Uncertainty as to effects Mattias Alveteg, Harald Sverdrup.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Advertisements

“Students” t-test.
Anthony Greene1 Simple Hypothesis Testing Detecting Statistical Differences In The Simplest Case:  and  are both known I The Logic of Hypothesis Testing:
Parameter Estimation Chapter 8 Homework: 1-7, 9, 10 Focus: when  is known (use z table)
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Confidence Intervals, Effect Size and Power
Training Manual Aug Probabilistic Design: Bringing FEA closer to REALITY! 2.5 Probabilistic Design Exploring randomness and scatter.
All Hands Meeting, 2006 Title: Grid Workflow Scheduling in WOSE (Workflow Optimisation Services for e- Science Applications) Authors: Yash Patel, Andrew.
From Uncertain Depositions to Uncertain Critical Load Exceedances Maximilian Posch RIVM Coordination Center for Effects (CCE/TF M&M) Balancing Critical.
GoldSim 2006 User Conference Slide 1 Vancouver, B.C. The Submodel Element.
Lecture 3 Confidence Intervals and Experimental Objectives.
1 Source apportionment of PM in the PCM model John Stedman 23 April 2010.
Parameter Estimation Chapter 8 Homework: 1-7, 9, 10.
Measurement, Quantification and Analysis Some Basic Principles.
Uncertainty in Engineering - Introduction Jake Blanchard Fall 2010 Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers1.
1/49 EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008 Chapter 9 Estimation: Additional Topics.
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module k – Uncertainty in LCA.
1 Assessment of Imprecise Reliability Using Efficient Probabilistic Reanalysis Farizal Efstratios Nikolaidis SAE 2007 World Congress.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency US NRC Approach for Seismic Hazard Assessments INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM STRONG EARTHQUAKES.
Many times in statistical analysis, we do not know the TRUE mean of a population of interest. This is why we use sampling to be able to generalize the.
Basic Business Statistics, 11e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 Confidence Interval Estimation.
Value of information Marko Tainio Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
Statistical Sampling & Analysis of Sample Data
AMERICA’S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Mort Anvari 1 Cost Risk and Uncertainty Analysis MORS Special Meeting | September.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Confidence Intervals Chapter 8.
BPS - 3rd Ed. Chapter 131 Confidence Intervals: The Basics.
Normal Distribution.
Interval Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Limits to Statistical Theory Bootstrap analysis ESM April 2006.
4-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Strategy Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Capacity Strategy Chapter 4.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Sampling distributions rule of thumb…. Some important points about sample distributions… If we obtain a sample that meets the rules of thumb, then…
1 / 12 Michael Beer, Vladik Kreinovich COMPARING INTERVALS AND MOMENTS FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF COARSE INFORMATION M. Beer University of Liverpool V.
Systematic Review: Interpreting Results and Identifying Gaps October 17, 2012.
Chapter 6: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
Calculate, map and used of critical loads and exceedances for acidity and nitrogen in Europe Professor Harald Sverdrup Chemical Engineering, Lund University,
Uncertainties in emission inventories Wilfried Winiwarter Joint TFEIP & TFMM workshop on uncertainties in emission inventories and atmospheric models Dublin,
Regularised Inversion and Model Predictive Uncertainty Analysis.
Chapter 11 The t-Test for Two Related Samples
Why use landscape models?  Models allow us to generate and test hypotheses on systems Collect data, construct model based on assumptions, observe behavior.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Lecture 8 Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Two Population Parameters.
A Framework and Methods for Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Maps Donald A. Keefer Illinois State Geological Survey.
CLUSTERING GRID-BASED METHODS Elsayed Hemayed Data Mining Course.
1 of 48 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Uncertainty & Variability Charles Yoe, Ph.D.
P5 : Advanced Performance Management. B1: External Influences on Organisational Performance B1. Changing business environment B2. Impact of external factors.
1 Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module k – Uncertainty in LCA.
Resource Characterization Rich Wolski, Dan Nurmi, and John Brevik Computer Science Department University of California, Santa Barbara VGrADS Site Visit.
IIASA Riku Suutari, Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont Wolfgang Schöpp A methodology to propagate uncertainties through the RAINS scenario calculations.
Supplementary Chapter B Optimization Models with Uncertainty
Uncertainty Analysis in Emission Inventories
Inference: Conclusion with Confidence
Monte Carlo Simulation Random Number Generation
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
Uncertainty Analysis in Emission Inventories
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
ACCURACY IN PERCENTILES
Bootstrap Confidence Intervals using Percentiles
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
Interval Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
Soil Gross Nutrient Balances
Simple Linear Regression
Chapter Outline Inferences About the Difference Between Two Population Means: s 1 and s 2 Known.
WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol: Project Module
Summing up and next steps
Uncertainties in emission inventories
Presentation transcript:

Uncertainty as to effects Mattias Alveteg, Harald Sverdrup

Acknowledge uncertainties Specifying types of uncertainties Quantitative estimates Understanding policy relevance Unc. management in decision process Funding Uncertainty in singular datavalues/events, ”thin air” sensitivity analysis Assessing uncertainty in structurally complex feedbacksystems of uncertain components Paradigm shift

Uncertainty vs Sensitivity A sensitivity assessment is relatively simple An uncertainty assessment demands detailed knowledge on input uncertainty

Uncertainty assessment Estimating uncertainty range –replicates, spatial heterogeneity, literature, etc. Estimating uncertainty distribution –lower pedigree => thicker tails (rectangular?) –bounded/non bounded distributions? Estimating interdependencies –ensure consistent input, additional submodels needed?, move system boundary?

Site specific unc.

Changing perspective Create one set of input for all sites taking interdependencies into account Calculate critical load for all sites => One CDF for the region Repeat over and over again =>Several independent CDFs for the region Calculate confidence intervals for the different percentiles of the region CDF

Site specific unc. (157 sites in the grid)

Site/percentile specific unc.

Comments Shifting our view from sites to percentiles –makes us more certain about the excedance in the region –we loose all information on where within the grid CL is exceeded

Number of sites?

Fewer sites = larger uncertainty

Fewer sites = less representativity

Thus: Increasing the number of sites up to sites per grid reduces uncertainty and increases representativity Increasing the number of sites increases the 95%-ile exceedance Taking uncertainty into account increases the exceedance

Dynamic uncertainties A flexible tool, UNSAFE, has been developed –creates input to dynamic soil chem. models –effective sampling (Latin Hypercube) –option to specify explicit distributions –handles input databases of different quality –is being tested in Switzerland

Future work or end of the road? Most of our work so far has not been funded Uncertainty assessment requires substantial funding No funding => No future work

Where do the uncertainties come from ?