAMINATION IRREGULARITYCERTIFICATION OFFICE OF ORIGIN Providing advice to applicants Certification of the international application Reply to or remedy irregularities Keeping track of basic mark in a 5 year period Notifications of ceasing of effect Forwarding official forms on behalf of the holder

Applicant Office of origin Certification Designated Contracting Party Formalities International Bureau International Register Gazette Certificate National/Regional Application or Registration International Application Notification International Application: Procedure Publication

Examination of the International Application in the International Bureau

Role of the International Bureau The International Bureau examines the formalities such as Information in the international application Classification of goods and services (Nice) Classification of figurative elements (Vienna) Fees The International Bureau will Register the mark in the International Register Notify the Offices of designated Contracting Parties, inform the Office of origin and send a certificate to the holder/representative Publish the mark in the WIPO Gazette of International Marks (e-Gazette)

3 Categories of Irregularities Classification of goods and services (Rule 12) Goods and services not properly classified Office of origin to remedy Indication of goods and services (Rule 13) Too vague, linguistically incorrect, or incomprehensible Office of origin to remedy Miscellaneous (Rule 11) Entitlement, basic registration/application number, priority, MM18, fees, etc. Office or origin, applicant or both to remedy

Irregularity Rule 12: Procedure Proposal from the International Bureau (3-months time limit/ 2 months: reminder) Office of origin’s response The International Bureau withdraws (fees paid) = registered as filed The International Bureau modifies or confirms (fees paid) = registered as per modification or International Bureau’s proposal No response from the Office of origin Fees paid = registered as per International Bureau’s proposal Fees not paid = application abandoned (refund) The International Bureau’s opinion prevails Refund: fees paid minus ½ basic fee for a black and white reproduction

Irregularity Rule 13: Procedure Suggestion from the International Bureau (3-month time limit) Office of origin’s response Accepted by the International Bureau = Registered as per the Office of origin’s opinion Rejected by the International Bureau Registered (term deleted if not classified) Registered as filed (if term is classified, with annotation) No response from the Office of origin Registered as filed, with annotation

Irregularity Rule 11: Procedure Proposal from the International Bureau (3-month time limit) Office of origin’s / applicant’s response Remedied = registered Not remedied = application abandoned (refund) No response from the Office of origin / applicant = application abandoned (refund) Refund: fees paid minus ½ basic fee for a black and white reproduction

Date of the International Registration

Date of the IR (1) The date of receipt of the international application by the Office of origin, provided it is received by the International Bureau within 2 months The date of receipt by the International Bureau if it is received from the Office of origin later than 2 months The date of the international registration may be affected if any of the following substantive elements is missing (Rule 15): identity of the applicant, designated Contracting Parties, reproduction of the mark, indications of goods and services The date of the international registration will be the date the last missing element was received by the International Bureau

Date of the IR* (2) Receipt of the international application by the Office of origin 2 months * Receipt of the international application by the Office of origin 2 months Receipt of the international application by the International Bureau * Receipt of the international application by the Office of origin 2 months Receipt of the international application by the International Bureau Receipt by the International Bureau of the last missing element * Receipt of the (irregular) international application by the International Bureau

Effects of the International Registration

Effects of an International Registration From the date of the international registration, the protection of the mark in each of the designated Contracting Parties is the same as if the mark had been filed directly with the Office of that Contracting Party, and the mark had been registered by the Office of that Contracting Party, if no refusal is notified within the applicable time limit

Examination in the Office of the Designated Contracting Party

The Role of the Office of the Designated Contracting Party The role of the Office of the designated Contracting Party will be determined by the domestic legislation The domestic legislations of the designated Contracting Parties set the conditions for protecting a trademark and determine the rights which result from protection The Madrid system offers the possibility for these Offices to issue decisions on the status of protection Provisional refusals Statements of grant of protection Further decisions Invalidations

Examination Process in the Office of the Designated Contracting Party The Office of the designated Contracting Party P will examine the request for extension of protection as if it was domestic application Provisional refusals must be notified to the International Bureau within a set time limit The Office of the designated Contracting Party should send a statement of grant of protection to the International Bureau if all procedures before the Office has been completed before the expiry of the time limit and there are no grounds to refuse protection RECEIPT OF NOTIFICATION SUBSTANTIAL EXAMINATION GRANT OF PROTECTION PROVISIONAL REFUSAL CONFIRMATION OF REFUSAL NATIONAL REGISTRATION DESIGNATED OFFICE

