1 Weaving interoperability: combining local, regional and national solutions on hospital level IMIA HIS Conference, Oeiras, July 3, 2006 Juha Mykkänen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Skilling Up for Patient-Centered E-Health E. Vance Wilson University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Advertisements

MDI 2010, Oslo, Norway Behavioural Interoperability to Support Model-Driven Systems Integration Alek Radjenovic, Richard Paige The University of York,
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. SAOR: Semantically Annotated Oncology and Radiology Progress.
Quality Label and Certification Processes Vienna Summit 11 April 2014 Karima Bourquard Director of Interoperability IHE-Europe.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 12 Slide 1 Distributed Systems Design 2.
Utilization of Basic Register Information from the PSI Perspective Aki Siponen, Counsellor, Ministry of Finance Business with Public Information National.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
0 General information Rate of acceptance 37% Papers from 15 Countries and 5 Geographical Areas –North America 5 –South America 2 –Europe 20 –Asia 2 –Australia.
© 2006 IBM Corporation IBM Software Group Relevance of Service Orientated Architecture to an Academic Infrastructure Gareth Greenwood, e-learning Evangelist,
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
1 Juha Mykkänen (ed.) University of Kuopio, HIS R&D Unit Health Kuopio seminar Brussels, 5 November 2004 Health Information Systems and Information Technology.
Standardization and Interoperability in healthcare IT Export HIS Shanghai & Guangzhou seminars Juha Mykkänen Health Information Systems R & D Unit University.
A Robust Health Data Infrastructure P. Jon White, MD Director, Health IT Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse.
Adaptive Services Grid FP6 – IST Develop a prototype of an open development platform for adaptive services registration,
PROJECT NAME: DHS Watch List Integration (WLI) Information Sharing Environment (ISE) MANAGER: Michael Borden PHONE: (703) extension 105.
EHealth Partners Finland Finnish Agency for Technology and Innovation Tekes grants no /06 and 70030/06 Evaluation studies support.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
Integrating aspects of interoperability, policy and governance FRIS: a research information infrastructure in Flanders euroCRIS Strategic Members meeting.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
F Model-centric approaches for HIS development 1 Model-Centric Approaches for the Development of Health Information Systems Medinfo 2007, Brisbane Tue.
January 2012IHE Europe 1 INTEGRATING THE HEALTHCARE ENTERPISE Morten Bruun-Rasmussen, MEDIQ Charles Parisot, GE Healthcare, IHE International Board Vilnius,
EHealth Partners Finland Finnish Agency for Technology and Innovation Tekes grants no /06 and 70030/06 Architecture, Interoperability,
RIDE ConsortiumRIDE Workshop, December 8, 2006, Brussels 1 The RIDE Roadmap Methodology and the Current Progress Prof. Dr. Asuman Dogac, Turkey Dr. Jos.
Juha Mykkänen University of Kuopio, HIS R&D Unit Health Kuopio seminar Brussels, 5 November 2004 SerAPI project: Service-oriented architecture and Web.
L SERVICE DELIVERY Pharmacy Public Health Provider Interoperability Services Data Interchange Legacy System Adapters Simulator Health Service Bus Infrastructure.
EHealth Partners Finland Finnish Agency for Technology and Innovation Tekes grants no /06 and 70030/06 Needs analysis at pilots by.
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
F Healthcare software services - open interfaces and standards in Finland HL7/OMG Healthcare Services Specification Project London, 31 Jan 2006 Juha Mykkänen,
Life after PlugIT in Kuopio; Research projects in FINNWELL- program (TEKES) Anneli Ensio, Research Director University of Kuopio Department of Health Policy.
A National Study of eHealth Standardization in Finland - Goals and Recommendations Medinfo 2007 Brisbane Wed 22 Aug, Session S126, 4 PM Juha Mykkänen a,
Geneva, Switzerland, April 2012 Introduction to session 7 - “Advancing e-health standards: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders” ​ Marco Carugi.
EHealth Interoperability – EU Commission activities Dr Octavian Purcarea Unit H1 – ICT for Health Directorate ICT for citizens and businesses DG INFSO.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
Slide 1 of 4 Open Health Tools New Member Presentation Doug Burke, President & Cofounder December 7, 2012.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
PlugIT results: Open integration solution specifications and application interfaces Juha Rannanheimo, researcher, PlugIT-project Marko Sormunen, Mika Tuomainen,
Clinical Collaboration Platform Overview ST Electronics (Training & Simulation Systems) 8 September 2009 Research Enablers  Consulting  Open Standards.
Semantic Web: The Future Starts Today “Industrial Ontologies” Group InBCT Project, Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä, 29 April 2003.
Promoting excellence in social security ICT Industry Forum: Perspectives and solutions Introductory presentation Franck.
Independent Insight for Service Oriented Practice Summary: Service Reference Architecture and Planning David Sprott.
Topic 3A SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY: REUSE OF EHR DATA Mats Sundgren.
SDMX IT Tools Introduction
Providing web services to mobile users: The architecture design of an m-service portal Minder Chen - Dongsong Zhang - Lina Zhou Presented by: Juan M. Cubillos.
NCP Info DAY, Brussels, 23 June 2010 NCP Information Day: ICT WP Call 7 - Objective 1.3 Internet-connected Objects Alain Jaume, Deputy Head of Unit.
HeC PMT Meeting Tallinn 10 July 2008 Brainstorming session: what interest can there be in thinking about a possible new HeC 2 project to follow-up the.
SAGE Nick Beard Vice President, IDX Systems Corp..
Rule Engine for executing and deploying the SAGE-based Guidelines Jeong Ah Kim', Sun Tae Kim 2 ' Computer Education Department, Kwandong University, KOREA.
Basic Concepts Key Learning Points : The objectives of this chapter are as follows:  To provide an introduction to the basic Concepts of enterprise architectures,
Prague, 19 – 22 April 2006 OneStopGov 4 th Eastern European e-Gov Days 2006 A life-event oriented framework and platform for one-stop government: The OneStopGov.
1 Acquisition Automation – Challenges and Pitfalls Breakout Session # E11 Name: Jim Hargrove and Allen Edgar Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 Time: 2:30 pm-3:45.
EHealth Development Vision. eHealth ojectives Healthcare systems and network focused on the patient: Not patient runs between institutions but the patients’
Case Study: HL7 Conformance in VA Imaging Mike Henderson Principal Consultant Eastern Informatics, Inc.
Informatics for Scientific Data Bio-informatics and Medical Informatics Week 9 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information.
Presented for discussion with Implementation SIG Heather Grain.
A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
A Nordic reference architecture for Personal Connected Health and Care
The GEMBus Architecture and Core Components
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
Single Point of Entry (SPOE)
Chapter 16 – Software Reuse
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Chapter 16 – Software Reuse
Presentation transcript:

