CM-18 June 20071 The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM-22 Magnet Issues, 6 June MICE Magnet Cool Down and Other Issues Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
Advertisements

MICE RF Cavities and RFCC Module Update Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE RF Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, UK April 17, 2012 April 17,
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
Magnet Measurement Device for MICE F. Garnier, P-A. Giudici, F.Bergsma CERN MICE Collaboration Meeting No July 2011 Oxford technical drawings by.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Spectrometer Solenoid Report and Coupling Coil Update Michael S. Zisman MICE Operations Manager Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.
1 Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Cost Update Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 10 February 2005.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Status report about the e-  identifier Study of shielding against the stray magnetic field at the downstream end of the spectrometer F. Huveneers, Gh.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
Magnetic Field Studies Dan Karmgard for the HCAL RBX Group.
Goal of MICE:   out /  in of   Assuming a standard (or agreed to) definition of 6-D cooling.  We can also assume that the tracker can give.
Realistic Model of the Solenoid Magnetic Field Paul S Miyagawa, Steve Snow University of Manchester Objectives Closed-loop model Field calculation corrections.
MICE Collaboration Meeting March 29 - April 1, CERN MICE alignment, tolerances and supports Tuesday March 30 Room Edgar Black/IIT March17-
8/07/ J.M. Rey1 J.M. Rey CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM Saclay The different (magnetic) ways to run the MICE experiment.
12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.
Spectrometer Solenoid and RFCC Update Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Introduction Mapper machine Mapper software - Simulation - Corrections - Fitting.
Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.
MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.
Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
Status of RFCC-Module Development Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting at INFN-LNF, Frascati,
Magnet quench during a training run Successfully trained to peak currents and operationally tested Thermal performance requirements met 3D magnetic bore.
Tilt meter fiducial Guide rail Abstract This poster covers the survey and alignment techniques selected for installation of the SPIRAL2 accelerator devices.
Status of COBRA Magnet Wataru OOTANI MEG review meeting July 11 th, 2003 PSI Switzerland.
MICE CM32 8 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.
ATLAS Inner Detector Magnetic Field I am responsible for providing the magnetic field map for the ATLAS Inner Detector.  6m long x 2m diameter cylindrical.
Some Thoughts on Magnetic Measurements for MICE Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720, USA.
MICE magnetic measurements: AFC considerations Alain Blondel see a previous discussion for reference in CM35 (Feb 2013 slides by V. Blackmore, A. Blondel.
Forum March 2003H.Taureg1 Magnetic Fields in ALICE Mapping and Monitoring.
Magnet Measurement Device for MICE F. Garnier, P-A. Giudici, F.Bergsma CERN MICE Collaboration Meeting No. 29 RAL technical drawings by O.Jamet.
Abstract: The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) is an international effort sited at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which will demonstrate ionization.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.
Magnet vacuum vessel w/radiation shield and cold mass in place Magnet leads (left) and the three cryocoolers on the top of the spectrometer solenoid service.
NIKHEF B-field monitors Paul Balm November 11 th, 1999.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
UK Update Package Managers Meeting 001 Roy Preece 13 th January 2014.
Helical Undulator Status Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Vrije Universiteit amsterdam Milan, September 25, 2000 VELO System J.F.J. van den Brand LHCb Vertex Detector System: Status Report J.F.J. van den Brand.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
MICE RF Coupling Coil Magnets Update Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory October 6, 2010 Sofia, Bulgaria.
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
Mapping the Magnetic Field of the ATLAS Solenoid Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester ATLAS experiment + solenoid Objectives Field mapping machine.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Oxford, UK July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011.
Progress on MICE RFCC Module for the MICE Experiment * Allan DeMello, Nord Andresen, Michael Green, Derun Li, Heng Pan, Steve Virostek, Michael Zisman.
OsC mtg 15/10/2014 MICE Step IV Alan Grant. Content Step IV – Construction Status – Finances – Schedule – Risks – Summary 2.
1) News on the long scale length calibration 2) Results of the two surveys performed on plane 7 Set 1: morning of 12/11/2004 Set 2: morning of 19/11/2004.
MICE Coupling Coil Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Illinois Institute of Technology June 17, 2013 June 17, 2013.
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
201 MHz Cavity Plans Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February 11, 2011 MAP Friday Video Conference Meeting.
FIELD MAPPING V. Blackmore CM38 23rd February /70.
MICE Coupling Coil Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?
IR Beam Transport Status
Presentation transcript:

CM-18 June The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut NIKHEF, Amsterdam, Netherlands

