Learning Forward 1 The question for educators is not whether all humans can learn, but what conditions can we devise so that they will learn. Roland Barth,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements


Leaders Facilitate Teamwork
Working with your Central Office Staff, Leadership Team, and Board Dennis R. Coe, Superintendent Henry County Schools.
Collaborative Learning
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Parents as Partners in Education
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
The Finishing Pieces ACSD Summer Conference 2008 Karen Sullards Principal Bayou Meto Elem PCSSD.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Structuring Retreats to Share Findings and Discuss Recommendations Paul Cobb and the MIST Team.
FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF SHARED DECISION MAKING AND THE PRINCIPAL'S LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN A LARGE URBAN DISTRICT by Don Leech & Charles.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
Chris John Merbein P-10 College. The initial plan was to work one-on-one with the three classroom teachers. The flaws in this plan quickly became apparent:
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
TEACHER LEADER TEAM Amory School District.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Complete puzzle at your table  Discuss with tablemates what is noticeable about the puzzle once it is together.  Do the traits from your puzzle resemble.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
T.L.C. T eaching in L oudoun C ounty New Teacher Induction, Mentor, and Coaching Program.
with Terry Doerscher Doerscher Consulting LLC
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
Southern Regional Education Board Welcome What Does Academic Integration Really Mean in the Career-Technical Classroom? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP. Teamwork Review the team task Review the team values Review the program Light entertainment on teams.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
The Roles and Responsibilities of Club President– A Effective Club Rotary Clubs  Sustain and/ or grow their membership base  Implement successful projects.
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Ted Price, Ph.D. West Virginia University Workshop Facilitator September 16, 2010.
TJPTSA DIVERSITY COMMITTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 10, 2010.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
Presentation to North Carolina State Board of Education Global Education Task Force March 14, 2012  Adam Hartzell, Executive Director  Matt Friedrick,
Managing for Quality and Competitiveness
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Facilitating Collaborative Decision Making Anne Wright.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Common Core State Standards Implications for Leadership Curriculum Leadership Council Networking Session.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
FLEXIBILITY and the DENVER PLAN Objectives for today: Understand DPS’ future direction related to academic supports. Understand DPS’ approach to.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Office of Service Quality
Amy Bobak Angelina Saloom Kimberly Carthy-Pierre Tina Pavy.
1 CHILDREN FIRST NETWORK SUMMARY Winter 2009 Confidential – Not for Distribution.
Instructional Partners Westlawn Middle School Lacey Lupo.
Developing Instructional Leaders in Brevard County.
The Pathway Leadership Team’s Role Kathleen Harris, Director Technical Assistance and Coaching
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
SCHOOL LEADERS AS HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGERS Tony Milanowski & Steve Kimball University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Perceptions of Head Teachers & Principals: Views of Teacher Leaders’ Qualifications Canadian Society for the Study of Education Canadian Association for.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Parents as Leaders: Module Objectives
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Leaders of Teachers (external to classroom)
Learning-oriented Organizational Improvement Processes
Parents as Leaders PCL Module 1 Parents As Leaders
Initial Implementation Riverbank Elementary, WUSD
Leadership Development
Presentation transcript:

Learning Forward 1 The question for educators is not whether all humans can learn, but what conditions can we devise so that they will learn. Roland Barth, Learning By Heart Ann M. Delehant 1001 Hillsboro Cove Circle Webster, NY (585) Janis Streich Spotsylvania County Public Schools Emily Horne Spotsylvania County Public Schools

“Only the organizations that have a passion for learning will have an enduring influence.” {Covey, The Leader of the Future, 1996} 2

Participants will: Define the qualities and importance of innovation and teacher leadership development Discover how one school system developed a structure for teacher leadership using internal expertise, resources and external support Start your own plan for teacher leadership development Learn with and from one another. 3

4 Supt. Teacher Association Board Principals Teacher Leaders Central Office SYSTEMS W. P. Dolan ParentsCommunityParentsCommunity ParentsCommunityParentsCommunity Diagonal Teams Teachers, Staff and Students

Moving to a Distributed Leadership Structure Distributed Leadership in Practice Workshop Developed by: Dr. John A. DeFlaminis, Executive Director Penn Center for Educational Leadership University of Pennsylvania

Distributed Leadership Review the five levels of leadership designs outlined on the next five slides. Discuss each level. Assess your current teams against this model. Individual Quick Write: Write down three steps that you might take to begin to shift to the “higher” levels of distributed leadership. 6

