 If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

John Rawls A Theory of Justice.
EM Winter Read for Friday  Chapter  Cases Eminent Domain Battling Over Bottled Water  Articles Isbister: Income distribution Maxwell:
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Demystifying Efficiency in the Economics Classroom David A. Anderson Centre College.
Merck and River Blindness
AFFLUENCE AND MORALITY. Human actions: a typology From the perspective of ethics, actions may be divided into 3 categories: 1) Permissible 2) Non-permissible.
Phil 360: Business Ethics. A variety of perspectives on famine We have seen that a government has some obligation toward starving members of its society.
Imperfect Markets and Welfare ECO /8/13 Dr. Watson AUN.
ETHICAL THEORIES: OVERVIEW. Universal Moral Theories Utilitarianism Egoism Deontology Rules-based Rights-based Virtue ethics.
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 12 INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES.
Ethics, Part 2 Normative Codes. a) DEONTOOGICAL: [161-65] i) DUTY-BASED ii) CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -UNIVERSALIZING ACTS iii) MAXIM OF RESPECT iv) MOTIVES.
Rich and Poor by Peter Singer.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
Agenda Read N.E. Chapter 6 Review Powerpoint for next class (online)
ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS EGN 4034 FALL 2008 CHAPTER 3-4 Organizing Principles.
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
Rock, Paper, Scissors! Rock > Scissors Paper > Rock Scissors > Paper.
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Redistribution, Efficiency, Fairness 1. Consider a Possibility Frontier Most government action we have thought about is getting you from inside the frontier.
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
1 III World Hunger & Poverty. 2 Arthur’s Central Argument John Arthur: “World Hunger and Moral Obligation” 1)Ignores an important moral factor: entitlement.
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 8: Virtue Ethics Virtues and Everyday Life ◦ Virtues push us to be what we ought to be rather than what we ought to do What is Virtue? - The virtuous.
Copyright 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies 11-1 Facts About Income Inequality Causes of Income Inequality Equality Versus Efficiency The Economics of Poverty.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Rock, Paper, Scissors! Rock > Scissors Paper > Rock Scissors > Paper.
1. Give an example not in your book that would illustrate the concept of “compensating differential.” Less desirable places to live Low wage advancement.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
ETHICALETHICALETHICALETHICAL PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES.
MICROECONOMICS Chapter 5 Efficiency and Equity
Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law.
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
The Entitlement Theory of distributive justice
Utilitarianism.
Consenting Adults Reading By Robert Pollock. Moral Equivalency? American academia and media were rife with the notion that the United States and the Soviet.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Obligations to Starving People Peter Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality ”
Arthur’s Criticism of Singer Entitlements and “Realistic Morality”
The Philosophy of Peter Singer Laura Guidry-Grimes, Fall 2011.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
University of Papua New Guinea Guest Lecture Lecture: Philosophy of Economics.
Consequentialism v. Deontology. Ticking Bomb Scenario.
Chapter 3: Ethics for Policy Analysts “If liberty and equality…are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike.
Ethics Topic 3.
Moral Principles Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D.
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION
Political theory and law
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Michael Lacewing Stealing Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.
Rock > Scissors Paper > Rock Scissors > Paper
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Rock > Scissors Paper > Rock Scissors > Paper
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Presentation transcript:

 If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation … no guidance  I give to others because I’m happy

 The greatest happiness for the greatest number  U1 + U2 + … + U  If utility shows marginally decreasing returns to income, can trade off utility  I give to others if their gain is greater than my loss.  Notice: ends justify means

 Singer  If we can prevent a great deal of misery without sacrificing anything of comparable moral value, we should.  Each person has a duty to maximize SWF  Give 5%, 25%, a lot more, to reduce hunger.

 Singer  If we can prevent a great deal of misery without sacrificing anything of comparable moral value, we should.  Rawls  Veil of ignorance  1 – Be free  2 – Choose the distribution to make the least happy person as happy as possible  Max(U1), then max (U2), then max (U3), then….

1 – Deontology: the study of duty  This is what you ought (not) to do  This is what a good person would do.  Doing something you should that you don’t want to? How holy!  I give because I ought to.

1 – Deontology: the study of duty 2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person  Who are you becoming?  “Not virtuous acts, but being a virtuous person” – Schiller  I give because I want to be a compassionate person.

1 – Deontology: the study of duty 2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person 3 – Rights  Duty holder and duty bearer  Charity vs. Entitlement vs. Right  India ~2001

1 – Deontology: the study of duty 2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person 3 – Rights 4 – Sen capabilities Development is capability or freedom Transform resources into valuable activities Multi-dimensional

1 – Deontology: the study of duty 2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person 3 – Rights 4 – Sen capabilities 5 – Nozick Freedom Is the process fair? Was the start fair?

In our Classroom!

 Richest/Poorest  Richest 1 / Poorest 1 = 42/0  Richest 10%/Poorest 10% = 119/0.3 ~ 376  R25%/P25% = 275/47 = 5.9

 Right now, 26 points/46  At end of the semester, 60/100  Headcount ratio: 68%  Poverty gap: 46%  Pov gap squared: 31%

 You all started fairly.  The process that determines grades was fair and impartial.  The grades as they stand are equitable.

 No student owns their own points. The entire class owns all points.  “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

 Now the distribution has

 Now the distribution has everyone flunking.

 Now the distribution has

 Now the distribution has everyone flunking.

 Now the distribution has

 Now the distribution has everyone flunking.

 Now the distribution has

 Now the distribution has everyone flunking.

 20% of the points go to the government.  Now the distribution has everyone flunking.  Winston Churchill:  The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

 What is my duty to help my fellow students who aren’t doing as well as I am?