Maximizing Resources for Student Success: Focus on Assessment and Grading Activities Dr. Lou Guthrie| Director National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

AB 806 – WILK FIFTY PERCENT LAW FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MAY 2013 MAY 15, 2013 AB 806 WILK ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE 1.
GEAR UP Idaho  GEAR UP Idaho is a federal grant program that provides comprehensive, early intervention college access programming to selected Idaho.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Institutionalizing Assessment: Changing a Mindset Al Foderaro, Director Denise Schmidt, Associate Director Career Services & Cooperative Education COUNTY.
Meeting the Challenge of Supporting Teaching and Learning with Technology in Tight Budget Times Table 5 Seminars on Academic Computing University Executive.
Peralta Community College Budget Allocation Model BAM November 17, 2014.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
David Proulx, Assistant Vice President for Financial Planning and Budgeting Budget Office Website:
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Competency-based, Performance- based, Direct-assessment: What’s in a Name? Beth Castiglia, Ph. D. Dean, Larry L. Luing School of Business, Berkeley College.
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
Manoa Budget Committee Update Kathy CutshawFebruary 18, 2015.
Howard Cohen, Chancellor. Strategic Vision  Position Purdue University Calumet to be a full- service, high quality regional university  A resource for.
+ A New Form of Professional Development: The Institutional Effectiveness Program and the Success Center for California Community Colleges David Morse,
Success is what counts. Achieving the Dream: Lessons Learned and Opportunities Moving Forward SHEEO Annual Meeting Presentation Santa Fe, NM July 16, 2009.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Our Roles as Stewards of Collaborative Excellence.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Advising Strategic Plan University of Cincinnati August 10,2015.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
College Credit for Veterans Cris McCullough - Academic Affairs, CCCCO Dean, Curriculum & Instruction Veterans Summit San Jose, California December 5, 2014.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating a New Prior Learning Assessment Program for a State University System Funding for this project provided by the U.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Accelerated Instructional Program Review Handbook Spring 2007.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
DEFINITION OF MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION TO MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONS.
BUILDING A PRIOR LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Office for Prior Learning Assessment Joyce Lapping, Director and Panel Presenter at NEASC 126 th Annual Meeting.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
State Budget and Election Fall 2010 University Priorities Questions/comments/discussion.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
NSF STEM Scholarship Program. Outline NSF-STEM program information – One submission per year – Mission – Regulations What we learned last time – Strengths.
ACCREDITATION, SELF-STUDIES, AND FACULTY ROLES
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
The Future of our Colleges: Student Success ASCCC Futures Committee.
California State University, Sacramento Shared Solutions: A Framework for Discussing California Higher Education Finance Nancy Shulock, Director Institute.
The New Mission Frontier: The Community College Baccalaureate Degree Pilot John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee Jolena Grande, Cypress College Jackie.
Baccalaureate Degrees in the California Community College System Jolena Grande, Cypress College James Todd, Modesto Junior College John Stanskas, ASCCC.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Student Unit Record Data Use Division of Florida Colleges December 8, 2015.
GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. Apportionment Funding 101 & The Fifty Percent Law: Part I Presented November 10,
Objectives for Training Session Familiarize managers with new process Link planning process to Institutional Effectiveness and budget process Review forms.
Presentation to the House Education Committee January 13, 2011.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Knowledge Management: Using the Baldrige Model to Promote Evidence-Based Decision Making and Guide Institutional Reform Dr. Fiona Baxter
State Board of Education Presentation November 17, 2015.
Catch the Next is replicating and scaling up the Puente model (based at UC Berkeley) in Texas. Puente is proven, scalable, & cost-effective. CTN is a non-profit.
Adding Cost and Benchmarking to Your Program Review Michelle Taylor| Senior Research Analyst National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Community College Benchmarking: Assessment, Improvement and Accountability Michelle Taylor| Senior Research Analyst National Higher Education Benchmarking.
CTE Strong Workforce Task Force Recommendation Implementation Grant Goold Julie Bruno John Stanskas Van Ton-Quinlivan Lynell Wiggins.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
Planning in the Context of Budget Reduction
Update: UMKC Spending, Staffing and Benefits /16
Promoting College Access & Success
Online Teaching Conference
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Evaluating Digital Learning Implementation with the CWiC Framework
Texas Association of Community Colleges
Internship Bill of Rights
FY19 Budget Summit Academic & Student Life Katherine Frank
Central Washington University
Presentation transcript:

Maximizing Resources for Student Success: Focus on Assessment and Grading Activities Dr. Lou Guthrie| Director National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute Moving Forward with Assessment, 2015 Regional CC Assessment Conference © Johnson County Community College All rights reserved.

