Choose When You Use How to Think About Utility Customers The Nevada Dynamic Pricing Trial (NDPT) Craig Boice, Director ADS Town Meeting Washington, D.C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Energy Analysis Department Electricity Markets and Policy Group DOE Smart Grid Investment Grant Program: Dynamic Pricing & Consumer Behavior Studies Chuck.
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Focus on Pepcos Washington, DC Residential Smart Meter Pilot Program Presented By Steve Sunderhauf July 14, 2009.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Educational and Motivational Intervention to Enhance Consumers Use of Health Plan and Medical Group Quality Data Patrick.
CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT (CAR) TRAINING Presented By: John Haigh Office of Vocational and Adult Education And Heather Fleck DTI Associates, Inc.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.
AEP Texas Energy Efficiency / Demand Response Programs Russell G. Bego, EE/DR Coordinator AEP Texas September 24, 2014.
SGIG Consumer Engagement Experience: The Sequel National Town Meeting on Demand Response & Smart Grid July 11 th, 2013 Shawn Enterline, Vermont Energy.
SMUD’s SmartPricing Options Marketing Strategy Jennifer Potter July 31, 2014 Powering forward. Together.
Experience you can trust. Statewide Single-Family Rebate Program Evaluation: Lighting CALMAC/MAESTRO Meeting San Francisco, CA July 26, 2006 Tami Rasmussen.
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ENERGY PRODUCED BY A BIFACIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY IN THE ERA OF TIME-OF-USE PRICING J. Johnson, K. Hurayb, Y. Baghzouz Electrical.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Overview of ARRA-Funded SGIG Consumer Behavior Studies Peter Cappers (LBNL) A National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid July 11, LBNL.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.
Introduction of Internet Survey Methodology to the Emirate of Abu Dhabi Andrew Ward, Maitha Al Junaibi and Dragica Sarich.
Trying Out New Survey Techniques – Lessons Learned 2013 Northwest Hazardous Materials Management Conference Liz Tennant, Strategic Advisor, Office of the.
What Drives the Response in Demand Response? Craig Boice Boice Dunham Group Metering, Billing, CRM/CIS America 2005 Las Vegas, Nevada April 13, 2005 BOICE.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
Rachel Weaver Program Manager Maryland Energy Administration
HOME ENERGY USAGE REPORTS: DOES INCREASED FEEDBACK LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT ENERGY REDUCTIONS AND REDUCED COSTS? NASUCA MID YEAR MEETING JUNE 25, 2012 Ricky.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Position Your Employment Services in the Labor Market Define your Employment Services Describe the Feature and Benefits of your Employment Services Develop.
1 SmartMeter™ Delivering Customer Benefits Jana Corey Director, Policy Planning Integrated Demand-side Management Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
1 SCE – Lessons Learned from Pricing Experiences July 31, 2014.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
Tips & Tools for Successful Implementation Created by Choice Strategies.
Customer Service Standards
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
Smart Grid Research Consortium November 9, DM Goals/Objectives User adoption & consumer engagement Prove consumer behavioral change Prove consumer.
CPUC Residential Rate Rulemaking Workshop July 31, 2014 SDG&E TVP Marketing and Outreach Proposals.
This presentation outlines the following: How we believe we can help Electronic Marketing Strategy Marketing Overview SMS Marketing Overview Electronic.
Residential Survey. Survey Objectives Develop a more accurate algorithm to predict the presence and use of electric heat for residential customers. Algorithm.
SENSE Fall 2007 Pilot Orientation Conference Calls.
2011 Residential HAN Pilots Evaluation Results © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
OG&E’s Smart Study TOGETHER: Impact Assessment of Enabling Technologies and Dynamic Pricing Rates Katie Chiccarelli, Craig Williamson January 24, 2012.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
PG&E Winter Bill Programs and Plans Low Income Oversight Board Meeting September 17, 2008 Sacramento, CA.
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
© 2005 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: April 26, 2005 Summer Hours Sample comprised of 428 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 428 responses.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
R OCKY M OUNTAIN P OWER C OMPANY DSM OPT-OUT PROPOSAL Utah Industrial Energy Consumers (UIEC) November 3, 2009.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Pilot Design and Load Impact M&V Dr. Stephen George Senior Vice President.
Statement of Problem: Because of changes in resident staffing, our academic hospitalist Section required a 50% increase (from 12 to 18 FTE) in faculty.
… what did Delaware do? Ensuring representative sample for Family Survey….
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.
Navigating the Verification Process Office for Child Nutrition.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
PURLs Program Development (Personalized URLs) Integrating Direct Mail with the Internet.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
Pasadena Water and Power Contract with Opower: Behavioral Energy Efficiency and Customer Engagement Program Services Pasadena City Council June 6, 2016.
Summary of BGE’s Pilot of Innovative Direct Mail Campaign January 27, 2012.
Hawai’i Over 77,000 PV systems interconnected or approved statewide. 17% of customers 500+ MW of PV installed Oahu: 32% of single family homes have.
1 BGE Smart Energy Pricing Program: Update to Maryland Public Service Commission April 23, 2008 Wayne Harbaugh VP – Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Policies and Procedures
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
High School Application Process School Year
Mike Cormack, Board Chair Public Employment Relations Board
Peak Day Pricing Module 2:Eligibility & Default
2012 Business Guidelines for Association Membership
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Presentation transcript:

Choose When You Use How to Think About Utility Customers The Nevada Dynamic Pricing Trial (NDPT) Craig Boice, Director ADS Town Meeting Washington, D.C. July 11, 2013

