Wong Yat Fu05000041 Tsang Heng Cheong05017475. Many benchmarks are used to describe an economy e.g. growth rate of GDP, GDP per capita, net export, performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Global Competitiveness Report: A Tool for Fostering Better Policies 8 th November, 2005 Augusto Lopez-Claros Chief Economist & Director Global Competitiveness.
Advertisements

Cologne University of Applied Sciences / Fachhochschule Köln Faculty of Economics and Business Administration   Prof. Dr. Frank Gogoll Prof. Dr. Wolfgang.
OPEN FOR BUSINESS An introduction to New Zealand August 2014.
Doing Business in the Middle East and North Africa – with particular reference to Iraq Baghdad 12 November Presentation to Iraq Private Sector Development.
Policy Implications for Iceland Melissa Johns Investment Policy Specialist, World Bank November 21, 2006 Doing Business 2007: How to reform.
ASSESSMENT OF FDI ATTRACTIVENESS: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) APPROACH SERCIN SAHIN Yıldız Technical University, Department of Economics
1 Using and Misusing Investment Incentives James Alm and David L. Sjoquist March 2008.
Assessing Law and Order The Lesson from the Global Competitiveness Index and the Growth Competitiveness Index  Irene Mia  Senior Economist  Global Competitiveness.
1 The Global Competitiveness Report and Evaluation of Mongolia’s Position Kerry Jaggi and Emma Loades World Economic Forum 13 October 2005 Copyright 2004.
What Economic Systems and Policies are Compatible with Protection of the Environment? Augusto López-Claros Director and Chief Economist Global Competitiveness.
 Jennifer Blanke Senior Economist and Director, Global Competitiveness Network World Economic Forum  November 26, 2008 Assessing the Competitiveness.
The Economy of the European Union European Economic and Trade Office 歐 洲 經 貿 辦 事 處.
World Economic Forum Competitiveness Indicators and Policy Actions Aleksandra Zoric Krzic USAID Serbia.
 Jennifer Blanke Director, Senior Economist World Economic Forum  Montenegro | 20 May, 2008 Assessing Southeast Europe’s Competitiveness in an International.
Wong Check Ying Cheung Siu Wun Lee Po Hung Leung Yee Ka
Chapter 25 Economic Growth McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Transitional Countries Integration with the European Union 4th period Intensive Course 1st Lecture Monday Professor Juha Väätänen.
MOEA Training Course 2011 Competitiveness of Nations
1 “European R&D Benchmarking (2002) “European R&D Benchmarking (2002)” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Student Presentations Students: Miguel.
Size of Nations’ Economies: Real Purchasing Power (PPP, 2012) Nation Rank Gross Domestic Product U.S.1$15.6 trillion China2$12.3 trillion India 3$4.7 trillion.
Global Competitiveness Report 2013/14 Suriname. The Global Competitive Report The GCR is produced by the World Economic Forum The report is based on the.
International Comparison. 2 Business Environment and Innovation.
ASSESSING THE LINKAGES BETWEEN ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS AND PROPERTY MARKET TRANSPARENCY PROFESSOR GRAEME NEWELL University of Western Sydney
Click to edit Master title style Doing Business in Veneto 2009 Michael Klein Vice President - Financial and Private Sector Development, World Bank-IFC,
1 Doing Business 2010: Poland Neil Gregory Advisor and Acting Director Financial & Private Sector Development Krakow, Poland September 9, 2009.
Doing Business 2007 How to reform Sept 5 th 2006 Caralee McLiesh World Bank.
StatiSense ® - Wale Micaiah © Nigeria Global Competitive Index: Health & Primary Education.
Competitive Regulation for Glorious Economy
The business environment in the Czech Republic Viktorie Klímová
Elusive Quest for Growth: Is innovation engine of growth? Motoo Kusakabe, Senior Counselor to the President EBRD.
StatiSense ® - Wale Micaiah © Global Competitiveness Index: Focus on Nigeria.
Click to edit Master title style Doing Business 2009 in East Asia and the Pacific Presented by Rita Ramalho.
 Jennifer Blanke Director, Senior Economist World Economic Forum  Montenegro | 20 May, 2008 Assessing Southeast Europe’s Competitiveness in an International.
1. 2 Contents Part I. Global Competitiveness Programme What are we trying to achieve? The Global Competitiveness Report Results and analysis Part II.
INTERNATIONALA CONFERENCE Security and Defence R&D Management: Policy, Concepts and Models R&D HUMAN CAPITAL POLICY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR KONSTANTIN POUDIN.
GORAN RADMAN Chairman, SenseConsulting Technology and Innovation Competitiveness in Eastern and Southeastern Europe.
Doing Business 2008 in CROATIA Presented by Michael U. Klein Vice President, The World Bank & Chief Economist, IFC.
Financial & Private Sector Development …… ……. Arusha, Tanzania August 17, 2011 Doing Business in The East African Community 2011.
Why Are Some Nations Wealthy?
Levels of Economic Development Levels of economic development are measured in goods and services available in a country.
About the private sector’s needs Conference “COPING WITH SHORT-TERM RISKS AND ACCELERATION OF LONG-TERM GROWTH” June 25-26, 2008 Bishkek, Hyatt Hotel Talai.
To relocate or not to relocate Hans Martens Chief Executive European Policy Centre.
Sofia, March 25, 2003 BULGARIA, BRITAIN AND THE LISBON AGENDA: STRATEGIES FOR RAISING EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY.
Trade and Competitive Advantage. The Global Competitiveness Report World Economic Forum Global competitiveness.
2015 World Bio Summit and Expo Dubai, UAE Dr. Mark G. Bloom, CLP, RTTP Registered U.S. Patent Attorney Keynote Presentation 1.
Doing Business 2007 How to reform Private Sector Development in Small States Michael Klein Vice President, Financial and Private Sector Development and.
The United States The Economy. What is GDP ? Gross Domestic Product (GDP): The total market (or dollar) value of all final goods and services produced.
Overview of the Singapore Economy 2000 –GDP = US$92 bil (0.9% of US economy) –Per Capita GNP = US$24,700 (ranked 19th in the world)
Levels of Economic Development Levels of economic development are measured in goods and services available in a country.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005 Growth Economics Production Possibilities Analysis Supply Determinants of Real Output Growth in the AD-AS Model.
Economic Growth 8 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Foreign Direct Investments – A Key Prerequisite for Economic Growth – Case of the Czech Republic VLADIMÍR BARTOVIC EUROPEUM INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY,
Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 16-1 Ingredients of Growth Production Possibilities Labor and Productivity Growth in the AD-AS Model Accounting.
International Competitiveness of Korean Government.
Welcome to EGI Community Forum 2014 May 19 th, 2014 Anita Lehikoinen Permanent Secretary.
ACHIEVING COMPETITIVENESS, INCLUSIVE GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY IN REAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: THE TOUGH CHOICES IN AN ERA OF CHANGE Presented By:
ECONOMIC GROWTH One tool can have many uses!
THE NEW ZEALAND BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT APRIL Page Click to edit Master title style Forbes Magazine International Budget Partnership Transparency International.
Economic Growth Chapter 25 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
OPEN FOR BUSINESS An introduction to New Zealand August 2014.

