William Edson SUNY at Albany

 New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: ±  Chi2:  Meas. Used: 31  σ : ±  New Corrected Results:  Signal Fraction: ±  σ : ±  Correction Systematic: ±

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal JER JRE JES up JES down JVF up JVF down BSF up BSF down MET up MET down Tau trig up Tau trig down TES up TES down Tau Eveto SF up Tau Eveto SF down

Nominaltes_uptes_down No cut GRL Trigger ntrack > Electron/muon overlap Event cleaning Lepton veto ntaus > njets ≥ MET > 60 GeV MT < 80 GeV nbjets > Trigger match Truth match Cutflows

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal Wnorm Up Wnorm Down QCD Bin/Range HiISR LowISR

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal Original kfac/ σ (FE) from TopMC11 twiki Correction using Ref σ ’s Using kfac/ σ (FE) from

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal AlpHerwig (baseline) (105200) SYST_AtF_ SYST_AtF_ SYST_Full_ ) fullsim mc11c POWHEG+fPythia sample (SYST_Full_117050) and sample ) fullsim mc11c POWHEG+fPythia sample (SYST_Full_117050) and the fullsim mc11c ALPGEN+HERWIG samples (AlpHerwig(baseline)) 1.3) AtlFast2 mc11b POWHEG+fPythia sample (SYST_AtF_117050) POWHEG+fHerwig sample (SYST_AtF_105860)

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal > <

MET Dijet Mass

MET Dijet Mass

for (unsigned int tfj = (tau_matched.size() - 1); tfj > 0; tfj--) { try { int REFN1 = tau_matched.at(tfj).entry(); int REFN2 = tau_matched.at(tfj-1).entry(); if( (physics->tau_BDTJetScore->at(REFN1)) > (physics- >tau_BDTJetScore->at(REFN2))) { save = tau_matched.at(tfj); tau_matched.at(tfj) = tau_matched.at(tfj-1); tau_matched.at(tfj-1) = save; } catch (const std::out_of_range& C12_2){ std::cerr << endl << "C12.2: OUT OF RANGE ERROR: " << C12_2.what() << endl; EMERXIT = 12; continue; }

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute) Unc (%) Nominal Range Range Range Range Range Range Bins Bins Bins Bins Range increases/decreases in steps of 20GeV Bin amount increases/decreases in steps of 5

 Y(0): ±  Slope: ±  Chi2: NDF: 8998

Slope: ± y-intercept: ± Chi2: NDF: 7

Input Fraction Previous Gaussian Mean Output Fraction Unc.Gaussian Mean Output Fraction Unc

RangeFit to MeansFit to All ValuesCorrected σ Y(0)SlopeY(0)Slope 0.1 – – – –

MC Tau Count MC Tau Children pdgIDMC Tau Children Count Leptonic pdgID values: e → 11, μ → 13, τ → 15

Samples Normalized to Own Integrals Samples Normalized to Sum of Integrals

 C0: GRL  C1: Trigger  C2: Primary vertex with ntracks > 4  C3: Electron/muon overlap  C4: Jet cleaning  C5: Lepton Veto  C6: tau n ≥ 1  C7: n jets >= 4 with eta 0.75  C8: MET > 60GeV  C9: M T < 80GeV  C10: >= 1 b jet  C11: Trigger matched tau n ≥ 1 and p T >= 40GeV  C12: MC tau object match

 Equation:  N(x): total number of events of type x for distribution  n(x) i : number of events in bin of type x  frac(Sig): fraction of N(Remain) expected to be Signal  binfrac(x) i : fraction of events in bin of type x expected from MC or template  σ i : uncertainty in bin i

 σ i determined using factors for:  bin error:  data  signal, MC  QCD template  other backgrounds, MC  statistical error:  data: signal region  other backgrounds, MC  signal, MC  QCD template (uncertainty of background region data and all MC background region carried through via default SumW2

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 14  chi/ndf:

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 15  chi/ndf:

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 18  chi/ndf:

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 12  chi/ndf: 1.323

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 11  chi/ndf: 1.308

CutSig EvtsFakesSig Eff.Fake Ratio Rej Fact. Sig/ sqrt(Bkgd) Sig/ Sqrt(Sig+ Bkgd) C5 Lep Veto C6 ntaus > C7 njets C8 MET C9 MT C10 bjet C12 Trig match