E -nuff! : Practical Tips For Keeping Emails From Derailing Your Case Presented by Jerry L. Mitchell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC “Zubulake IV”
Advertisements

The Evolving Law of E-Discovery Joseph J. Ortego, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP New York, NY Jericho, NY.
A GIA is a contract between a surety company and a contractor (or subcontractor)/principal. A GIA is a standard, typical document in the construction.
Saving Your Documents Can Save You Anne D. Harman, Esq. Bethany B. Swaton, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 2100 Market Street, Wheeling (304)
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
Effective Document Retention: Lean, Mean, But Not Spoiling You or Your Lawsuit Effective Document Retention: Lean, Mean, But Not Spoiling You or Your Lawsuit.
Considerations for Records and Information Management Programs in Light of the Pension Committee and Rimkus Consulting 2010 Decisions.
248 F.R.D. 372 (D. Conn. 2007) Doe v. Norwalk Community College.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
Ronald J. Shaffer, Esq. Beth L. Weisser, Esq. Lorraine K. Koc, Esq., Vice President and General Counsel, Deb Shops, Inc. © 2010 Fox Rothschild DELVACCA.
Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 5/7/2015 Careful Communication.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc.  Motion Hearing before a Magistrate Judge in Federal Court  District of Colorado  Decided in 2007.
E - Discovery Federal Rules 2006 Alabama Rules February 2010 –Scope of duty to preserve electronic evidence during course of litigation –Sanctions for.
Establishing a Defensible and Efficient Legal Hold Policy September 2013 Connie Hall, J.D., Manager, New Product Development, Thomson Reuters.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
LEGAL LIMITS TO COMMUNICATION. COMMON LAW FRAUD  Cunning  Deception  Artifice  Cheat  Circumvent  Breach of Trust  Breach of Confidence  Undue.
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY March 4, 2009 Presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the Tarrant County Bar Association Carl C. Butzer Jackson.
5 Vital Components of Every Custodian Interview David Meadows, PMP, Managing Director – Discovery Consulting, Kroll Ontrack Dave Canfield, EJD, Managing.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
1 ELECTRONIC DATA & DISCRIMINATION INVESTIGATIONS Peter J. Constantine U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor.
EDiscovery and Records Management. Records Management- Historical Perspective- Paper Historically- Paper was the “Corporate Memory” – a physical entity.
Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds” Steven Raskovich University Counsel California State University PSSOA Conference – March 23, 2006.
Electronic Record Retention and eDiscovery Peter Pepiton eDiscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance.
Introduction to Written Discovery
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
DOCUMENT RETENTION ISSUES FOR IN- HOUSE COUNSEL Rebecca A. Brommel BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Creating an Effective Policy Central Missouri Chapter Jesse Wilkins April 16, 2009.
Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc. 239 F.R.D. 81 District of New Jersey
Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 9/19/2015 Record Management.
EDISCOVERY: ARE YOU PREPARED? Dennis P. Ogden Belin McCormick, P.C. 666 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: (515) Facsimile:
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
Discussion Peggy Beeley, MD 2/11/14 Mitigating Medical Malpractice Risks Through Documentation.
Archiving s. How to Manage Auto-Archive in Outlook Your Microsoft Outlook mailbox grows as you create and receive items. To manage the space.
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
DOE V. NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 248 F.R.D. 372 (D. CONN. 2007) Decided July 16, 2002.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 11Slide 1 Production of Documents Scope Scope Includes documents of all types, including pictures, graphs, drawings, videos.
MATT DOW Jackson Walker L.L.P. February 14, 2007.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
Rambus v. Infineon Technologies AG 22 F.R.D. 280 (E.D. Va. 2004)
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc. 224 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007) By: Sara Alsaleh Case starts on page 136 of the book!
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
CORPORATE RECORDS RETENTION POLICY TRAINING By: Diana C. Toman, Corporate Counsel & Assistant Secretary.
ILTA – Insight 2007 E-Disclosure --Preparing for Compliance-- Moderator: Sally Gonzalez, Director, Navigant Consulting, Inc. Panelists: Oz Benamram, Director.
Use: Policies to Enhance Employee Productivity Elizabeth A. Coonan BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Digital Government Summit
Session 8 Confidentiality and disclosure. 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: The duty of confidentiality Part 3: The duty of disclosure Part 4: Confidentiality.
Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. Not Reported in So.2d, 2005 WL (Fla.Cir.Ct.) Ediscovery, Fall 2010 Francis Eiden.
Fool me twice… Shame on Me Metro Toronto Convention Centre February 2, 2010.
The Sedona Principles November 16, Background- What is The Sedona Conference The Sedona Conference is an educational institute, established in 1997,
Zubulake IV [Trigger Date]
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
Record Retention to Manage Risk F. Jay Meyer Vice President & Senior Attorney TD Banknorth, N.A. Portland, Maine.
1 PRESERVATION: E-Discovery Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire &Casualty Insurance Co.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Proposed and Recent Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
Public Records Training Manitowoc City Attorney’s Office.
#16PACE Preparing For The Inevitable... How To Be Ready When The Lawsuit Comes And Steps To Proactively Limit Corporate Inconvenience And Liability Mitchell.
When the law firm is the client Handling legal holds, document collections and productions of your own firm’s documents.
Legal Holds: Educating Company Employees About Document Preservation
Electronic Data Discovery
Sadi R. Antonmattei-Goitia Sullo & Sullo, LLP February 16, 2019
Presentation transcript:

e -nuff! : Practical Tips For Keeping s From Derailing Your Case Presented by Jerry L. Mitchell

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp INTRODUCTION has become one of the most important forms of communication in the business world One recent study estimated that there are approximately 850 million business accounts in the world Last year an average of 89 billion business s were sent each day Fighting over retention, destruction and production of s has become a major and expensive issue in litigation

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Is Dangerous Ineffective form of Communication –Per Dr. Albert Mehrabian of UCLA, Communication is: Tone38% Visual55% Words 7% –OK for facts or data –Doesn’t work for opinions, feelings, sensitive issues

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp is Dangerous (con’t) People will say things in an they would never say in person or in a letter Creates exhibits you will see again at your deposition Lawsuits can be won and lost, and even powerful politicians brought down, by the content of, or the failure to preserve, s

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Have A Written Policy Notice that computer and system are company property and that company monitors Content restrictions Treatment of confidential information Back-up tapes –Archival –Disaster recovery

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Have A Written Policy (Con’t) Retention/Destruction –Balance business needs vs. litigation risks –Specific retention requirements may apply –Preservation obligations in litigation Enforcement

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Train Your Users Cover policies –Obtain acknowledgement Limitations of Etiquette –Proof read/spell check –Don’t use text-style abbreviations –Check attachments twice Traps –Auto-fill/Auto-correct –Reply all

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Train Your Users (con’t) Traps (con’t) –“ Recall ” What the recall says: “John Jones would like to Recall this message” What the recipients actually see: “Stop whatever you are doing and read the last from John Jones word by word to find out where he screwed up”

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Preservation Obligations In Litigation Major issue in litigation today Issue a litigation hold when you reasonably anticipate litigation –What is “reasonable anticipation of litigation”? –May trigger limitations –“Work Product” privilege claim may trigger duty Put it in writing to anyone involved in the transaction at issue

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp After Litigation Hold In Place Halt auto-deletion of s Monitor compliance with litigation hold –Be informed of potential sources of electronic data –If necessary, take possession of sources of data Keep data in its native format Document your preservation efforts Consider issuing a request to opposing party to preserve relevant data

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Failure To Preserve - Spoliation Elements: –Whether party has a duty to preserve the evidence –Whether that party negligently or intentionally spoliated evidence; and –Whether the spoliation prejudiced other party’s ability to prosecute or defend the case

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Failure To Preserve – Spoliation (con’t) Consequences: –Jury instruction Adverse inference Presumption –Monetary Sanctions –Exclusion of evidence, claims or defenses –Death Penalty Sanctions

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Lawyers Are Not Immune Not all communications are privileged s can be produced in certain types of cases, such as legal malpractice Consider purging red-line notes and draft versions of documents (not subject to litigation holds) Limit communication with experts

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Related Electronic Discovery Issues Personal devices/ addresses –Must include them in your litigation hold if used for business purposes –Sanctions have been imposed for failure to preserve when relevant and responsive –Can ISPS be subpoenaed to obtain personal s? Instant messaging Address these in your written policy!

kasowitz benson torres & friedman llp Conclusion Q & A Session Send me your doozy s Jerry L. Mitchell, Partner Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP 700 Louisiana, Suite 2200 Houston, Texas