6. Ráðstefnan um rannsóknir á íslensku þjóðfélagi Háskólanum á Akureyri, 20. – 21. apríl 2012 The Nordic Countries in an International Comparison Helga.
Kazakhstan Economic Policy 1. Contents 1Country overview 2Diversification policy of Kazakhstan 3Initiatives in Kazakhstan 4Anti crisis initiatives 5New.
Assessment of a Country as a Market or Production Location
The Global Competitiveness Report
Please listen to the audio as you work through the slides
Assessing National Competitiveness The Global Competitiveness Report September 2016 Amir Jahangir Chief Executive Officer Mishal Pakistan.
KNOWLEDGE PERSPECTIVE ON ECONOMIC POLICY IN EU ACCESSION COUNTRIES
Taiwan Economic Development
Taiwan Economic Development
Presentation transcript:

Wong Yat Fu Tsang Heng Cheong

Many benchmarks are used to describe an economy e.g. growth rate of GDP, GDP per capita, net export, performance of stock markets, etc

The overall performance of an economy is not reflected by separate use of a few indicators Biased, not a full picture of the “health” of the economy

Published by the World Economic Forum (WEF) Provides an overview of factors that are critical to driving productivity and competitiveness The rankings are drawn from a combination of publicly available hard data, and the results of the Executive Opinion Survey (EOS) EOS: a comprehensive annual survey conducted by the WEF, together with its network of Partner Institutes (leading research institutes and business organizations) in the countries covered by the Report

The EOS captures the expert opinions of over 11,000 business leaders and entrepreneurs on: Macroeconomic EnvironmentPublic Institutions: Corruption Technology, Innovation and Diffusion Domestic Competition Human Resources: Education, Health and Labour Cluster Development General InfrastructureCompany Operations and Strategy Public Institutions: Contracts and Law Environment

