New ensemble-based products for tropical cyclones Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Division also: Ed Rappaport (NHC), Mark DeMaria (NESDIS), Zoltan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improvements to Statistical Intensity Forecasts John A. Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Fort Collins, Colorado, Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Fort Collins,
Advertisements

Improvements in Statistical Tropical Cyclone Forecast Models: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Andrea Schumacher 2, John.
Joint Typhoon Warning Center Forward, Ready, Responsive Decision Superiority UNCLASSIFIED An Overview of Joint Typhoon Warning Center Tropical Cyclone.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC.
A Brief Guide to MDL's SREF Winter Guidance (SWinG) Version 1.0 January 2013.
The impact of targeted observations from 2011 Winter Storms Reconnaissance on deterministic forecast accuracy Tom Hamill NOAA Earth System Research Lab,
HURRICANE GORDON and the NWP models near the Iberian Peninsula.
Statistical post-processing using reforecasts to improve medium- range renewable energy forecasts Tom Hamill and Jeff Whitaker NOAA Earth System Research.
National Weather Service SLOSH S ea, L ake, and L ake, and O verland O verland S urges from S urges from H urricanes H urricanes Part 1: W. Shaffer / MDL.
The Storm Surge Toolkit Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane Center Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane.
Frank Marks NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division 11 February 2011 Frank Marks NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division 11 February 2011 Hurricane Research.
Details for Today: DATE:3 rd February 2005 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Assignment 2 briefing Evaluation of Model Performance 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models.
Tropical Cyclone Forecasts Dr. Richard J. Murnane Risk Prediction Initiative Bermuda Biological Station for Research, Inc.
Validation of the Ensemble Tropical Rainfall Potential (eTRaP) for Landfalling Tropical Cyclones Elizabeth E. Ebert Centre for Australian Weather and Climate.
Instituting Reforecasting at NCEP/EMC Tom Hamill (ESRL) Yuejian Zhu (EMC) Tom Workoff (WPC) Kathryn Gilbert (MDL) Mike Charles (CPC) Hank Herr (OHD) Trevor.
HFIP Ensemble Products Subgroup Sept 2, 2011 Conference Call 1.
HFIP Ensemble Subgroup Mark DeMaria Nov 21, 2011 Conference Call 1.
Introduction to Numerical Weather Prediction and Ensemble Weather Forecasting Tom Hamill NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center Boulder, Colorado USA.
A Regression Model for Ensemble Forecasts David Unger Climate Prediction Center.
National Weather Service – Newport/Morehead City NC NHC/WFO Tropical Products…and What’s New for 2012 WFO Newport Hurricane Awareness Seminar July 17,
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
Observing Strategy and Observation Targeting for Tropical Cyclones Using Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation Chen, Deng-Shun 3 Dec,
A. Schumacher, CIRA/Colorado State University NHC Points of Contact: M. DeMaria, D. Brown, M. Brennan, R. Berg, C. Ogden, C. Mattocks, and C. Landsea Joint.
Applications of ATMS/CrIS to Tropical Cyclone Analysis and Forecasting Mark DeMaria and John A. Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Fort Collins, CO Andrea Schumacher,
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
OPERATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OBJECTIVE ANNULAR HURRICANE INDEX ANDREA B. SCHUMACHER 1, JOHN A. KNAFF 2, THOMAS A. CRAM 1, MARK DEMARIA 2, JAMES P.
Update on Storm Surge at NCEP Dr. Rick Knabb, Director, National Hurricane Center and representing numerous partners 21 January 2014.
Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC HFIP Workshop, 4-8 May 2009.
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Guidance on Intensity Guidance Kieran Bhatia, David Nolan, Mark DeMaria, Andrea Schumacher IHC Presentation This project is supported by the.
Continued Development of Tropical Cyclone Wind Probability Products John A. Knaff – Presenting CIRA/Colorado State University and Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS.
Large Ensemble Tropical Cyclone Forecasting K. Emanuel 1 and Ross N. Hoffman 2, S. Hopsch 2, D. Gombos 2, and T. Nehrkorn 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of.
NOAA’s Seasonal Hurricane Forecasts: Climate factors influencing the 2006 season and a look ahead for Eric Blake / Richard Pasch / Chris Landsea(NHC)
Verification Approaches for Ensemble Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones Eric Gilleland, Barbara Brown, and Paul Kucera Joint Numerical Testbed, NCAR, USA
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity to Large-Scale Forcing in the 2008 HWRF model Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Fort Collins, CO Brian.
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting LTJG Jeffrey Pereira, NOAA Storm Surge Unit National Hurricane Center NOAA Storm Surge Workshop May 2011 LTJG Jeffrey.
NHC Activities, Plans, and Needs HFIP Diagnostics Workshop August 10, 2012 NHC Team: David Zelinsky, James Franklin, Wallace Hogsett, Ed Rappaport, Richard.
Notes on reforecasting and the computational capacity needed for future SREF systems Tom Hamill NOAA Earth System Research Lab presentation for 2009 National.
1 An overview of the use of reforecasts for improving probabilistic weather forecasts Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Div.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Improving Hurricane Intensity.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2008 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
2/10/03F.Marks1 Development of a Tropical Cyclone Rain Forecasting Tool Frank D. Marks NOAA/AOML, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, FL QPE Techniques.
Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP): Where do we stand after 3 years? Bob Gall – HFIP Development Manager Fred Toepfer—HFIP Project manager Frank.
Development of Probabilistic Forecast Guidance at CIRA Andrea Schumacher (CIRA) Mark DeMaria and John Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS/ORA) Workshop on AWIPS Tools for.
The Impact of Lightning Density Input on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasts Mark DeMaria, John Knaff and Debra Molenar, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort.
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
Exploitation of Ensemble Prediction System in support of Atlantic Tropical Cyclogenesis Prediction Chris Thorncroft Department of Atmospheric and Environmental.
Tropical Cyclones in IFS and NICAM Julia V. Manganello Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (Many thanks to Kevin Hodges!) Athena Workshop, 7-8 June.
Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasting Using Lightning Data during the 2010 GOES-R Proving Ground at the National Hurricane Center Mark DeMaria.
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
Development of a Rapid Intensification Index for the Eastern Pacific Basin John Kaplan NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division Miami, FL and Mark DeMaria.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC 2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC Eric S. Blake, Richard J. Pasch, Andrew Penny NCEP Production.
Enrica Bellone, Jessica Turner, Alessandro Bonazzi 2 nd IBTrACS Workshop.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Hurricanes and Global Warming Kerry Emanuel Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Analysis of Typhoon Tropical Cyclogenesis in an Atmospheric General Circulation Model Suzana J. Camargo and Adam H. Sobel.
National Hurricane Center 2009 Forecast Verification James L. Franklin Branch Chief, Hurricane Specialist Unit National Hurricane Center 2009 NOAA Hurricane.
Description of the IRI Experimental Seasonal Typhoon Activity Forecasts Suzana J. Camargo, Anthony G. Barnston and Stephen E.Zebiak.
New Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Tools for the Western North Pacific Mark DeMaria and John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU.
Objective and Automated Assessment of Operational Global Forecast Model Predictions of Tropical Cyclone Formation Patrick A. Harr Naval Postgraduate School.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR, Fort Collins, CO NCAR/NOAA/CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop 16.
Munehiko Yamaguchi 12, Takuya Komori 1, Takemasa Miyoshi 13, Masashi Nagata 1 and Tetsuo Nakazawa 4 ( ) 1.Numerical Prediction.
Figures from “The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System”
Application of the CRA Method Application of the CRA Method William A. Gallus, Jr. Iowa State University Beth Ebert Center for Australian Weather and Climate.
A Guide to Tropical Cyclone Guidance
Storm Surge Forecasting Practices, Tools for Emergency Managers, A Probabilistic Storm Surge Model Based on Ensembles and Past Error Distributions.
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting
Verification of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts
Presentation transcript:

New ensemble-based products for tropical cyclones Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Division also: Ed Rappaport (NHC), Mark DeMaria (NESDIS), Zoltan Toth (ESRL), Barb Brown (RAL), Bob Gall (NWS/OST) NOAA ESRL presentation at 91 st Annual AMS, Seattle, WA in 24 th WAF / 20 th NWP, 24 January 2011

Why uncertainty products? Paraphrasing Vice President Joe Biden: “Barack, if you lived in this city, then knowing the uncertainty would be a big *&^%ing deal.”

There are existing NHC uncertainty products, but they are primarily based on average statistics of past forecast errors

“Cone of uncertainty”

Are we ready for ensemble-based products? Ensembles still exhibit systematic errors – Global models under-forecast hurricane intensity – Ensemble spreads often too small – direct use may result in overconfidence in forecasts. Still… – There are methods such as statistical post-processing to ameliorate the errors. – Forecasters, media, emergency users want the products, even if imperfect. – It makes sense to start planning for a future with ensemble-based products.

And we are getting better. As models and ensemble techniques improve, ensemble predictions will increasingly be used to improve hurricane forecasts. Still, there are not that many tropical cyclone forecast products that leverage the uncertainty estimates produced by ensembles. Example: improvement to track forecasts from experimental EnKF-based GFS ensemble relative to operational NCEP ensemble.

