Functional Organization of the Transcriptome in Human Brain Michael C. Oldham Laboratory of Daniel H. Geschwind, UCLA BIOCOMP ‘08, Las Vegas, NV July 15,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Microarray Pitfalls Stem Cell Network Microarray Course, Unit 3 October 2006.
Advertisements

Development of the mammalian nervous system NEU
Detecting Orthologs Using Molecular Phenotypes a case study: human and mouse Alice S Weston.
‘Gene Shaving’ as a method for identifying distinct sets of genes with similar expression patterns Tim Randolph & Garth Tan Presentation for Stat 593E.
Microarray Data Analysis Using R Studies in Tissue Databases Mark Reimers, NCI.
Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PloS Comp Biol. 7(1): e Steve Horvath Peter Langfelder University of California, Los Angeles.
Consensus eigengene networks: Studying relationships between gene co-expression modules across networks Peter Langfelder Dept. of Human Genetics, UC Los.
Why microarrays in a bioinformatics class? Design of chips Quantitation of signals Integration of the data Extraction of groups of genes with linked expression.
Gene Expression Analysis using Microarrays Anne R. Haake, Ph.D.
Network Analysis and Application Yao Fu
“An Extension of Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis to Include Signed Interactions” Michael Mason Department of Statistics, UCLA.
A Geometric Interpretation of Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis Steve Horvath, Jun Dong.
Signed weighted gene co-expression network analysis of transcriptional regulation in murine embryonic stem cells ES cell culture Self- renewing Ecto- derm.
Steve Horvath University of California, Los Angeles Module preservation statistics.
Returning Back …. A Big Thanks Again Prof. Jason Bohland Quantitative Neuroscience Laboratory Boston University Prof. Matt Hibbs Jackson Labs.
Amandine Bemmo 1,2, David Benovoy 2, Jacek Majewski 2 1 Universite de Montreal, 2 McGill university and Genome Quebec innovation centre Analyses of Affymetrix.
BIF Group Project Group (A)rabidopsis: David Nieuwenhuijse Matthew Price Qianqian Zhang Thijs Slijkhuis Species: C. Elegans Project: Advanced.
Gene expression and DNA microarrays Old methods. New methods based on genome sequence. –DNA Microarrays Reading assignment - handout –Chapter ,
Basic features for portal users. Agenda - Basic features Overview –features and navigation Browsing data –Files and Samples Gene Summary pages Performing.
Differential Network Analysis in Mouse Expression Data Tova Fuller Steve Horvath Department of Human Genetics University of California, Los Angeles BIOCOMP’07.
Steve Horvath Co-authors: Zhang Y, Langfelder P, Kahn RS, Boks MPM, van Eijk K, van den Berg LH, Ophoff RA Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in.
FMRI guided Microarray analysis Imaging-Guided Microarray: Isolating Molecular Profiles That Dissociate Alzheimer’s Disease from Normal Aging  A.C. Pereira,
HUMAN-MOUSE CONSERVED COEXPRESSION NETWORKS PREDICT CANDIDATE DISEASE GENES Ala U., Piro R., Grassi E., Damasco C., Silengo L., Brunner H., Provero P.
Introduction to DNA Microarrays: Functional Mining of Array Patterns Michael F. Miles, M.D., Ph.D. Depts. of Pharmacology/Toxicology and Neurology and.
SHI Meng. Abstract Changes in gene expression are thought to underlie many of the phenotypic differences between species. However, large-scale analyses.
Relating Protein Abundance & mRNA Expression Mark B Gerstein Yale (Comp. Bio. & Bioinformatics) NIDA site visit at Yale
Differential analysis of Eigengene Networks: Finding And Analyzing Shared Modules Across Multiple Microarray Datasets Peter Langfelder and Steve Horvath.
The Stanley Neuropathology Consortium Integrative Database: A novel web-based tool for exploring neuropathological traits, gene expression and associated.
Decoding the Network Footprint of Diseases With increasing availability of data, there is significant activity directed towards correlating genomic, proteomic,
Networks of Neuronal Genes Affected by Common and Rare Variants in Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Overview of Microarray. 2/71 Gene Expression Gene expression Production of mRNA is very much a reflection of the activity level of gene In the past, looking.
Paper Review on Cross- species Microarray Comparison Hong Lu
E14.5E16.5E18.5 Normalized mRNA level Get1 Nfix Smarcd3 A Supplementary Figure 1 (A) The microarray expression levels of bladder terminal differentiation.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Consensus modules: modules present across multiple data sets Peter Langfelder and Steve Horvath Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between.
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS) LECTURE 13 ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSCRIPTOME.
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 5.
NCode TM miRNA Analysis Platform Identifies Differentially Expressed Novel miRNAs in Adenocarcinoma Using Clinical Human Samples Provided By BioServe.
Gene Set Analysis using R and Bioconductor Daniel Gusenleitner
 2014 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Transcript profiling analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brains Mariet Allen 1, Daniel Serie 4, Michael.
 2011 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Novel late-onset Alzheimer’s disease loci variants associate with brain gene expression Mariet.
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 3.
Computational Genetics Unlocks the Basis for Birdsong & Human Speech Morgan Wirthlin Dept. Behavioral Neuroscience Oregon Health & Science University.
Eigengenes as biological signatures
Histology of Nervous Tissue
The mRNA stem cell signature.
Cortical Evolution: Judge the Brain by Its Cover
Psychiatric Disorders: Diagnosis to Therapy
Integration of omic networks in a developmental atlas of maize
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2017)
Human-Specific Transcriptional Networks in the Brain
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages e7 (December 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Bace2 mRNA expression in neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes.
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (March 2018)
Psychiatric Disorders: Diagnosis to Therapy
Genomic landscapes of the two typical NEs found in this study.
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Pearson correlation of gene expression identifies distinct groups of male- and female-enriched genes. Pearson correlation of gene expression identifies.
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Varying Intolerance of Gene Pathways to Mutational Classes Explain Genetic Convergence across Neuropsychiatric Disorders  Shahar Shohat, Eyal Ben-David,
Network modules correspond to known and novel functional distinctions between neuronal subtypes. Network modules correspond to known and novel functional.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Regulating gene expression
Derivation of ImSig. Derivation of ImSig. A, An example of a correlation network generated from a tissue data set where nodes represent unique genes and.
A, unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the expression of probe sets differentially expressed in the oral mucosa of smokers versus never smokers. A,
Integrated pathogen load and dual transcriptome analysis of systemic host-pathogen interactions in severe malaria by Hyun Jae Lee, Athina Georgiadou, Michael.
Fig. 4 Differential histone modifications at promoters in various brain cell populations. Differential histone modifications at promoters in various brain.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e7 (July 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Functional Organization of the Transcriptome in Human Brain Michael C. Oldham Laboratory of Daniel H. Geschwind, UCLA BIOCOMP ‘08, Las Vegas, NV July 15, 2008