This year (2006), over 11,000 business leaders in 125 countries were polled Each leader will make a score from 1 to 7 on different areas of economies The higher score, the better

The 2006 GCI rankings and 2005 comparisons (first 40): GCI Country/Economy2006 Rank2006 Score2005 Rank Switzerland Finland Sweden Denmark Singapore United States Japan Germany Netherlands United Kingdom Hong Kong SAR Norway Taiwan, China Iceland Israel Canada Austria France Australia Belgium GCI Country/Economy2006 Rank2006 Score2005 Rank Ireland Luxembourg New Zealand Korea, Rep Estonia Malaysia Chile Spain Czech Republic Tunisia Barbados314.70— United Arab Emirates Slovenia Portugal Thailand Latvia Slovak Republic Qatar Malta Lithuania

Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI 3 sub-indexes 9 pillars

We look at the 1st pillar, institutions… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

1st pillar: Institutions A. Public institutions 1. Property rights 2. Diversion of publics funds 3. Public trust of politicians 4. Judicial independence 5. Favoritism in decisions of government officials

1st pillar: Institutions (cont’d) A. Public institutions 6. Wastefulness of government spending 7. Burden of government regulation 8. Business costs of terrorism 9. Reliability of police services 10. Business costs of crime and violence 11. Organized crime

The GCI and public institutions:

1 st pillar: Institutions (Cont’d) B. Private institutions 12. Ethical behavior of firms 13. Efficacy of corporate boards 14. Protection of minority shareholders’ interests 15. Strength of auditing and accounting standards

We look at the 2st pillar, infrastructure… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

2 nd pillar: Infrastructure 1. Overall infrastructure quality 2. Railroad infrastructure development 3. Quality of port infrastructure 4. Quality of air transport infrastructure 5. Quality of electricity supply 6. Telephone lines (hard data)

We look at the 3st pillar, macroeconomy… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

3 rd pillar: Macroeconomy 1. Government surplus/deficit (hard data) 2. National savings rate (hard data) 3. Inflation (hard data) 4. Interest rate spread (hard data) 5. Government debt (hard data) 6. Real effective exchange rate (hard data)

The GCI and macroeconomy:

We look at the 4th pillar, health and primary education… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

4 th pillar: Health and primary education A. Health 1. Medium-term business impact of malaria 2. Medium-term business impact of tuberculosis 3. Medium-term business impact of HIV/AIDS 4. Infant mortality (hard data) 5. Life expectancy (hard data) 6. Tuberculosis prevalence (hard data) 7. Malaria prevalence (hard data) 8. HIV prevalence (hard data) B. Primary education 9. Primary enrolment (hard data)

We look at the 5th pillar, higher education and training… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

5 th pillar: Higher education and training A. Quantity of education 1. Secondary enrolment ratio (hard data) 2. Tertiary enrolment ratio (hard data) B. Quality of education 3. Quality of the educational system 4. Quality of math and science education 5. Quality of management schools C. On-the-job training 6. Local availability of specialized research and training services 7. Extent of staff training

The GCI and higher education and training:

We look at the 6th pillar, market efficiency … Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

6 th pillar: Market efficiency A. Good markets: Distortions, competition, and size 1. Agricultural policy costs 2. Efficiency of legal framework 3. Extent and effect of taxation 4. Number of procedures required to start a business (hard data) 5. Time required to start a business (hard data) 6. Intensity of local competition

6 th pillar: Market efficiency (cont’d) A. Good markets: Distortions, competition, and size 7. Effectiveness of antitrust policy 8. Imports (hard data) 9. Prevalence of trade barriers 10. Foreign ownership restrictions 11. GDP – exports + imports (hard data) 12. Exports (hard data)

6 th pillar: Market efficiency (Cont’d) B. Labor markets: Flexibility and efficiency 1. Hiring and firing practices 2. Flexibility of wage determination 3. Cooperation in labor-employer relations 4. Reliance on professional management 5. Pay and productivity 6. Brain drain 7. Private sector employment of women

6 th pillar: Market efficiency (Cont’d) C. Financial markets: Sophistication and openness 8. Financial market sophistication 9. Ease of access to loans 10. Venture capital availability 11. Soundness of banks 12. Local equity market access

We look at the 7th pillar, technological readiness… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

7 th pillar: Technological readiness 1. Technological readiness 2. Firm-level technology absorption 3. Laws relating to ICT 4. FDI and technology transfer 5. Cellular telephones (hard data) 6. Internet users (hard data) 7. Personal computers (hard data)

We look at the 8th pillar, business sophistication… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

