Academic Practice CPD From Drop-in to Doctorate: flexibility as a principle for credit-bearing CPD Nicola Reimann and Liz McDowell (Northumbria University) & Participants of the Academic Practice Programme: Linda Allin Richard Buckley Julia Charlton Joanne Smailes Teri Taylor Alison Venis Cath White
Overview of paper Overview of Northumbria Academic Practice Programme Key aspects of flexibility Participants’ experiences Problems of flexibility
Northumbria Academic Practice Programme Since 2005/6 Suite of PG modules Free-standing professional development OR Credit-bearing study Suite of PG awards PGCert PGDip MA ProfDoc Paid for by institution
Underpinning principles Flexibility Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Relevance to work Collaboration and networking Career development
Inclusivity For everyone who teaches and/or supports students Collaboration Across Schools and Services Across roles Diverse teaching team
Richard Buckley Students’ Union Representation and Democracy Coordinator
Range of opportunities Informal → formal Practice development → pedagogic research Open session → module → award Suite of awards Drawing on provision across university
Cath White, Lecturer in Geography
Recognition of prior learning and achievements AP(E)L Against module learning outcomes Against programme learning outcomes Recognition PGCert in HE L&T Master’s in Education
Julia Charlton, Lecturer in Nursing
Responding to university strategies Research-informed Teaching Initiative ‘The Link between Teaching & Research’ module Student Well-being Strategy & Duty of Care ‘Guiding and Supporting Students’ module Assessment for Learning in L&T Strategy ‘ Assessment for Learning’ module Promotions scheme ‘ Constructing an Academic Practice Portfolio’ module Work-based modules to address emerging issues
Alison Venis, Project Officer, Research-informed Teaching Initiatives
Relevance to practice Link to work Ownership Impact Work-based modules ProfDoc
Teri Taylor, Lecturer in Physiotherapy
Assessment Double use Negotiable submission formats Multiple deadlines ‘Statement of CPD activity’ Doctorate: Thesis Portfolio
Linda Allin, Lecturer in Sports Development
Joanne Smailes. Learning & Teaching Adviser
Problems arising from flexibility Clash with standard delivery, assessment and admin systems Administration much more complex Logistics of linking to other development opportunities within institution Participants: Workload issues Progression less clear Complexity of AP(E)L process
Teri Taylor Lecturer in Physiotherapy
Questions for discussion What do you think: should credit-bearing professional development programmes be as flexible as possible? Why? How flexible is the credit-bearing programme at your institution? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages (or vice-versa)? How could your programme be made more flexible? What problems might arise from making it more flexible?