7 7 L The LeaderTeam Members - Locus of leader command between the team and higher management - Follow directions - Work for the leader more so than with each other - Has sole authority for decision- making - Have limited access to higher management. Provides information to leader as requested - Set apart by role, title, and position - Limited communication with the leader (mostly around work) - Directs the organization’s members in influencing the core work - No direction of organization’s members in influencing the core work Level 1:Traditional Chain of Command Positions leader above and separate from the work team

8 8 L The LeaderTeam Members - Leader locus central to team communication and decision-making - Rely on leader for information and direction - Provide information to leader for decision- making as needed - Directs most activities - Individual leadership may be exercised on non-leader led issues - Accessible to all team members - Directed by leader on key decisions - Directs the organization members in influencing the core work - May affect direction of organization members in influencing the core work. Level 2: Leader is Central Positions leader from above to the center of the work group (especially for communications) but distinction still exists between what leader and work team does

9 9 Level 3: Some Shared Decision-Making and Authority Positions leader central to the team but leader begins to shift decision- making authority. Team members share responsibilities belonging to leader who encourages communication, collaboration, and teamwork among team members. LL L The LeaderTeam Members - Shares decision-making authority in selected areas - Involved in decision-making in selected areas - Encourages independence/leadership in selected areas - Scope of responsibility expands for some team members - Promotes teamwork, collaboration and communication among team members - Developing teamwork and collaborative/communication skills - Develops team and team members for increased responsibility - Growing collaborative team and spirit. May not include entire team - Shares direction of organization members in influencing the core work - Share some direction of organization members in influencing the core work

10 Level 4: Extensive Shared Decision-Making and Authority Leader and team develop confidence in shared decision-making and authority. Team members share more responsibilities belonging to leader who encourages even greater communication, collaboration, and teamwork. L L L L L The LeaderTeam Members - Shares decision-making authority in more areas and across more team members - Encourages independent leadership in more areas and across more team members - Involvement in decision-making in more areas and across more team members - Scope of responsibility expands for most team members - Promotes teamwork, collaboration, and communication among team members - Strong teamwork and collaborative communication skills - Develops interdependent team and team members for increased responsibility - Strong, interdependent and collaborative team and spirit - Shares direction of organization members in influencing the core work. - Share more direction of organization members in influencing the core work.

11 Level 5: Distributed Leadership The leader is no longer central to the team and greater interdependence develops and exists between the team members and the leader. The leader has distributed some responsibilities and decisions and the team’s authority has increased. L The LeaderTeam Members - Has shifted from sole doer to supporter, coach, and facilitator in distributed areas - Assume distributed duties/areas with little assistance from the leader - Works with team to expand authority to higher level responsibilities - Work closely with school staffs and, in many cases, other team members - Coordinates the team efforts - Assume distributed responsibilities formerly held by the leader and have decision-making authority in those areas - Allows others to direct organization members in influencing distributed areas of the core work - Direct organization members in influencing distributed areas of the core work. L L L L

12 Level 6: Highly Distributed Leadership Team members are self-directed and the leader’s role has shifted to other issues, while still providing direction and acting as a resource when needed. Group members are available for more responsibility. The LeaderTeam Members - Supports, coaches and counsels (as needed) the self-directed teams as they take on increasingly challenging responsibilities - Self-directed and confident in distributed leadership areas. Makes decisions in those areas - Free to focus on new issues outside the teams - Take full ownership of most aspects of delegated areas - Identifies new responsibilities for team - May be able to assume more new responsibilities. Highly evolved networks develop. - Distributed responsibilities to others to direct organization members in influencing distributed areas of the core work. - May begin another distributed leadership team in new area. - Direct organization members in influencing distributed areas of the core work. L L L L L L

13

14 Teacher Leader Model Standards

15 SCPS Teacher Leadership Site

PLANNING ORGANIZER FIRST DRAFT—what should be part of our planning. We can set up as a table? PURPOSE: GOALS/OBJECTIVES: Teacher Leader Standards: Identifying and selecting candidates Developing the capacity for candidates for different roles (differentiated PD based on roles) Instructional Coaches Tech Lead Teachers Content Coaches—ELA, Math, Common Core ACCOUNTABILITY--Assessing teacher leaders- Monitoring program 16

Other resources Katzenmeyer, Marilyn, and Gayle Moller. Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop as Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, Print. The What, Why and How of Teacher Leadership symposium.aspx symposium.aspx Center for Teaching Quality