WU Research Integrity Policy 2010 Revision Presentation for the Committee on Research Integrity for the School of Medicine December 1, 2010 Attachment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
1 Sexual Harassment b. 2 Supervisor’s Responsibilities b Supervisors are responsible for setting the tone for a harassment-free work environment and for.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
2 Agenda Goals of documentation training Iowa Administrative Code SURS Reviews Questions & answers.
Training for College Panhellenics Resources: NPC Manual of Information, AFA Annual Mtg 2008 Judicial Procedures Presentation by SMU, Law & Order, NPC Judicial.
Federal Aviation Administration Grant Assurance Compliance David Cushing, Manager, Los Angeles Airports District Office Principles & Processes.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Administrative Procedures for Allegations of Research Misconduct Executive Summary (see WSU Policy 2101 for Details)
Anti-Discrimination & Harassment Policy
FLW EO Office 1 COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. FLW EO Office 2 Overview  Describe the Army’s EO Complaint Process  Define the types of Complaints  Describe.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Student Code of Conduct Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Committee Assistant principals, parents, interventionists, AEA representatives.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Policy on Misconduct in Research. Why Do We Need It? Misconduct in research has significant impact on university reputation and credibility. It should.
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
TELECARE CORP HIPAA AND THE AMENDMENT PROCESS Updated 11/17/09.
DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.
Establishing a Hospital Patient
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
The Martha’s Vineyard Public Schools Civil Rights Policy {Adoption Date}
1 Effective Internal Workplace Investigations Best Practices.
Project co-financed by European Union Project co- financed by Asean European Committee for Standardization Implementing Agency 1 Module 13 GMP Workshop.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Compliance and Ethics Training Overview
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Complainant seeks informal advice. Has ten (10) days to inform RMCC if going to file allegation. Research Misconduct Committee Chairperson (RMCC) Before.
Jamie Rolland.  3 years old  Copies available in libraries, principals’ offices, and upon request  All District Libraries share policies.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Grievance Process. A grievance may be lodged by a public service employee if that employee has an honest belief based on reasonable grounds that: an administrative.
Complaints The Policy Company Limited ©. Policy Complaints are encouraged and welcomed as a way of ensuring that any dissatisfaction with the quality.
DRAFT Proposed Sexual Harassment Policy Office of General Counsel Southern Illinois University September 2008.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Uniform Complaint Procedure Memorandum # MEM-560 October 10, 2003 By: Jaime Morales.
 Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 20 (Part XX) was proclaimed dealing with Violence Prevention in the Work Place.  Work Place Violence.
Moving To the Year 2000:Implementing 4010 Implementation Resolution Process Rich Emrich EDI Manager J.M. Schneider.
FERPA Guidelines for Cooperating Teacher and University Supervisors.
Policy and Procedure for the Handling of Complaints against the AG Consultation with the Standing Committee on the Auditor-General 9 April 2008 Wandile.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Handling Research Misconduct Allegations & Promoting Research Integrity Scott J. Moore, Ph.D., J.D. Investigative Scientist National Science Foundation.
PATIENT & FAMILY RIGHTS AT DOHMS. Fully understand and practice all your rights. You will receive a written copy of these rights from the Reception, Registration.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
Filing an Academic Grievance
TOPS TRAINING.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
COMPREHENSIVE RULES REVISIONS
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
Managing Cases of Research Misconduct
Presentation transcript:

WU Research Integrity Policy 2010 Revision Presentation for the Committee on Research Integrity for the School of Medicine December 1, 2010 Attachment 9

Revisions Revision: Combined Policy and Procedures documents into single comprehensive Policy document Re-organized to achieve more understandable format Added new sections for further clarity History: WU maintained separate RI Policy and RI Procedures ORI Review of WU Policy ORI determined WU policy and practice are compliant ORI suggested revisions for clarity & inclusion of regulatory/procedure elements into Policy document Attachment 9

Policy Changes Suggested by ORI Created a specific Retaliation Protections Section Outline protections for all involved in RI proceedings Describe process for reviewing allegations of retaliation Include all elements of Federal Regulations at 42 CFR 50 and 93 – Some of the details were in our Procedures and not specifically in the Policy Notifications – Expanded to more closely match regulations Attachment 9

The core principles and requirements of the Policy remain unchanged. The primary revisions include the following: Format revisions to help with flow and usability Clarified the rights and responsibilities for all parties that may be involved in research misconduct proceedings Expanded protections from retaliation Expanded the details for sequestering and handling of evidence Added information on admissions of guilt to outline the steps taken if a respondent chooses to admit to the allegations against him/her Expanded the applicability and definitions Attachment 9

Rights and Responsibilities Expanded on elements from previous policy to provide further clarity: Covers all parties to a proceeding Requires confidentiality Requires good faith – Complainant who makes allegation – Respondent who must respond – Committee members who must deliberate Attachment 9

Sequestering & Handling Evidence Expanded on elements from previous policy to provide further clarity: Requires all parties to provide evidence material to the allegations Allows respondent copies of, or supervised access to, evidence in order to defend against allegations Requires maintenance of records by VCR Attachment 9

Voluntary Admissions of Guilt Added to the policy: All admissions of guilt required to be in writing CRI must be satisfied that no other misconduct exists apart from admission ORI requires prior notification if admission of guilt will close case Attachment 9

Protections from Retaliation Expanded on elements from previous policy to provide further clarity: The University will not tolerate acts of retaliation If any person involved in a research misconduct proceeding feels s/he has been adversely affected by retaliation, they should notify the RIO, RECO, CRI, or VCR immediately Review of allegations of potential retaliation will be a two step process as described in the following slides Attachment 9

Administrative Review process for Potential Retaliation RIO responsible for taking reasonable and practical steps to protect individuals from retaliation Based on observations and/or conversations with the individuals involved in the proceedings, including the CRI members, the RIO may determine administrative steps are needed to address any potential opportunities for retaliation Attachment 9

Administrative Review process for Potential Retaliation Administrative steps may include, but are not limited to, seeking intervention by Human Resources, discussions with the Department Head to develop actions to assure protection, consultation with OGC or other steps necessary to protect against retaliation. The RIO shall update the CRI on the steps taken to protect the individual. Attachment 9

Review Process for Formal Complaint of Retaliation If administrative steps have not provided adequate protection, s/he may submit a formal written complaint – Upon receipt of a formal complaint, the RIO will appoint a subcommittee of the CRI to review the compliant – The CRI subcommittee will Interview individuals as appropriate prepare a written report of their findings and recommendations for resolution and submit it to the Dean and VCR – If an individual is found to have committed retaliation, the VCR, in conjunction with the dean, will take corrective actions, which are final – The RIO will update the CRI on the decision of the dean and VCR and the corrective actions taken Attachment 9

QUESTIONS? Attachment 9