. Tanya Potashnik: A/Director, Policy and Economic Analysis October, 2013 Patented Medicine Prices Review Board CPI Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regular DIP Methodology – a refresher Ottawa, May 16, 2013 Patented Medicine Prices Review Board Regulatory Affairs and Outreach Branch.
Advertisements

Postal Regulatory Commission Postal Pricing Regulation in the U.S. October 4, 2011 Charles J. Robinson Assistant Director Office of Accountability and.
Employer seminars Pensions policy overview November 2011 Presentation By: Sharon Liptrott Scottish NHS Pension Scheme Policy Manager
Budget 2008 E mpowering Entrepreneurs Canadian Federation of Independent Business January 2008.
Mattoon Community Unit School District #2 MCUSD# Tax Levy Presentation Presented: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Board Action: Tuesday, November 13, 2007.
Drug Medi-Cal (DMC) Organized Delivery System Wavier November 3,
Let’s Talk Numbers Ottawa, December 6, 2012 Patented Medicine Prices Review Board.
Drug Pricing in Canada Victoria Brown, Anureet Sohi, Lisa Weger SPHA 511.
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council January 30, 2012 Washington D.C
Michelle Boudreau, Executive Director Ottawa Convention Centre September 25, 2012 Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (PMPRB) to Canadian Association.
July 9, 2015 Georgia Department of Behavioral Health & Developmental Disabilities Residential and Respite Cost Study Overview of Proposed Rate Models.
Michelle Boudreau, Executive Director Pricing and Reimbursement Toronto, Ontario June 11, 2012 Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (PMPRB): 25 Years.
CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED CHANGES. We are living longer Longer pensions need more funding.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
School Funding Formula (Agenda item 7). Overview Provide an overview of the formula headlines Final schools funding formula 2015/16 Base Formula.
Outreach Sessions Montreal, November 22, 2012Toronto, November 23, 2012 Patented Medicine Prices Review Board Regulatory Affairs and Outreach Branch.
Measuring U.S. Industrial Production During a Downturn in Economic Activity Prepared for the: OECD Short-term Economic Statistics Expert Group September.
Copyright©2004 South-Western Measuring the Cost of Living.
UNDERSTANDING PROPOSAL “A” IN A DECLINING MARKET DWAYNE G. MCLACHLAN CMAE 4 CITY ASSESSOR CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS PRESENTED BY.
V. Finkelshteyn Economics Personal Finance #3
Monetary Policy Summary of 2007 and Looking Ahead to 2008 January 2008.
DH PRICE CONTROLS Implications for the Future Pricing and Supply of Branded Medicines within NHS Hospitals.
Drug Prices in Canada and the US: More Than Meets the Eye? National Academy of Social Insurance Annual Conference Wayne Critchley Executive Director, PMPRB.
Review of EDC Solar Long- term Financing Program Analysis January 12, 2012 Center for Energy, Economic, and Environmental Policy DRAFT.
Administrative Law Research: Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations Trisha Simonds Fall 2008.
The Australian Energy Regulator SA electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Framework and approach Presentation to the Energy Consumers’ Council.
The E-Mod multiplier increases or decreases the amount of premium to be paid during each policy period. What is an Experience Modifier? The Experience.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦ AER – Chris Pattas, General Manager – Networks ◦ Consumer challenge panel – Ruth.
 2012 NCCI Holdings, Inc. WC-5 Just How Credible Is That Employer? Proposed Experience Rating Plan Changes CAS RPM Seminar Philadelphia, PA March 21,
Inflation Report August Costs and prices Chart 4.1 Measures of consumer prices (a) (a) Data are non seasonally adjusted.
The Australian Energy Regulator Public Forum NSW electricity distribution & transmission revenue proposals July 2014.
Internal/External Sales Rate Development – Intermediate “Answers to Common Questions”
Data and Construction of Economic Table Washington Child Support Group December 2007 Session I.
Consumer Price Index. Federal Government’s Main Goals One of the federal government’s main goals has been to maintain price stability. If the price of.
Entry to the Eurozone – Slovenia Mojca Maček Kenk, Head of CPI/HICP Department.
Conclusion with State Lands PRC Sunnyside Lane Tahoe City 20 February 2015 Prepared by Greg Price (415)
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 04/06/
Report to the Legislature Required by Senate Bill 2202 (due January 1, 2002) Board Briefing June 13, 2001 Agenda Item 5 Attachment 1.
Woodland School District # Tax Levy 10/28/2014.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
Run length and the Predictability of Stock Price Reversals Juan Yao Graham Partington Max Stevenson Finance Discipline, University of Sydney.
Colorado River Basin: Overview of Determining Lake Powell and Lake Mead Annual Operational Tiers WSWC Seasonal Precipitation Forecast Workshop December.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada3-1 Chapter 3 Ratio, Proportion, and Percent Contemporary Business Mathematics with Canadian Applications Eighth.
Current Issues in Pensions Seminar 27 March 2008, Edinburgh Clearance – the Pensions Regulator’s perspective Fraser Low.
Discussion on Multi Year Tariff By Vivek Sharma & Manisha Kabra.
15 October 2013 Briefing on draft s 56G report on the effectiveness of information disclosure regulation at Christchurch Airport.
Briefing for financial market analysts 30 April 2013 Draft report on the effectiveness of information disclosure regulation at Auckland Airport.
UNFCCC secretariat, SDM Rocío N. Correia, Associate Programme Officer Efforts undertaken to deliver the expected work Singapore, 28. October 2010.
Management of the Fiscal Framework June Managing the Fiscal Framework All about fiscal planning / budgeting Projecting total revenues, expenses.
The Australian Energy Regulator SA electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Framework and approach 20 November 2013.
DNPC05 Consultation Paper Balance of Revenue Recovery between LDZ System Charges and Customer Charges Steve Armstrong 27 th July 2009.
Draft Decision on the Reset of Prices for Electricity Distribution Businesses Presentation to Market Analysts 19 July 2011.
Standing Up for Small Business 2017 Ontario Budget Recommendations
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Monetary Policy Report 2008:1
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
RIIO-GD1:network charging volatility
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Patented Medicine Prices Review Board
MBIE arrangements for finalising remaining technical regulatory settings in the Telecommunications (New Regulatory Framework) Amendment Act, 2018 Presentation.
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
0476 Alignment of DN Charging Methodology with RIIO-GD1 Arrangements
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
Scale of quota assessments of the Member States
Special Finance, Budget and Enrolment Committee
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Amendments to the Liquor Bill, 2003
Amendments to the Liquor Bill, 2003
Introduction to HPMP.
Presentation transcript:

. Tanya Potashnik: A/Director, Policy and Economic Analysis October, 2013 Patented Medicine Prices Review Board CPI Initiative

CPI-Initiative - Background  The Consumer Price Index methodology was introduced as part of the Board´s Guidelines on Excessive Prices in 1989, in application of the CPI pricing factor listed in the now sub- section 85(1)(d) of the Patent Act.  The CPI is one of four pricing factors the Board must take into consideration when determining whether the price of a patented drug product is excessive.  The CPI Adjustment Methodology was last amended in 1994 and applies to ‘existing’ patented drug products in accordance with the Board´s Guidelines. 2

CPI-Initiative  To allow patentees to set prices reflective of current CPI rates, the Board´s CPI methodology provides for the calculation of the CPI Adjustment factors based on forecast changes in the CPI.  These forecasted CPI Adjustment factors are published each year in the April NEWSletter.  Patentees are able to use these published forecasted factors to increase their prices up to the allowable maximum. The actual CPI values are obtained in January of the following calendar year, which are used by Board Staff in accordance with the Guidelines, to calculate the National Non-Excessive Average Price (N-NEAP) for the year. 3

CPI-Initiative  Using an actual CPI rather than forecast CPI may provide for:  better aligning the PMPRB´s processes  improving internal operations  reduction of uncertainty that could affecting patentees´ pricing models and business planning for subsequent years  predictability and certainty for patentees when they consider price increases  An impact analysis conducted by Board Staff shows that over the last twelve years, forecasted CPI values tended to be lower than actual CPI.  The average difference between forecast and actual CPI has been relatively small. On average, the forecasted CPI has been 2.03% and actual CPI has been 2.07%. 4

Regulatory Burden Reduction  In alignment with the Government’s Red Tape Reduction Plan and Economic Action Plan, the PMPRB has committed to examining its price review process to identify possible ways to reduce the regulatory burden on patentees and increase efficiency without adversely affecting its mandate to protect consumer interests.  The Board consulted stakeholders in a Notice and Comment issued May 2013 on the two priority initiatives to amend the CPI-Adjustment Methodology and the filing requirements.  12 stakeholders provided submissions.  Feedback on both proposals was generally supportive. 5

CPI-Initiative: Summary of Stakeholder Feedback  Stakeholders were overall supportive of the CPI initiative. 3 Broad Areas of Concern:  Details on how actual lagged CPI would be determined and when it would be communicated to stakeholders.  Assurance that the use of actual lagged CPI was in line with provincial drug plan policies on price changes.  Patentees did not want to be in a position where the ability to raise prices was curtailed during transition period. 6

CPI Initiative—Next Steps  Notice and Comment (May 2013): Maintain the current CPI- Adjustment Methodology for existing drug products, except replace the use of the forecast CPI with actual CPI in calculating the CPI-Adjustment Factor for the forecast period.  Notice and Comment (October 2013): Provide further clarity on the proposal with the Side by Side Changes to the Guidelines. 7