Official Disclaimer “This presentation was prepared and delivered by Craig Boice of the Boice Dunham Group, Inc., and represents only his opinion. This presentation in whole or in part has neither been endorsed, nor reviewed, nor authorized by the U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, or NV Energy.” However, if you have questions: Craig Boice

A Smart Grid AMI project to benefit 2.4 MM Nevadans 1.3 MM electric meters, 150k gas modules over 46k square miles Nevada PUC approved July 30, 2010 Sensus, Itron, Alstom technologies $35MM in annual operating benefits $303 MM in total project costs $139 MM of federal SGIG funding NDPT to test dynamic rates, education & technology 3 NV Energize is a SGIG Project

4 NDPT Data spans usage, surveys, and interviews: Meter, HVAC, education, and customer service data collected, analyzed Surveys for demographics, premise, & customer attitudes/acceptance – baseline and completion conducted, analyzed On-premises interviews, longitudinal focus groups conducted, analyzed EPP, low-income attitudes and price response effects documented The NDPT Design spans Nevada: Randomly-assigned treatments from a stratified sample with opt-in acceptance Two separate trials (North & South) across a two-year span (3/1/ /28/2015) May opt-out after year one: best-bill guarantee for the first year only TOU/CPP rates, EcoFactor technology and Vergence Entertainment education treatments The NDPT is Statewide

The NDPT Design is Formal Treatment CellParticipants: North(#) Participants: South (#) Total Participants (#) Education Only* Rate Only (TOU-E) Rate Only (CPP) TOU-E + Education CPP + Education TOU-E + Education + Technology CPP + Education + Technology Total1,4882,4803,968 5 *Education-Only treatment cell a special case

NDPT Rates Are Complex RateFlatCore Summer CPP Shoulder Summer CPP Core Summer On-Peak Core Summer Off-Peak Shoulder Summer On-Peak Shoulder Summer Off-Peak Winter Off-Peak TOU-E.11442NA CPP RateFlatSummer CPP Summer On-Peak Summer Mid-Peak Summer Off-Peak Winter On-Peak Winter Off-Peak TOU-E.09964NA CPP NDPT Rates – North (Schedule D-1 Total Rate, $/kWh) NDPT Rates – South (Schedule RS Total Rate, $/kWh) Source: Statement of Rates, effective (10J & 63K(1)) Summer Peak Period: June-September, 2-7 PM Summer Shoulder Months: June and September Summer Core Months: July and August Off-Peak Period: all other June-September hours, October-May all hours CPP an overlay to TOU-E, with pm non-holiday weekday events (14 Core, 4 Shoulder) Summer On-Peak Period: July-September, 1-6 PM weekdays Summer Mid-Peak Period: July-September, 10 am-1 PM and 6-9 pm weekdays Summer Off-Peak Period: July-September, all other hours Winter On-Peak Period: October-June, 5-9 pm, all days Winter Off-Peak Period: October-June, 9 pm – 5 am, all days CPP an overlay to TOU-E, with pm non-holiday weekday events (14 July-August, 2 September) 6

The NDPT Targeted Single-Family Households Single-family households screened for eligibility Smart meter installation date Service class Medical codes, employee/contractor, 12 other criteria Pools were randomly ordered, and then randomly assigned Control group, or one of the six treatment pools by energy use strata ‘noncompliers’ 7

The NDPT Solicitation was Classic Direct Marketing 8 Heads-up postcard sent to eligible customers that an important offer was on the way Two days later, customers received a recruitment packet: Personalized letter Treatment ‘Savings Guide for Applicants” brochure Return postcard and envelope Rate information card Disclosure agreement Reminder letter sent six weeks later followed by outbound calling to non-respondents in open cells

First, a Postcard Alert… 9

Then, a Solicitation Packet 10

Recruitment Was A Success 11 Despite research constraints, recruited and installed 5,279 Nevada households as NDPT participants From a single staged mailing of postcards and recruitment packets: Immediately filled more than half of all cells, with overenrollment due to simultaneous submissions Later in the first month, had to turn away hundreds of customers due to cells being filled prior to their responses 5% overall enrollment ( % across cells) achieved before brakes applied BUT large-usage, multi-treatment strata below statistical preferences, despite more mailings and calls

NDPT Current Enrollment Treatment CellParticipants: North(#) Participants: South (#) Total Participants (#) Education Only*---26 Rate Only (TOU-E) Rate Only (CPP) ,251 TOU-E + Education CPP + Education ,038 TOU-E + Education + Technology CPP + Education + Technology ,037 Total1,8463,4335, *Education-Only treatment cell a special case

NDPT Enrollment Was Easy, But Not for Everyone 13 Customers could enroll via telephone, dedicated website, return mail Automatic phone and web confirmation/denial provided letters sent to all those who tried to enroll via mail Education and technology treatments required installs Education recipients had welcome s, mail packets, and instructions (80% installed application, 65% the game) Technology recipients had installation scheduling invitations (many didn’t respond or changed their minds)

Early NDPT Lessons Customers are key components of the Smart Grid, whose role is to own their energy usage 2. Customers come preconfigured (e.g., many believe they are already on time-based rates, or find them obvious) 3. Almost all customer engagement is casual and fast (not decisive and analytic) 4. Technology installation is a bigger job than many customers want to do, or even understand 5. Marketing works: motivation and trial guided by light, enjoyable, repetitive, and continual reinforcement