LOGIC AND SETS CHAPTER 5. LOGIC AND SETS 5.1 Equivalent Statements 5.2 Drawing Conclusions from Data 5.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Advertisements

Statements and Reasoning
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
2-4 Rules of Logic What is deductive reasoning?
A Quick Look at Quantified Statements. Why are Quantified Statements Important? The logical structure of quantified statements provides a basis for the.
Solution to Problem 2.24 ECS 101 Lab 4.
PHIL 120: Jan 8 Basic notions of logic
Chapter 3 Section 5 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Adapted from Discrete Math
LOGIC CHAPTER 3 1. EULER DIAGRAMS: A PROBLEM-SOLVING TOOL
Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Valid Arguments Decide if each argument is valid. If the stones are rolling, they are not gathering moss. If the stones are not gathering moss, they are.
Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.
Review! It’s Go Time!.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 4 ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Week 3 - Monday.  What did we talk about last time?  Predicate logic  Multiple quantifiers  Negating multiple quantifiers  Arguments with quantified.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Write paragraph proofs
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Venn Diagrams and Logic Lesson 2-2. Venn diagrams: show relationships between different sets of data. can represent conditional statements.
LOGIKA MATEMATIKA 1 EQUIVALENT STATEMENT Let A be the statement formula (~(p ∨ q )) → (q ∧ p )
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Warning: All the Venn Diagram construction and pictures will be done during class and are not included in this presentation. If you missed class you.
TOPIC 14 Venn Diagrams. Another approach to answering PROBABILITY questions is to use a VENN DIAGRAM. Example 1 Draw a Venn diagram to show the following.
Logic and Proof Day 5. Day 5 Math Review Goals/Objectives Review properties of equality and use them to write algebraic proofs. Identify properties of.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 By Dr. Dalia M. Gil, Ph.D.
Integers on a Number Line Grade 6 Standard 1.C.1.a.
Splash Screen.
Chapter 3 Logic Active Learning Lecture Slides
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
Review Sheet Chapter Two
CLAST Logic.
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
2 Chapter Introduction to Logic and Sets
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Splash Screen.
Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
Let us build the tree for the argument Q>-P | P>Q.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
ALGEBRA II ALGEBRA II HONORS/GIFTED - SETS : THE COMPLEMENT OF A SET and CROSS PRODUCTS ALGEBRA II SETS : THE COMPLEMENT.
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
Presentation transcript:

LOGIC AND SETS CHAPTER 5

LOGIC AND SETS 5.1 Equivalent Statements 5.2 Drawing Conclusions from Data 5.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments

5.1 Negating Statements 1. Select the statement that is the negation of “It is raining and the sun is not out”. A. If it is raining then the sun is not out. B. It is not raining and the sun is out C. It is raining and the sun is not out. D. It is not raining or the sun is out.

5.1 Negating Statements 1. Select the statement that is the negation of “It is raining and the sun is not out”. A. If it is raining then the sun is not out. B. It is not raining and the sun is out C. It is raining and the sun is not out. D. It is not raining or the sun is out.

5.1 Negating Statements 1. Select the statement that is the negation of “It is raining and the sun is not out”. A. If it is raining then the sun is not out. B. It is not raining and the sun is out C. It is raining and the sun is not out. D. It is not raining or the sun is out.

5.1 Universal Quantifiers ALL Some (are) Some (are not) No (None) 4. The negation of “ No students failed this class”: B. Some students failed this class. A. All students failed this class. D. No student failed this class. C. Some students did not fail this class.

5.1 Equivalent Statements Equivalencies for “If p, then q” 1) ~p or q 2) If ~q, then ~p

5.1 Example 5. Select the statement logically equivalent to “If Tina is in Las Vegas, then she is in Nevada”. A. Tina is in Las Vegas or she is in Nevada. B. If Tina is not in Nevada, then she is not in Vegas. C. If Tina is in Nevada, then she is in Las Vegas. D. If Tina is not in Las Vegas, then she is not in Nevada. Let V=in LasVegas Let N=in Nevada The statement given is “If V then N” The statement given is equivalent to: ~V or N, If ~N then ~V

5.1 Example 5. Select the statement logically equivalent to “If Tina is in Las Vegas, then she is in Nevada”. A. Tina is in Las Vegas or she is in Nevada. B. If Tina is not in Nevada, then she is not in Vegas. C. If Tina is in Nevada, then she is in Las Vegas. D. If Tina is not in Las Vegas, then she is not in Nevada. Let V=in LasVegas Let N=in Nevada The statement given is equivalent to: ~V or N, If ~N then ~V V or N If ~N then ~V If N then V If ~V then ~N

10. Select the rule of logical equivalence that directly transforms (in one step) statement “i” into statement “ii”. i. Not all children are left handed. ii. Some children are not left-handed. A. “Not (not p)” is equivalent to “p” 5.1 Transforming B. “If p then q” is equivalent to “If not q, then not p” C. “Not all are p” is equivalent to “Some are not p” D. “All are not p” is equivalent to “Some are not p”

5.2 Venn Diagram A B C 1. Sets A,B, and C are related as shown in the diagram. Which of the following statements is true, assuming none of the regions is empty? U A. Any element of A is also a member of C. B. No element is a member of A, B and C. C. Any element of U is a member of A. D. None of these statements is true.

