LINCOLN-DOUGLAS CROSS EXAMINATION. Your manner of questioning and answering affects your credibility or ethos. Communicate through your demeanor that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Advertisements

Lincoln – Douglas Debate
A Short Introduction to Rhetoric  Rhetoric is the Art of Persuasive Language  Writers and speakers use Rhetoric to convince readers and listeners to.
Speaking to Persuade Communicating to External Stakeholders.
TODAY’S GOALS Learn advanced strategies for addressing counterarguments Finalize preparations for the class debate.
An Introduction to Rhetoric: Using the Available Means
Cross Examination.
Social Choice Session 20 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Essay Writing Elements of the Essay.
Part IV: Recognizing Modes of Writing Chapter 8: Four Primary Modes of Writing Chapter Eight Four Primary Modes In this chapter, you will: 1. become familiar.
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
Identifying, Responding, Analyzing, & Writing Strategies
Into the Wild Post Reading
Crossfire CODEY HAWKINS UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA 2015 GEORGIA DEBATE INSTITUTES.
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
This is the suggested or implied meaning or meaning or emotion associated with a word- beyond its literal definition- The feeling the word gives. Hint:
PURPOSE, THEME, CHARACTERIZATION Anthem. Purpose The reason behind the text. This is especially important for examining rhetoric. You cannot examine the.
Simplified Rules of Evidence How to Behave in the Courtroom.
Thesis  The overriding claim of the argument; what your paper will prove.  Brief sketch of how you will prove it.
Today’s goals Evaluate the final class media project
Objectives: - To define and apply vocabulary needed for Unit 4.
What is Cross-examination? “The process of questioning the opposing advocate for purposes of clarification and refutation.” (Kay and Ziegmueller)
English 9H Ms. Bugasch November 4, 2013 “D” Day Goals 1. Evidence Submittal and Approval 2. Students will be able to: -Understand the purpose of cross-examination.
 WATCH THE VIDEO CLIP, THEN GO TO THE WEB SITE WRITE DOWN WHAT’s THE MOST IMPORTANCE PART OF THE TRIAL AND TELL WHY. 
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
The WPA WHAT IS THE WPA? Every campus in the CSU is subject to the Graduate Writing Assessment requirement, or GWAR. At SDSU, students take the WPA, or.
Academic Vocabulary Argumentation Terms. diction: a writer's or speaker’s choice of words, as well as the syntax, or order of the words emotional appeals.
The Socratic Seminar: Where great minds converge..
Inquiring Minds. The goals for today’s lesson are...  To demonstrate understanding of the process of scientific inquiry,  To recognize that science.
Slow Writing Once you've finished any piece of writing in class you get to improve. Read through your first sentence. Interrogate every single word and.
Debate Pointers A debate Exhibition. Case case: set of arguments supported by evidences anatomy of a case: definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
C. E. R. S. A R G U M E N T P R O T O C O L 1 Modified from Lucy Calkins’ Writers Workshop Argumentation Institute at Columbia University, New York, 2013.
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
Introducing Essay 3 The Research Paper.
Revolutionary Period Literary Terms. 11/20/2015Free Template from Aphorism Short, concise statement expressing a wise or clever.
Ethos, Pathos, Logos.
Welcome to American Literature Warmup: What do you expect a sermon titled “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” to be like?
Argumentation The act or process of giving reasons for or against something. The act or process of making and presenting arguments.  MAKING A CLAIM 
Persuasion Terms. Logos- The process of reasoning that uses logic, numbers facts and data. Pathos- When the writer appeals to the reader’s emotions Ethos-
Bell Ringer 5/22  Please get out your Patrick Henry Activity and your textbook so that we can go over section 1 for participation points.  1, 3.
Plan 1.Introducing the team 2.Case: Theme; actuality; importance Definitions Criteria Arguments + explanations + support/evidence (examples, statistics,
Eight Is Enough In the Perfect Paper. Thesis  The overriding claim of the argument; what your paper will prove.  Brief sketch of how you will prove.
The Power of Text: How do we use a text to get what we want?
Argument: Bridge Words. What are Bridge Words? Bridge Words are terms that link what we are reading to the unit objective. For this unit we are reading.
Public Forum Debate Basic Forensics. What is public forum debate? Style of debate compared to a nationally- televised debate, like Crossfire. Debaters.
JUDGING PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE Find the PuFo in You!.
 MYuE0IZQ34 MYuE0IZQ34.
READ LIKE A WRITER CREATIVE WRITING MINI-LESSON. QUESTIONS TO ASK What do you notice about how this text was written? Underline repeating phrases or repeating.
SOAPSTONE & STRATEGIES Annotation Notes. SOAPS Speaker Occasion Audience Purpose Subject.
English II Honors—December 9, 2015 Daily Warm-up: The second part of The 11 th Hour explores other environmental consequences of over-development and over-utilization.
Cross Examination. Coming Up With Questions When you’re listening to your opponent’s speeches, it can be tempting to focus only on jotting down rebuttals,
Strategies of Persuasion & the Art of Rhetoric Ethos, Pathos, Logos.
Chapter 4: Writing a Rhetorical Analysis ENG 113: Composition I.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Survey Training Pack Session 20 – Presentation of Findings.
What makes a speech?.
Claims and Warrants. Argument Who is Toulmin and What Is His Method? HOW WHY.
Cross Examination.
Rhetoric The art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
AP Language and Composition
Argument: Key Terms.
Bell Ringer MUGShot Sentence.
The WPA WHAT IS THE WPA? Every campus in the CSU is subject to the Graduate Writing Assessment requirement, or GWAR. At SDSU, students take the WPA, or.
CX Purpose and Strategies
The Rhetorical Triangle
Rhetoric Notes.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Presentation transcript:

LINCOLN-DOUGLAS CROSS EXAMINATION

Your manner of questioning and answering affects your credibility or ethos. Communicate through your demeanor that you are dynamic, expert, trustworthy, and pleasant. There are four primary types of questions you can use: 1.Direct 2.Open 3.Probing 4.Leading

Direct Questions Refer to a specific piece of information and usually have a short answer. Example: –“What was the source for you definition of energy?” –“Do you support mandatory penalties for violations of your plan?”

Open Questions Allow the respondent to amplify ideas and probably should be limited to explanations of implications of the argument rather than repeating ideas already presented. Example: –“Tell us why you favor mandatory execution of violators” is better than “Explain your plan’s philosophy.”

Probe Questions These are similar to open questions in requiring a longer answer. They are often directed at a specific line of reasoning which the opponent has used. Example: –“Why do you (the opponent) rely so much on moveon.org for your evidence?” Such a question might reveal weakness in the research or evidence of your opponent. You can imply that the research is biased. Try to delve beneath the surface of the evidence or reasoning as to WHY it is included in the argument.

Leading Questions The debater can set up a series of questions, especially if some sort of logical relationship is the ultimate goal of his/her series of questions. You are setting up a series of questions which eventually lead the opponent to admit his or her weakness in reasoning and/or evidence.

In cross examination, the speaker whose opponent has just finished speaking should ask questions. Demanding “yes or no” questions are not permitted, and the debater being questioned should be allowed an opportunity to reply. The debater asking questions may cut off a reply if his or her opponent appears to be stalling, or if an important point has been reached. Throughout cross examination, both speakers should face the audience directly (not each other), and should remain courteous.