1 Weaving interoperability: combining local, regional and national solutions on hospital level IMIA HIS Conference, Oeiras, July 3, 2006 Juha Mykkänen, Mikko Korpela HIS R&D Unit, University of Kuopio, Finland

2 2 In this presentation HIS, sub-systems and interoperability Local, regional and national health information infrastructure initiatives in Finland HIS architectural components: hospital view Some challenges for advanced interoperability Emerging interoperability best practices Summary + discussion

3 3 IMIA HIS, Heidelberg, April 2002: "need a common description for components in health information systems" - still a valid need components = units of composition, reuse and interoperability: –scope, availability, granularity, physical and conceptual nature –healthcare-specific scope: infrastructure, administration, care support, direct care, diagnostics, communication, simulation –information and semantics, instance / type / context / meta levels –functionality and interactions - capabilities + collaboration –relation to reference architectures and specific application architecture –technical aspects - data communication, interfaces, technical infrastructure, integration platforms etc. –cross-cutting aspects: security, management, flexibility, extensibility –relationship to systems lifecycle - development paradigm, migration Mykkänen, Tuomainen 2006, Information and Software Technology, submitted.

4 4 Process model of a hospital – systems are for processes Core process: Direct care Support processes: Laboratory Radiology … Input: illness Output: wellness? Auxiliary processes: Management, … Korpela 2005, presentattion at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou Role of information systems in hospitals

5 5 Rehabilitation Korpela 2005, presentattion at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou Beyond the hospital – seamless care

6 6 Health information infrastructure developments / Finland Kuopio Helsinki Hospitals and health centres –primary care = health centres: ~100 % use EPR systems –hospitals: replacing legacy core applications > 10 years –continuous heterogeneity in processes, applications, infrastructures –managerial and clinical process developments - e.g. DRG, decision support Regional –new organisational models of health services (e.g. laboratories, regional clusters) –regional information systems, references to back-end HIS data –shared electronic services (e.g. prescriptions, electronic booking) –disease-specific specialised systems National –national services: EHR for professionals, code sets/vocabularies etc. –migration from regional to national services Citizen –e-services emerging first for professionals, then patients –PHR: little real integration to professional-oriented EPRs

7 7 Sample high-end composition of the hospital-wide information system today: Helsinki-Uusimaa hospital district HUS,Sinikka Ripatti 2004 Hospital level

8 8 Example of a major vendor’s architecture Medici Data Oy, Juha Sorri HMIS core EPR system Loosely connected systems Common context & services Launching Common user Hospital level inner circles: optimised usability, reduced maintenance and redundancy, tightly integrated application families and components outer circles: flexibility, cross-organisational processes