The remainder of the presentation will summarize recommendations from this workshop.

Recommendations for products oriented toward forecasters Intensity and intensity change Cyclogenesis Structure Track Associated phenomena (storm surge, winds, rainfall, tornadoes). Locations for supplemental adaptive observations. Non forecasters may be interested in the same products, but given early stage with these products, may be wise to put “experimental” disclaimer statement if made widely available.

Augment track products with intensity-related information Analyzed ocean tropical cyclone heat potential (TCHP), forecast central pressure (mb-900) and vertical wind shear are shown. Permits visualization of co-variations, e.g., central pressure’s relation to TCHP, shear.

Time series of variables that may be related to intensity, displaying mean, 20 th & 80 th percentiles (white lines) and min/max from ensemble (blue). In this case, the min in central pressure at 51 h appears to be related to a decrease in vertical shear.

Incorporate ensemble information into LGEM (Logistic Growth Eqn. Model) V = forecast velocity V mpi = maximum potential intensity (a function of SST at forecast position) S = shear (normalized) C = 0-15 km average vertical velocity from plume model using SST, temperatures and humidity in a 200 to 800 km ring around storm. Red are parameters of the model, fit using reanalysis data, an adjoint algorithm, and steepest descent algorithm. Ref: DeMaria, MWR, January 2009

LGEM intensity “forecast” (fit with dependent reanalysis data and observed track info) When trained after the fact on environmental analysis data from Frances, the reconstructed intensity is very accurate. (But of course less accurate when trained on data across many storms and feeding real-time forecast information, with its biases). Ref: ibid

Possible ensemble improvements to LGEM Provide ensemble of tracks and environmental forecasts to LGEM, resulting in ensemble of intensity forecasts. If large data set of past forecasts (reforecasts) are available from same model run operationally: – Statistically adjust forecasts for systematic errors (in position, in thermodynamic profiles, etc.) – Possibly train LGEM on forecast data as opposed to analysis data (i.e., MOS instead of perfect-prog).

Tropical cyclogenesis Uses TCgenesis from reforecasts to provide some calibration for possible biases. Ref: D. Richardson, personal communication, ECMWF.

Other recommendations for new ensemble products for cyclogenesis, storm structure, storm surge, winds, rainfall, tornadoes in slides after conclusions.

Innovations here: (1)Cone of uncertainty estimated directly from ensemble (contains 90% of probability). (2) Lagged forecast track data shown in lighter grey colors, provides sense of trends in track. Track products

Recommendations for/from media, emergency managers, end users. Keep it simple! Perhaps red/yellow/green confidence levels on deterministic forecasts. Desire some products similar to but simpler than those for forecasters. Associated explanatory web pages to accompany new graphics. Train product recipients, possibly by COMET.

Conclusions Several possible new ensemble-based graphics shown here. We welcome your input concerning other possible new graphics that will be useful to the community. BAMS draft article at tinyurl.com/4t6onm4

Other cyclogenesis recs. Include tracker output of model-generated storms and genesis probabilities estimated from the ensemble in geographical areas, especially at the 48-hour and 120-hour lead times. Examine whether a statistical model of genesis (Schumacher et al. 2009) incorporating ensemble genesis information might provide skillful guidance.

Storm structure products Ensemble averages of the radius of the outermost closed isobar (OCI), which provides one possible measure of overall storm size. Ensemble-mean predictions of 34, 50, and 64- kt (15.4, 25.7, and 32.9 ms -1 ) wind radii in different quadrants, where the ensemble of storms is relocated to a common position. Probability distributions of the OCI and wind radii might also be useful.

Targeted observations Ensemble-based techniques may be useful for determining the most useful locations for supplemental observations. Typically, an ensemble-based targeting algorithm considers how much the forecast uncertainty (usually measured in this case as some function of the ensemble spread, i.e., the standard deviation about the mean) would be reduced as a result of the reduction in analysis-error variance in an ensemble due to the assimilation of extra data. Techniques are promising but are limited in their utility by the lack of calibration of the ensemble and the assumption of linear error growth (Majumdar et al. 2006; Reynolds et al. 2010).

Storm surge, winds, rainfall, tornadoes Storm surge probabilities might be generated by driving surge models like SLOSH (Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes; Houston et al. 1999) with ensemble guidance. Post-processed ensemble guidance may provide improved estimates of precipitation from land-falling TCs. Statistical models may also make it possible to estimate tornado likelihood based on the environmental characteristics. Additional probabilistic forecasts could be generated for winds above critical thresholds such as tropical-storm or hurricane-strength and could provide information on the timing (onset, duration).