CPI Initiative – Proposal Detail  The current methodology will be maintained and the CPI used will be the actual lagged CPI that is available in the 3 rd week of January  The new CPI initiative is proposed for 2015 implementation  The January 2014 NEWSletter will announce the actual CPI for the 2013 year, a 12-month period ending in December This actual lagged 2013 CPI will be used to calculate the CPI-Adjustment Factors for 2015  In the April 2013 NEWsletter, patentees were provided with the 2014 forecast CPI-Adjustment Factors. For 2014, the existing CPI- Adjustment Methodology will be applied  The CPI initiative is proposed for implementation for 2015, as a result transitional measures are not being contemplated 8

CPI-Adjustment Factors that will Influence the Price if Initiative is Implemented for CPI-Adjustment Factors that Influence Price April 2013: Forecast CPI was released. This will be used in calculating the adjustment factors for the forecast period of Actual CPI that is available January 2015 (for 2014 year). No release of forecast CPI in April 2014 (for 2015). Actual CPI that is available January 2014 (for 2013 year)  This number will be used to calculate the adjustment factors for the forecast period of  We are committing to this actual CPI number to set the price ceiling for No release of forecast CPI in April 2015 (for 2016). Actual CPI that is available January 2015 (for 2014 year)  This number will be used to calculate the adjustment factors for the forecast period of  We are committing to this actual CPI number to set the price ceiling for

Side by Side Changes to Guidelines (Changes in Red) Schedule 9—CPI Adjustment Methodology 1.2 The CPI-Adjustment Methodology involves the following calculations: Adjusting the benchmark prices of the drug product for the cumulative change in the CPI from the benchmark year to the year under review (CPI- Adjusted Price); and Applying a cap on the maximum price increase in any one year, equal to 1.5 times the forecast change in the annual CPI. In periods of high inflation (over 10%), the limit will be five percentage points more than the forecast change in the CPI. Schedule 9—CPI Adjustment Methodology 1.2 The CPI-Adjustment Methodology involves the following calculations: Adjusting the benchmark prices of the drug product for the cumulative change in the CPI from the benchmark year to the year under review (CPI- Adjusted Price); and Applying a cap on the maximum price increase in any one year, equal to 1.5 times the change in the latest actual lagged CPI. In periods of high inflation (over 10%), the limit will be five percentage points more than the latest actual lagged change in the CPI. 10

Side by Side Changes to Guidelines (Changes in Red) 2.6 Forecast CPI: The forecast CPI for the forecast year is based on the previous year´s actual CPI published by Statistics Canada adjusted for the latest annual inflation projections by the federal Department of Finance. The forecast CPI is also published annually in the PMPRB´s April NEWSletter. 2.6 Actual Lagged CPI: The actual lagged CPI used for the forecast year is based on the latest actual CPI published by Statistics Canada adjusted for the latest annual actual inflation also published by Statistics Canada. The actual lagged CPI is also published annually in the PMPRB´s January NEWSletter. There is a 2 year lag between the year of the actual CPI used and the year it is applied to. For example, the actual lagged CPI used for the forecast year of 2015 is the actual 2013 CPI published by Statistics Canada in January

Side by Side Changes to Guidelines (Changes in Red) 2.7 CPI-Adjustment Factor: The forecast CPI divided by the base CPI, rounded to three decimal places. 2.7 CPI-Adjustment Factor The actual CPI divided by the base CPI, rounded to three decimal places. 2.9 Cap In any year, the price increase of a patented drug product may not exceed 1.5 times the forecast change in the annual CPI. In times of high inflation (greater than 10%), the limit will be 5 percentage points more than the forecast change in the CPI. 2.9 Cap In any year, the price increase of a patented drug product may not exceed 1.5 times the latest change in the actual lagged CPI. In times of high inflation (greater than 10%), the limit will be 5 percentage points more than the actual change in the CPI. 12

Example (Changes in Red) Example of the application of the CPI-Adjustment Methodology at the national level: Forecast Year: Jan – Dec 2015 First sale: 1998 Benchmark Year: 2012 National Average Transaction Price in Benchmark Year: $10.00 National Average Transaction Price in 2013: $10.39 CPI-adjusted price: (assuming this is the CPI-adjustment factor for 2012) x $ (National ATP in Benchmark Yr.) = $ Cap: (1.5 x actual lagged CPI for 2013 assumed to be 1.3%) x $ = $ The 2015 National Non-Excessive Average Price for the patented drug product is the lower of the CPI-adjusted price and Cap: $

Side by Side Changes to the Guidelines (Changes in Red) Removal of C.12.3 Review of Prices of Existing Patented Drug Products as it no longer applies.  C.12.3 In the event that the actual change in the CPI is less than the forecast CPI and an apparent excessive price arises solely due to the patentee´s reliance on the forecast CPI, the price will not be presumed to be excessive. The patentee is expected to comply with the actual CPI in all subsequent reporting periods, and the application of the CPI-Adjustment Methodology for the forecasted year will be based on the actual change in the CPI for that year. The result for patentees that took price increases based on the forecast inflation will be that the actual change in the CPI for the forecasted year will be used to calculate the next year´s National and Market-Specific Non-Excessive Average Prices. 14

CPI Initiative  Questions?  Comments? Thank you. 15