Teams: Characteristics and Diversity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Work in the 21 st Century Chapter 13 Teams in Organizations Ryan McVay/Getty Images.
Advertisements

Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Fifteen Effective Groups and Teams.
The Nature of Work Groups and Teams
Chapter 11 The Nature of Work Groups and Teams
& 12 & Processes.
Chapter 6 Groups and Teams. Copyright © 2006 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Purpose and Overview Purpose –To understand effective.
Part 4: Leading PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Understanding Work Teams.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter 13 Teams and Team Building.
Chapter Seven Motivating and Managing People and Groups in Business Organizations © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Group Processes and Work Teams Chapter Nine. © Copyright Prentice-Hall Group Dynamics Group dynamics focus on the nature of groups – the variables.
1 Team Development and Performance OS 386 October 17, 2002 Fisher.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 14-1 Chapter Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Teams: Processes and Communication
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Teams: Characteristics and Diversity Chapter 11.
Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation
Virtual teams These are teams that work together and solve problems through computer-based interactions. What are some benefits? Drawbacks? They save time,
Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation
Leaders and Leadership
© 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Developing and Leading Effective Teams Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All.
11-1©2005 Prentice Hall 11: Effective Work Groups and Teams Chapter 11: Effective Work Groups and Teams Understanding And Managing Organizational Behavior.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Effective Groups and Teams
Effective Team Management
Managing Teams.
Effective Team Management
Chapter 10 THE NATURE OF WORK GROUPS AND TEAMS. CHAPTER 10 The Nature of Work Groups and Teams Copyright © 2002 Prentice-Hall What is a Group? A set of.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6-1 Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation Chapter 6.
Values, Attitudes, Emotions, and Culture: The Manager as a Person chapter three Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Team Dynamics.
Effective Groups and Teams
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 9: Teams Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 13: Groups and Teams
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
Chapter Four Communicating Across Cultures McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
P.I.I.M.T American University of Leadership
Teams in Organizations Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 7 Group and Team Behavior.
Welcome to this Organizational Behavior course that uses the 16th edition of the textbook, Organizational Behavior by Robbins and Judge. This is considered.
Effective Groups and Teams Handout # Explain why groups and teams are key contributors to organizational effectiveness. Identify the different.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter8 Groups Behavior and Teamwork.
Chapter Thirteen Groups & Teams: Increasing Cooperating, Reducing Conflict McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 Effective Team Management.
Groups. After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Define group and differentiate between types of groups. Identify the five stages of group.
Effective Groups and Teams chapter fifteen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Teams Kevin Posalski David Shin. What are Teams Teams are groups of two or more people who interact and influence each other, are mutually accountable.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Teams: Characteristics and Diversity Chapter 11.
Foundations of Group Behavior Week 6 lecture 11,12.
11 Developing Groups Contrast a group and a team Define norms Explain the relationship between cohesiveness and group productivity.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
MANAGEMENT Part Five: The Leading Process
Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation
Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation
Teams: Characteristics and Diversity
Project team building, conflict, and negotiation
Define groups and the stages of group development
Understanding groups and teams
University of Northern IA
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Understanding Work Teams
Region 1 - Training Module
Distinguish between a team and a work group and outline the key elements that are essential for the establishment of a team Describe the dimensions and.
Presentation transcript:

Teams: Characteristics and Diversity 11

Learning Goals What are the five general team types and their defining characteristics? What are the three general types of team interdependence? What factors are involved in team composition? What are the types of team diversity and how do they influence team functioning? How do team characteristics influence team effectiveness? How can team compensation be used to manage team effectiveness?

Team Characteristics A team consists of two or more people who work interdependently over some time period to accomplish common goals related to some task-oriented purpose. A special type of “group.” The interactions among members within teams revolve around a deeper dependence on one another than the interactions within groups.