CM-18 June Magnetic Measurement and Monitoring Some comments about the MICE magnetic field. What is important to know from the MICE magnetic measurements? How should one measure the magnetic field in the MICE magnets? Should the field within the spectrometer solenoid be monitored? Should one monitor the MICE magnetic field while operating the magnet? Methods of magnetic field monitoring

CM-18 June Tracker 1 AFC1 AFC2 Tracker 2 AFC3 Coupler 1 Coupler 2 MICE Magnet Coils

CM-18 June The Characteristics of MICE Magnet The MICE magnets have a total of 18 coils. Various coils are connected in series with a total of 6 circuits. The MICE magnets ideally share a common axis. Since the MICE magnets are axially symmetric the fields should have only r and z component. There should be no  component of the field. A  component of field means that there are field errors. These errors are due to error in coil placement, lumps of ferromagnetic material, and other sources of magnetic field. The field should be proportional to the coil currents to better than 0.1 percent, except for the shield end of the detector.

CM-18 June Sources of Field Errors in MICE The MICE magnets do not share a common axis. The axis error for a coil should be less than ±2 mm. The coil axis is tilted with respect to the MICE channel axis. The axis tilt should be less than ±3 mrad. The MICE coils are not in the correct z position. The z position should be correct to about ±5 mm. Lumps of ferromagnetic material, and other sources of magnetic fields are present near the coils. Calculations suggest that this effect is small for most of the channel. Circulating currents in the superconducting filaments can cause field errors. For the operating fields in the MICE channel. This error is small (<0.03 percent).

CM-18 June Why Measure the MICE Magnets? It is important to know the location of the magnetic axis for each of the magnets in the MICE channel. The magnetic measurements should confirm whether the actual magnetic field is the same as the field calculated by the by the magnetic field codes. The magnetic field measured can be used to analyze how the muons will behave in the MICE channel. The actual field measurements can also be put into MICE simulation codes.

CM-18 June The Expected Magnetic Field in the MICE Channel Tracker Magnet End AFC Magnet Coupling Magnet Center AFC Magnet

CM-18 June MICE Magnet Magnetic Measurements

CM-18 June MICE Magnetic Measurement Process Magnetic alignment begins during construction. Low current magnetic measurements at 300 K can be used to verify that the magnetic axis is in the correct x-y position and angle, at a time when one can adjust the position of the cold mass. The MICE magnets will use self-centering supports. This means that the center between the supports is in the same position at 4 K as it is at 300 K, within ±0.2 mm. The axis angle error should be <0.8 mrad for the RFCC magnet, <0.5 mrad for the AFC magnet and <0.2 mrad for the tracker solenoid.

CM-18 June Magnetic Measurement process cont. Measurements at the vendor will verify that the magnet will reach it full design field. The on-axis field will be measured as a function of z. It should be possible to determine the solenoid magnetic axis angle with respect to the magnet bore axis. A field map will not be made at the vendor’s plant. It is recommended that a magnetic field map be made in the regions of the magnet that will see the beam. For the AFC and tracker magnets the beam diameter is 0.3 m in diameter. For the coupling magnet this diameter is 0.42 m. The tracker magnet these measurements will be made at FNAL. There is no decision as to where the other magnets will be mapped.

CM-18 June A Magnetic Measurement Technique Measurements can be made using temperature compensated Hall probes. At fields from 0.5 T to 2 T the error is <0.03 percent. Most Hall probes are not calibrated above 2 T. Three axis Hall probes (to measure the r, z and  components of the field) can be mounted on a rotating disc at different radii. The probe mounting errors are significant. Rotating the discs will allow one to determine whether a measured error is a probe mounting error or a real field error. The field should be measured at a number of z locations along the physical (room temperature) axis of the magnet.

CM-18 June The Field within the Tracker Magnet The radial component of field is small through much of the range. The peak radial field is ~1.4 T at the ends of the magnet. Magnet alone from 2.5 m < z < 7.0 m and from 0.0 m < r < 0.2 m Note: In the good field region, the field is about T. There is no field from the other MICE magnets.

CM-18 June The Field outside the Tracker Magnet The 300 G line is about 1 meter from the ends of the tracker magnet. The radial position of the 300 G line is at a radius of about 1 meter. This is a stay clear line at Fermilab. Magnet alone from 2.5 m < z < 7.0 m and from 0.0 m < r < m Note: There is no iron ring at the end of the spectrometer magnet in this case. Tracker Magnet Coil

CM-18 June Tracker Magnet Measurements The external field is important because of safety concerns, especially at fields >0.03 T. The field tracker magnet is above 2 T. The field from the center of the uniform field region to the end of the magnet is not linear with current because the iron shield can affect the field within the tracker volume up to 2 percent. This is why the two end coils have tuning power supplies. The tracker magnet room temperature Hall probes must be calibrated to 4.5 T. Can one differentiate between errors caused by the iron shield and probe calibration errors? YES

CM-18 June The Field within the AFC Magnet The radial component of field is large in the flip mode as shown. The peak radial field is ~2.4 T at the ends of the magnet. Magnet alone from 0 m < z < 1.32 m and from 0.0 m < r < 0.2 m Note: There is no field from the other MICE magnets.