Maximizing Resources Website

Activity Based Costing: What is it? Maximizing Resources for Student Success: –An introduction to the project. –Instructional Activities Assessment and Grading as an Activity Conclusions: Need for changing the way we manage higher education. Session Outline

Activity-Based Costing An analytical framework for better information

ABC Costing Allows colleges to: –Target cost reductions to specific activities –Calculate the effect of innovations and their cost structure –Reward effective and efficient departments –Provide incentives for inefficient departments to improve

Without knowing the cost of educational activities, there is no way to improve productivity in a systematic and sustainable manner. Maria Anguiano Vice Chancellor of Planning and Budget UC Riverside

Activity-Based Costing Framework Activity-based costing: –A costing methodology that identifies activities in an organization –Assigns all related costs to activities –Relates the cost to cost driver –Direct costs roll-up, they are not allocated down

Activity-Based Costing Framework ABC systems focus on the work activities of people and the associated costs ABC recognizes the equipment and materials required to provide each service or accomplish each activity ABC includes the space and costs of that space that is required to provide an activity

Example: Activity-Based Costing Framework Activity Teaching Advising Grading Salaries and benefits Classroom / office spaces Materials Etc. Cost driverCosts # of students % of Costs for teaching # of students Cost of activity per student

Implementing ABC Activity based costing changes ” the rules of the game” You will find surprises

Maximizing Resources for Student Success Changing Higher Education Cost & Outcomes Management

Perfect Timing Grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to research costs JCCC participated in pilot study, Maximizing Resources for Student Success

Maximizing Resources For Student Success National fiscal benchmark project for community colleges Teaches how to implement a simplified version of ABC Pilot study completed in fall 2013 All data shared here is from the pilot 19 community colleges used in the analysis

Project Partners

Developed by National Advisory Board Broome Community College, NY California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, CA Chandler-Gilbert Community College, AZ College of Southern Nevada, NV Florida Keys Community College, FL Johnson County Community College, KS Lone Star College System, TX Metropolitan Community College, MO Montcalm Community College, MI Normandale Community College, MN Ozarks Technical Community College, MO St. Charles Community College, MO State University System of Florida, Board of Governors, FL Tallahassee Community College, FL University of Hawaii Community Colleges, HI

Tremendous Amount of Useful Data Minimal data collection burden Members can be on the leading edge of this new trend IR offices can provide key financial metrics to their executive leadership Gives you the ability to look at costs and outcomes and tie them together

Project Deliverables National Reports Peer Comparisons Institutional Report ABC Guide

Activities InstructionStudent Services Admissions Recruitment Advising Counseling Career Services Financial Aid Registrar / Student Records Tutoring Testing Services Co-curricular Activities Veterans Services Disability Services Program Development Course Development Teaching Faculty Tutoring Faculty Advising Academic Service Assessment and Grading Professional Development Academic Support Instructional Technology Support Library Services Experiential Education

ABC: Managerial Assessment Enlist deans or heads of divisions: Report the percentage of time faculty spend on instructional activities, such as teaching, grading, course development –Salaries and Benefits –Full Time Equivalent Faculty Executive, Clerical and Professional Staff Non-Labor Operating Costs Not including facilities and capital costs

Time spent on instructional activities

Instructional Costs Cost of Instructional Activities

Assessment and Grading as an Instructional Activity Costs and impact on outcomes.

Definition used in study. Assessing prior and current learning; developing and selecting assessment methodologies; evaluating student assignments and performance to award course credit, and contributing to broader assessment of student learning outcomes.

Advisory committee did it Why did we combine Grading and Assessment? Educational assessment, the process of documenting knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefsEducational assessment Grading (education), a teacher's evaluation of a student's performance in classGrading (education)

Instructional Activities with Student Success

Cost of Assessment and Grading had a positive impact on: 3 Year Graduation and Transfer Rates Fall to Next Term Persistence Rates Fall to Fall Persistence Rates Means that colleges that spent more per student on assessment and grading had higher rates of the following:

Institution Report: 2015 Study

© Johnson County Community College All rights reserved.

Conclusions Assessment and Grading is one of the more expensive components of instructional activity Faculty spend more time on Assessment and Grading than any other instructional activity, except teaching Spending time (and thus money) on assessment and grading can have an impact on student success

Conclusions Colleges need data to establish relationship between costs and student outcomes ABC moves colleges from budgeting to strategic finance Relatively easy to implement a barebones version of ABC Benchmarking provides –Information on the cost / quality relationship –Opportunities to increase efficiencies –The ability to spend funds on activities that have the greatest impact on student success

Learn More about Benchmarking and Best Practices JCCC.edu/Benchmark

Contact Information Lou Guthrie © Johnson County Community College All rights reserved.