Team Types Work teams Management teams Parallel teams Project teams Action teams

Types of Teams Table 11-1

Types of Teams Figure 11-1

Variations within Team Types Virtual teams are teams in which the members are geographically dispersed, and interdependent activity occurs through electronic communications—primarily e-mail, instant messaging, and Web conferencing.

Stages of Team Development Forming Forming Storming Norming Performing Adjourning Storming Time Norming Performing Adjourning

Punctuated Equilibrium At the initial team meeting, members make assumptions and establish a pattern of behavior that lasts for the first half of its life. Adapted from Figure 11-2

Team Interdependence Task interdependence refers the degree to which team members interact with and rely on other team members for the information, materials, and resources needed to accomplish work for the team. Pooled interdependence

Team Interdependence, Cont’d Sequential interdependence

Team Interdependence, Cont’d Reciprocal interdependence

Team Interdependence, Cont’d Comprehensive interdependence

Goal Interdependence A high degree of goal interdependence exists when team members have a shared vision of the team’s goal and align their individual goals with that vision as a result.

The Mission Statement Development Process Table 11-2

Outcome Interdependence A high degree of outcome interdependence exists when team members share in the rewards that the team earns.

Team Composition Team composition Role Leader–staff teams Team task roles Team building roles Individualistic roles

Team and Individualistic Roles Table 11-3

Team and Individualistic Roles, Cont’d Table 11-3

Team Composition, Cont’d Member ability Disjunctive tasks Conjunctive tasks Additive tasks

Discussion Questions Do you think student teams function best in an additive, disjunctive, or conjunctive manner? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each structure?

Team Composition, Cont’d Member personality Agreeable people tend to be more cooperative and trusting, tendencies that promote positive attitudes about the team and smooth interpersonal interactions. Conscientious people tend to be dependable and work hard to achieve goals. Extraverted people tend to perform more effectively in interpersonal contexts and are more positive and optimistic in general.

Team Composition, Cont’d Team diversity Value in diversity problem-solving approach Similarity-attraction approach Surface-level diversity Deep-level diversity

Team Composition, Cont’d Team Size Having a greater number of members is beneficial for management and project teams but not for teams engaged in production tasks. Research concluded that team members tend to be most satisfied with their team when the number of members is between 4 and 5.

Five Aspects of Team Composition Figure 11-4

What Characteristics Can Be Used to Describe Teams? Figure 11-5

How Important Are Team Characteristics? One aspect of team effectiveness is team performance. A second aspect of team effectiveness is team viability. The relationship between task interdependence and team performance is moderately positive. The relationship between task interdependence and team commitment is weaker.

Effects of Task Interdependence on Performance and Commitment Figure 11-6

Application: Team Compensation Outcome interdependence has obvious connections to compensation practices in organizations. High outcome interdependence promotes higher levels of cooperation because members understand that they share the same fate — if the team wins, everyone wins, and if the team fails, everyone fails. Design team reward structures with hybrid outcome interdependence.

Takeaways Teams are comprised of two or more people who work interdependently over some time period to accomplish common goals related to some task-oriented purpose. Teams are more interdependent and task focused than groups. There are several different types of teams—work teams, management teams, parallel teams, project teams, and parallel teams—but many teams in organizations have characteristics that fit in multiple categories and differ from one another in other ways. Teams can be interdependent in terms of the team task, goals, and outcomes. Each type of interdependence has important implications for team functioning and effectiveness.

Takeaways, Cont’d Team composition refers to the characteristics of the members who work in the team. These characteristics include roles, ability, and personality, as well as the number of team members. Depending on the team’s task, it may be important to consider the average ability of the members, the ability of the most able, or the ability of the least able. The effect of diversity on the team depends on time and whether the diversity is surface-level or deep-level. The effects of surface-level diversity tend to diminish with time, whereas the effects of deep-level diversity tend to increase over time.

Takeaways, Cont’d Task interdependence has a moderate positive relationship with team performance and a weak relationship with team commitment. Outcome interdependence has important effects on teams, which can be managed with compensation practices that take team performance into account.