CM-18 June The Field outside the AFC Magnet In the flip mode, the 300 G line is ~1.5 meters from the ends of the focusing magnet. The radial position of the 300 G line is at a radius of ~1.3 meters. Magnet alone from 0 m < z < 2.0 m and from 0.0 m < r < 1.5 m In the non-flip mode, the 300 G line is ~1.5 m from the ends of the focusing magnet. The radial position of the 300 G line is at a radius of ~1.3 meters. The line shape is different.

CM-18 June AFC Magnet Measurements The external field is important because of safety concerns, especially at fields >0.03 T. In the radial direction the 0.03 T line is further from the axis than in the tracker magnet. The field within AFC magnet bore is above 2 T. The field within the AFC solenoid is linear with current (to ±0.1 percent) over a broad range of currents. One must check to see if the cooler motor shields affect the field within the magnet bore more than ±0.1 percent. If the field is linear with current to ±0.1 percent, the room temperature Hall probes do not have to be calibrated above 2 T.

CM-18 June The Field within the Coupling Magnet The radial component of field is small through much of the range. The peak radial field is ~0.287 T at the ends of the magnet. Magnet alone from m < z < m 0.0 m < r < 0.2 m Note: There is no field from the other MICE magnets.

CM-18 June The Field outside the Coupling Magnet The 300 G line is ~3.35 meters from the ends of the tracker magnet. The radial position of the 300 G line is at a radius of ~2.9 meters. This is a stay clear line at Fermilab. Magnet alone from m < z < m 0.0 m < r < m Coupling Coil

CM-18 June Coupling Magnet Measurements The external field is important because of safety concerns, especially at fields >0.03 T. The 0.03 line is further from the center than in the other magnets. The bore coupling magnet field is just above 2 T. The field within the solenoid is linear with current (to ±0.1 percent) over a broad range of currents. One must check to see if the cooler motor shields affect the field within the magnet bore more than ±0.1 percent. If the field is linear with current to ±0.1 percent, the room temperature Hall probes do not have to be calibrated above 2 T.

CM-18 June Monitoring the field within the Spectrometer Magnet

CM-18 June The Blue rings are the tracker scintillating fiber planes. The spacing between planes is : 150mm, 180mm, 200mm and 470mm. All fiber planes are in the magnet good field region. The MICE Scintillating Fiber Tracker Module Field Sensor

CM-18 June Field Monitoring on the Tracker Frame The field in this region is about 4 T (depending on the muon momentum). The sensors should be calibrated up to 4.5 T. Since the tracker field is uniform (to ± 0.3 percent), one can use single axis (in a direction parallel to the magnet axis) Hall sensors to monitor the field. The z axis Hall sensors should be mounted on the tracker frame near the scintillating fiber planes at a radius greater than 150 mm. Three planes of sensors should be within the uniform field volume. There can be three or four z axis sensors in each sensor plane.

CM-18 June Monitoring on the Tracker Frame cont. The sensors on the tracker frame can be used for tuning the magnetic field in which the tracker is located. The average magnetic field (in the center of the tracker) is controlled using the 300 A spectrometer solenoid power supply. The field uniformity can be monitored using the end plane sensors. Field uniformity is controlled using the 60 A power supplies across the two end coils of the spectrometer solenoid. The tracker sensors are critical for tuning the tracker solenoids for MICE.

CM-18 June MICE Magnet Monitoring using External Probes outside of the Cryostat

CM-18 June Is External Field Monitoring Necessary for the MICE Channel Magnets? Once the MICE channel has been assembled, magnetic measurements of the channel magnets is longer be possible. One cannot measure the effect of current in other MICE magnets on the field within a particular MICE magnet. One must use the calculated to field to determined the effect of one magnet on another magnet in MICE. Jean Michel Rey of Saclay proposed that the field be monitored by three axis magnetic measurement probes (Hall probes) in at least three places around each of the coils in the MICE channel. This method is used to monitor the field in ATLAS. Is this a useful technique for the MICE cooling channel?

