USING D2L TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Bruce DeRuntz & Mohamad Ali Department of Technology, Southern Illinois University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment An Overview of Purpose, Structures and Systems Approved by Curriculum Committee Approved by Academic.
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Curriculum Maps Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Student Internships and Learning Outcomes Assessment By Harpal S. Dhillon, AGSB University Helmut Pusterer, AGSB University Manpreet K. Dhillon, Hult International.
Health sciences curriculum renewal mapping template Sample Excel spread sheet template for mapping courses or programs to the Threshold Learning Outcome.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Nassau Community College THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK G eneral E ducation A ssessment R eview Kumkum Prabhakar, Assistant Professor of Biology.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Assessing Students’ Skills in Science & Technology Hong Kong University – May 19 th 2006 Graham Orpwood York/Seneca Institute for Mathematics, Science.
1 MBA Learning Assurance Committee Progress Report to the ZSB Faculty September 20, 2007.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Using the D2L Competencies Tool to Provide Student and Course Data J.C. Turner, Riverland Community College
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Tusculum College School of Business. Tusculum College Program is: –Approved…Regionally by Southern Association of Colleges and Schools –Flexible & cost.
OBE Briefing.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Jason D. Powell Ferrum College Saturday, October 15, :30-2:30 PM ACA Summit Asheville, NC.
Enhancing OSP for Programmatic and Institutional Assessment Lynn Ward and John Gosney Indiana University.
Student learning outcomes Training Subcommittee University Assessment Committee University of Toledo
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
ABET Accreditation Process Chemical Engineering Department Prof. Emad Ali.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
Resources and Reflections: Using Data in Undergraduate Geosciences Cathy Manduca SERC Carleton College DLESE Annual Meeting 2003.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
_Macros Learning in the 21st Century Learning in the 21 st Century – Students as Self-Directed and Self-Assessing Learners PowerPoint Slides at.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Program Level Assessment for Continuing Studies Programs.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Writing Assignments in Mechanical Engineering Anne Parker University of Manitoba A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,
Learning Objectives Online Course Improvement Program (OCIP) Susie Bussmann & Miley Grandjean, IIQ.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
How To Write Student Learning Outcomes
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Closing the Assessment Loop
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Assessment of Student Learning
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
ECE361 Engineering Practice
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
Welcome W 1.2 Introduction to Engineering Design II
Development of ABET Syllabus
Materials and Manufacturing Engineering
Criminal Justice A.A.S. School of Science, Health and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Criminal Justice: Law Enforcement Leadership School of Health, Science and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Lisa Colbert.
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

USING D2L TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Bruce DeRuntz & Mohamad Ali Department of Technology, Southern Illinois University

Competencies - Overview Competencies are the measurable or observable knowledge, skills, abilities, and behaviors. Competencies validate information about the knowledge, skills and abilities of students through the assessment of learning objectives. D2L Competencies Tool enables us to assess:  Program Competencies  Course Learning Objectives Evaluation Activities

Continuous improvement – curriculum, pedagogy Student success and retention Program Accreditation (Compulsory) Why?

Analyze Design Develop Implementation Evaluation Analyze Design Develop Implementation Evaluation Analyze Design Develop Implementation Evaluation Retention Growth Why? Retention Growth Retention Growth Student Retention Course Repetition

D2L Competencies Structure A competency structure is a hierarchy composed of three basic elements:  “Program” Competencies  “Course” Learning Objectives  “Assessment” Activities

D2L Terminology: Parent-child relationships between competency structure elements ElementParentsChildren “Program” CompetencyOther higher-order competencies Learning objectives. Other lower-order competencies “Course” Learning ObjectiveCompetenciesActivities “Assessment” ActivityLearning objectives

How it looks like in D2L “Program” Competency “Course” Learning Objective “Assessment” Activities

5 Step Process Work flow of Competencies Mapping

IT001 AKA “a” Knowledge of Fundamentals: An understanding of the fundamentals of management, quality, production, and automation. IT002 Interpreting Data: An ability to interpret graphical, numerical, and textual data. IT003 Problem Solving: An ability to apply relevant scientific and technology principles to solve real world, open-ended industrial problems. IT004 Design: An ability to design an industrial process to meet customer needs. IT004 Communication: An ability to communicate effectively in oral, written and visual forms. IT005 Teamwork: An ability to work in teams and understand the effective team dynamics and characteristics. IT006 Contemporary issues, non-technical issues, global awareness: An awareness of contemporary and non-technical issues in technology profession and the role of professionals in an interdependent global society. IT007 Professional Ethics: An awareness and understanding of professional ethics. Program Outcomes/Competencies :

Step #1  D2L administrator (JP Dunn) enters department level “program” competencies in D2L database

Step #2  Instructor enters course learning objectives in D2L database  From D2L menu - (Track/Competencies/New/Competencies or Learning Objectives)

Step #3  Mapping process – Instructor links course learning objectives to “program” competencies

After the linking “Program” Competency “Course” Learning Objectives

Step #4  Link Activities – Instructor select the method to assess the course learning objectives with identified activities (quiz items, rubrics, assignments, discussions)

Step #5  Set assessment criteria – Instructor sets the threshold to assess the learning objectives (e.g ≥ 60% of overall quiz score)

Competencies Reports

Reports – by learning objectives

Individual student report by objective

Overall Individual report for one competency “Define Key Terms”

D2L Insights Reports – JP generates course and department reports  %20reports %20reports  Other D2L Insights reports include:  Standard Report  Accreditation report  Competencies report  Grade report  Enrollment report

IT-208 – Fundamental of Manufacturing Process, Fall 2014

Important considerations  Use standard conventions in D2L to avoid confusions, including university-wide common assessment terminology.  Use measurable verbs in learning objectives, so that they can be assessed using learning activities.  A learning objective can be assessed with more than one activities, and vice versa.

D2L demonstration

Thank You