NeuronsAstrocytesOligodendrocytesMicroglia ~10 11 ~10 12

Microarray studies of the human brain face a number of challenges Cellular heterogeneity –mRNA extracted from tissue homogenates Sample quality –Post-mortem tissue Sample size –Typically, <10 individuals per group Focus on differential expression

What’s wrong with differential expression?

Methodological overview: WGCNA

The data Network 1 (U133 cortex): 67 samples, 67 individuals Network 2 (U95 cortex): 42 samples, 32 individuals Network 3 (U133 caudate nucleus): 27 samples, 27 individuals Network 4 (U133 cerebellum): 24 samples, 24 individuals * Raw data obtained in collaboration with Dr. Kazuya Iwamoto and Dr. Tadafumi Kato at RIKEN. ** Following outlier removal, there were 11 pairs of samples from the same individuals in Iwamoto et al. and Ryan et al. One unique sample per individual was retained.

M1A M2 M3 M4A M5A M6A M7A M8A M9A M10A M11A M12A M13A M14A M15A M16A M17A M18A M19A M5B M20 M21 M17B M22 M23 M24 M4B M9B M16B M10B M15B M25 M8B M19B M26 M18B M27 M4C M11C M28 M29 M30 M31 M19C M9C M1C M32 M13C M18C M33 M34 M35 M36 M8C M16C M37 M5C M15C M38 M1D M12D M19D M39 M18D M40 M41 M6D M10D M42 M14D M11D M4D M7D M43 M44 M45 M16D M46 M9D M15D M47 A: CTX B: CTX_95 C: CN D: CB The networks

Many modules are preserved across networks

k me is the Pearson correlation between the expression level of a given probe set and a given eigengene, e.g.: Quantifying module membership with k me

A B C k me is significantly correlated across networks

Conserved modules are enriched for markers of major cell classes 1 Cahoy, J.D. et al. J Neurosci 28: (2008) 3 Nielsen, J.A. et al. J Neurosci 26: (2006) 5 Genes2Cognition Consortium 2 Lein, E.S. et al. Nature 445: (2007) 4 Bachoo, R.M. et al. PNAS 101: (2004) 6 Morciano, M. et al. J Neurochem 95: (2005)

Thought experiment Sample Amount

The cortical transcriptome is organized into functional modules M1A M2 M3 M4A M5A M6A M7A M8A M9A M10A M11A M12A M13A M14A M15A M16A M17A M18A M19A

NeuronsOligodendrocytesAstrocytes Ribosomes Glutamatergic synapses Purkinje neurons PVALB+ interneurons Mitochondria Neurogenesis Gender Meningeal cells Hypoxia Microglia Modules are organized into a functional meta-network

Applications 1)Context-specific annotation for genes expressed in the human brain ( “ guilt-by-association ” ) Rationale: genes with the strongest evidence of membership for the same module are likely to be driven by the same underlying factors

M6A: PVALB+ interneurons

Applications 1)Context-specific annotation for genes expressed in the human brain ( “ guilt-by-association ” ) 2) In silico comparisons of cellular specificity of gene expression across brain regions Rationale: genes with the most significant differences in membership for cell-type modules between brain regions imply differences in the cellular specificity and/or consistency of gene expression

Applications 1)Context-specific annotation for genes expressed in the human brain ( “ guilt-by-association ” ) 2) In silico comparisons of cellular specificity of gene expression across brain regions 3)Cellular phenotype discovery Rationale: unsupervised analysis of gene coexpression patterns can identify novel distinctions among cell types within brain regions

M15CM13C Caudate nucleus 1 Cahoy, J.D. et al. J Neurosci 28: (2008) 2 Lein, E.S. et al. Nature 445: (2007) 3 Bachoo, R.M. et al. PNAS 101: (2004)

M13C (CN) identifies genes that are coexpressed in the SVZ

Conclusions The human brain transcriptome is organized into modules of coexpressed genes –Many modules are reproducible across microarrays, individuals, and brain regions Several highly conserved modules are enriched for markers of major cell classes –‘ Core ’ transcriptional programs for neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and microglia –Context-specific annotation for thousands of genes expressed in the human brain Potential to leverage consistency of k me for comparisons with other conditions of interest (e.g. disease)

Acknowledgements Dan Geschwind Steve Horvath Gena Konopka Peter Langfelder Collaborators: Dr. Kazuya Iwamoto Dr. Tadafumi Kato The Geschwind lab