CM-18 June External Field Measurements cont. For the tracker module, three axis Hall probes could be installed 120 degrees apart on the outside of the tracker magnet cryostat over the center of each match coil and the center of the long center coil in the spectrometer solenoid. This is in addition to the probes installed on the tracker frame. For the AFC module, a two sets of three axis Hall probes could be installed 120 degrees apart on the outside of the AFC cryostat over the coils. For the RFCC module, a single set of three axis Hall probes could be installed 120 degree apart on the outside of the magnet cryostat at the center.

CM-18 June External Field Measurements cont. The field outside the tracker magnet and the AFC magnet in the non-flip mode is quite low (~0.05 T). Measurement sensitivity will be a problem. Earth’s field and iron near the magnet will cause errors. The field outside the coupling coil is high (~1 T) and the field outside the AFC magnet in the flip mode is at a medium level (0.2 to 0.35 T). External field monitoring makes sense if there is no iron around the magnets. There will be iron (pumps, compressors, shields, and other items) that may affect the field outside of MICE, but the MICE channel field errors should be less than ±0.1 percent.

CM-18 June External Field Measurements cont. It is not clear that external field measurements are useful for the tracker solenoid. The fields are low and the errors due to earths field and magnetization in the room are considerable. However, monitoring of the field within the magnet bore around the tracker is can help tune the magnet for different spectrometer field levels. This should be done. Lumps of iron outside of MICE (cooler motor shields and vacuum pump shields) can affect the field outside of the coupling coil because the magnetic moment generated by the iron is higher and the coil is closer to the iron. The field outside of the AFC magnet may also be affected by iron. It is not clear that three axis field monitoring is useful.

CM-18 June External Field Measurements cont. Measuring the external field may be useful to determine the MICE channel operating mode and an individual magnet coil’s polarity. Measurement of magnet polarity can be done with a single one z axis probe that is mounted outside of the magnet cryostat at the coil center. Such probes can be at room temperature or 4 K. Other than measuring the field direction and approximate magnitude to determine the channel operating mode, field monitoring outside of MICE magnets does not appear to be very useful.

CM-18 June Tracker Magnet Vacuum Vessel Sensor Location M1 Sensor M2 Sensor Spectrometer Sensor Redundant Hall sensors on other side are not shown.

CM-18 June Focusing Magnet Vacuum Vessel Sensor Location Coil 2 Sensor Coil 1 Sensor Redundant Hall sensors on other side are not shown.

CM-18 June Coupling Magnet Sensor Coupling Magnet Vacuum Vessel Sensor Location Redundant Hall sensor on other side is not shown.

CM-18 June Concluding Comments Magnetic measurements (both warm and cold) are done at the vendor to determine that the magnet meets the basic specification. Field mapping on all individual magnets should be done in the region where the MICE beam will be. The angle of the magnetic axis with respect to the magnet physical axis must be determined. Single axis external field probes are useful for determining the operating mode and the magnet and its polarity. Knowing the field on three planes on the tracker frame is very useful.

CM-18 June B-field sensor status Frank Filthaut Radboud University / NIKHEF

CM-18 June The B-field sensor 56 mm 3 Hall probes (orthogonally mounted)  3D measurement Temperature sensor (needed for calibration) Obtain 2×10-4 relative accuracy through precise (s/w) calibration

CM-18 June Sensor production Order: ~ 36 probes suitable for B < 4T field –Suitable for use within solenoid bore –34 will be calibrated up to B < 4.5 T (Grenoble) 2 used for irradiation test –40 additional cards ordered (B < 1 T) Status: –All produced, but not yet calibrated –Calibrator tool vanished! F. Bergsma (CERN) re- building Aim is to be done by July 1 Measurement time (at GHMFL): July 6-21 (facility then closed until September

CM-18 June Readout From experiment’s point of view: one CAN bus So far, used only stand-alone (Windows+Kvaser ) applications –Apart from use in LHC: PVSS (EPICS analogue)

CM-18 June Readout (cont’d) Given experiment’s choice of EPICS: TEWS TIP810 Industry Pack card –Not yet ordered –EPICS support: under VxWorks only CAN or CANopen ? –Little experience with / time for driver s/w etc. Continuing to read-out stand-alone would greatly facilitate this task! –If not: need help! (Even testing: availability IOC?)

CM-18 June Mapping solenoid fields Such sensors have been used on previous occasions for field map purposes (ex: LHCb)

CM-18 June Mapping fields (cont’d) A priori, no reason why these sensors could not be used for field map purposes Requirements: –Fixture (rotating or not?), movement control –Upon sensor calibration, should be able to provide h/w, s/w

CM-18 June Radiation test Radiation hardness a possible issue –RF emission: only as of 2009 (does not prevent us from installing - and using - sensors earlier) Still would like to test in detail –Alan Bross: test in FNAL Lab-G setup –Being prepared (after CM?)