9 9 Migration situation in a major hospital KYS, Pekka Sipilä, 2006 Old HIS systems New HIS systems Health center systems Hospital level

10 Elements of a HIS architecture: hospital view Common core services: Starting point for HIS Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing presumptions: –heterogeneous specialised applications, existing (legacy) systems –practicality, feasible implementation threshold in multi-vendor environment –extensibility –service- orientation supported by generic middleware

11 “Pluggable” specialized clinical subsystems Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing alternatives: –non-pluggable clinical subsystems –no clinical subsystems

12 Standard structured EPR/EHR data storage Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing alternatives: –system-specific data views –point-to-point queries –(personal / virtual health record - outside organization)

13 Front-end viewer for health professionals (EHR-S) Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing alternatives: –context management –no point-of- decision integration –(additional) workflow management systems

14 Information exchange by messages across facilities Potentially same data structure Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing alternatives: –central repository (for some scenarios - see next slide) –peer-to-peer negotiations / mediation

15 Clinical on-line access across facilities Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing alternatives: –peer-to-peer negotiations / mediation

16 Patient’s / citizen’s front-end Korpela, Mykkänen, Porrasmaa, Sipilä 2005, CHINC conference, Beijing add: –opposite direction –patient-provider communications

17 HIS challenges for interoperability healthcare process specifics –balance between customer, provider and organisational objectives –complexity, legality, communication, multi-professionality, exceptions –externalisation of healthcare processes from HISs –requires flexibility of architectures, definition of migration paths explosion of potential interoperability solutions –architectures, evaluation of standards, development and maintenance costs evidence –identification of real needs, requirements traceability –collection of application experience of domain-neutral best practices in HIS generic innovation vs. local introduction –reduced local tailoring, increased reuse on many levels –gaps: product development - healthcare process development - academia?

18 Interoperability apex 2006 Semantic and process integration –structured and coded information, shared terminologies, ontology-based semantics –clinical decision support, integration and adaptation of HIS into defined or even evidence-based workflows Service-oriented architectures –paradigm for open, flexible and business-aligned systems, cohesive & reusable services –process management and automation (vs. exceptional healthcare workflows) –infrastructure services (e.g. EHR access, codes and terminolofies, access control) and added value services (e.g. decision support) –e.g. Healthcare Services Specification Project / HL7+OMG Profiles = constraints on application of generic mechanisms –technical: e.g. Web services interoperability (WS-I) –functional: e.g. HL7 EHR-S Functional Model –semantic: e.g. CEN/OpenEHR archectypes, HL7 templates –standardisation: e.g. Integrating Healthcare Enterprise (IHE)

19 Summary and discussion topics hospitals will long remain one central point for health services provision, but will not remain "the centre" –challenges for advanced interoperability remain on local, regional, national and international level: common frameworks needed –regional and national initiatives demand local acceptance and user benefits described elements are based on Finnish practical experience, international standardization, China, Africa one basis for generic framework architecture adjustable to the specific contexts in Portugal, Germany, UK, USA, … Mozambique? how can the service interfaces and semantics be developed for global reusability & local adaptability? gradually? –understanding of and support for healthcare processes –semantic and functional views addressed → International standardization of relevant aspects with users and industry → ’IT for Health’ at IFIP World IT Forum → IMIA recommendations, Health Informatics in Africa HELINA

20 Healthcare application integration: PlugIT, 2001­2004: Finnish Agency for Technology and Innovation Tekes grants no /01, 40246/02 and 90/03 Service-oriented architecture and web services in healthcare application production and integration: SerAPI, 2004­2007: Tekes grants no /04, 40353/05 Healthcare work and information systems development in parallel: ZipIT Tekes grants no /04 and 790/04, and ActAD­HIS, Finnish Work Environment Fund grant no : Packaging Finnish e-health expertise for international use: Export HIS, 2004­ (Tekes grant no /04,), e-Health Partners Finland, (Tekes grants no /06, 70030/06) Informatics development for health in Africa: INDEHELA­Methods (Academy of Finland grants no ,1998­2001), INDEHELA­Context ( and , 2003, 2004­2007): Open Integration Testing Environment: Avointa, 2004­2006: Tekes grant no /04 Acknowledgements and more information

21 Assets to support benefits of electronic health information interoperability separation of care management from patient-specific health information increasingly documented and formalised requirements, processes and practices in healthcare common concept models, vocabularies and terminologies, extended to ontological languages and tools component- and service-based systems development and management approaches to support changing requirements and heterogeneous environments guidelines, methods and reference models for acquisition, integration and systems development projects Mykkänen, Specification of Reusable Integration Solutions in Health Information Systems, forthcoming.