5.2 Draw Conclusions P Q All P’s are Q’sSome P’s are Q’s No P’s are Q’sSome P’s are not Q’s P P P Q Q Q

5.2 Example F No A’s are F’s I Given that: i. No people who make assignments are friendly. ii. All instructors make assignments. Determine which can be logically deduced. A. All instructors are friendly. All I’s are A’s A B. No instructor is friendly. C. Some instructors are friendly. D. None of these answers.

5.2 Valid Arguments

5.2 Example Select the conclusion that will make the following argument valid. If all students take Math, then some new instructors are needed. No new instructors are needed. A. No students take Math B. If there are no new instructors, no students take Math C. Some students do not take Math D. Some students take Math

5.2 Example Select the conclusion that will make the following argument valid. If all students take Math, then some new instructors are needed. No new instructors are needed. Let p = all students take math Let q = some new instructors are needed The statement: If all students take Math, then some new instructors are needed.

5.2 Example Select the conclusion that will make the following argument valid. If all students take Math, then some new instructors are needed. No new instructors are needed. Let p = all students take math Let q = some new instructors are needed The statement: No new instructors are needed.

5.2 Example Select the conclusion that will make the following argument valid. If all students take Math, then some new instructors are needed. No new instructors are needed. Let p = all students take math Let q = some new instructors are needed : Not (all students take math) Not all means some do not

5.2 Example Select the conclusion that will make the following argument valid. If all students take Math, then some new instructors are needed. No new instructors are needed. A. No students take Math B. If there are no new instructors, no students take Math C. Some students do not take Math D. Some students take Math

5.3 Deducing Conclusions 1. If you ask questions, you will learn a lot. If you read often, you will ask questions. 2. All sailors are swimmers. All swimmers wear life jackets. Sally is wearing a life jacket. Use symbolic argument Use Venn diagram

5.3 Symbolic Example 1. Select a logical conclusion: If you ask questions, you will learn a lot. If you read often, you will ask questions. B. You will learn a lot. A. If you learn a lot, you will ask questions C. You will not learn a lot. D. If you read often, you will learn a lot.

5.3 Diagram Example Study the given information and select the Correct conclusion A. Sally is not a sailor. L SW SL U B. Sally is a sailor. C. Sally is a swimmer. D. None of these 2. All sailors are swimmers. All swimmers wear life jackets. Sally is wearing a life jacket. One who wears a life jacket can be anywhere in L

C. All fish live in water and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass live in water. A. All fish taste good and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass taste good. B. Every Girl Scout is a girl. Susan is a Girl Scout. Therefore, Susan is a girl. 5.3 Invalid Arguments 3. All of the following arguments have true conclusions, but one is not valid. Select the argument that is not valid. D. All flies are dirty and insects are dirty. Therefore, all flies are insects.

C. All fish live in water and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass live in water. A. All fish taste good and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass taste good. B. Every Girl Scout is a girl. Susan is a Girl Scout. Therefore, Susan is a girl. 5.3 Invalid Arguments 3. All of the following arguments have true conclusions, but one is not valid. Select the argument that is not valid. D. All flies are dirty and insects are dirty. Therefore, all flies are insects. MAKE A VENN DIAGRAM FOR EACH

A. All fish taste good and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass taste good. 5.3 Invalid Arguments Taste Fish Bass U √ valid

B. Every Girl Scout is a girl. Susan is a Girl Scout. Therefore, Susan is a girl. 5.3 Invalid Arguments Girls GS Susan U √ valid

C. All fish live in water and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass live in water. 5.3 Invalid Arguments Water Fish Bass U √ valid

5.3 Invalid Arguments D. All flies are dirty and insects are dirty. Therefore, all flies are insects. Dirty Flies Insects U x invalid

C. All fish live in water and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass live in water. A. All fish taste good and all bass are fish. Therefore, all bass taste good. B. Every Girl Scout is a girl. Susan is a Girl Scout. Therefore, Susan is a girl. 5.3 Invalid Arguments 3. All of the following arguments have true conclusions, but one is not valid. Select the argument that is not valid. D. All flies are dirty and insects are dirty. Therefore, all flies are insects.

REMEMBER MATH IS FUN AND … YOU CAN DO IT