Cross Border Internal Investigations Roger Best 06 July 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of Corporate Counsel Houston Chapter Meeting of June 8, 2010 What to Do When the Feds Come Knocking In-House Responsibilities for Criminal.
Advertisements

© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
The View of European Business Stuart Popham 14 March 2008 Survey Results.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Hong Kong Privacy Code on Human Resource Management
EMS Auditing Definitions
Introduction to the APPs and the OAIC’s regulatory approach Presented by: Este Darin-Cooper Director, Regulation and Strategy May 2015.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS March 16, Difference between being an employer vs. a law enforcement officer Garrity – this case involves employees’
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS JULY 13, 2004 Professor Susan Carle.
Developed by Susan Carle under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with.
Money Laundering 23 September Contents 1 What is money laundering? 2. The ‘primary’ money laundering offences 3. Failure to report and tipping off.
1 EFFECTIVE IN-HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS AND PRESERVING THE PRIVILEGES Presented By: John Eldridge Haynes and Boone, LLP (713) and Chris Chaffin BMC.
Data Protection Paul Veysey & Bethan Walsh. Introduction Data Protection is about protecting people by responsibly managing their data in ways they expect.
1 Raymond Doray Conflicts between the new Canadian Money Laundering Act and the rules of professional conduct and ethics September 13, 2002.
FSA Enforcement Ian Mason Head of Department, Wholesale Group Enforcement Division June 2005.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
ETHICS FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL A Special 2-Hour Ethics CLE Program for the ACC Georgia Chapter ETHICS.
RIBA/UKTI “Working Internationally” Mike Allan Partner Projects and Construction.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Outsourcing Louis P. Piergeti VP, IIROC March 29, 2011.
Why foreign companies need to prepare for the UK Bribery Act Transparency International Belgium Roger Best 3 March 2011.
Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM.
ADB Project TA 3696-PAK, Regulation for Corporate Governance 1 REGULATION FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN PAKISTAN CAPITAL MARKETS.
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING TRAINING FOR LENDERS Bill Heyman Offit Kurman
NEBOSH LEVEL 6 NATIONAL DIPLOMA MODULE A: MANAGEMENT OF HS LESSON 9 : CRIMINAL LAW Part One: HASAWA 1974.
Strategic Planning for Company Exit Legal considerations Mark Harden, Partner Thrings LLP.
Practising open procurement of IT Thomas Vinje, Partner, Clifford Chance LLP, Brussels 10 June 2010.
Forum on HEI Procedures for Suitability for Social Work Legal Perspectives London House, Goodenough College Monday, 3 November 2008.
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
Conducting Cross-Border International Internal Investigations Association of Corporate Counsel International Legal Affairs Committee Jeffrey D. Clark Willkie.
Preparing Russian Companies for UK Bribery Act Enforcement - The Defence of “Adequate Procedures” Nicholas Munday 14 December 2010 Moscow.
International Investigations: Issues to Consider When Conducting or Defending Against an FCPA Investigation Outside the United States Presented by: Sandee.
Individual liability for competition law infringements Koen Platteau UIA - Firenze 31 October 2014.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Canada’s Lobbying Act Joe Wild Assistant Secretary to the Cabinet for Machinery of Government Privy Council Office Government of Canada.
Part 2: Negotiating the Transaction. The Deal Team –Should comprise at a minimum: Corporate Finance lead; M&A Legal lead; Commercial/Business Lead; Integration.
Session 5 Anti-Money Laundering & Financial Crime Conducting or Supporting the Investigation Process Presented by ERM Institute Monday, 24 February 2014.
Risk Management & Corporate Governance 1. What is Risk?  Risk arises from uncertainty; but all uncertainties do not carry risk.  Possibility of an unfavorable.
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FCM TRAINING
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts Telephone Massachusetts.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Dawn raids.
Session 7 Compliance failure policy. 1 Contents Part 1: COLP and COFA duties Part 2: What do we have to comply with and why does it matter? Part 3: Compliance.
WASHINGTON DC | NORTHERN VIRGINIA | NEW JERSEY | NEW YORK | DALLAS | DENVER | ANCHORAGE | DOHA | ABU DHABI Government Investigations – an Inspector General’s.
Session 8 Confidentiality and disclosure. 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: The duty of confidentiality Part 3: The duty of disclosure Part 4: Confidentiality.
1 The Public Interest Disclosure (Whistleblower Protection) Act.
An Overview THE AUDIT PROCESS. MAJOR PHASES IN AN AUDIT Client acceptance and retention Establish terms of the engagement Plan the audit Consider internal.
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
Felicity Banks Head of Business Law Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales The Role of Accountants in the Fight against Money Laundering.
Introduction to the Australian Privacy Principles & the OAIC’s regulatory approach Privacy Awareness Week 2016.
Investigations: Strategies and Recommendations (Hints and Tips) Leah Lane, CFE Director, Global Investigations, Texas Instruments, Inc.
Data protection—training materials [Name and details of speaker]
1 Vereniging van Compliance Officers The Compliance Function in Banks Amsterdam, 10 June 2004 Marc Pickeur CBFA CBFA.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
CHAPTER SIXTEEN The Right to Privacy and Other Protections from Employer Intrusions.
Every employer must ensure, as far as is reasonable practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all his employees More specifically, employers must.
Recognizing the Client
The English Law of Privilege: a Summary
The role of tax advisers - initial considerations -
Bob Siegel President Privacy Ref, Inc.
Policy Dialogue on Corporate Governance in China
Current Privacy Issues That May Affect Your Credit Union
Personnel Investigations
Bonnie Weiss McLeod Cooley LLP
Internal Investigations Subsequent Use During Criminal Proceedings
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
Professional Rules and Negotiating Outcomes …
Explain the role of ethics in financial- information management
Presentation transcript:

Cross Border Internal Investigations Roger Best 06 July 2011

Outline Why companies commission internal investigations The basics of conducting internal investigations Legal constraints on the conduct of internal investigations Cross-border implications 06 July Cross Border Internal Investigations

Why companies commission internal investigations Firms authorised by the Financial Services Authority (“FSA) Principle 11 “A firm must deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way, and must disclose to the FSA appropriately anything relating to the firm of which the FSA would reasonably expect notice” SUP 15 Notification required if –Significant reputational impact –Significant fraud and accounting irregularities or employee misconduct “The FSA recognises that there are good reason for firms wishing to carry out their own investigations. This might be for, for example, disciplinary purposes, general good management, or operational and risk control. The firm needs to know the extent of any problem, and it may want advice as to what immediate or short- term measures it needs to take to mitigate or correct any problems identified. The FSA encourages this proactive approach and does not wish to interfere with a firm’s legitimate procedures and controls.” [FSA Enforcement Guide paragraph 3.17] The Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”): Guidance of self-reporting on Overseas Corruption encourages companies to self-report and commission an investigation: “We will discuss the scope of any further investigation needed. Wherever possible, this investigation will be carried out by the corporate’s professional advisers.” Good corporate governance Reputational risk management 06 July Cross Border Internal Investigations

4 FSA approach to firms conducting their own investigations in anticipation of FSA enforcement action The FSA recognises that sharing the outcome of an investigation can potentially save time and resources A firm's willingness to volunteer a report is something the FSA may take into account when deciding whether to take enforcement action The FSA encourages prior consultation before an investigation is commenced because it is concerned about the potential prejudice to any investigation it may wish to conduct (particularly where there is possible criminal conduct or market abuse) In addition to seeing the report the FSA may want access to the underlying documents and interview notes supporting the report The FSA will accept material on the basis of a limited waiver of privilege but expects to be able to use any report for enforcement action 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

5 The preparation and gathering of material Document preservation notices What is the scope of the investigation? Where is the relevant data stored? How do the IT systems work? Who is required to assist in the collection task? What confidentiality obligations need to be imposed on third party vendors? Clean up – don’t forget the obligations on third parties to destruct documents and clean their systems 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

6 Co-operation with the investigation Employees are under a contractual duty to co-operate with an investigation to establish relevant facts Limited obligations of former employees unless imposed by termination arrangements 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

7 Constraints on internal investigations Data protection restrictions on personal information Is there justification for processing? Does notice need to be given? Is there a pre-existing policy on telephone tapes and monitoring? Can personal data be exported? Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act restricts interception and live monitoring of communications 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

8 Constraints on internal investigations (2) Maintenance of privilege Employment law considerations Do not predetermine internal disciplinary findings Watch out for the need to switch from investigation to formal disciplinary process Independent representation of employee Privilege against self-incrimination 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

9 Reducing civil litigation risk Record purpose at the outset of the investigation and consider whether it is for a privileged purpose Use in-house legal function and external lawyers where there could be a claim for privilege and advantages therefrom Form of report (oral or written/factual or evaluative) Maintenance of privilege Limited disclosure of the report Restrict interviewees access to interview notes 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

10 Warning Throughout the process remain alert to The requirement to file suspicious transaction reports (STRs and SARs) FSA’s general notification requirements relating to firms and approved persons The advantages of self-reporting to the SFO The possibility that there will be a leak requiring a reactive statement 06 July 2011 Cross Border Internal Investigations

Cross-border complications Some countries have blocking laws that make it illegal to investigate on their territory where there are foreign or national implications (e.g. Switzerland and France) In some European countries breach of data privacy and/or bank secrecy laws carries criminal law penalties Some other European countries’ employment laws provide greater levels of protection for employees in relation to internal investigations and subsequent disciplinary action Local bar rules may prohibit local lawyers conducting factual investigations Differing concepts of confidentiality and legal privilege in civil law countries reduce the advantages of using lawyers for internal investigations 06 July Cross Border Internal Investigations

Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ © Clifford Chance LLP 2011 Clifford Chance LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC Registered office: 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ We use the word 'partner' to refer to a member of Clifford Chance LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications UK v1 Cross Border Internal Investigations