8 th pillar: Business sophistication A. Networks and supporting industries 1. Local supplier quantity 2. Local supplier quality B. Sophistication of firms’ operations and strategy 3. Production process sophistication 4. Extent of marketing 5. Control of international distribution 6. Willingness to delegate authority 7. Nature of competitive advantage 8. Value-chain presence

We look at the 9th pillar, innovation… Basic requirement Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness Business Sophistication Innovation GCI

9 th pillar: Innovation 1. Quality of scientific research institutions 2. Company spending on research and development 3. University/industry research collaboration 4. Government procurement of advanced technology products 5. Availability of scientists and engineers 6. Utility patents (hard data) 7. Intellectual property protection 8. Capacity for innovation

The relative importance of particular factors is different for different economies Depends on what stage is the economy experiencing E.g. what presently drives productivity in economy A is necessarily different from what drives it in economy B

Each of the sub-indexes is weighed differently, depending on the stage of a given country More weight is placed on those pillars that are most important at a given stage of a country’s development WeightsBasic requirements Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Factor-driven stage 50%40%10% Efficiency-driven stage 40%50%10% Innovation- driven stage 30%40%30%

The pillars are organized into three sub-indexes: Institutions Infrastructure Macroeconomy Health and Primary Education

The pillars are organized into three sub-indexes: Higher Education and Training Market Efficiency (goods, labor, financial) Technological Readiness

The pillars are organized into three sub-indexes: Business Sophistication Innovation

Uses of GCI: By government, investors, enterprises etc Investors: to decide whether to invest in that economy Government: to help make policies to attract foreign investors

Let take Hong Kong and Singapore as examples Collect data from EOS Average the score under 9 pillars

Basic Requirements CountryInstitutionsInfrastructureMacroeconomy Health and primary education Hong Kong SAR Singapore The score of Basic requirements will be average of the underlying 4 pillars –Hong Kong SAR = 6.04 –Singapore = 6.14 Singapore has a better performance on Basic requirements

Efficiency Enhancers Country Higher education and training Market efficiency Technological readiness Hong Kong SAR Singapore The score of Efficiency enhancers will be average of the underlying 3 pillars –Hong Kong SAR = 5.40 –Singapore = 5.63 Singapore also does a better job on Efficiency enhancing

Innovation Factors CountryBusiness sophisticationInnovation Hong Kong SAR Singapore The score of Innovative factors will be average of the underlying 2 pillars –Hong Kong SAR = 4.97 –Singapore = 5.11 Singapore also does a better job on Innovative factors comparing to Hong Kong

Different stages of economy has to use different weightings WeightsBasic requirements Efficiency enhancers Innovation and sophistication factors Factor-driven stage 50%40%10% Efficiency-driven stage 40%50%10% Innovation-driven stage 30%40%30%

Hong Kong and Singapore are also Innovation- driven stage Singapore has a higher score on GCI, that is why Singapore ranking 5th and Hong Kong ranking 11th Basic Requirement s Efficiency Enhancers Innovation Factors Final Score Hong Kong SAR 6.04 x 30%5.44 x 40%4.97 x 30%5.46 Singapore6.14 x 30%5.63 x 40%5.11 x 30%5.63

The relationship between GCI and other economic indicators may not be linear The information of unemployment rate is limited The model is using top 20 countries with highest GCI (N = 20)

Unemployment rate is negative economic indicator Fewer people participate in production Unemployment rate should be negatively related to global competitiveness

Negatively related Unemployment rate  1%, GCI  GCI = ( x Unemployment rate) R square = Correlation coefficient =

Negatively related Unemployment rate  1%, Basic requirements score  GCIBS = ( x Unemployment rate) R square = Correlation coefficient =

Negatively related Unemployment rate  1%, Efficiency enhancers score  GCIEE = ( x Unemployment rate) R square = Correlation coefficient =

Positively related Unemployment rate  1%, Efficiency enhancers score  GCIIF = ( x Unemployment rate) R square = Correlation coefficient =

Positively related Nominal GDP per capita  US$1000, GCI  GCI = ( x GDP per capita) R square = Correlation coefficient =

Negatively related GDP Growth rate  1%, GCI  GCI = ( x GDP growth rate) R square = Correlation coefficient =

GCI is negatively related to unemployment rate GCI is positively related to GDP per capita The higher GCI, the better

GCI dose not have a well explained relationship with a single economic indicator With low R square GCI is not significantly affect by a single economic indicator GCI is relatively a full-scale index

GCI = x unemployment rate x GDP growth rate x GDP per capita x GDP deflator R square =

GCI has a better explained relationship with a group of economic indicator Again, it proves that GCI is a better all round indicator Provide a fair and accurate result