Communications from the designated Contracting Parties

Communications from designated Contracting Parties Possibility of oppositions filed after 18 months (Rule 16) Interim status (Rule 18bis) Statement of grant of protection (Rule 18ter(1)) Provisional refusal (Rule 17) Statement of grant of protection following a provisional refusal (Rule 18ter(2)) Confirmation of total provisional refusal (Rule 18ter(3)) Further decision (Rule 18ter(4)) Invalidation (Rule 19)

Provisional Refusal Article 5 Rules 16, 17 and 18

Provisional Refusal What is meant by “Provisional Refusal”? Are there any restrictions on the right to refuse? Time Grounds Time limits for notification of provisional refusal 12 or 18 months, or “18 months+” The time limit runs from the date of notification from the International Bureau to the Office of the designated Contracting Party in question

Grounds for Provisional Refusal General principle (Article 5(1)) Refusal may be based only on the grounds which would apply, under the Paris Convention, in the case of a mark deposited directly with the Office notifying such refusal Non-valid grounds Divergent opinion on the classification of the goods and services (Rule 12) Banning of multi-class registration or obligation of a limited number of goods or services (Article 5(1))

Notification of Provisional Refusal (1) Notification of provisional refusal is sent to the International Bureau Notification of ex officio provisional refusal must contain The Office making the notification Number of the international registration All the grounds on which the refusal is based If the refusal is based on prior right(s), all relevant data concerning that mark Whether the refusal affects all goods and services or an indication of which goods and services are affected Time limit for filing a request for review/appeal, and to which authority

Notification of Provisional Refusal (2) Where the provisional refusal is based on an opposition, or on opposition and on other grounds, the notification shall indicate that fact In addition to the information in an ex officio provisional refusal, it shall contain Name and address of the opponent Where opposition is based on prior right(s), a list of goods and services on which the opposition is based Provisional refusal is recorded in the International Register and transmitted to the holder

Irregular Provisional Refusal Rule 18

Irregular Provisional Refusal (1) Deficiencies The notification is not signed Details of conflicting mark(s) are not included Goods and services affected are not mentioned Particulars of the opponent and of the goods and services on which opposition is based are not mentioned The provisional refusal is recorded The Office is invited to rectify within 2 months The holder receives a copy of the refusal and of the letter sent to the Office

Irregular Provisional Refusal (2) Deficiencies Time limits are not mentioned (for appeal/to file response to opposition) Competent authority (for appeal) is not mentioned Requirements to file (appeal or response) are not mentioned The provisional refusal is not recorded The Office is invited to rectify within 2 months If rectified, it is recorded with date of defective refusal If not, it is not considered as such The holder receives a copy of the refusal and of the letter sent to the Office

Irregular Provisional Refusal (3) The provisional refusal is not considered as such if it Does not indicate any international registration number Does not indicate any grounds for refusal Is sent after the expiry of the refusal period The International Bureau transmits a copy to the holder for information The International Bureau informs both the holder and the Office

Interim Status of a Mark in a designated Contracting Party Rule 18bis

Interim Status of a Mark in a designated Contracting Party Optional communications from designated Contracting Parties on the status of protection of the mark Interim status before sending a provisional refusal (Rule 18bis(1)(a)) Interim status after sending a provisional refusal (Rule 18bis(1)(b))

Final Disposition on Status of the Mark Rule 18ter

Final Disposition on Status of the Mark Statement of grant of protection where no notification of provisional refusal has been communicated (Rule 18ter(1)) Statement of grant of protection following a provisional refusal (Rule 18ter(2)) Total or partial grant of protection Confirmation of total provisional refusal (Rule 18ter(3)) Further decision (Rule 18ter(4))

Invalidation Rule 19

Invalidation The decision has observed due process The effects of an international registration are invalidated and it is not subject to appeal Content of the decision Specifying the authority International registration number and name of the holder Scope of the invalidation The fact that the decision is not subject to appeal The date the decision was pronounced and, if known, the effective date

Questions ?

Thank you